This
concludes the exchange between Jesus and Judas. Judas condemned the act of Mary
as wasteful and neglecting the poor. Jesus knew the heart of Judas and exposed
his pretended concern (he was interested in an opportunity to get at the funds
himself). Bob Deffinbaugh uniquely identifies this exchange as “The
Sweet Smell of Love and the Stench of Greed!” The facts include: (1)
yes, the ointment was expensive and in theory could have been used for the
poor, (2) on this occasion Mary displays more spiritual insight than the
apostles, [i] and (3) Judas was stealing
from the “church of Christ” treasury.
Here
are a few take-aways.
We
will not eradicate poverty. This fact is not an excuse to ignore poverty and
the poor – just a heavy dose of realism we must accept. Helping the poor is a
worthy biblical goal, but realism says it will not be eradicated. We should
operate in the realistic, not in a fantasy world of our own imaginations. The
Lord himself was poor in earthly goods (Luke
9:58; 2
Corinthians 8:9), yet had compassion for the poor and needy (e.g. Matthew
25:44-46;Mark
12:41-44; Luke
6:20; Luke
8:43-48; Luke
14:13).
There
is plenty of opportunity to help the poor. The import of Jesus chiding Judas is
not that we should not help the poor since poverty cannot be eradicated – but
that there will always be opportunities to help the poor. Judas (and all of us)
could have helped the poor before Mary’s anointing. Judas (and all of us) can
help the poor after Mary’s anointing. This singular, spiritual, and sacrificial
act of Mary does not abate our responsibility for and ability to help the poor.
Jesus’s death – once for all – does not remove perennial opportunities toward
the poor. Deuteronomy
15:11 well makes the point, “For the poor shall never cease out
of the land: therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thine hand
wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land.”
All
who claim to care don’t always care. Those who condemn others for not caring
enough, may not care at all themselves! As Judas, the condemnation may be a
cover of their own covetousness or other motives unrelated to a true concern
for the poor and needy. One can “anoint Jesus” and still have time to care
about the poor – regardless of what Judas says. These are not conflicting
duties and one must do at the time “what thy hand findeth to do.” (Compare Ecclesiastes
9:10; Mark
14:8; and 2
Corinthians 8:12.)
Often
in the United States of America we conceive of a “rich church” helping a “poor
society,” but often the true church is the true poor. Thomas Kelly captured
this thought in his blessed hymn inspired by Zephaniah
3:12:
“Poor
and afflicted,” Lord, are thine,
Among
the great unfit to shine;
But
though the world may think it strange,
They
would not with the world exchange.
“Poor
and afflicted”—yes, they are;
They’re
not exempt from grief and care;
But
he who saved them by his blood,
Makes
every sorrow yield them good.
“Poor
and afflicted”—’tis their lot;
They
know it, and they murmur not;
’Twould
ill become them to refuse
The
state their Master deigned to choose.
“Poor
and afflicted”—yet they sing,
For
Jesus is their glorious King;
“Through
sufferings perfect,” now he reigns,
And
shares in all their griefs and pains.
“Poor
and afflicted”—but ere long,
They’ll
join the bright, celestial throng;
Their
sufferings then will reach a close,
And
heaven afford them sweet repose.
And
while they walk the thorny way,
They’re
often heard to sigh and say—
“Dear
Saviour, come; O quickly come!
And
take thy mourning pilgrims home.”
No comments:
Post a Comment