Below is something I discovered in a Word Document and decided it is worth posting. The following was a general response on the subject of revival, and specifically to a comment about Jack Hyles: “If immediate outward manifestations measured revival, Hyles did better than anyone I’ve ever seen and on a more consistent basis.”
It is interesting and apparently reflective of our culture, that happenings like the “Jesus Revolution” and the “Asbury University Revival” grasps attention in the wider culture, but “revivals” like those of Jack Hyles did not. Yes, Hyles and those in his orbit had much better “results” over a longer period of time and, as was stated, “on a more consistent basis.” Now, to be clear, I do not think Hyles’s revivals were really any more revival than what is what is happening at Asbury now. Back probably thirty years ago or so, for a while I made a concerted effort to go through and “add up” the revivals reported by evangelists to the Sword of the Lord periodical. It was quite consistent, in having multiple reports over and over with results such as “100 saved, 2 baptisms.” There is something wrong with that when this kind of ratio is consistently true of a large group of evangelists. It does not follow the biblical pattern.
All that said, it is intriguing that people outside of the “revivals” such as the “Jesus Revolution” and the “Asbury University Revival” get caught up in meditating on them as possible heirs to the “Great Awakenings” – while never giving revivalists such as Hyles the time of day. Not sure why that is/was. Regardless, time has proven the fruits of the “Hyles Revolution” were not as tasty as many independent Baptists thought.
