Translate

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

History of the plurality of pastors, finishing the testimony

For enquire, I pray thee, of the former age, and prepare thyself to the search of their fathers

After I started a “refresher course” studying the plurality of pastors, I remembered several years ago I had purchased and read Who Runs the Church: 4 Views on Church Government.[i] I pulled this book off the shelf to review Sam Waldron’s chapter on “Plural-Elder Congregationalism.” In this chapter, he references the relationship of his view of church government to the writings of the “Apostolic Fathers.”[ii] In his footnotes, Waldron listed considering nine divisions of these writings.[iii] In a response to Waldron, L. Roy Taylor seems to understand that “Waldron gives ample evidence to establish the plurality of elders in a local congregation not only the New Testament but, with the exception of Ignatius, in eight of the nine major sources of the Apostolic Fathers” (p. 233). I agree that Waldron supplied “ample evidence” but could not find that he ever asserted giving evidence from all nine sources. He specifically cites, I believe, I Clement, Shepherd of Hermas, and Didache. Because of this I decided to make a quick run-through check of the sources. In addition to the nine sources of Waldron (see endnote below), I have added two more – Fragments of Quadratus of Athens and The Martyrdom of Polycarp, which are sometimes included among the “Apostolic Fathers.”

Below (near the end) is a chart of my interpretation of the “Apostolic Fathers” on the practice of plurality of elders. Ignatius is the sole possible supporter of any kind of “episcopacy,” speaking of three offices with the bishop in the singular.[iv] His references are strong but contrary to the weight of the evidence. Three of the writings (Barnabas, Quadratus, Diognetus) do not mention anything of relevance to the subject. It is my opinion that seven of the writings favor and point the early historical record toward plurality of elders in a single church. Some are quite straightforward, enough so that I consider them “conclusive” evidence in favor of plurality (Didache, First Clement, Hermas, Polycarp, Second Clement). Two I consider (and list as) “inconclusive.” The brief Fragments of Papias speak of elders in the plural, but generically in a way that does not directly identify the relationship of elders to congregations. The Martyrdom of Polycarp speaks of Polycarp as a bishop singular at Smyrna, but notably only calls him “a bishop” and not “the bishop.” This itself is inconclusive, nevertheless supports the conclusion from Polycarp’s Epistle to the Philippians.

Next, I will include a few excerpts from these writers that I have not given previously – including two from Ignatius which support a position other than the one I hold.

Ignatius to the Magnesians, 6:1 “Seeing then that in the aforementioned persons I beheld your whole people in faith and embraced them, I advise you, be ye zealous to do all things in godly concord, the bishop presiding after the likeness of God and the presbyters after the likeness of the council of the Apostles, with the deacons also who are most dear to me, having been entrusted with the diaconate of Jesus Christ, who was with the Father before the worlds and appeared at the end of time.”

Ignatius to the Trallians, 3:1 “In like manner let all men respect the deacons as Jesus Christ, even as they should respect the bishop as being a type of the Father and the presbyters as the council of God and as the college of Apostles. Apart from these there is not even the name of a church.”

Clement of Rome’s First Epistle to the Corinthians, 1 Clement 47:6 “It is shameful, dearly beloved, yes, utterly shameful and unworthy of your conduct in Christ, that it should be reported that the very steadfast and ancient Church of the Corinthians, for the sake of one or two persons, maketh sedition against its presbyters.”

Polycarp to the Philippians, 6:1 “And let the presbyters also be compassionate, merciful to all, bringing back those that have wandered, caring for all the weak, neglecting neither widow nor orphan nor poor, but ‘ever providing for that which is good before God and man,’ refraining from all wrath, respect of persons, unjust judgment, being far from all love of money, not quickly believing evil of any, not hasty in judgment, knowing that ‘we all owe the debt of sin.’”

Second Epistle to the Corinthians (aka Pseudo-Clement), 2 Clement 17:35 “And let us not seem to attend and believe now only, while we are being admonished by the presbyters, but also when we have departed to our homes, let us remember the commandments of the Lord; and let us not, on the other hand, be drawn aside by the lusts of the world, but let us endeavour, by coming more frequently, to make progress in the commandments of the Lord, to the end that we all being of one mind may be gathered together unto life.”

Favors
Early Church Writing
Est. Date AD
Single Bishop
Plural Elders
Inconclusive
50-120
No
Yes
Conclusive
80-120
X
X
No mention
80-140
No
Yes
Conclusive
100-160
No
Yes
Conclusive
105-115
Yes
No
Conclusive
110-140
No
Yes
Conclusive
110-140
No
Yes
Inconclusive
120-130
X
X
No mention
130-160
No
Yes
Conclusive
130-200
X
X
No mention
150-160
No
Yes
Inconclusive

The previous posts:
Online sources re the “Apostolic Fathers”


[i] This book is part of the Zondervan Counterpoints Series.
[ii] The “Apostolic Fathers” is a traditional name for early Christian writers (and their writings, 1st and 2nd centuries) who are believed to have had relationships with one or more of the apostles – or as Waldron puts it, “those writings supposed to have been written before AD 150 by the disciples of the apostles.” (p. 194)
[iii] Waldron’s list contained nine divisions of these writings: Clement of Rome’s First Epistle to the Corinthians; Ignatius’s Seven Epistles; Polycarp’s Epistle to the Philippians; The Didache; The Epistle to Diognetus; The Epistle of Barnabas; The Shepherd of Hermas; Pseudo-Second Clement; and Fragments of Papias. (pp. 243-244) His dates range from AD 97 to Ad 156.
[iv] Presbyters/elders and deacons being the other two.

No comments: