First, some excerpts of Jones’s advice to
individual churches:
- More training—Pastor search committees should undergo a period of training before they commence their search. Most search committees are not trained in what to look for, how to go about a thorough background check, or how to ask the tough questions that ought to be asked. I can see a day coming when church insurance companies will require search committees to be trained or they will not cover any litigation that is brought against the church for the actions of a pastor or staff member who was hired but not properly vetted.
- Deeper, deeper, deeper background checks—While most search committees obtain criminal background checks, most stop the deep dive at that point. The criminal background check should be the beginning of the deep dive, not the end. Search committees should ask the candidate if he would submit to an audit of his finances; bank statements, credit card statements, and the like. This should be done by an independent third party, and the search committee members should only be given the results if there something malicious or disqualifying.
- Spies—My home church, to my knowledge, sent people to the towns of their candidates to ask around about them. This didn’t prevent what happened, but I think if more churches would take the time to do this, there would be some grief saved.
In the comment section, David Rogers stated,
“Ideally, churches should look for home-grown pastoral leadership from within
their own congregation.” He did not disagree with thorough investigation if the
church looks “outside,” but pointed out a difference between what he sees as
the norm and the ideal. Over the years I have come to much the same
conclusion – that we should pray for God to raise up men among us,
and generally call those we know rather than churches looking hither, thither,
and yon for pastors. There is no perfect solution in an imperfect world, but I
believe this is an improvement, a move in the right direction.
My main interest is not discussing #metoo per
se, but it is interesting how this kind of thing is affecting the way
search committees research their potential pastoral candidates. For example,
when I saw the word “spies” in Jones’s piece, I thought to myself “That sounds
weird.” Is there a better way?
In the absence of polling date, based on
experience I’d say the majority of Baptist churches set a pastor search
committee in pursuit of the one best man for the job. Often this ideal man does
not live in the vicinity and is personally unknown to the church. This explains
the desire for background checks and spies! Much of drive to find a replacement
pastor from “off summers”[i] is
related to pride, performance, and popularity. The church must have a man who
speaks well in the pulpit (performance), one that makes them look good to the
community (pride), and one who has a reputation “among the brethren”
(popularity). Not only that, churches often have very unrealistic expectations
– expectations that exacerbated by the single pastor model so popular in
contemporary times.
It is obvious that there were itinerant preachers
in New Testament times.[ii]
They “went every where preaching the word” (Acts
8:4). However, when churches were established and settled (though
there were apostles and preachers who traveled, preached and visited) there was
also established and settled ministry in those churches. The settled ministry
usually consisted of several preachers and teachers. See Acts
13:1, for example. When Paul and Barnabas traveled back through Lystra,
Iconium, and Antioch, the ordained elders in the churches in those places, Acts
14:23 – “And when they had ordained them elders in every church, and had prayed
with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, on whom they believed.” Paul instructed
to Titus ordain elders in the churches in the cities of Crete (Titus
1:5). James’s exhortation to the sick to call the elders of the
church (James
5:14) implies a settled ministry in the churches.
The point is not to suggest there can or will be
no geographical movement among the ministry, but to simply suggest that the
current scheme employed by many churches overlooks a biblical pattern that well
supplies the churches if followed.[iii]
Pray the Lord send forth labourers into his harvest (Luke
10:2) and send them from right among us.[iv]
We should know them that labour among us – and what better way than when God
raises them up from those we already know? (Cf. 1
Thessalonians 5:12.)
[i] “Off summers” – something
of an in-house joke, “off summers” means coming from somewhere else, not
nearby.
[ii] Itinerant
(adj.) means “traveling from place to place,” or “characterized by traveling
from place to place.”
[iii] Often
this “current scheme” is fixated on credentials, engulfed in a “Messiah
Syndrome” (i.e. looking for a savior rather than a pastor), deluded with
grandeur, and operates with a “beauty pageant” mentality. Search committees
tend heavily toward credentials. They usually do not know the candidate. They
“validate” the candidate’s abilities by looking at his degree. This is a
commonly accepted method of assessing a pastor’s ability.
[iv] We should commit the word
of truth to the faithful among us. 2 Timothy 2:2 “And the things that thou hast
heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who
shall be able to teach others also.”
No comments:
Post a Comment