One (24 hour) day at a time: random excerpts on the
early history of Genesis
Below you will find excerpts and observations on the first seven days of creation, which may pique your interest in studying the topic further.
“The meaning of words is important for clear
communication. It is by their use and contrast that we can accurately arrive at
correct biblical interpretation.”
“Note that Scripture explicitly states that Adam
named all the ‘livestock’ (Heb. behemah), the ‘birds of the air’ (Heb. oph
hassamayim) and all the ‘beasts of the field’ (Heb. chayyah hassadeh). There is
no indication that Adam named the fish in the sea, or any other marine
organisms, nor any of the insects, beetles or arachnids.”
“The time when this [Genesis 1:28] took place must
have been the sixth day, on which, according to Genesis 1:27, the man and woman
were created: and there is no difficulty in this, since it would not have
required much time to bring the animals to Adam to see what he would call them,
as the animals of paradise are all we have to think of; and the deep sleep into
which God caused the man to fall, till he had formed the woman from his rib,
need not have continued long.”
There’s no reason to doubt these events could have
taken place as part of a literal 24-hour day, but even if there was reason to
doubt that happening the question shouldn’t be, “What do we think could or
couldn’t have happened?” The question should be, “What does Scripture say
happened?”
C.D. Ginsburg, cited by P. J. Wiseman, Clues
To Creation In Genesis, London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, 1977, pp.
122-123
“The institution of the Sabbath on the seventh
day, which if understood as an indefinite period would have no meaning for man,
and the constant usage of this expression in Scripture to denote an ordinary
day, with the few exceptions of poetical or oratorical diction, and the literal
meaning which all commentators and Bible readers have assigned to it till
within the last century, are additional proofs that the primitive record
purports to intimate the expression ‘yom’ as a natural day.”
My own comment on two verses used to “disprove”
24-hour days in Genesis 1.
“‘Yom’ is elsewhere used of long periods of time, as in Psalm 90:4, which is cited in 2 Peter 3:8.” The references to God and time in Psalm
90:4 and 2
Peter 3:8 refer to normal years and normal days. If not, the instruction
would make no sense. Day and year in these verses mean ordinary ones, which
allows them to contrast and make the point. The Bible is not saying “a 1000
years is as a long period of time and a long period of time is as a 1000
years,” but that 1000 X 360 days and 24 hours are of no real consequence to
God, since he is outside of time.
“Some writers have observed the absence of the
article from the mention of each of the first five days. They have concluded
that Moses must have meant to convey to his readers that at least those days
were long periods of time. They have noted that the normal use of the article
is to make the noun definite. Gleason Archer makes the following statement: ‘In
Hebrew prose of this genre, the definite article was generally used where the
noun was intended to be definite.’ There are many examples where the number and
noun occur without the article, yet the meaning is definite. Thirteen
occurrences, similar to Genesis 1, use the noun without the article but with a
number (Numbers 11:19; I Samuel 1:1; 1 Chronicles 12:39; II Chronicles 20:25;
Ezra 8:15, 32; Nehemiah 2:11; Daniel 1:12, 14-15; 12:12-13, and Jonah 3:4). In
each of these other occurrences, the English translation uses the definite
article. The absence of the article in Genesis 1 does not mean that the days
are long periods of time.”
Lost the source of this comment, and cannot now find it
“The Old Testament has at least 26 times when
evening and morning are used in the same verse. Each time they occur, the
meaning is that of a normal day. Here are a couple of examples to illustrate
the point: Exodus 16:8 says, ‘And Moses said, this shall be when the Lord shall
give you in the evening flesh to eat, and in the morning bread to the full.’
Also Exodus 18:13, ‘and the people stood by Moses from the morning until the
evening.’”
“It is used to refer to a 24-hour period in
Genesis 7:11. It is used to refer to the period of daylight between dawn and
dusk in Genesis 1:16. And it is used to refer to an unspecified period of time
in Genesis 2:4.”
“...the former position—that the days are literal
24-hour days—is the historic position that the church has adopted since New
Testament times... For a detailed account of what the early church fathers
believed about the literal 24-hour interpretation of the Hebrew yom, see chapter 3 of Sarfati, J.
(2004), Refuting Compromise, (Green
Forest, AR: Master Books), pp 107–139.”
The Moody Bible Commentary
“The argument that this naming of the animals
would have taken more than a single day is not valid. The primary purpose of
bringing the animals before Adam was not to give them names, but rather to
highlight his need for a woman, which a relatively small number of animals
would suffice to establish. Indeed the Hebrew word names (shemot) is perfectly consistent with the understanding that Adam
simply gave general designations to each general category or class of animal
(e.g. ‘equine,’ ‘serpentine,’ ‘canine,’ etc.) rather than precise labels such
as ‘Equus ferus caballus,’ ‘Crotalus horridus,’ ‘Canis lupus familiaris,’ let
alone ‘Spot’ or ‘Rex.’”
No comments:
Post a Comment