Daugherty points out that “The message that ‘America
is a Christian nation’ is flat-out false factually, legally and practically”
and that “It is the latest sideshow in the endless culture war built on the
fiction that the Framers in Philadelphia in 1787 intended to constitute a
Christian nation.”[i] He quotes Baptist
forefather John Leland: “The notion of a Christian commonwealth should be
exploded forever.”[ii] He might also have quoted
National forefather John Adams: “The government of the United States is not, in
any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”
But then, to make his case, he exhibits a clear
bias toward believing in some instances the United States ought to operate in a
manner that fits his view of Christian policy (and condemns when it does not). “Contrary to Jeffress’ claim, we
can’t put kids in cages and call ourselves a Christian nation. We can’t deny
healthcare to people who can’t afford it and call ourselves a Christian nation.”
Now, I ask, Mr. Daugherty, if you argue that the United States is not (and never has been) a
Christian nation, why are you expecting the nation to operate according to your
own view of Christian principles? Consistency, thou art a jewel.
Speaking in principle, ethical behavior is right for
everyone, but the ethical behavior of each one will be based on his or her
standards of right and wrong. Acting in ways consistent with one’s view of right
and wrong will (or should) for the Jew be based on the understanding of the Old
Testament, on the Bible (OT & NT) for the Christian, the Qur’an for the
Muslim, the Bhagavad Gita for the Hindu, and so on. Since the United States of
America is neither Jewish, Christian, Muslim, nor Hindu, the ethics of the U.
S. as a nation must be based on its Constitution and laws, proceeding in ways
consistent with those.
People have hearts. Nations have laws. The laws of
all the other nations of the world are not the laws of the United States. If we
as a nation are not following our own laws, we should hope to correct those. If
we as a nation have laws that are not good, we should try to change those. If
we as a nation have laws that are good, we should try to follow those. We who
are Christians have a right to propose and promote laws in keeping with our
Christian worldview, without expecting the United States of America to be a
Christian nation.
[i] While on the one hand it
is clear that the framers did not intend to constitute a Christian nation
constitutionally and politically, on the other hand it is obvious historically
that the primary heritage of our nation is from a Judeo-Christian worldview.
[ii] Leland also wrote, in A Chronicle of His Time in Virginia: “Government
should protect every man in thinking and speaking freely, and see that one does
not abuse another. The liberty I contend for is more than toleration. The very
idea of toleration is despicable; it supposes that some have a pre-eminence
above the rest to grant indulgence, whereas all should be equally free, Jews,
Turks, Pagans and Christians.”
No comments:
Post a Comment