Translate

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

The cities of Simeon: How many?

Q. How many cities were given to the children of Simeon for their inheritance? My English Standard Version translation, in Joshua 19:2-6, lists (by count) 14 cities – Beersheba, Sheba, Moladah, Hazar-shual, Balah, Ezem, Eltolad, Bethul, Hormah, Ziklag, Beth-marcaboth, Hazar-susah, Beth-lebaoth, and Sharuhen – but then says “thirteen cities with their villages.”

A. A number of Bible versions have this error.[i] The King James translation of verse two is “Beer-sheba, or Sheba, and Moladah…”[ii] Read Joshua 19:1-8. “Beer-sheba, or Sheba” provides the explanation – that is, giving two names by which one city is called. If Beersheba and Sheba refer to the same city, then the number of cities named agree with the number given, thirteen. The parallel record in 1 Chronicles 4:28-31 harmonizes with this conclusion, simply leaving the word “Sheba” out of the list.

The Barker 1611 printing of the new translation now called the “King James Version” has the word “or” between “Beer-sheba” and “Sheba.”

In his commentary, John Gill writes:

…Beersheba, that is, Sheba; for so the particle ‘vau’ is sometimes used (z), and must be so used here; or otherwise, instead of thirteen, it will appear that there are fourteen cities, contrary to the account of them, Joshua 19:6; so Kimchi and Ben Melech make them one city. And it may be observed, that in the enumeration of the cities of Simeon, 1 Chronicles 4:28, Sheba is left out, and only Beersheba is mentioned…

(z) Vid. Noldium, p. 280. No. 1200.[iii]


[i] Including but not limited to: Common English Bible, Douay-Rheims, Good News Translation, Lexham English Bible, Modern English Version, New Living Translation, Revised Standard Version, and The Voice.
[ii] Even some King James Bibles have a printing error here, with “Beer-sheba, and Sheba, and Moladah” instead of “Beer-sheba, or Sheba, and Moladah.”
[iii] Possibly a reference to: Loca Concordantia, cum uniuscujusque Radicis Latina Interpretatione, secundum Robertsonum, Buxtorfium, Marium de Calassio et Noldium, by Edward Griffith. 

Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Pastors, Parents, and Worldviews

The American Worldview Inventory 2022 Study of Parents and Pastors provides “shocking results concerning the worldview of Christian pastors”: “...a new nationwide survey among a representative sample of America’s Christian pastors shows that a large majority of those pastors do not possess a biblical worldview.” “The latest AWVI 2022 release from the Cultural Research Center at Arizona Christian University indicates that barely one-half of the pastors of evangelical churches (51%) have a biblical worldview.” There are related posts at the following link:


  • AWVI 2022: The Worldview Dilemma of American Parents (Release #01: 03-08-2022)
  • AWVI 2022: The Strengths and Weaknesses of What Pre-Teen Parents Believe and Do (Release #02: 03-29-2022)
  • AWVI 2022: A Detailed Look at How the Worldview of Parents of Preteens Misses the Mark (Release #03: 04-12-2022)
  • AWVI 2022: Improving Parents’ Ability to Raise Spiritual Champions (Release #04: 04-26-2022)
  • AWVI 2022: Shocking Results Concerning the Worldview of Christian Pastors (Release #05: 05-12-2022)
  • AWVI 2022: Only Half of Evangelical Pastors Possess a Biblical Worldview; Incidence Even Lower for Most Denominations (Release #06: 05-24-2022)
It should be no surprise, considering the evidence in this study, that Christianity in the United States is in dire straits. In relation to this study, Janet Parshall interviewed George Barna on In the Market radio. In the discussion, he pointed out our problematic standards of grading a successful church. Our modern measures of success are primarily (based on my writing them after he said them, so maybe not exactly in his words):
  • How many attendees (influence)
  • How many programs (relevance)
  • How many people on staff (respectability)
  • How much money collected (affluence)
  • What kind of building owned (accommodations, number of square feet)
If we judge the success of churches by the number of people, programs, & personnel, and the amount of property & prosperity, we cannot help but go astray. May the Lord help us return to the old paths (Jeremiah 6:16).

Monday, June 13, 2022

King James translators versus modern text critics

Differences in approach of the King James translators versus some modern text critics. Spiritual versus secular.

“And in what sort did these assemble? In the trust of their own knowledge, or of their sharpness of wit, or deepness of judgment, as it were in an arm of flesh? At no hand. They trusted in him that hath the key of David, opening and no man shutting; they prayed to the Lord the Father of our Lord…” Miles Smith, Translators to the Readers

 

“I would like to work as a text-critic as if God didn’t exist, so to speak.” Tommy Wasserman

 

“It does not matter [whether NT textual critics are Christians, rlv], for the quality of their work does not depend on their faith but on their adherence to academic standards.” Jan Krans[i]



[i] In the brackets in the Krans quote is my explanation of the context. He had written that “In practice New Testament textual critics today tend to be Christians themselves, but not always.” Then he goes on to say that it does not matter.

Sunday, June 12, 2022

New mercies

John Keble wrote “Morning” (based on Lamentations 3:22-23) circa 1827, and printed The Christian Year, Thoughts in Verse for the Sundays and Holydays throughout the Year. Keble was born April 25, 1792, Fairford, Gloucestershire, England. He was educated at the University of Oxford. A priest in the Church of England, as well as theologian and poet, Keble was ordained in 1816. He was a leader in the Oxford Movement (a “High Church” movement in the Church of England). Keble died March 29, 1866 at Bournemouth, Hampshire, and is buried at All Saints Churchyard at Hursley, City of Winchester, Hampshire, England.

Other poetic collections by Keble include The Psalter, Or, Psalms of David in English Verse (1839) and Lyra Innocentium (1846). The five stanzas below are stanzas 6-8, 14, and 16 of sixteen that appear in The Christian Year, pages 1-4. “Morning” often appears with the tune Melcombe by Samuel Webbe (1740-1816). For a tune in The Sacred Harp or Southern Harmony, I suggest Hebron.

1.(6) New every morning is the love
Our wakening and uprising prove;
Through sleep and darkness safely brought,
Restored to life, and power, and thought.

2.(7) New mercies, each returning day,
Hover around us while we pray;
New perils past, new sins forgiven,
New thoughts of God, new hopes of heaven.

3.(8) If on our daily course our mind
Be set to hallow all we find,
New treasures still, of countless price,
God will provide for sacrifice.

4.(14) The trivial round, the common task,
Would furnish all we ought to ask,
Room to deny ourselves; a road
To bring us, daily, nearer God.

5.(16) Only, O Lord, in thy dear love
Fit us for perfect Rest above;
And help us, this and every day,
To live more nearly as we pray.

Saturday, June 11, 2022

Gun violence victim’s mother, and other links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Friday, June 10, 2022

Menno rolls over

Mennonite Church USA passes resolution committing to LGBTQ inclusion
The Mennonite Church USA repealed instructions to pastors not to officiate at marriages between people of the same sex. The denomination’s official confession, which views marriage as between a man and a woman, remains unchanged.

Nearly 83% of the delegates meeting at a special assembly in Kansas City, Missouri, voted in favor of repealing the guidelines barring marriage for same-sex couples, while the resolution for LGBTQ inclusion passed by a narrower margin, with 55.7% in favor.

Thursday, June 09, 2022

The chief instrument that must be engaged, and other quotes

The posting of quotes by human authors does not constitute agreement with either the quotes or their sources. (I try to confirm the sources that I give, but may miss on occasion; please verify if possible.)

“No man has a right to promise to do wrong.” -- Charles H. Spurgeon

“The chief instrument that must be engaged throughout the whole of corporate worship is the heart.” -- Unknown

“Sin is the Trojan Horse out of which comes a whole army of troubles.” -- Thomas Watson

“With God we may not strive: But to bow down the willing neck, and bear the yoke, is wise; To kick against the pricks will prove a perilous emprise.” -- Credited to the Greek poet Pindar, or Pindaros; translator unknown

“Victory has a thousand fathers, defeat is an orphan.” -- Attributed to various sources

“In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” -- George Orwell

“Cultural elitism is based on self-righteous judgmentalism which, in turn, begets even more self-righteous judgmentalism.” -- Michael Brown

“Be careful when you follow the masses – sometimes the ‘m’ is silent.” -- Unknown

“If a man’s business requires so much of his time that he cannot attend the services of his church, then that man has more business than God intended him to have.” -- credited to J. C. Penney

“God does not bless what his word forbids.” -- Unknown

“Remember, today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.” -- Dale Carnegie

“Wasted time equals wasted years, which equals wasted life.” -- Unknown

“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.” -- Stephen Covey

Wednesday, June 08, 2022

Stephen M. Reynolds, the Comma, and Credentialism

Back in 2017, I posted a grammatical argument in favour of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7) made by Stephen Edward Mills Reynolds (1909-2007). Recently I prepared some biographical information on Reynolds for Find-A-Grave. At about the same time, I noticed a diatribe on the Baptist Board asserting that only long dead scholars (1700s-1800s) supported the Johannine Comma with a grammatical argument and that no “real” modern scholars do so. Enter Stephen M. Reynolds. I do not personally buy credentialism; neither am I selling it. However, those who scold others about “real scholars” usually do (buy and sell it). The credentials of Reynolds are first rate, as far as theological credentials go, and his expertise was in biblical languages. He taught in credible institutions, wrote for peer-reviewed journals, and was consulted for his expertise. Y’all don’t have to buy the argument made by Reynolds, but once in awhile y’all stick your heads up out of your holes and realize that all scholars are not cast in the same mold, even if all of your favorites are. (By the way, just ’cause someone is dead does not mean he is wrong, or because someone is contemporary does not mean he is right. And vice versa.)

The way to get around recognizing folks such as Edward F. Hills and Stephen M. Reynolds as “real scholars” is to have them “drummed out of the corps.” Such men having “real” credentials – often better than their detractors – teach in “real” institutions of learning, and write “real” articles for “real” peer-reviewed journals. However, their refusals to speak the standard scholarly shibboleths mean that they become anathema to the majority who feel threatened by their dissent!

Education:

  • Bachelor of Arts, Miami University, 1931
  • Bachelor in Theology, Princeton Theological Seminary, 1933
  • Master of Arts, Princeton University, 1938
  • PhD in Semitic Languages, Princeton University, 1939
  • Bachelor of Library Science, Columbia University, 1951

Employment includes:

  • Lincoln University, Chester County, Pennsylvania
  • Crozer Theological Seminary, Upland, Pennsylvania
  • Faith Theological Seminary, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania
  • Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Affiliations/Memberships include:

Works include:

  • The “Polyglot” Arabic text of Zachariah: a Comparative and Critical Study. PhD. Dissertation, Princeton University, 1939
  • “Al-'Alam’s Version of Zechariah,” The Muslim World, Volume 33, Issue 4. (October 1943): pages 273-275
  • “Calvin’s View of the Athanasian and Nicene Creeds,” Westminster Theological Journal, Volume 23, Issue 1. (1960): pages 33–37
  • “Supreme Importance of the Doctrine of Election and the Eternal Security of the Elect as taught in the Gospel of John,” Westminster Theological Journal, Volume 28, Issue 1. (1965): 38-41.
  • “Πυγμῇ (Mark 7:3) as ‘Cupped Hand’,” Journal of Biblical Literature, Volume 85, Issue 1. (1966): pages 87-88
  • “The Zero Tense in Greek, a Critical Note,” Westminster Theological Journal, Volume 32, Issue 1. (1969): pages 68-72
  • “A Note on Dr. Hengel’s Interpretation of πυγμῇ in Mark 7 3,” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Älteren Kirche, Berlin, Volume 62, Issue 3. (1971): page 295
  • “The Word ‘Again’ in Creeds and Bible,” Westminster Theological Journal, Volume 35, Issue 1. (1972): 28-35
  • Alcohol and the Bible, Little Rock, AR: Challenge Press, 1983
  • The Holy Bible, a Purified Translation, the Gospel According to John, Glenside, PA: L. L. Reynolds Foundation, 1999
  • The Holy Bible: A Purified Translation (The New Testament), Glenside, PA: L. L. Reynolds Foundation, 2000
  • The Biblical Approach to Alcohol, Glenside, PA: L. L. Reynolds Foundation, 2003 (original 1989, Princeton University Press)
  • Faithful Biblical Interpretations, Glenside, PA: L. L. Reynolds Foundation, 2003 (original 1994)
Additional:
The above list is compiled from my research, and does not claim to be exhaustive. As far as I know, all the information about Stephen M. Reynolds is correct, even if not complete.

Tuesday, June 07, 2022

David, a man after God’s own heart

Q. How was David as a man after God’s own heart? 

But now thy kingdom shall not continue: the Lord hath sought him a man after his own heart, and the Lord hath commanded him to be captain over his people, because thou hast not kept that which the Lord commanded thee. (1 Samuel 13:14)

And when he had removed him, he raised up unto them David to be their king; to whom also he gave testimony, and said, I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after mine own heart, which shall fulfil all my will. (Acts 13:22)

A. It is important to notice the context of this statement about David. 1 Samuel 13:13-14 first mentions it and Paul referred to it when exhorting the Jews in the synagogue at Antioch in Pisidia. This was God’s message through Samuel to Saul. It contrasts David and Saul. Saul was a king who disobeyed God even when he had direct specific instructions from God through his prophet (1 Samuel 15:10-14). “And Samuel said to Saul, Thou hast done foolishly: thou hast not kept the commandment of the Lord thy God, which he commanded thee: for now would the Lord have established thy kingdom upon Israel for ever. But now thy kingdom shall not continue: the Lord hath sought him a man after his own heart, and the Lord hath commanded him to be captain over his people, because thou hast not kept that which the Lord commanded thee.”

Primarily, the statement is not about David’s goodness, not a reference to the moral character of David; but rather about David’s willingness as king to follow God’s instructions, unlike King Saul. Saul was disobedient and rebellious. David was submissive and reverential. Contrasting two similar incidents in the lives of King David and King Herod sharply illustrates this. God sent prophets to both these kings to confront them with their sin. When Nathan exposed David’s sin with Bathsheba, saying, “Thou art the man,” what did David say? He responded, “I have sinned against the Lord.” He even wrote a mournful song confessing his sin (Psalm 51). When John the Baptist told Herod of his sin, “It is not lawful for thee to have his brother Philip’s wife,” what did Herod do? He responded by putting John in prison and eventually had him beheaded. David as a man after God’s own heart sinned, but when confronted with sin, he repented.

Monday, June 06, 2022

“Blended” Worship

“The most significant point about ‘blended worship’ to me is the inescapable and amazing irony of it. The people who use it would argue that the musical style doesn't mean anything. If it doesn’t mean anything, then you can use one style and it won’t matter. By blending, you are admitting that it matters and that it does mean something. So it turns the underlying philosophy and thinking into a total fraud. Now, we already knew it was phony, but ‘blended worship’ makes it as obvious as it can be.”

Kent Brandenburg

“Let us rather die than allow false worship in our churches—Jehovah and Baal are not to be ‘blended.’”

Thomas Ross

Sunday, June 05, 2022

The Banner of the King

Venantius Honorius Clementianus Fortunatus wrote “Vexilla regis prodeunt” / “The Royal Banners Forward Go”. He was born in Italy circa AD 530, and died in France in circa AD 609. He served as the bishop of the Abbey of St. Croix in Poitiers, France beginning in Ad 599. Fortunatus wrote many hymns, some of which have survived to the present.

John Mason Neale (1818-1866), an Anglican priest, translated the hymn from the Latin into English.

The hymn addresses the ransom in blood paid by Jesus Christ on the cross – its eternal ordination, its fulfillment of prophecy, its primary efficacy – and the debt of praise and honour we owe. The hymn in Long Meter. It has been paired with many different hymns, including Hamburg by Lowell Mason and Plainsong Tune.

1. The royal banners forward go;
The cross shines forth in mystic glow,
Where he in flesh, our flesh who made,
Our sentence bore, our ransom paid.

2. Where deep for us the spear was dyed,
Life’s torrent rushing from his side,
To wash us in that precious flood
Where flowed the water and the blood.

3. Fulfilled is all that David told
In true prophetic song of old;
How God the nations’ king should be,
Who reigns and triumphed from the tree.

4. On whose strong arms, so widely flung,
The weight of this world’s ransom hung;
The price of all mankind to pay,
And spoil the spoiler of his prey.

5. O tree of beauty, tree most fair,
Ordained those holy limbs to bear:
How bright adorned with Jesus’ blood,
A cleansing fount, a crimson flood.

6. To thee, eternal Three-in-One,
Let homage meet by all be done;
As by the cross thou dost restore,
So guide and keep us evermore.

The third stanza contains an interesting phrase – “reigns and triumphed from the tree” – based on a gloss that entered into some early Bible translations of Psalm 96:10. Of this, the Matthew Henry Commentary states: “Some of the ancients added a gloss to this, which by degrees crept into the text, The Lord reigneth from the tree. So Justin Martyr, Austin, and others, quote it, meaning the cross, when he had this title written over him, The King of the Jews.”

Saturday, June 04, 2022

In other words, at the behest of abeyance

  • abeyance, noun. A state of temporary inactivity.
  • behest, noun. An authoritative order or an urgent prompting.
  • catena, noun. A chain or connected series, especially a connected series of texts written by early Christian theologians.
  • conjunction, noun. (Grammar) Any member of a small class of words distinguished in many languages by their function as connectors between words, phrases, clauses, or sentences (e.g. and, because, but, however).
  • contraction, noun. An act or instance of contracting; a shortened form of a word or group of words, with the omitted letters often replaced in written English by an apostrophe.
  • curatorium, noun. A group of curators (in various senses), typically acting as an advisory body.
  • descriptor, noun. A significant word or phrase used to categorize or describe text or other material, especially when indexing or in an information retrieval system.
  • digressive, adjective. (Esp. in Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement) Descriptor of Christians, churches, groups, etc. who deviate or turn aside from the truth; one who leaves the scriptural teachings of the church for new doctrines, new methods, etc.
  • fascicle, noun. A separately published installment of a book or other printed work.
  • fexting, noun. Conducting an argument or fuss via text message; fighting by text.
  • meme, noun. A cultural item in the form of an image, video, phrase, etc., that is spread via the internet and often altered in a creative or humorous way.
  • palimpsest, noun. A manuscript or piece of writing material on which the original writing has been effaced to make room for later writing but of which traces remain.
  • porcine, adjective. Of or relating to swine; resembling swine; hoggish; piggish.
  • quackster, noun. A quack; a person who pretends, professionally or publicly, to skill, knowledge, or qualifications he or she does not possess; a charlatan.
  • scour, verb. To clean or brighten the surface of (something) by rubbing it hard, typically with an abrasive or detergent.
  • stunning and brave. An expression parodying social justice warriors who act as if they fear fierce backlash and ruination of their careers because of their stand, when they actually have the full support of almost everyone in their circles.
  • tween, noun. A youngster between 10 and 12 years of age, considered too old to be a child and too young to be a teenager. (Contraction of between.)
  • zyzzogeton, noun. A genus of large South American leafhoppers (family Cicadellidae) having the pronotum tuberculate and the front tibiae grooved. (Say what?)

Friday, June 03, 2022

Glorious to pass over an offense

Isaiah 29:21 “That make a man an offender for a word,...” “Inadvertently spoken, unwarily dropped, without any bad design or ill meaning; or for a word misplaced or misconstrued…” (From John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible. It seems that we modern Americans often search in crevices just to find reasons to be offended. If it is glorious to pass over an actual offense, perhaps it is also glorious not to find one where it is not.

Proverbs 19:11 The discretion of a man deferreth his anger; and it is his glory to pass over a transgression.

Thursday, June 02, 2022

These little ones

Oh, the heartbreak to view these little faces.

Matthew 19:14 But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.

Methodism slowly divides, and other links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Wednesday, June 01, 2022

Simon the Canaanite, an apostle

Q. Why is the other apostle named Simon called a Canaanite in Matthew 10:4 and Mark 3:18?

A. This Simon receives a designation to distinguish him from the other apostle Simon (Simon Peter).[i] It appears that the predominant view about the word “Canaanite” in these verses does not have to do with ethnicity, or a geographical location, but that it is a translation of a Syriac word (which most now call Aramaic) meaning “zealous” and probably referring to a sect of the Jews. For example, Smith’s Bible Dictionary says that Luke’s ζηλωτης (Zelotes, in Luke & Acts) is the Greek equivalent for the Syriac term κανανιτης/κανανιτην (Canaanite) used by Matthew and Mark, both of which are names of a Jewish sect.[ii] The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown commentary says, “The word ‘Kananite’ is just the Aramaic, or Syro-Chaldaic, term for ‘Zealot’.”

Some have understood that this Simon was a Canaanite in the sense of either from the land of Canaan or from Cana in Galilee. Albert Barnes writes, “His native place was probably ‘Cana.’ Afterward he might with propriety be called by either title.” [That is, either Canaanite or Zelotes, rlv.] Jerome also thought this Simon was from Cana, writing, “He was surnamed Peter to distinguish him from another Simon who is called the Cananean, from the village of Cana of Galilee, where the Lord turned water into wine.”[iii]

Matthew 10:4 and Mark 3:18 in the Traditional Text form have κανανιτης and κανανιτην, respectively. Eclectic texts such as Westcott-Hort, Tyndale House, and UBS have καναναιος and καναναιον. Older versions based on eclectic texts (e.g., RV, ASV, and RSV) translated this “Cananaean,” while modern versions such as CSB, ESV, LEB, and NIV translate (interpret) it as Zealot. Zelotes is ζηλωτην/ζηλωτης, found in Luke 6:15 and Acts 1:13.

Though not explicitly stated, it seems likely all of the twelve apostles were Jews. Jesus initially sent the twelve (of whom Simon was one) neither “into the way of the Gentiles” nor “into any city of the Samaritans” but rather “to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” This, in my opinion, makes it unlikely that one of the twelve was a Gentile. At least to the understanding of the gathered crowd on the Pentecost after Christ’s resurrection, the disciples were “all Galilæans” (Acts 2:7).

There is a noticeable difference in the Greek spelling in κανανιτης (Canaanite) in the Gospels, to χανααν (Canaan) and χαναναιοι/χανανεις/χαναναιους (Canaanite) in reference to a location and people. The word Canaanite in the Gospels starts with the Greek letter kappa (κ) and the land of Canaan starts with the Greek letter chi (χ). This may not be definitive – since words can have more than one spelling – but it is at least a clue that the words are different (a difference that does not show up in English).[iv]

My conclusion is that ζηλωτης and κανανιτης have the same meaning. Matthew and Mark use the Syriac term, while Luke uses the Greek term, meaning “zealous” or “zealot”. “Canaanite” is a proper word, a good translation (for example, “Zealot” in the CSB, ESV, LEB, and NIV is more of an interpretation), somewhat of a transliteration, and part of the ongoing English translation tradition leading up to the King James Bible.[v] It is best to be satisfied that it means “zealous” or “zealot”[vi] and remain uncertain whether Simon was a member of the Jewish sect called Zealots – since it is an historical question whether Jews were identified by that name as early as the time Jesus ordained his apostles.[vii]

Other comments

  • John Gill: “The former of these is called Simon the Canaanite, to distinguish him from Simon Peter, before mentioned; not that he was a Canaanite, that is, an inhabitant of the land of Canaan, a man of Canaan, as a certain woman is called a woman of Canaan, (Matthew 15:22) for all the disciples of Christ were Jews; though in Munster's Hebrew Gospel he is called (ynenkh Nwemv), ‘Simeon the Canaanite’, or of Canaan, as if he belonged to that country; nor is he so called from Cana of Galilee, as Jerom and others have thought; but he was one of the (Myanq) , ‘Kanaim’, or ‘Zealots’; and therefore Luke styles him, ‘Simon called Zelotes’, (Luke 6:15) (Acts 1:13).”
  • Matthew Poole: “We must not understand by Canaanite a pagan, (for Christ sent out none but Jews), but one of Cana, which by interpretation is Zelus, from whence it is that Luke calleth him Zelotes.”
  • Matthew Henry: “Simon is called the Canaanite, or rather the Canite, from Cana of Galilee, where probably he was born; or Simon the Zealot, which some make to be the signification of Kananites.”
  • Expositor’s Greek Testament: “The form Καναναῖος seems to be based on the idea that the word referred to a place. Jerome took it to mean ‘of Cana,’ ‘de vico Chana Galilaeae’.”
  • Adam Clarke: “The Canaanite—This word is not put here to signify a particular people, as it is elsewhere used in the Sacred Writings; but it is formed from the Hebrew קנא kana, which signifies zealous, literally translated by Luke, Luke 6:15, ζηλωτης, zelotes, or the zealous, probably from his great fervency in preaching the Gospel of his Master.”
  • Vincent’s Word Studies: “The Canaanite (ὁ Καναναιος) Rev., Cananaean. The word has nothing to do with Canaan. In Luke 6:15; Acts 1:13, the same apostle is called Zelotes. Both terms indicate his connection with the Galilaean Zealot party, a sect which stood for the recovery of Jewish freedom and the maintenance of distinctive Jewish institutions. From the Hebrew kanná, zealous; compare the Chaldee kanán, by which this sect was denoted.”


[i] Using the “nickname” of “surname” of “the Zealot” or “the Canaanite” likely was one way to help distinguish this Simon from the other Simon, called Peter.
[ii] Many students of the language believe κανανιτης etymologically comes from the Syriac/Aramaic word qan’an, meaning “zealous one.”
[iii] Commentary on Matthew, St. Jerome, Translated by Thomas P. Scheck, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008, p. 115.
[iv] On the other hand, in Greek the city of Cana in Galilee is spelled beginning with a kappa. Cana = κανα.
[v] Simon Chananæus and Simonem Cananæum (Latin Vulgate), Simon Chananeus and Simonem Chananeum (Anglo-Saxon Gospels, circa 700-900), Symount Chananee and Symount Cananee (1382 Wycliffe Bible), Simon off cane and Symon of cane (1526 Tyndale NT), Simon of Canan and Simon of Cane (1557 Geneva NT), Simon the Cananite and Simon the Cananite (Geneva 1560; with the note: Or, the zealous/zealous), Simon [the] Cananite and Simon Cananite (Bishops Bible), Simon the Chanaanite and Simon the Chanaanite (1602 Bishops Bible), Simon the Canaanite and Simon the Canaanite (1611 Barker King James Bible). I include the Latin Vulgate since the Anglo-Saxon Gospels and the Wycliffe Bible is translated from it rather than from the Greek.
[vi] “Showing great energy or enthusiasm in pursuit of a cause or objective” and “a person who is enthusiastic, fanatical, and/or uncompromising in pursuit of their religious, political, or other ideals.”
[vii] In the Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992), David Rhoads writes, “The evidence from Josephus suggests that it was not until about 68 C.E. during the Roman-Judean War that one of the revolutionary factions came to identify itself formally as the Zealots. Therefore, it is anachronistic to view people acting with zeal before 68 C.E. as members of a sect called the Zealots.”

Tuesday, May 31, 2022

The Rod of God and Moses

Moses and the call of God

  • Exodus 4:2-4, 17 There is a rod in Moses’s hand
  • Exodus 4:20 Moses’s rod is also the rod of God

The rod is associated with Moses’s stretched out hand, and Moses’s stretched out hand is associated with the stretched out hand of God. (Cf. Exodus 7:19; 8:5, 17; 9:22; 10:12, 21; 14:16, 26)

God uses what we have, and what we have belongs to God.


Moses and Aaron before Pharaoh
  • Exodus 7:9-13 The rod becomes a serpent
  • Exodus 7:14-20 The rod and rivers to blood
  • Exodus 8:5-6 The rod and frogs
  • Exodus 8:16-17 The rod and lice
  • Exodus 9:22-23 The rod and hail
  • Exodus 10:12-13 The rod and locusts
  • Exodus 10:21-22 The rod and darkness
God judges Egypt and its gods. He demonstrates his sovereignty and power, using Moses, Aaron, and the rod of God and Moses.

Moses and the journey into the wilderness

  • Exodus 14:15-28  The rod, Moses, the Israelites, and the Red Sea
  • Exodus 17:5-6 The rod, Moses, and the water from the rock in Horeb
  • Exodus 17:8-13 The rod, Moses, Joshua, Aaron, Hur, and the Amalekites
  • Numbers 20:7-11 The rod, Moses, and the water from the rock, the second time

God divides the Israelites from the Egyptians. The God who brings them out will bring them through (Hebrews 7:25). God quenches the thirst of his people, both physically and spiritually (John 7:37). The rod of God and Moses demonstrates the work of unity. We are laborers together with God (1 Corinthians 3:9). We can and do misuse what God has given us. With greater light comes great responsibility (Luke 12:48).


Concluding thoughts

In Moses’s hand, God used a dry stick. The rod was not a magic wand, but a demonstration of the power of God. God also answered prayer, instead of Moses using the stick. Compare Exodus 10:18-19, for example, where God answered Moses’s earnest prayer with a miracle. Put what we have in our hand in the hand of God. Shamgar had an ox goad (Judges 3:31). Ehud had a dagger in his left hand (Judges 3:15). Gideon and his army had only trumpets and lamps (Judges 7:19). Dorcas had a needle and thread (Acts 9:39). Ezekiel prophesied to dry bones and they lived (Ezekiel 37:1-14)

Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the Lord of hosts. Zechariah 4:6

Monday, May 30, 2022

9 Things You May Not Know About Memorial Day

9 Things You May Not Know About Memorial Day, from History.com.
In May 1868, General John A. Logan, the commander-in-chief of the Union veterans’ group known as the Grand Army of the Republic, issued a decree that May 30 should become a nationwide day of commemoration for the more than 620,000 soldiers killed in the recently ended Civil War. On Decoration Day, as Logan dubbed it, Americans should lay flowers and decorate the graves of the war dead “whose bodies now lie in almost every city, village and hamlet churchyard in the land.”

And since 2000, when the U.S. Congress passed legislation, all Americans are encouraged to pause for a National Moment of Remembrance at 3 p.m. local time.

Chiasm and TR

“I think that word counts strongly support the Textus Receptus – a conclusion noted by others too including Gioacchino Michael Cascione in his book ‘Repetition in the Bible’. I have found many, many examples where the word count in the TR supports a chiasm but e.g. Nestle-Aland doesn’t, but so far have found no examples where the reverse is the case.”
Biblical chiasm expert, Stewart Fleming

Sunday, May 29, 2022

Our dear Lord has mixt the cup

In December of 1832 and 1833, Gilbert and Phebe Ann Cunningham Beebe lost two children, first 1-year old James Moore Beebe and then 6-year old Robert George Beebe about a year later. “The following lines were written on the death of two children, the one expired without a struggle or groan, – the other languished in severe distress for eleven weeks.”

From the death of these children Beebe, a Baptist elder, wrote the following lines. I believe these lines could be a fine church hymn on the providence and sovereignty of God. For that reason, I removed stanzas four and five as too specific for congregational use. For the entire poem, look HERE.

The hymn is Long Meter. I suggest the tune Kedron. However, the tunes Hamburg and Hebron are likely more familiar to more congregations, so more useful for that reason.

“Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.” Psalm 23:4

1. Call’d as we are to bear thy rod,
Thou ever faithful cov’nant God;
Thy grace impart, that we may feel
Submissive, at thy sovereign will.

2. It is thy right, thou Lord of heaven,
To take from us what thou hast given, –
Remand our offspring to the dust,
And teach our hearts in thee to trust.

3. Twice in the circuit of this year,
Thy chast’nings we’ve been call’d to bear –
Yet all is right; we bless thy name,
Nor of thy Providence complain.

4. But why fond nature dost thou pore*
Their suf'’rings, languishing are o’er.
And soon of us, it shall be said
They’re mingl’d with the slumb’ring dead.

5. Hush Lord the murm’rings of our mind,
May we through mercy be resign’d,
To all thy will, to all thy ways,
And in affliction give thee praise.

6. Since our dear Lord has mixt the cup
Be still, our souls and drink it up;
Jehovah has our good in view,
He’ll give us grace and bear us through.

* pore = to gaze intently