Translate

Showing posts with label Old Testament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Old Testament. Show all posts

Friday, December 06, 2024

Do we have the Old Testament?

I am on an email list from Crossway. Sometimes there are links to helpful articles; sometimes not so much. November 3rd’s article was “I’ve Heard It Said the Old Testament Is Full of Errors.” Coming from Crossway, I was not exactly hopeful that it would exude the kind of confidence that many regular folks have in their Bibles.

In the brief article/video, Old Testament scholar John D. Meade says that the Old Testament has “all the signs of human fragility,” but it “has a wealth of manuscripts, a ton of evidence, and textual critics who can actually look at all those manuscripts, compare them, sift out what are simple copyist errors, and actually restore the original text based on comparing all of the evidence.”

Just what parishioners in the pews pine for, a troupe of text critics to tell them that they do not have the Old Testament. But just hold on till they finish their never-ending work! Like New Testament scholar Dan Wallace, Meade believes “We do not have now—in our critical [Hebrew] texts or any translations—exactly what the authors of the [Old] Testament wrote.” Perhaps he learned from experience to try to maintain a little more optimism (or something) than Wallace, and did not go on to say, “Even if we did, we would not know it.”

After I first wrote this for a Facebook post in early November, I was excited a few days later that Pastor Jeff Riddle posted a review of it. His goes into more detail than mine. You can listen and read on the Stylos blog, as well as listen on YouTube.

Wednesday, June 26, 2024

Opposition to God’s work

Opposition to God’s work: Nehemiah 6

  • Romans 8:7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God...
  • John 15:20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you...

Private communication

2 That Sanballat and Geshem sent unto me, saying, Come, let us meet together in some one of the villages in the plain of Ono. But they thought to do me mischief.

3 And I sent messengers unto them, saying, I am doing a great work, so that I cannot come down: why should the work cease, whilst I leave it, and come down to you?

4 Yet they sent unto me four times after this sort; and I answered them after the same manner.

Personal intimidation

5 Then sent Sanballat his servant unto me in like manner the fifth time with an open letter in his hand;

6 Wherein was written, It is reported among the heathen, and Gashmu saith it, that thou and the Jews think to rebel: for which cause thou buildest the wall, that thou mayest be their king, according to these words.

7 And thou hast also appointed prophets to preach of thee at Jerusalem, saying, There is a king in Judah: and now shall it be reported to the king according to these words. Come now therefore, and let us take counsel together.

8 Then I sent unto him, saying, There are no such things done as thou sayest, but thou feignest them out of thine own heart.

Prophetic deception

10 Afterward I came unto the house of Shemaiah the son of Delaiah the son of Mehetabeel, who was shut up; and he said, Let us meet together in the house of God, within the temple, and let us shut the doors of the temple: for they will come to slay thee; yea, in the night will they come to slay thee.

11 And I said, Should such a man as I flee? and who is there, that, being as I am, would go into the temple to save his life? I will not go in.

12 And, lo, I perceived that God had not sent him; but that he pronounced this prophecy against me: for Tobiah and Sanballat had hired him.

13 Therefore was he hired, that I should be afraid, and do so, and sin, and that they might have matter for an evil report, that they might reproach me.

Privileged affiliation

17 Moreover in those days the nobles of Judah sent many letters unto Tobiah, and the letters of Tobiah came unto them.

18 For there were many in Judah sworn unto him, because he was the son in law of Shechaniah the son of Arah; and his son Johanan had taken the daughter of Meshullam the son of Berechiah.

19 Also they reported his good deeds before me, and uttered my words to him. And Tobiah sent letters to put me in fear.

Friday, May 17, 2024

Calling sinners to repentance

Luke 5:32 I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

Jeremiah 3:22-25 

22 Return, ye backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings. Behold, we come unto thee; for thou art the Lord our God. 23 Truly in vain is salvation hoped for from the hills, and from the multitude of mountains: truly in the Lord our God is the salvation of Israel. 24 For shame hath devoured the labour of our fathers from our youth; their flocks and their herds, their sons and their daughters. 25 We lie down in our shame, and our confusion covereth us: for we have sinned against the Lord our God, we and our fathers, from our youth even unto this day, and have not obeyed the voice of the Lord our God.

  • Repentance turns to the Lord, “we come unto thee” v. 22. “Lord, to whom shall we go?” John 6:68.
  • Repentance rejects other ways, “in vain is salvation hoped for from…” v. 23. “ye turned to God from idols…” 1 Thessalonians 1:9.
  • Repentance embraces shame and confusion, “shame hath devoured…We lie down in our shame,” vs. 24-25. “For godly sorrow worketh repentance…” 2 Corinthians 7:10.
  • Repentance acknowledges sin against God, “we have sinned against the Lord our God, we… have not obeyed,” v. 25. Repentance doesn’t excuse sin as just “mistakes” and “errors.” “O wretched man that I am!” Romans 7:24.

Thursday, August 17, 2023

Romans 3 and Psalm 14

Reviewing and Comparing Romans 3 and Psalm 14.

Some people claim that Paul quoted from Psalm 13/14 from the LXX. I believe it is more likely that the LXX of Psalm 13/14 was later (after Paul wrote to the Romans) conformed to match what Paul wrote in Romans 3.

The Vaticanus LXX can be checked HERE. However, the pages load very very slowly (at least on my computer). To find the Psalm, go to thumbnail 630. Some of it is also on page 631.

When discussing and debating evidentiary matters, going to the source is the best solution to settle questions about the exhibit entered into evidence. However, if you despair of getting the relevant page to open on your computer, you may also review this secondary source. You can look at how this material is added in as verse 3b in the Greek OT with Brenton English translation.

3b τάφος ἀνεῳγμένος ὁ λάρυγξ αὐτῶν, ταῖς γλώσσαις αὑτῶν ἐδολιοῦσαν· ἰὸς ἀσπίδων ὑπὸ τὰ χείλη αὐτῶν, ὧν τὸ στόμα ἀρᾶς καὶ πικρίας γέμει, ὀξεῖς οἱ πόδες αὐτῶν ἐκχέαι αἷμα, σύντριμμα καὶ ταλαιπωρία ἐν ταῖς ὁδοῖς αὐτῶν, καὶ ὁδὸν εἰρήνης οὐκ ἔγνωσαν· οὐκ ἔστι φόβος Θεοῦ ἀπέναντι τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν αὐτῶν.

3b Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness; their feet are swift to shed blood: destruction and misery are in their ways; and the way of peace they have not known: there is no fear of God before their eyes.

It is included as a footnote (*) in the Greek Old Testament provided online by the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. These words are not in the Hebrew text.

The Septuagint text muffles and muddles what is actually the citation by Paul of a number of Old Testament texts from different locations. It suggests that someone revised this portion of the Greek Old Testament to make it match the citations made by Paul.

  • “Their throat is an open sepulchre, with their tongues they have used deceit” is from Psalm 5:9
  • “the poison of asps is under their lips” is from Psalm 140:3
  • “whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness” is from Psalm 10:7
  • “their feet are swift to shed blood: destruction and misery are in their ways; and the way of peace they have not known” is from Isaiah 59:7-8
  • “there is no fear of God before their eyes” is from Psalm 36:1. 

“If” Paul is quoting the Greek Old Testament and those words were then in Psalm 14, then the conclusion would be that we need to trash the Hebrew original language apographs, and buy & use only a Greek Old Testament, or an English translation of it! On the other hand, we might realize how many huge messes exist in what has been passed down to us as the Greek OT, and instead trust the Hebrew text and the English translation based on it. Paul, under inspiration of the Spirit, is citing various OT passages that support that the Scriptures conclude all under sin.

The portion in the clip below (from page 630 at the link I gave in the first paragraph) that is circled in red is from what Brenton calls 3b, the suspect portion matching Romans 3 – but is missing in the Hebrew text.

The typed portion below that I place in double brackets is not in the scan clipped below, but is over on the next page.

 ΕἰΣΤὸΤέΛΟΣΨΑΛΜὸΣΤῷΔΑΥΐΔ. - ΕΙΠΕΝ ἄΦΡΩΝ ἐΝ ΚΑΡΔίᾳ ΑὐΤΟῦ· ΟὐΚ ἔΣΤΙ ΘΕόΣ. ΔΙΕΦΘάΡΗΣΑΝ ΚΑὶ ἐΒΔΕΛύΧΘΗΣΑΝ ἐΝ ἐΠΙΤΗΔΕύΜΑΣΙΝ, ΟὐΚ ἔΣΤΙ ΠΟΙῶΝ ΧΡΗΣΤόΤΗΤΑ, ΟὐΚ ἔΣΤΙΝ ἕΩΣ ἑΝόΣ. 2 ΚύΡΙΟΣ ἐΚ ΤΟῦ ΟὐΡΑΝΟῦ ΔΙέΚΥΨΕΝ ἐΠὶ ΤΟὺΣ ΥἱΟὺΣ ΤῶΝ ἀΝΘΡώΠΩΝ ΤΟῦ ἰΔΕῖΝ Εἰ ἔΣΤΙ ΣΥΝΙὼΝ ἢ ἐΚΖΗΤῶΝ ΤὸΝ ΘΕόΝ. 3A ΠάΝΤΕΣ ἐΞέΚΛΙΝΑΝ, ἅΜΑ ἠΧΡΕΙώΘΗΣΑΝ, ΟὐΚ ἔΣΤΙ ΠΟΙῶΝ ΧΡΗΣΤόΤΗΤΑ, ΟὐΚ ἔΣΤΙΝ ἕΩΣ ἑΝόΣ. 3B ΤάΦΟΣ ἀΝΕῳΓΜέΝΟΣ ὁ ΛάΡΥΓΞ ΑὐΤῶΝ, ΤΑῖΣ ΓΛώΣΣΑΙΣ ΑὑΤῶΝ ἐΔΟΛΙΟῦΣΑΝ· ἰὸΣ ἀΣΠίΔΩΝ ὑΠὸ Τὰ ΧΕίΛΗ ΑὐΤῶΝ, ὧΝ Τὸ ΣΤόΜΑ ἀΡᾶΣ ΚΑὶ ΠΙΚΡίΑΣ ΓέΜΕΙ, ὀΞΕῖΣ Οἱ ΠόΔΕΣ ΑὐΤῶΝ ἐΚΧέΑΙ ΑἷΜΑ, ΣύΝΤΡΙΜΜΑ ΚΑὶ ΤΑΛΑΙΠΩΡίΑ ἐΝ ΤΑῖΣ [[ὁΔΟῖΣ ΑὐΤῶΝ, ΚΑὶ ὁΔὸΝ ΕἰΡήΝΗΣ ΟὐΚ ἔΓΝΩΣΑΝ· ΟὐΚ ἔΣΤΙ ΦόΒΟΣ ΘΕΟῦ ἀΠέΝΑΝΤΙ ΤῶΝ ὀΦΘΑΛΜῶΝ ΑὐΤῶΝ.]]


[Note: Our Psalm 14 is Psalm 13 in the Greek Old Testament.]

Tuesday, December 20, 2022

The Nazarene

But when he [i.e., Joseph] heard that Archelaus did reign in Judæa in the room of his father Herod, he was afraid to go thither: notwithstanding, being warned of God in a dream, he turned aside into the parts of Galilee: and he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene.[i] Matthew 2:22-23.

The historical incident

Matthew 2:23 records the historical incident of Joseph, Mary, and Jesus journeying from the land of Egypt to the city of Nazareth. After coming out of their exile of safety in Egypt, they returned to Nazareth. Because of God’s warning, they did not stop in Judæa but continued on to their former home in Galilee. There Jesus grew from boyhood to manhood (cf. Luke 2:51-52; 4:16).

Nazareth was a village in the region of Galilee, part of the land of Naphtali (Joshua 21:32; 2 Kings 15:29, et al.). Galilee bordered and was west of the Jordan River and the Sea of Galilee. Isaiah 9:1 suggests a region jutting into or surrounded by “the nations,” Gentiles, a non-Jewish population (cf. Matthew 4:15). Magdala (Matthew 15:39), Tiberias (John 6:1, 23), and Capernaum (Matthew 4:13) were on the Sea of Galilee. Nazareth and nearby Cana (John 2:1ff.) were about halfway between the Sea of Galilee and the Mediterranean Sea.

As cities go, Nazareth was small and insignificant. Neither the Hebrew Old Testament, the Apocrypha, the writings of Josephus, nor the Talmud mention the city of Nazareth. It first shows up in the Bible in the Gospels, as the town of Mary and Joseph (cf. Luke 1:26; 2:4; Matthew 2:23; 4:13).[ii] Joseph and Mary had lived in Nazareth before traveling to Bethlehem because of the taxation (cf. Luke 2:4-5), and thither they eventually return.

One commonly accepted belief about the origin of the name of the city is that it derives from the Hebrew word netzer (or nēser, netser נֵצֶר). The Old Testament Hebrew uses this word four times, including Isaiah 11:1.[iii]

“…the name, Nazareth, is from the Hebrew word netzer, which is translated ‘branch’ in the English language. Several of the Old Testament prophets predict the coming of Christ as ‘the Branch,’ or a synonymous term.”[iv]

Concerning the name of the city, John Gill writes:

A Nazarene, as David de Pomis says,{[v]}

“is one that is born in the city Netzer, which is said to be in the land of Galilee, three days journey distant from Jerusalem.”

The prophetical equivalent

The historical incident of Jesus’s family returning to Nazareth coincides with the fulfillment of prophecy. Matthew explicitly and unequivocally connects Jesus being a called “a Nazarene” with his dwelling in Nazareth.[vi] What is the prophecy? What does it mean?

In its simplest meaning, a Nazarene is a man from Nazareth.[vii] But why is “a Nazarene” significant? We cannot search the Old Testament and find the word Nazareth, much less Nazarene. Note that in verse 23 Matthew writes prophets plural, rather than citing one specific prophet. Rather than “fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet,” it is “fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets.” Compare Matthew 1:22; 2:15, 17; 3:4; 4:14; 8:17 and other places, where he is stating a specific prophecy by a specific prophet. This should shortly (or at least eventually) suggest to us that Matthew is connecting a theme of prophecy, a general sense, rather than a direct statement found in one particular place.

But what is that theme? What is the sense? Unlike Bethlehem, the town of King David where Jesus was born, Nazareth was an obscure town in a despised region of the country. Commenting on Matthew 2:23, Matthew Henry wrote:

“Thither they were sent, and there they were well known, and were among their relations; the most proper place for them to be in. There they continued, and from thence our Saviour was called Jesus of Nazareth, which was to the Jews a stumbling-block, for, Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?” [and “out of Galilee ariseth no prophet” they thought.]

Henry continues on this theme:

“…He shall be called a Nazarene. Which may be looked upon…As a name of reproach and contempt…Now this was not particularly foretold by any one prophet, but, in general, it was spoken by the prophets, that he should be despised and rejected of men (Isa. liii. 2, 3), a Worm, and no man (Ps. xxii. 6, 7), that he should be an Alien to his brethren, Ps. lxix. 7, 8.”

Albert Barnes put it this way.

“He does not say ‘by the prophet,’ as in Matthew 1:22; Matthew 2:5, Matthew 2:15, but ‘by the prophets,’ meaning no one prophet particularly, but the general character of the prophecies. As Jerome observes,[viii] he shows that he took not the words from the prophets, but only the sense.”[ix]

The high and holy eternal Son of God became the meek and lowly (Matthew 11:29; Zechariah 9:9), of no reputation, the reputation of a Nazarene. The prophets, plural, prophesied this theme about the Messiah to come. Jesus fulfilled it.

Prophets prophesy

  • Psalm 22:6-8 But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people. All they that see me laugh me to scorn: they shoot out the lip, they shake the head, saying, He trusted on the Lord that he would deliver him: let him deliver him, seeing he delighted in him.
  • Psalm 69:7-8a Because for thy sake I have borne reproach; shame hath covered my face. I am become a stranger unto my brethren, and an alien unto my mother’s children.
  • Psalm 118:22  The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner.
  • Isaiah 53:2-3 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him. He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
  • Isaiah 53:12 …he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
  • Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off…
  • Zechariah 9:9 …behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.

Jesus Christ fulfills

  • Matthew 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
  • Mark 8:31 And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.
  • Luke 17:25 But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of this generation.
  • John 1:11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
  • John 1:46 And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see.
  • John 7:52 They answered and said unto him, Art thou also of Galilee? Search, and look: for out of Galilee ariseth no prophet.
  • John 12:48 He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.
  • Acts 3:14-15 But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you; and killed the Prince of life, whom God hath raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses.
  • Philippians 2:6-8 …Christ Jesus: who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
  • Hebrews 2:9 But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death…

Called a “Nazarene” i.e., Jesus of Nazareth, by:

  • a multitude in Jerusalem (Jesus the prophet of Nazareth ιησους ο προφητης ο απο ναζαρεθ, Matthew 21:11)
  • a maid in Jerusalem (Jesus of Nazareth ιησου του ναζωραιου, Matthew 26:71; του ναζαρηνου ιησου ησθα Mark 14:67  )
  • by demons (Jesus of Nazareth ιησου ναζαρηνε, Mark 1:24; Luke 4:34)
  • a crowd on the Jericho road, heard by blind Bartimæus (Jesus of Nazareth ιησους ο ναζωραιος, Mark 10:47; Luke 18:37)
  • an angel (ιησουν ζητειτε τον ναζαρηνον Mark 16:16)
  • disciples on the way to Emmaus (Jesus of Nazareth ιησου του ναζωραιου Luke 24:19)
  • Philip (Jesus of Nazareth ιησουν τον υιον του ιωσηφ τον απο ναζαρεθ John 1:45)
  • officers of the priests (Jesus of Nazareth ιησουν τον ναζωραιον, John 18:5, 7)
  • someone writing by the authority of Pilate (Jesus of Nazareth ιησους ο ναζωραιος, John 19:19)

In an ingenious display of the low and humble estate of Jesus, Luke 4:28-30 shows that even the despised citizens at the synagogue of the despised city of Nazareth despise and reject Jesus the Nazarene, intending to cast him down the brow of the hill on which Nazareth was built. Oh, the power and wonder, too – “But he passing through the midst of them went his way.” See Matthew 13:54-58, another occasion where “they were offended in him” and showed him no honour – he whom they contemptuously considered the native carpenter’s son. Although the Nazarene prophet was without honour in his own country, in his own city, in his own house, yet at the name of the Nazarene carpenter’s son every knee shall bow and every tongue shall confess “that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”

The Lowly Nazarene (by William Henry Gardner, 1866-1932).

1. Jesus knows earth’s cares and sorrows,
Through Death’s valley has He been,
At the bench He toiled and suffered,
Christ, the “Lowly Nazarene.”
 
2. His great heart will bear our burdens,
On Him you can ever lean,
He knows all our hopes and longings,
Christ, the “Lowly Nazarene.”
 
3. Comfort gives He to the beggar,
Freely as unto a Queen,
For His love indeed is boundless,
Christ, the “Lowly Nazarene.”
 
Chorus:
Lord of earth and sky forever,
Christ, the Lord, with pow’r supreme!
Born of woman in a manger,
Once a “Lowly Nazarene.”

We see Jesus the Nazarene, the Son of God who made himself of no reputation, lower than the angels for the suffering of death – the death we deserved and his death that paid the penalty for sin. With the songwriter Charles H. Gabriel, “I stand amazed in the presence of Jesus the Nazarene.”

Amen.


[i] 23 και ελθων κατωκησεν εις πολιν λεγομενην ναζαρεθ οπως πληρωθη το ρηθεν δια των προφητων οτι ναζωραιος κληθησεται Matthew 1:23 in 1894 Textus Receptus.
[ii] Some mythicists (people who think that Jesus never existed) place high stock in the fact of lack of prior mention, hoping to use it to support their own myth. However, neither faith nor facts support their diversion. In 2009, Israeli archaeologists found what they believed were the remains of a dwelling in Nazareth that can be dated to the time of Jesus. Archaeologist Yardena Alexandre, excavations director at the Israel Antiquities Authority, said that their finds suggested that Nazareth was a small out-of-the-way city populated by Jews of modest means. See “Nazareth dwelling discovery may shed light on boyhood of Jesus,” as well as “Did First-Century Nazareth Exist” and “Jesus’ House? 1st-Century Structure May Be Where He Grew Up.”
[iii] For four uses of netzer (sprout, shoot, branch) in Old Testament, see Isaiah 11:1; 14:19; 60:21; Daniel 11:7.
[iv] Old Testament in Matthew, Volume I, J. W. Griffith, Pasadena, TX: White Printing, 1994, p. 28.
[v] De Pomis, 1525-after 1593, a notable Italian Jewish physician and philosopher, in Ẓemaḥ Dawid (i.e., The Offspring of David), Hebrew Lexicon, fol. 141. 2., 1587.
[vi] Nazarene – an inhabitant of the village of Nazareth. This has been often confused with Nazarite. A common misreading or misinterpretation of “Nazarene” is that it means “Nazarite.” However, Matthew does not say Nazarite, and Jesus was not a Nazarite.
[vii] Followers of the Nazarene were sometimes called Nazarenes. “For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes:” (Acts 24:5). In addition, sometimes “Christians are called Notzrim by Israelis in the Middle East.” See “Jesus “the Nazarene” – what is behind the title?
[viii] Et veniens habitavit in civitate, quae vocatur Nazareth ut adimpleretur quod dictum est per prophetas, quoniam Nazareus vocabitur. Si fixum de Scripturis posulsset exemplu, numquam diceret, quod dictum est per prophetas; sed simpliciter, quod dictum est per prophetam: nune autem pluraliter prophetas vocans, ostendit se non verba de Scripturis sumpsisse, sed sensum. Nazaraeus, sanctus interpretatur. Sanctum autem Dominum futurum, omnis Sciptura commemorat. Possumus et aliter dicere, quod etiam verbis, juxta Hebraicam veritstem in Isaia scriptum sit: Esiet virga de radice Iesse, et Nazaraeus de radice ejus conscendet (Isai. xi. i.). | English translation: And coming, he dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, that he would be called a Nazarene. If he had asked for a fixed example from the Scriptures, he would never have said what was said through the prophets; but simply, what was said by the prophet: but now, calling the prophets in the plural, he shows that he did not take the words from the Scriptures, but the sense. A Nazarene, the Spirit interpreted. And all the Scriptures mention the coming of the Holy Lord. We can also say in another way, that even in words, according to the Hebrew truth, it is written in Isaiah: A rod shall come from the root of Jesse, and a Nazarene shall come up from his root. (Isai. xi. i.). Jerome’s Commentary on Matthew.
[ix] Barnes sums up the view of Jesus the Nazarene as one despised in four points: 1. He does not say “by the prophet,” as in Matthew 1:22; Matthew 2:5, Matthew 2:15, but “by the prophets,” meaning no one particularly, but the general character of the prophecies. 2. The leading and most prominent prophecies respecting him were, that he was to be of humble life; to be despised and rejected. 3. The phrase “he shall be called” means the same as he shall be. 4. The character of the people of Nazareth was such that they were proverbially despised and contemned, John 1:46; John 7:52. To come from Nazareth, therefore, or to be a Nazarene, was the same as to be despised, or to be esteemed of low birth; to be a root out of dry ground, having no form or comeliness. This was what had been predicted by all the prophets.

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

The cities of Simeon: How many?

Q. How many cities were given to the children of Simeon for their inheritance? My English Standard Version translation, in Joshua 19:2-6, lists (by count) 14 cities – Beersheba, Sheba, Moladah, Hazar-shual, Balah, Ezem, Eltolad, Bethul, Hormah, Ziklag, Beth-marcaboth, Hazar-susah, Beth-lebaoth, and Sharuhen – but then says “thirteen cities with their villages.”

A. A number of Bible versions have this error.[i] The King James translation of verse two is “Beer-sheba, or Sheba, and Moladah…”[ii] Read Joshua 19:1-8. “Beer-sheba, or Sheba” provides the explanation – that is, giving two names by which one city is called. If Beersheba and Sheba refer to the same city, then the number of cities named agree with the number given, thirteen. The parallel record in 1 Chronicles 4:28-31 harmonizes with this conclusion, simply leaving the word “Sheba” out of the list.

The Barker 1611 printing of the new translation now called the “King James Version” has the word “or” between “Beer-sheba” and “Sheba.”

In his commentary, John Gill writes:

…Beersheba, that is, Sheba; for so the particle ‘vau’ is sometimes used (z), and must be so used here; or otherwise, instead of thirteen, it will appear that there are fourteen cities, contrary to the account of them, Joshua 19:6; so Kimchi and Ben Melech make them one city. And it may be observed, that in the enumeration of the cities of Simeon, 1 Chronicles 4:28, Sheba is left out, and only Beersheba is mentioned…

(z) Vid. Noldium, p. 280. No. 1200.[iii]


[i] Including but not limited to: Common English Bible, Douay-Rheims, Good News Translation, Lexham English Bible, Modern English Version, New Living Translation, Revised Standard Version, and The Voice.
[ii] Even some King James Bibles have a printing error here, with “Beer-sheba, and Sheba, and Moladah” instead of “Beer-sheba, or Sheba, and Moladah.”
[iii] Possibly a reference to: Loca Concordantia, cum uniuscujusque Radicis Latina Interpretatione, secundum Robertsonum, Buxtorfium, Marium de Calassio et Noldium, by Edward Griffith. 

Tuesday, May 10, 2022

Old Testament verses in Syriac/Aramaic

Q. Are there verses in the Old Testament that are written in a language other than Hebrew?

A. Yes. Some texts in the Old Testament are in Syriac, more commonly called Aramaic today.

According to language experts, the earliest inscriptions in the Syriac or Aramaic language use the Phoenician alphabet. Over time it developed into the square style we know as the Hebrew alphabet. I would illustrate the biblical Syriac as somewhat like our reading something in English, then running across a portion in Latin, Spanish, or such like – using the same alphabetical letters but with different vocabulary.

There are four undisputed passages of the Old Testament written in Syriac/Aramaic:

  • Ezra 4:8–6:18. This passage begins with a letter written to King Artaxerxes (“Rehum the chancellor and Shimshai the scribe wrote a letter against Jerusalem to Artaxerxes the king”), followed by other letters and official documents. Ezra includes some of the narrative in this language as well. 
  • Ezra 7:12-26. This writing in Syriac is a copy of the letter that King Artaxerxes gave unto Ezra, which Ezra inserted into the record.
  • Jeremiah 10:11. This is the only verse in Syriac in the book of Jeremiah. This warning is one sentence that occurs in the midst of Hebrew text. This certainly would have grabbed their attention.
  • Daniel 2:4b–7:28. This section includes five stories about Daniel and his friends, as well as a prophetic vision (chapter 7).

In addition, these words are considered Syriac/Aramaic words, and some researchers might suggest and include a few others.

  • Genesis 31:47 – translation of a Hebrew place name, Jegar-sahadutha (Syriac) versus Galeed (Hebrew).
  • Proverbs 31:2 – the Syriac word “bar” is used instead of the Hebrew word “ben”, both of which mean “son”.

It is correct that some of the Old Testament is written in Syriac/Aramaic rather than Hebrew – though this constitutes only a small portion of the total. Though no passages (sentences, paragraphs, chapters) of the New Testament are written in Syriac/Aramaic, it does include some words and phrases – including Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani (Matthew 27:46), Talitha cumi (Mark 5:41), and Maranatha (1 Corinthians 16:22). This creates an appealing affinity of Syriac as a “second language” of both the Old and New Testaments.

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

Do We Need the Old Testament?

“The Old Testament is the cradle in which the Christ child is laid.”  Martin Luther

Do We Need the Old Testament? The Benefits of the Old Testament, as seen in Romans 15:1-13.

The Old Testament provides the historical and theological foundation of New Testament Christianity. Most Christian denominations at least tacitly accept the Old Testament as part of their sacred writings. Searching, I did not find any who explicitly deny the Old Testament, other than the revived Marcionite Christian Church. Their website states, “The Hebrew bible (Old Testament) and the carnal deity portrayed within it, is antithetical to the words and teachings of Jesus Christ...It represents an alien culture and religion diametrically opposed to the God revealed to us through Jesus Christ...”

Marcion of Sinope[i] (ca. AD 95-160) rejected the entire Old Testament and some of the New Testament, focusing on the writings of Paul.  His Bible contained a truncated Gospel of Luke, 10 epistles of Paul—and no Old Testament. Most other Christians rejected him and his views as heretical, and he started his own church circa AD 144.

Though I have not found reference to another Christian denomination that officially rejects the Old Testament, many modernists and liberals view the religion and morals of the Old Testament as primitive. They have no qualms rejecting any parts of the Old Testament they find personally offensive.[ii] Other Christians may find it dull, boring, and hard to read. Still others see it as confusing or irrelevant. Due to these various considerations, many who do not outright reject the Old Testament as part of their sacred scripture nevertheless do not read and study it.

However, the unity of the Old and New Testament Scriptures is an important and edifying truth. Paul illustrates this unity in 1 Timothy 5:18, quoting both the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 25:4) and New Testament (Luke 10:7) as scripture. (See also Galatians 3:24-25, the law as a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ.) In Romans 15:1-13, Paul refers to the Old Testament five times in these 13 verses. He directly lauds and demonstrates its utility.

1 We then that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak, and not to please ourselves. 2 Let every one of us please his neighbour for his good to edification. 3 For even Christ pleased not himself; but, as it is written, The reproaches of them that reproached thee fell on me. 4 For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope. 5 Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: 6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. 7 Wherefore receive ye one another, as Christ also received us to the glory of God. 8 Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers: 9 And that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy; as it is written, For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto thy name. 10 And again he saith, Rejoice, ye Gentiles, with his people. 11 And again, Praise the Lord, all ye Gentiles; and laud him, all ye people. 12 And again, Esaias saith, There shall be a root of Jesse, and he that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles; in him shall the Gentiles trust. 13 Now the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, that ye may abound in hope, through the power of the Holy Ghost.

The Old Testament instructs and admonishes the believers and their churches, verse 4. Cf. 1 Corinthians 10:11. The things written in the Old Testament were not for them alone, but were written and preserved for the learning of those who some come afterward (2 Timothy 2:2). If God had them written and preserved for our instruction and admonition, then the apparent conclusion is that the words should and must be read and studied.

The Old Testament testifies of Christ, verse 3. Cf. Luke 24:25-27; 44-45. Paul refers to Psalm 69:9, as it prophesies and speaks of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament provides an example (vs. 1-3), supporting Paul’s point to the Roman believers that they should care for others, as did our Lord. It promotes unity (vs. 6-7). It confirms promises made to the fathers (v. 8). It shows the promises were not for Abraham’s seed alone, the circumcision, but also foretells the inclusion of the Gentiles (vs. 9-12). In rapid succession draws out this conclusion from Psalm 18:49, Deuteronomy 32:43, Psalm 117:1, and Isaiah 11:10 (in the law, in the prophets, and in the psalms).

The Old Testament teaches us patience, comfort, hope, and unity, verses 4-7, 13. The Old Testament encourages the people of God through his promises and their fulfillment (for example, Matthew 1:22 with Isaiah 7:14). We learn from its record the creation of the world; the origin of sin; the work of God in his providence, his miracles, and his judgements; and the promise of a Saviour (e.g., Genesis 3:15). We see that he is “the God of patience and consolation,” as well as “the God of hope.” We can be fully persuaded that, what God has promised, he is able also to perform.

Yes, the Old Testament is the cradle in which the Christ child is laid, so to speak, promising us a Saviour and promoting our faith, hope, and love. Read it for instruction. Read it for admonition. Read it in unison with the New Testament.


[i] Sinope was a Greek colony in Pontus.
[ii] Apparently, unlike modern liberals, Marcion accepted the historicity of the Old Testament. For example, he believed “the carnal deity portrayed within it” created the world, as taught in Genesis.

Monday, July 15, 2019

The Stone of Help

1 Samuel 7:12 Then Samuel took a stone, and set it between Mizpeh and Shen, and called the name of it Eben-ezer, saying, Hitherto hath the Lord helped us.
Here I raise mine Ebenezer;
Hither by thy help I’m come;
And I hope, by thy good pleasure,
Safely to arrive at home.
Jesus sought me when a stranger,
Wandering from the fold of God;
He, to rescue me from danger,
Interposed his precious blood.
(Robert Robinson, 1758)

Thus far the Lord hath led me on,
Thus far His pow’r prolongs my days;
And ev’ry evening shall make known
Some fresh memorial of His grace.
(Isaac Watts, 1707)

Monday, June 26, 2017

These three men

Ezekiel 14:14 though these three men, Noah, Daniel, and Job, were in it, they should deliver but their own souls by their righteousness, saith the Lord God.[i] See also Ezekiel 14:12-21.

In this prophecy of Ezekiel the expression “these three men” is used three times, in verses 14, 16 and 18. The three names of the three men – Noah, Daniel, and Job – are mentioned twice. Noah, Daniel, and Job are examples of righteousness. Noah is described as having “found grace in the eyes of the Lord…a just man and perfect in his generations,” and one who “walked with God” (Genesis 6:8-9). By faith he built an ark (Hebrews 11:7). Daniel is a prophet (Matthew 24:15; Mark 13:14) who is “a man greatly beloved” (Daniel 9:23; Daniel 10:11), who separated himself to God in the midst of his servitude in Babylon (Daniel 1:3-8). He remained faithful in the face of death (Daniel 6:4-10). Job was a man “perfect and upright…one that feared God, and eschewed evil” and there was “none like him in the earth” (Job 1:1-8; 2:3). His faith sustained him when all he had was lost (Job 1:20-22).

In contrast to the prophecy of Ezekiel in the present situation, these three men had each been the means of delivering others. Noah prepared an ark to the saving of his house, and was the means of preservation of human life on the earth (Genesis 6:18; (Hebrews 11:7). Daniel interpreted Nebuchadnezzar’s dream and was thereby the means of saving his friends, as well as the other wise men of Babylon (Daniel 2:5; 16-18; 47-49). Job prayed for his friends, with whom the Lord was displeased, and God accepted his intercession for them (Job 42:7-10) – a living lesson on the mercy of God (James 5:11).

Despite the recognized righteousness of these men – men whose names were connected with deliverance – Ezekiel warns that even such as these three could not delay the judgment on God on these people. Even were there dwelling in Jerusalem well-known righteous men from either past or present – it would be no benefit to them. There would be no stay of the sentence through their intercession (Cf. Jeremiah 15:1). There would be no repeal of punishment for their presence (Cf. Genesis 18:23; Genesis 18:32). Matthew Henry wrote, “But a people that had filled the measure of their sins, was not to expect to escape for the sake of any righteous men living among them; not even of the most eminent saints...” God is longsuffering, but we must not presume upon it (2 Peter 3:9-10). He knows how to separate the righteous from the wicked (2 Peter 2:9), and ultimately the wicked will perish (Psalm 37:38). There is judgment surely coming that will not be restrained (Psalm 7:9).


[i] Adonai Jehovah; Notice here, since the word Adonai/Lord is present that YHWH/Jehovah is translated God and placed in small caps.

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Is the book of Job historical?

Question: Is the book of Job a true story or an allegory?

The protagonist of the story is identified by name (Job) and gender (man), and located by place (land of Uz). The story of Job is presented to the reader as history. The story tells about a man, gives his name, mentions where he lived, and provides details about his life, his family, his friends and his calamity. Cf. e.g. Job 1:1-5; Job 2:9-13; Job 42:10-16.

Two biblical writers – one in the Old Testament and one in the New Testament – refer to Job as an historical person. Ezekiel lists Job along with two known historical persons, Noah and Daniel (Ezekiel 14:14-20). James cites “the prophets” generally (the prophets were real historical people) as examples of suffering and patience – and then names Job as a credible historical figure of whom they had heard, whose example might comfort the suffering by demonstrating the mercy and compassion of God (James 5:10-11).

The concluding material about Job – especially about his daughters – has the earmarks of an historical record rather than a fictional account. The names of his three daughters, their extraordinary beauty and their receiving equal inheritance with their brothers does not seem particularly pertinent to concluding an allegory on suffering. On the other hand, it adds a fine touch to concluding the historical record of a man who suffered greatly (Job 42:14-15).

Sunday, June 18, 2017

Tamar and Onan, reprise

Genesis 38:6-10 And Judah took a wife for Er his firstborn, whose name was Tamar. And Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the LORD; and the LORD slew him. And Judah said unto Onan, Go in unto thy brother’s wife, and marry her, and raise up seed to thy brother. And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother’s wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother. And the thing which he did displeased the LORD: wherefore he slew him also.

The act of one Onan, son of Judah, son of Jacob, has given us the English word “Onanism” – Onan + “ism,” a suffix used in the formation of nouns denoting action or practice, therefore related to act of Onan.[i] It is most often used to refer to masturbation (and Genesis 38:6-10 is therefore used as a proof text against such an act), but sometimes used to refer to coitus interruptus. What actually occurred in this recorded case?

The key is found in the euphemism “he went in unto.” This phrase is used in Genesis and elsewhere in the Old Testament to refer to sexual intercourse. Note these examples:
  • Genesis 16:4 - And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived: and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.
  • Genesis 29:23 - And it came to pass in the evening, that he took Leah his daughter, and brought her to him; and he went in unto her.
  • Genesis 30:4 - And she gave him Bilhah her handmaid to wife: and Jacob went in unto her.
  • Genesis 38:2 - And Judah saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite, whose name was Shuah; and he took her, and went in unto her.
  • Judges 16:1 - Then went Samson to Gaza, and saw there an harlot, and went in unto her.
  • Ruth 4:13 - So Boaz took Ruth, and she was his wife: and when he went in unto her, the LORD gave her conception, and she bare a son.
  • II Samuel 12:24 - And David comforted Bathsheba his wife, and went in unto her, and lay with her: and she bare a son, and he called his name Solomon: and the LORD loved him.
  • II Samuel 16:22 - So they spread Absalom a tent upon the top of the house; and Absalom went in unto his father’s concubines in the sight of all Israel.
  • Ezekiel 23:44 - Yet they went in unto her, as they go in unto a woman that playeth the harlot: so went they in unto Aholah and unto Aholibah, the lewd women.
We see in these examples that “went in unto” clearly refers to the sex act. Onan’s sin was not masturbation in front of his brother’s wife. Onan rejected the established levirate marriage custom,[ii] while abusing the system and using it as an occasion to enjoy sexual pleasure with his deceased brother’s wife – while he disdained his obligation to raise up an heir in his brother’s name.


[i] Onan is also mentioned by name in Genesis 46:12, Numbers 26:19 and I Chronicles 2:3.
[ii] Levirate marriage is marriage in which the brother of a deceased man is obliged to marry his brother’s widow, when the deceased brother has no children. Cf. Deuteronomy 25:5-10. The post from which this is reprised is found HERE.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

7 things about the first 7 days

The word "day" is used three ways in the Bible -- an entire revolution of the earth (i.e. 24 hours); the period of time between sunrise and sunset (i.e. daylight); or some unspecified period of time (i.e. figurative). This would introduce the possibility that the "days" of creation -- those mentioned in the first chapter of Genesis -- might theoretically be any one of these. Which is it?

7 reasons that the first 7 days are 24-hour days rather than 1000-year days or extended periods of time
1. Though "day" is sometimes used of prolonged periods, in all five of Moses' books (the Pentateuch) when "day" is used with a numerical adjective, its meaning is restricted to a literal 24-hour day. Genesis One is no exception.
2. The specific mention of "evening" and "morning" indicates that the Bible is speaking of 24-hour days. These terms would be meaningless if referring to some unknown period of time. Evening and morning refer to a 24-hour day; Bible days began at sunset rather than at midnight as our days (Cf. Gen. 1:5; Exod. 12:18; Lev. 23:32).
3. If the evening were the first half of an extended period of time and the morning the second half, what happened to the plants created on the third day when the evening of the fourth day came? Could they survive 500 years of darkness? The same goes for the animals.
4. Adam was 930 years old when he died (Cf. Gen. 5:5). If Genesis One days were 1000-year periods, Adam would have been over 1000 years old on the second day of his existence, and over 2000 by the time he died -- since he was created on the sixth day. The first seven days were the same kind of days Adam lived all of his life, and by which the days of his life were counted. If each day were a 1000 years, Adam would have been around 334,800,000 years old when he died. 
5. Why would it take God 6000 years to create the world? God didn't need 1000-year days -- it's the theistic evolutionists who need that period of time to explain their views. The Genesis account tells of a God who spoke and things came into existence.
6. None said these days were ages before the scientists said the earth was billions of years old. The motive behind lengthening the first seven days is make the Bible conform to science -- to fit the belief that the earth if billions of years old. Many scientific theories oppose God's Word. No proven scientific fact disagrees with the Bible. Should scientists ever arrive at the truth, they will find Bible-believers are already there!
7. Man's six work days correspond precisely to God's six work days. Man's day of rest corresponds to God's day of rest. Man's seven-day week is the same as God's seven-day week. See Exodus 20:8-11. 

The first seven days are the same kind of days as our 24-hour days -- the first week a week by which all weeks thereafter are patterned. The truth is plain and simple in Genesis, if we have eyes to see and aren't searching for something else.

Thursday, February 07, 2013

5 Reasons for a Universal Flood


Was the flood of Noah's day universal? Is the Genesis flood account a myth or perhaps an exaggerated story of a local flood? Some scientists deny the possibility of a universal flood. The modernist scoffs at such an idea. The Bible-believing Christian must decide. What does the Bible say? Is there evidence?

Here are five biblical reasons that Noah's flood was universal:
1. God's intent was to destroy the entire human race from off the face of the earth (i.e., except Noah's family). See Genesis 6:12-17. A local flood would not have fulfilled God's purpose of judging the entire population for their sinfulness.
2. If the flood had been only local, the ark would have been unnecessary. God could have simply told Noah to leave the area before the flood and to return when the flood waters had abated.
3. The terminology used throughout the account indicates an event of universal proportions. In Genesis chapters 6-8, "the earth" is used 34 times; "every" 14 times; "everything" 11 times; "all flesh" 8 times; "all" 7 times; "filled" and "whole" twice. An expression such as "under the whole heaven" (Gen. 7:19) cannot be reduced to apply to a local area.
4. To cover the Ararat mountains (Gen. 7:20), whose highest peak is almost 17,000 feet, would require a universal flood. Water seeks its own level. The whole earth would have been covered at least to that depth.
5. God's promise to Noah after the flood -- Genesis 9:11 -- is a promise of universal rather than local application.

The preponderance of biblical evidence favors a universal flood. Will you believe it?

Saturday, June 23, 2012

The use of Old Testament Scripture

...in New Testament times.

The gospel that Paul preached was according to the Old Testament scriptures - I Corinthians 15:1-4.

Philip preached Jesus to the eunuch using the Old Testament scriptures in Isaiah - Acts 8:35.

Paul demonstrated that Jesus was the Christ from the Old Testament scriptures - Acts 17:1-4.

Bereans believed as a result of searching the Old Testament scriptures - Acts 17:10-12.

Apollos convinced Jews in Achaia that Jesus was the Christ using the Old Testament scriptures - Acts 18:28.

The Old Testament scriptures testify of Christ - John 5:29.

The Old Testament scriptures are able to make one wise unto salvation - II Timothy 3:15.

The Old Testament scriptures teach salvation by faith - Romans 4:3; 10:8-11; Galatians 3:8,22; I Peter 2:6.

Friday, February 16, 2007

The Gospel in Isaiah

Isaiah 9:6-7 is a great prophecy of Christ. It shows HOW He came into the world, WHO He really is, WHY He came, and WHAT He accomplished--

“For unto us a child is born,”- This speaks of His holy, sinless humanity, conceived in the virgin’s womb by the Holy Spirit. Christ is the ‘seed of woman,’ (Genesis 3:15).
“unto us a son is given:” This speaks of His eternal deity. His godly nature was not created or born. He is the eternal Son of God, Alpha and Omega, having no beginning and no end. He is the great ‘I AM’ (John 8:58).
“and the government shall be upon His shoulder,”- This speaks of WHY He came. It was to fulfill ALL THE CONDITIONS and REQUIREMENTS of the salvation of God’s elect. This is the government of grace, and all grace is in Christ (John 1:17).
“and His name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The Mighty God, the Everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace.” This describes His Person in all the facets of His glory as the Redeemer and the Lord of His people (Colossians 1:19; 2:9; 2 Corinthians 4:6).
"Of the increase of His government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon His kingdom,”- This describes the ASSURED FRUIT AND RESULT OF HIS FINISHED WORK, for “He SHALL save His people from their sins,” (Matthew 1:21). The ‘throne of David’ is the messianic throne of Christ our Redeemer. ‘His kingdom’ is His church whom He redeemed by His own blood.
"to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever." THIS DESCRIBES HIS FINISHED WORK ON THE CROSS. God is both just and justifier as the sins of God’s elect were imputed to Christ and His righteousness was imputed to them (Romans 3:24-26; 2 Corinthians 5:21).
“The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.” This shows how ALL of salvation is of the Lord, by His power, and for His glory.


-- Bill Parker, Ashland, KY, from the Bulletin of Shreveport Grace Church, 14 January 2007