Translate

Showing posts with label Socialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Socialism. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 29, 2024

The Socialist Singing Orator: Prof. E. F. Stanton

Introduction

“Rev. E. F. Stanton is styled the ‘singing orator’ and is an ordained minister of the Baptist church.”[i] 

In my rambles of research, I ran across an “odd duck” – a preacher and music teacher who was also a lecturer on the Socialist circuit in the early 1900s. This seemed sort of incongruous to me. Here is a bit of the story of Ernest F. Stanton.

Birth/Family/Marriage/Children

Ernest F. Stanton was born in Alabama in March of 1864, to parents William Henry Stanton and Elmyra Antoinette Phillips. Born in Georgia, they married in Alabama, before eventually coming to Arkansas and finally Comanche County, Texas.

E. F. married Florence Zeriah Sturkie of neighboring Erath County, on May 12, 1887 in Erath County, Texas. They had nine children, including Henry Eugene Stanton (1892–1956), Paul Otis Stanton (1894–1969), Cora Stanton Wattenberger (1898–1949), Lawrence Edwin Moore Stanton (1900–1996), Emmette Owen/Olen Stanton (1903–1965), and four whose names are lost to posterity. Based on the 1900 and 1910 censuses, the Stantons lost four children between the time of their marriage in 1887 and the 1900 census taken June 9, 1900.[ii]

Ernest and Florence Stanton made an unfortunate splash in Oklahoma newspapers in the second decade of the 20th century, when he filed for divorce in February 1916.[iii] This was reported all across the state. This action may have been dismissed, as his wife later sued for divorce in 1919 “on the grounds of Desertion and gross neglect of duty.”[iv]

Ernest F. Stanton in U. S. Federal Censuses:

  • 1870 Opelika, Lee County, Alabama; At home
  • 1880 6th district, Comanche County, Texas; At home, farmer
  • 1900 Duke, Greer County, Oklahoma; Music, vocal & instrumental
  • 1910 Wellington, Collingsworth County, Texas; Teacher of music
  • 1920 War Eagle, Benton County, Arkansas; Music Teacher
  • 1930 Precinct 5, Smith County, Texas; Teacher, music

Newspaper mentions suggest Stanton moved a lot and lived in a number of other places, including in Arkansas: Larue (ca 1923); Oklahoma: Duke (ca 1902);[v] Davidson (ca 1907),[vi] Oklahoma City (ca 1907), Altus (ca 1911),[vii] Hobart (ca 1916) Lone Wolf (1918); Texas: Gorman (ca 1905), Wellington (ca 1910),[viii] Hamlin (ca 1912), Rochester (ca 1912), Smith County (1914). It is possible, however, that the newspaper reports could have gotten some of the locations wrong. Additionally, this may indicate places he lived temporarily as he traveled to teach and lecture. His death certificate (1934) states, suggests, or at least implies that his residence was in Hood County, Texas before he entered the Austin State Hospital.[ix] He had been a resident at the State Hospital for four months and 10 days (from 6/27/1934) at the time of his death (11/7/1934).

His Work

Ernest F. Stanton was a music teacher, songwriter, Baptist minister, debater, and socialist lecturer (he was listed as a farmer in the 1880 census). He actively participated in gospel singing conventions. He compiled the song book Home and Church Songs, and perhaps others. He served as an assistant editor on some other songbooks, such as Our Thankful Songs: a New Collection of Choice Gospel Songs for Prayer, Praise, and Gospel Meetings, by the A. J. Showalter Company.

Singing schools.

In connection with his music work, Stanton itinerated to teaching singing schools. For example, he taught in Proctor, Texas in 1892; Prairie Home, Oklahoma in 1900; Quartz, Oklahoma in 1902; Martha, Oklahoma in 1904: Durant, Oklahoma in 1913; Cameron, Oklahoma in 1923; Fairview, Oklahoma in 1925. These probably only represent a small portion of the singing schools he taught. In connection with this work, he was often called “Professor E. F. Stanton.” His primary fields of labor were Texas and Oklahoma.

Orator.

E. F. Stanton is labeled as a Baptist minister on several occasions. There is no evidence that he was ever a pastor, and his primary religious work was probably itinerant evangelism. Additionally, most newspaper accounts of his oratory skills refer to lectures on the subject of Socialism – suggesting he was more of an evangelist for social reform than religious revival.

When Stanton lectured at the schoolhouse at Texola, Oklahoma in 1907, the reporter found the auditors listening attentively to the entire speech, except for a “few of the younger persons who like fiction more than facts, fun more than logic” who left the building when the lectures began.[x] Likewise a Socialist Justice periodical that same year described that in a courthouse speech “For two hours the ‘Singing Orator’ held the audience spell-bound with the glorious Gospel of Socialism.” Stanton himself wrote that he “Lectured at one place before a large audience. Every man was converted to Socialism except one old man who just returned from the asylum.”[xi]

A blurb in a Pentecostal Church of the Nazarene periodical in 1918 suggests that E. F. Stanton might have been connected with that denomination at the time. On the other hand, it may be that Stanton was only ever loosely connected to the Baptists, and that his moving ministry was inclusive of all denominations.

Herald of Holiness (Kansas City, Missouri), Vol. 6, No. 45, February 13, 1918, p. 16

Debate.

Stanton engaged in debates promoting Socialism. (Newspapers mention some that failed to make.) In 1910 a four-days debate with J. L. Davis rendered for Socialism “a powerful victory,” gaining 20 new members to the Wilmoth, Oklahoma local Socialist group.[xii] I found no records of religious debates.

Other.

E. F. Stanton authored several booklets, including The Fall of Babylon (possibly a poem) and What Socialism Is and Why It Should Prevail (Gerard, KS: Appeal to Reason, 1909).

In 1910, Stanton applied for and received a patent on a crude oil burner.

In 1918, the Herald of Holiness blurb calls Stanton the president of the Stanton Art Company.

Death

Ernest F. Stanton traveled extensively in Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas – and perhaps other places not now known. He seems to have been most active in Oklahoma. Perhaps the people of this young state overall were more friendly to his Socialist views. It is not hard to imagine how this belief could have hindered him in this period. Many Christians associated Socialism with atheism. In the context of challenging Stanton to debate, Luther Roberts also announced an address on the subject in which he would “charge, and prove, that socialism was hatched in atheism and that it is today atheistic and anti-religious.” [xiii]

Stanton’s life ended in the state where it began, Texas. He spent the last four months (and 10 days) of his life at the Austin State Hospital, Travis County, Texas, and died while there. His death certificate says he is buried there in the State Asylum Cemetery. Thus ended the career of the Socialist Singing Orator.

Three songs by E. F. Stanton


[i]Socialist Lectures,” Fort Worth Telegram, Friday, August 23, 1907, p. 9. Stanton is called the “singing orator” in a number of papers in Texas and Oklahoma (his primary base of operation). For example, Justice, June 7, 1907; The Comanche News, May 31, 1904; et al.
[ii] I searched Find-A-Grave and did not find any likely burials on that site for these children.
[iii] He complained that she was “nervous, quarrelsome and irritably disposed” to such a degree “to break up his health and injure his mental equilibrium and physical health.” “Enough After 29 Years,” The Weekly Democrat-Chief (Hobart, Oklahoma), Thursday, February 17, 1916, p. 1.
[iv] “Suit for Divorce,” The Mangum Star, Thursday, December 18, 1919, p. 3. The divorce may have been granted, as he is not in the censuses with his wife in 1920 and 1930, or they may have simply lived as separated. E. F. Stanton is listed as “widowed” in those censuses (his wife was not dead), and “separated” on his death certificate.
[v] “23 Years Ago,” Altus Times-Democrat, Friday, December 25, 1925, p. 10.
[vi] “Who Opposes Socialism,” Justice (Duncan Oklahoma), Friday, June 7, 1907, p. 6. It is possible that Davidson was not where he lived, but where he was on his lecture circuit when he wrote to the newspaper. (Justice appears to be a Socialist newspaper.)
[vii] Altus Weekly News, Thursday, June 8, 1911, p. 2.
[viii] Ibid.
[ix] “Hood County, Texas” is entered over the line “If non-residence give city, or town and state.” For profession, the death certificate lists “Laborer.” This must be information collected from his records at the hospital, since the informant is “Austin State Hospital Records.”
[x] “Noted Musician Lectures Here,” The Texola Herald, Friday, August 9, 1907, p. 1.
[xi] “Who Opposes Socialism,” Justice (Duncan Oklahoma), Friday, June 7, 1907, p. 6.
[xii] “Debate At Wilmoth,” The Oklahoma Pioneer (Oklahoma City), Saturday, December 17, 1910, p. 3; The debate was held at the Cottonwood Schoolhouse near Wilmoth, beginning November 21, 1910, “on the question: ‘Resolved, That Socialism Would be to the Best Interest of the People of the United States.” Stanton favored, and Rev. J. L. Davis of Bluffdale, Texas opposed. “Debate Near Wilmoth,” The Oklahoma Pioneer, Saturday, November 12, 1901, p. 4.
[xiii]Speaking at Teacross,” Hollis Post-Herald, Thursday, January 26, 1911, p. 1.

1904 Showalter Company Advertisement

Thursday, January 06, 2022

Rules for thee

...and not for me.

Excerpts from DeSantis Spokeswoman Reveals How AOC’s Florida Trip Is Something Even Worse Than Hypocrisy.
AOC’s behavior is not hypocrisy — it is HIERARCHY. By openly flouting the same rules that she pushes on her constituents, she is signaling that she is powerful and does not have to abide by the same restrictions as the peasants...

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, San Francisco Mayor London Breed, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, have all been among big left-wing names caught publicly breaking the very rules they preach when it comes to the pandemic.

And, of course, there’s President Joe Biden, whose contradictory statements and behavior when it comes to the coronavirus would be the stuff of late-night comedians, if the country had any late-night comedians left who were actually interested in political comedy.

Friday, June 21, 2019

Jesus is the Christ, the Lord, the Son of God

According to the New Testament, Jesus is the Christ, the Lord, the Son of God (John 20:311 Corinthians 12:31 John 4:15). More recent uninspired writers, dwelling on a lower plain, tell us that Jesus is a Capitalist or Jesus is a Socialist.[i] The modus operandi seems to be to enlist Jesus in support of one’s social and political philosophy rather than build a biblical philosophy that governs how Christians comprehensively engage the world around them.

In Jesus Was a Socialist, Chuck McKnight brings forth some good points from the Bible that check greed, challenge preconceived ideas, and at the least gives pause to confused capitalistic contentions. Nevertheless, he cherry picks Bible accounts that tend toward his point, fails to engage them earnestly, and miserably confuses the kingdom of God and human government. In Jesus was a Capitalist, Bryan Fischer focuses on one text – the parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14-30). Fischer’s tack seems to be showing that one exception to the “socialist rule” demonstrates the whole of the socialism argument is wrong. However, in doing so he fails to engage any number of texts that are pressed forward in the service of socialism. Both miss the mark. In attempting to conscript Jesus, we fail to follow Jesus.

Before moving forward, let’s define capitalism and socialism. According to Oxford English Dictionariescapitalism is “An economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state” and socialism is “A political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.”

My contention is that Jesus is not a capitalist and Jesus is not a socialist. We should not look for him to side with us, but we should get on his side. Jesus is the Christ, the Lord, the Son of God and his kingdom is not of this world. We are his ambassadors while we are here in the world. We are called to go, preach the gospel, and make disciples – not of capitalism, not of socialism, but of our Lord Jesus Christ. Sometimes it may look like we agree with capitalism; sometimes it may look like we agree with socialism.[ii] Who cares? Do we agree with the Bible, and our Lord Jesus Christ who wrote it? That is the question.

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.


[i] There is even a 2010 book titled Jesus Was a Capitalist, by Susie Wells and David S. Wells III.
[ii] Feeding the hungry, giving water to the thirsty, welcoming the stranger, clothing the naked, caring for the sick, and having concern for captives are mentioned and esteemed in the Bible (cf. Proverbs 25:21, Matthew 25:35-40, Deuteronomy 10:18, Matthew 14:14, Luke 4:18). On the other hand, Jesus indicates that there is more to kingdom business than feeding the poor (John 12:4-8), and approves private ownership (Matthew 20:1, Luke 15:12, Luke 16:12; cf. Acts 5:1-4). The kingdom of God is radical in nature and cannot be subsumed under some partisan political program. Jesus commends enterprise and condemns greed (Matthew 25:14-28, Luke 12:15-21). Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: for where your treasure is, there will your heart be also...seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness.

Monday, March 25, 2019

Trying to cure leukemia with leeches

No theory of government was ever given a fairer test or a more prolonged experiment in a democratic country than democratic socialism received in Britain. Yet it was a miserable failure in every respect...To cure the British disease with socialism was like trying to cure leukemia with leeches.
Margaret Thatcher, The Downing Street Years (HarperCollins, 1993)

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

The Bible and Democratic Socialism

Thanks to Obery M. Hendricks Jr. (a Religion and African American Studies professor at Columbia University) we now know that The Biblical Values of Ocasio-Cortez’s Democratic Socialism is better than sliced bread, on the top shelf with the views of Martin Luther King, Jr., and that democratic socialism is “strikingly similar” to the Bible while capitalism is not. I will make no defense of modern capitalism as it operates in the U.S., and will stipulate it often does not look very biblical. However, Hendricks Jr. clearly must cherry-pick both the views of Ocasio-Cortez and the Bible to make them fit into the package he is trying to sell.

Hendricks writes, “Democratic socialism seeks to build a more humane society, not by force or compulsion, but by way of the age-old democratic practice of ‘one person, one vote’.”[i] Democrat Socialists in the United States work within the democratic system we have – because that is the system that we have![ii] Nevertheless, compulsion forced by 50.1% on 49.9% is no less compulsion just because the majority voted to compel. Social control may take milder forms like compelling drivers to wear seat belts, or the state may take ownership of the rain that falls on one’s property.[iii]

Mr. Hendricks highlights several areas where he believes the Bible and democratic socialism “share the same essential concerns.” He is partially correct, but falls short of giving a full picture (whether through ignorance, deceit, or political posturing I cannot tell). Here are a few points from The Biblical Values of Ocasio-Cortez’s Democratic Socialism by Hendricks, and we will also notice some of Ocasio-Cortez’s own platform.[iv]

“The Bible and democratic socialism preach that governments should enact policies that address the needs of the poor, provide equal access to opportunity, and legislate policies that curb inequity.” Here the author cites Psalm 72:1-2, 4 – a text that speaks of the perfect government by the eternal one who perfects all justice. However, this text – and any other of which I am aware – falls short of preaching that a government should enact the specific policies of democratic socialists. God is quite capable of enacting perfect political policy. I do not trust others to do so; they have their own interests at heart. So far as I can tell, biblically speaking, for human consumption we have the Old Testament model of Israel and the New Testament statements that government generically exists to suppress evil and punish the evildoer.

“Jesus modeled universal health care by healing everyone who asked, regardless of their gender, nationality or ability to pay.”[v] Definite cherry picking here! The author picks Jesus’s 3-1/2 year ministry out of the entirety of human history. Even then, according to Hendricks’s own testimony, Jesus only healed “everyone who asked” – not everyone in the world who was sick. (Cf. Mark 6:5-7.) On the one hand, Jesus – by his own power, with compassion, borrowing nothing from others – healed those who came to him. On the other hand, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the Democratic Socialists wants a single payer health care system but must take from others to bring it to pass.

“Prophets consistently excoriated those exploiting their employees” (Jeremiah 22:13,17). Obviously, the law, the prophets, Jesus, and the New Testament support treating workers fairly – neither exploiting nor abusing them (Leviticus 19:13; Malachi 3:5; Luke 10:7; Colossians 4:1; James 5:4). In the hands of the Democratic Socialists this often morphs into a “minimum income for everyone” (see below) and removing the rights of the laborer to negotiate with his employer what they together can agree is a fair wage. Quite honestly, it seems that both socialists and capitalists struggle to explain Jesus’s parable of the labourers in the vineyard (Matthew 20:1-16).

Concerning a “minimum income for everyone” and “fair treatment of workers,” Obery Hendricks Jr. cites the Old Testament books of Leviticus (25:35-36) and Deuteronomy (24:14) to prove his point. True enough, we should show compassion on the poor and treat others fairly, though spinning this into a “minimum income for everyone” is enough to send one into an eisegetical tailspin. It is equally telling that many of the same ones who go to the law to support these points will throw a conniption hissy fit at those who use the same law against the practice of homosexuality. The same book that says take care of the poor also says, “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them” (Leviticus 20:13). The same book that says do not oppress the hired servant also says, “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God” (Deuteronomy 22:5). Yet Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Democratic Socialism favors both homosexuality and transvestism.

Neither Democratic Socialism nor Democratic Capitalism is biblical Christianity, regardless of what places they may intersect – or where advocates draw in an intersection that is not there. Is any politician or political pundit, left or right, looking for the full biblical picture? I suspect not. The goal is to pick out Bible verses that seem to support one’s position, the full biblical context notwithstanding. The socialist who loves to tax and tell people what is best for them will likely overlook biblical texts that speak askance of oppressive taxation and conscription (1 Samuel 8:10-22) or promote private ownership (Acts 5:3-4).[vi] The capitalist who loves money will doubtless overlook texts that condemn such love (1 Timothy 6:10), exhort to godly service (Luke 16:13), and to use money to do good to others (Ephesians 4:28).

Let us as Christians extract biblical Christianity from the political debate – not in the sense of leaving politics devoid of the great influences of the Bible, but in the sense of not trying to make the Bible fit our political philosophies! If one starts committed to the philosophy of socialism and looks in the Bible, the searcher will probably find it there. If one starts committed to the philosophy of capitalism and looks in the Bible, the searcher will probably find it there. Christians may struggle to develop a consistent political philosophy (assuming we need one), but it is not hard to know that individually we should “love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and love thy neighbour as thyself.” May God help us to start with the “philosophy” that the Bible is the word of God, the source of all truth, and search to find the truth.

Acts 17:11
These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

John 5:39
Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.


[i] Definitions of socialism, social democracy, and democratic socialism seem to fluctuate and it can be hard to distinguish them. Here are a few:
“Socialism can be defined as ‘a system of social organization in which private property and the distribution of income are subject to social control.” Business Insider
“At the root of our socialism is a profound commitment to democracy, as means and end. As we are unlikely to see an immediate end to capitalism tomorrow, DSA fights for reforms today that will weaken the power of corporations and increase the power of working people.” Democratic Socialists of America
Socialism is “a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.” EnOxfordDictionaries
“Social democracy is a political, social, and economic ideology that supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and capitalist economy.” Wikipedia
[ii] When the DSA writes, “…we are unlikely to see an immediate end to capitalism tomorrow…” it is reasonable to believe that they would like to see the end of capitalism.
[iii] When It Rains in Oregon, the State Owns the Raindrops –  “The state graciously allows you to collect water that runs off your roof directly into a rain barrel, but ‘if that water touches the ground, it is the property of the state of Oregon, and you cannot collect it without a permit’.”
[iv] Platform of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s avowed democratic socialism includes housing as a human right (though the Son of man had “not where to lay his head”), would squelch advocacy by require Congress “to take no money from the gun lobby or private equity companies that invest in the firearms industry” (though Jesus said ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free), and would require the government to provide “open access to affordable abortions” (though Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven; and the Bible teaches man is made in the image of God).
[v] Of course, when they’re not trying to make this point about universal health care, the Democratic Socialist types don’t mind accusing “Jesus the racist of heinous crimes against The Syrophenician Woman.
[vi] Here even in the context of the voluntary community aspects of the church at Jerusalem.