Translate

Tuesday, August 13, 2024

Memoir of Elder Elijah Hanks

Baptist preacher of Tennessee.

MEMOIR OF ELDER ELIJAH HANKS [1793-1871]

By S. C. Evins, 1872

Chapter I.

ELDER ELIJAH HANKS, the subject of this memoir, was born on the 12th of December, 1793, in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. His parents were devoted Christians, and members of the Baptist Church. They removed to Kentucky when he was but five years old, where they remained for several years. In the year 1810 they came to Tennessee, when it was but little more than a wilderness, and one vast canebrake. The Red-men had scarcely left his hunting-grounds when the Baptists planted the standard of the Cross, and erected rude cabins in which to worship the God of our fathers. In those early days, the facilities of acquiring an education, in Tennessee, were very few; consequently Elder Hanks, like most of the boys raised in that day, obtained but a limited education; but, being possessed of an indomitable will, and a strong constitution, he went forth in his daily labor, aiding his older brothers in subduing the forests, and making way for the plowshare. Thus he grew up to manhood, inured to hard and incessant toil, and hardly possessing the rudiments of a common English education. He was taught, however, to respect the worship of God, and although he grew up irreligious, he was quite moral in his habits, and regular in his attendance at church on Sundays. At the early age of nineteen years he was united in marriage to Miss Mary Wolverton, who proved a helpmeet indeed in all his arduous labors, till God took her home. They commenced the journey of married life together, neither of them being professors of religion. Like thousands of others, with them the family alter was entirely neglected. But God had a work for them to do though as yet they knew it not. Elder Hanks was endowed with an untiring energy, and such A powerful constitution that, in after life, he was enabled to do an amount of labor, both physical and mental, that seems almost incredible. But few men possessed the power of endurance that he did. Thus much information of the early life of Elder Hanks we have gleaned from reliable sources.

Chapter II. In this chapter we give the manner of, and some of the circumstances attending, his conversion and call to the work of the Ministry, as related by himself to the author of this memoir.

“My impressions, at times, were very strong to call on sinners to come to the Savior; but, when I thought of my inability for this important work, I would shrink from the cross. Being almost entirely without an education, I thought if I attempted such a thing, I would only disgrace the cause and myself. Finally, I was brought low on the bed of affliction. I felt guilty before God, for not doing what I sometimes thought was my duty, and I promised God that if he would restore me to health again I would do the best I could. I had a very long spell of fever, but finally, through the mercy of God, I was restored to health. Then my promise to God was arrayed before me, and I prayed to God, time and again, to make known to me, plainly, my duty, and I promised to perform it the best I could. I recollect one day, while I was on my knees at prayer, the curse inflicted on Jonah, for disobedience, passed before my mind, and I believed if I failed to yield to impressions, which I often had, that the frowns of God would rest upon me. The Pastor of our church, Elder Dodson, lived some distance away, and he was only with us once a month; and my brother-in-law had similar feelings to my own, he and I held prayer meetings, which greatly assisted me, our church cooperating with us. We held meetings .at night, from house to house, two or three nights in the week, and would give exhortations. The Lord greatly revived his work. In a few weeks there were about sixty added to the church. Sometimes, while telling what the Lord had done for poor sinners, it seemed the greatest privilege that I ever enjoyed; at other times I thought that I had disgraced myself and the cause of Christ, and that I had better quit; and if it had not been for the kind treatment and encouragement given me by the church, I should have faltered by the way. In a short time the Church licensed me to preach, and in a few months I was set apart to the full work of the ministry, by a Presbytery consisting of Elders Hobbs and Dodson.

Chapter III., After his ordination he was called to the Pastorship of the Knob Creek church, of which he was a member, it having ceased to be an arm of the Rutherford’s Creek church, as it had been constituted into an independent church. He says: “I was called to take charge of this church, soon after my ordination, and as my views on the Atonement were nearly the same with those of Brethern Dodson and Hobbs, for a time all seemed to move on in harmony. These two ministers were the only ones, in the Cumberland Association, who agreed with me on the extent of the Atonement made for the world by the sufferings of’ our Savior.” But in a short time one of them died, and the other moved away, leaving him alone to plead the clause that he had espoused with all his heart. About this time he was called to the care of the Friendship Baptist church, twelve miles south of Columbia. He accepted the invitation, and entered at once upon his duties as the Pastor of this church.

At this time, Elder Hanks tells us, there existed very dissimilar views between himself and other Ministers on the Atonement: that they taught some things which he believed were contrary to the teachings of the Scriptures; and that he could not preach his views fully without crossing the views of his preaching brethern. At first, he tells us, they treated him kindly, telling him that by reading and meditation he would see differently. He says: “Some were teaching that a covenant was made, before the foundation of the world, between the Father and the Son, and that the Church was given to the Son by the Father; that the Son agreed, on his part, to come into this world, to suffer and die for those whom the Father had given him in that covenant, and that all for whom he died would be saved. Sometimes they would preach that the Church was eternally justified in the mind and wisdom of God--that there was a common and a special call to sinners; the special call could not be resisted; the Spirit quickening the elect alone. In referring to this subject, he says: I did my best to believe this doctrine, as taught by my brethern, for I fully believed them to be honest. I loved them, and it grieved me to the heart that I could not see and believe as they did; for I could be nothing but a Baptist. I read and investigated their proof-texts prayerfully, willing to follow the teachings of God’s word in all things. I felt that I was responsible to God for everything that I taught in His name, and if called to the ministry, it was my duty to preach the whole truth, as I understood it. I believed in the doctrine of election and predestination, as taught in God’s word, but not as understood and preached by my brethern. Indeed, it was a matter of rejoicing to my poor heart that God did predestinate us to the adoption of children by His Son Jesus Christ, who is mighty and able to save, to the uttermost, all that come unto him; seeing He ever liveth to make intercession for the transgressors. I believed that we are the children of God by faith in Jesus Christ, having been elected according to the foreknowledge of God through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth. In this way I believed and taught the doctrine of election. For I believed that All the happiness that accrues to the children of God, is by faith in Jesus Christ, and not for works. I also believed and taught that Jesus Christ, by the grace of God, had tasted death for every man. This doctrine I proclaimed wherever I went. My very soul burned within me, for I wanted to preach it all over the land, from the rivers to the ends of the earth. I could not find anything in all God’s word that did not harmonize with my cherished views. This made me feel strong in the faith and power of His might. My brethern, however, began to cry out, ‘he is an Arminian! – have nothing to do with him!’ Still I could not hold ‘my peace, but cried the more, in the language of the “Master,’ to all men, ‘Repent, and believe the Gospel. Except ye repent, ye shall all perish; for God commandeth all men, everywhere, to repent. He that believeth not shall be damned. Ye will not come unto me that might have life.’ And with many such Scripture quotations I appealed to the sinners. God blessed my own soul as I preached his precious truth, and also made it the power of God unto salvation to many precious souls.”

Chapter IV. Elder Hanks’s bold and effective manner was not to be tolerated longer, by his brethern holding views on th Atonement differing from his own; accordingly, at the meeting of the Cumberland Association of Baptists, in the year 1829, or near that time, a committee of several brethern was appointed to confer with him and the Knob Creek Church, for nearly all of its members had embraced his views. That committee consisted of Eiders McConnico, Gale and Hunter, their strongest men. They came, bringing others with them. In giving an account of the visit of the committee, Elder hanks says: “I hoped to be able to satisfy them that we were orthodox. It was all in vain; for, although shown from the history of the Baptists, that, years ago, our brethern in Virginia and Kentucky had agreed that the preaching, by a brother that Jesus Christ, by the grace of God had tasted death for every man; or by the preaching by another brother, that he only died for the elect, and that the elect alone have a right to the privileges of the Gospel; should be no bar to church fellowship and communion; and that each party did agree, and had dropped the names by which each had been heretofore distinguished, styling themselves the “United Baptists.” I also showed that I was not the aggressor; for the same doctrine preached by me, was preached by our brethern in other States. After all this, the committee decided that we had departed from the faith, and we were consequently cut off from union with our people. “This was a sore trial to me and the little band, who, like true and trusty friends, as they were, stood by and supported me in the darkest time of my ministerial life. “The church doors, as well as private dwellings were closed against me, and for many months I was denounced as a heretic by those whom I had taught in my early days to love Jesus. The churches were warned to have no fellowship with me. In this lonely condition, I shall never be able to describe my feelings. With not a Baptist Minister near enough to me with whom I could associate, I was shunned and avoided by them all, as if to touch me would contaminate or sully their purity; and except the Knob Creek and the Friendship churches, which had been likewise cut off from the Cumberland Association because they adhered to the views entertained by me, there was not a church in all this part of the State which had any sympathy for me, or those holding similar sentiments.” I have given the foregoing account of Elder Hank’s trials and separation from the Cumberland Association, in nearly his own words, choosing to adopt his own mode of expression rather than my own. How hard it must have been to be severed so unceremoniously from those dear friends and brethern with whom he had been identified ever since he had been in the ministry, none of us at this late date can realize. But our beloved father in the ministry was ready to forsake all for Christ and his truth; and yet he naturally sought and craved the association of his brethern.

Chapter V. I will now give, in his own words, an account of his connection and participation in the “open communion” movement in which the Knob Creek church was once entangled. He says, in his own hand-writing: “Yet I do not say that, in this long and lonely time through which we passed, we lived free from error. My home church and myself drove into open communion, and received one or two Pedo-Baptist immersions. The effect was so different to what we had anticipated, that I was astonished and mortified; for, instead of bringing our Pedo-Baptist friends nearer to us, it only had an opposite tendency, and produced only alienation of feeling, as their Ministers almost forsook us. In the meantime, I went so far as to immerse two Methodists and two Presbyterians in good standing, who desired to be immersed by one who believed it to be the only mode, with. the understanding that they should remain with their respective churches if they wished to do so. In this practice we continued but a short time, for, seeing we did not get the sympathy and encouragement that we expected from them we very soon began to consider the error of what we had done, and whither we had drifted. The result was, that we soon returned and took our former stand, and that too, without the loss of a single member.” He also tells us that for the act of baptizing those persons, he received no thanks from their preachers. “I then thought,” said he, “that I was justified by the case of Phillip, who baptized the eunuch; but long since I have looked upon the act of baptizing their members, and communing with them, as incompatible with the Word of God. And I would, therefore, advise my brethern never to do the same, for when we commune with them at the Lord’s table and receive their baptisms, we certainly endorse their sprinkling and infant baptism. It seems to me that there can be no other fair construction of such acts. Then our members were frequently called Hanksites because we were cut off from our people and could neither ‘pour’ nor ‘sprinkle’ for baptism.” Again Father Hanks says: “I believed that there was too much intelligence in the Baptist Ministry for them to stay long where they then were; so in a few years the division took place--said to be, on the mission question; the one party believing that the Gospel should be sent by the efforts of the churches to the destitute in our own and heathen lands; the other party believing that if God wanted the Gospel preached to the world, He would send it without our aid; and that it would be done through persecution.

Hence each party separated from the other and began to work in their own way.’ I, of course, was found on the mission side of this question, and how my feelings were changed from a state of loneliness to that of joy and pleasure, for many of those who heretofore had held me off at a distance had their eyes opened now, and mutual friendship and good feeling were restored. How thankful I was, no tongue can tell, to meet not only in friendship, but in fellowship, those that I had so dearly loved. I now felt that whilst I was proclaiming a full and free salvation to all men, I had the prayers and sympathy of many warm and loving hearts, who were once estranged from me in feeling. . When the final separation took place in the Knob Creek church we were stronger in numbers than it was at first believed, our number being near one hundred, including all the officers of the church. “About this time the Friendship church was also cut off by the same Association because it endorsed the doctrine that I believed and taught, by retaining me as a pastor.”

Chapter VI.

“With these churches we began our work,” says our brother, amidst the most bitter persecution from many of our former associates in the Ministry. But the good Lord blessed his own truth and soon we began to see the pleasure of the Lord prosper in our midst. In a short time I baptized about forty-five hopeful converts. While our anti-mission brethern were crying ‘Heretic!’ ‘Wildfire!’ ‘Delusion,’ etc., I was permitted to baptize many precious souls into the fellowship of our churches. O how in my soul I magnified the Lord, who had visited his people in mercy. “While we stood alone, I visited my relatives in Kentucky, and there I baptized about fifteen persons. At the same time I baptized a gentleman who lived in Virginia (his name forgotten) and gave him a certificate of his baptism. A few months after my return I received a very pressing request to go back to the same place and take care of my scattered sheep with which I readily complied; and when I reached the place I found the church in a divided condition, two parties having already formed, some endorsing the views that I have preached and others still clinging to the old Antinomian creed, each party claiming to be the church. Those holding views consonant with my own in the meantime had procured the services of a Brother Edwards who lived in the state of Illinois, as their pastor and I at once decided on staying there several days and preaching for them. The other party as soon as I had commenced a meeting sent off immediately after one of their most talented ministers to come and confute the doctrines that I was preaching. The brother responded to their call and next day found him at my meeting. In the meantime his friends requested that I should invite him to preach when he arrived which I readily agreed to do. My appointment was at a private house and as soon as their preacher came, I invited him to preach, to which he agreed, on condition that I should preach first. So I proceeded in the services and being familiar with all the proof-texts, I referred to them, giving my views on the same as I proceeded. However there was one text which I purposely omitted, viz., ‘Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bond- woman shall not be heir with the son of the free woman.’ After I had closed, Brother C. arose and quoted that text and said it referred to the elect and non-elect; the son of the free woman to the elect, and the son of the bond woman to the non-elect. This was all the point made in his whole talk. When he closed I arose and asked the audience whether they would believe Paul or the preacher. Paul said, ‘These are two covenants,’&c. To close the services of the occasion I called on the Presiding Elder of the Methodist church to pray. The brother prayed very fervently that the good Lord might bless the truths preached by the first brother and make them the power of God unto salvation! ‘But O lord,” prayed he, ‘forgive the errors of the second brother, and make him a useful preacher.’ This prayer seemed to enrage the good brother for as soon as I announced the benediction he approached me and in an angry manner asked me if I aimed to insult him? To which I replied, ‘Sir, call on him who made the prayer.’ This he declined to do, and so the matter ended. “That church is still in existence and I am happy to learn in a prosperous condition. May it long continue to exert a salutary influence in the country where it is located. “On returning home, I visited Friendship church at the regular meeting time, where I met with one of the Anti-mission preachers. As my custom was, I invited him to preach for me. He very readily agreed to do so and during his sermon he took occasion to warn the people to shun those who came to them wearing black coats and white cravats and who rubbed their backs against the college walls! ‘for’ he said, ‘he is going about imposing himself on the churches and rending them wherever he goes. All his allusions to black coats, etc., I did not notice in my reply, but stated frankly to them (as to getting rid of me as he called it,) that I had repeatedly told them that if they continued me as their pastor they would certainly be cut off from the Association. They preferred to obey God rather than man and hence they were cut off as I have before stated without ceremony.”

Chapter VII. Thus we see that the strongest efforts were made to prejudice the minds of the people against our brother and if possible to put him down. But he continued to hold up Christ and Him crucified to perishing men inviting sinners to ‘come for all things are now ready,’ amidst the most bitter persecution. God owned his truth, and glorious results followed, wherever he went. Here is another instance of opposition which I give in his own words: “As I was on my way,” says he, “to fill an appointment in Hickman county, at a place called Gray’s Bend, the road was strange to me and seeing a gentleman and lady just ahead I hurried up my horse until I came up with them. On inquiring about the road, they stated that they were going to hear Hanks preach--’the man that was rending the churches all over the land.’ My reply was: ‘He must be a very bad fellow if what you say of him is true. I believe I will stop and hear him myself.’ They knew not that I was the Hanks of Whom they spoke in such unmeasured terms of condemnation until I arose to open the services. “I refer to these things,” said our venerable brother, “to show that my brethern who differ from me on the Atonement and kindred subjects, held me up before the world as a disturber of the peace. They even went so far as to threaten me with a prosecution by the civil law, for solemnizing the rites of matrimony and preaching as they were pleased to say without authority.” But none of these things moved him, neither counted he his life dear unto him for he desired to finish his life with joy. About this time Elders Leftwich and Roberts visited Elder Hanks. These brethern belonged to the Duck River Association of Baptists situated in Bedford and adjoining counties. They were called “Separate Baptists,” at that time. They remained several days with him and preached at the Knob Creek church and its vicinity preaching the same blessed truths believed and taught by our brother. This visit by these servants of God gave him great strength and encouragement. And when they left they invited him to visit their Association that they might become more intimately acquainted with each other’s views. This he gladly consented to do and promised to meet with the brethern of that Association. Accordingly he visited that body which held its session that same year with the Garrison Fork church in Bedford County.

On Monday at eleven o’clock the Association suspended its regular order of business and invited Elder Hanks to preach, requesting him especially to give them fully his views on the Atonement, together with a kind of epitome of the doctrine as believed by his people and taught by himself. For about two long hours he stood before that body of strange brethern. No mortal man ever plead the cause of his Master with more fervency and zeal than did our beloved brother on that memorable occasion. - When he closed a proposition was made by some brother for all the brethern who could heartily endorse the doctrine preached by Brother Hanks to signify the same by giving him the hand of fellowship. Whereupon the whole assembly, en masse, pressed forward to give him a hearty endorsement. The speaker wept and laughed and praised God who had brought him through so many sore trials. And now that he had found so many preaching brethern holding to the very same doctrines for which he had been maligned and persecuted it is not strange that he should weep for joy and cry out in the fulness of his heart, “Bless the Lord, O my soul! and all that is within me, praise His Holy name!,” At the next meeting of the Duck River Association delegates from both the Friendship and Knob Creek churches were sent and united with that body which met with the Flat Creek church, Bedford County, Tennessee. In the course of two or three years the subject of corresponding with what was then called the “Missionary Baptists” began to be agitated. Elder Hanks entered warmly into the discussions that ensued, and his whole soul was enlisted in the one great work of having the Gospel preached all over the known world. The discussion which followed for a time by both the friends of missions and their opponents as a general thing were carried on in a truly Christian-like spirit. But, alas! the demon of discord entered and the Duck River Association was doomed to division; one party favoring and wishing to aid the Mission Baptists in their plans to educate the rising ministry and thus qualify them successfully to defend the truth and maintain the same against all its adversaries and also to send the Gospel to the destitute everywhere; the other party opposing. Finally, in the year 1834 this body was rent asunder while holding its session with the Salem church, Franklin county, Tennessee. This separation Elder Hanks deplored very much. He thought it would very likely keep good and efficient brethern from cooperating together for years in spreading the truth throughout the land. The writer of this memoir has often heard him lament that our brethern, now called Separate Baptists should have committed the sad mistake of assuming a position so antagonistic to the great Baptist Brotherhood throughout the world and thereby weakening and retarding so far as their means and influence reaches our efforts to spread Baptist Bible truths from the rivers to the ends of the earth; and that he hoped and prayed for the union of all the Baptists in Tennessee, as well as all over the whole world and they might be made one in faith and one in effort to evangelize the nations of earth. For, while they are in a divided condition their enemies are striving hard to supplant them, and thus banish what we hold to be Bible truth from the earth.

Chapter VIII. After this sad and mournful event the Ministers of other Associations as well as from the Duck River began to visit Elder Hanks and to aid him in the information of other churches, Rutherford’s Creek church up to this time had been attached to the Cumberland Association (the same to which Knob Creek and Friendship churches had formerly belonged); but it decided almost unanimously that it was its duty to sever that connection. Accordingly delegates were sent and received into the Duck River Association, Elder Hanks being their pastor. Carter’s Creek church was organized this year under the fostering care of our ever-faithful brother. Others namely Mount Zion, Mars Hill, Rock Spring, Mount Lebanon and New Ramia sprang up and by the blessing of God the Baptists in number and talents began to be a power in the land. Truly may it be said that Elder Hanks was the pioneer of the Baptists in this part of Middle Tennessee. in 1849 the Judson Association was organized at Mount Lebanon church now a member of the Duck River Association. Elder Hanks was unanimously chosen its first Moderator. This body adopted the Constitution, &c. of the Duck River Association. I will here insert what Elder Hanks calls his articles of faith--those that he offered as a basis of union and cooperation to the committee sent by the Cumberland Association to investigate his orthodoxy in the early part of his ministry.

ARTICLES OF FAITH 1. “By one man sin entered into the world and death by sin; so death has passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.” Rom. v. 12 2. “But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honor; that he, by the Grace of God, should taste death for every man.” -- Heb.11. 9 3. “Therefore, being justified by faith, we have peace with i of God through our Lord Jesus Christ. -- Rom. v. 1. 4. “We are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation.” -- 1 Peter 1.5 5,- “And they went down into the water, both Phillip and the eunuch and he baptized him.” -- Acts viii* 38 “Therefore we are buried with him by baptism that like as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father,” &c. ‘Rom.vi. “Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?” Acts X4, 47. “But when they believed Philip, preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.” -- Acts viii. 12. 6. “They that have done good unto the. resurrection of life, and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” John v. 29. 7. “For God hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world by that man whom he hath ordained,” &c. Elder Hanks was the devoted Pastor of the Knob Creek church for a period of more than thirty years and he was beloved by his flock very dearly. He presided as an efficient Moderator of the Judson Association nearly every year after its organization. In the early days of his ministry standing alone as he did it was indeed very hard for us to realize the difficulties and dis- advantages under which he labored; but armed as he was with the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God, and having been thoroughly drilled in its use--(or from a child he had been taught in the Holy Scriptures) -- and, being filled with the Holy Spirit, his heart burdened with love for perishing sinners, he was able to vindicate and maintain the truth, as it was taught in God’s holy word.

Chapter IX. The readers of these pages is again referred to some of the struggles through which the subject of this memoir passed in his efforts to build up the Baptist cause in this country. At the time when the Rutherford’s Creek church invited him to become their pastor the majority of the members favored his views; yet there were a very few who seemed to cling to the “Do-nothing” side. But when they listened to his unanswerable arguments in support of the Bible doctrine, that the atonement is free and full, made for all men--that the scheme of redeeming mercy embraced the whole human race--it caused them first to look with favor and then to embrace his most cherished views. He took great pleasure in exposing the sophistries sometimes called Calvinism, but more correctly termed Fatalism or Stoicism- for the stoics long before Calvin’s day taught some of the same unscriptural and dangerous errors that are to be found in Calvin’s writings. Elder Hanks would take hold of any or all of their proof texts and with a master workman’s hand show that they fully harmonized with the doctrine of a free and full atonement. Carter’s Creek church was built up amidst the strongest opposition. Here he was called upon to whet up his weapons and gird on his armor of truth to do battle in defence of our faith in the one baptism--the immersion of a believer in water by a scriptural administrator as the only Christian baptism. The contest was waged pretty warmly between him and an eminent Pedo-Baptist Minister. Although Elder Hanks was not versed in the classics, knowing nothing of Hebrew and Greek, still, with our old English Bible which he had made the man of his counsel from his youth he was more than a match for any of his opponents. The cause of truth suffered not in his hands in this discussion but it was ably and successfully vindicated. The churches grew and multiplied under his care, the Lord adding the saved almost weekly to their members. Up to this time there had been no effort made to build a church east of Columbia. Elder B. Kimbrough had lived in the Rock Spring country for a short time but had gone to another field. However in the providence of God, Sister Nancy Cannon, wife of Brother George Cannon, now one of the Deacons of Rock Spring church, moved into that vicinity, she being the only Baptist in that community and having faith in her principles as firm as the everlasting hills, God made use of her as the means in his hands of building up his cause in her immediate vicinity. This sister desired Baptist preaching in the neighborhood, still more she wished for a Baptist church, one with which she could worship the God of her fathers and keep the ordinances as they were delivered to us. Soon after her removal she visited Elder Hanks and made known her wishes.

He yielded to her solicitations to have preaching and he gave her an appointment to carry back to her people. She went back with a glad heart, and made known his promise to preach for them. The people met at a schoolhouse near Rock Spring when Brother Hanks always true to his engagements was there in good time. On this occasion he seemed to be possessed of supernatural strength in holding forth the word of life and a crucified Savior; for before he closed his sermon the whole congregation was in a flood of tears some weeping over their sinful hearts and others rejoicing in the Christian’s hope. He at once saw plainly that here a people should be raised up for the Lord and therefore he left another appointment to visit them again. At the appointed time of his next visit he carried with him a young brother, Dawson a licentiate of Knob Creek church. This time he was still more encouraged and he therefore determined to hold a series of meetings as soon as practicable. Accordingly he appointed a time when he would return to that place. The next visit he made, Brother Meachum who had lately settled as pastor at Carter’s Creek church, accompanied him. This young brother was an active and energetic worker in the Master’s cause. During this meeting the good Lord did a great and glorious work for that people. Many souls were happily converted and before the meeting closed a church of thirty members was organized. He was called unanimously to become its pastor and in that capacity he labored efficiently for nine years. The year after this little vine was planted Elder Kimbrough paid them a visit and assisted brother Hanks in holding another meeting of several days which was a glorious success. The church at this meeting nearly doubled itself in numbers. He continued to preach for this church until Elder E. W. Benson was settled there as pastor.

Chapter X. Elder Hanks was twice married--to his first wife, Mary Wolverton, on the 6th day of June, 1811. Eight children, four sons and four daughters were the result of this union. Thomas Hanks, his eldest son is now a resident of Missouri and is an able Baptist minister. Sister Hanks was truly a help-meet for her devoted husband; she would often when he was so much discouraged, cheer him up, telling him to go and preach Jesus to the people and not suffer any uneasiness about his home affairs for she would take care of them. She often attended meeting with him and labored zealously in her sphere to give interest and success to the meetings. Sometimes in her ever-pious zeal for salvation of sinners she would exhort and persuade them to flee the wrath to come. In the absence of her husband at night before retiring to rest she would call her family together and after repeating a few verses from the old family Bible she would bow with and pray for them and commit them to her Saviour and friend not forgetting to ask the Lord to bless the labors of her husband and make him useful in the work of the Lord. He has often said to the writer of these lines that he attributed much of his success as a preacher to the encouragement he always received from his wife in the early part of his ministry. This good sister passed away from this world to her home in heaven quietly and peacefully on the last day of July, 1854, in the fifty-eighth year of her age. Her funeral was preached by Elders E. W. Benson and Thomas Witherspoon, her remains being followed by a large number of relatives and friends to the lonely grave and there deposited to await the summons from on high, “Arise and come to judgment.” She was often heard to pray most fervently that God would save all her children and we may add that we humbly hope her prayers have been answered for all of them now living are members of the church and those that are dead, died, as we learn in the triumphs of the Christian’s hope. The following is the obituary published in the Tennessee Baptist:


“Mary Hanks, consort of Elder Elijah Hanks, departed this life July 31st, 1854, aged 58 years. Her illness was very painful and protracted yet she complained not, but patiently endured it all as a part of her lot and even glorified-God amid dissolving nature. She died as she had lived, a Christian; though an humble, unpretending child of God, yet abounding in every good word and work by which a husband, child, relative or even humanity might be benefitted. “Sister Hanks had few equals in the discharge of the various duties of life. She was a devoted wife of our beloved Brother Hanks (one of the most useful Ministers in Middle Tennessee), for over forty years. During this long relationship to him as a man and a minister, she was truly a helpmeet indeed. When at home, she was kind, obliging and ever ready to do all in her power to render him happy. When called to go and labor in the vineyard of the Lord, he was blessed with one at home whose energy and force of character kept his domestic affairs well regulated; and though her happiest hours was in his company she never opposed his leaving home, night or day but urged him to go and preach unsearchable riches of Christ to a sinful world. As a mother she was tender, affectionate and exemplary. In answer to her prayers she lived to see all her children members of the Baptist church. May they never forget her advice in training them up for God: As a mistress she was merciful and reasonable; as a member of the Baptist church at Knob Creek for more than forty years she was faithful, pious, energetic and abundantly useful. As a member of society, social, agreeable, needing only to be known to be loved. Benevolent to the poor and kind to all. In her death her absence is deeply felt in all these endearing relationships, But our loss is her gain. “A short time before she died she called her husband to her bedside and talked freely and sensibly about her departure and gave him her last sweet counsels; then the children were called up, one by one, and then the servants; and when even her hands were cold in death and the soul just ready to take its flight, her husband asked her if she was conscious that she was dying? She replied that she was. He then said to her, ‘I hope there remaineth a rest for you. ‘Yes,’ she said, “and I shall soon enjoy it” These were her last words. She died in the Lord, and she rests from her labors.” From an acquaintance of upwards of four years with this mother in Israel, I feel that the pen need not describe her many virtues, for they are treasured in a more durable form;-- they are lastingly impressed upon the memories of her associates and friends.”


This obituary was written by my most intimate friend and co-laborer, Elder E. W. Benson. The following preamble and resolutions were adopted by the Knob Creek church to express its condolement-. “WHEREAS God, in his mysterious providence has taken by death from our midst Sister Mary Hanks, consort of our beloved pastor, and so long an esteemed and devoted member of this body; therefor, “RESOLVED, That this church deeply deplores the loss of one so much beloved; but we humbly bow in submission to the will of the great Shepherd, who has taken her from her labors to her eternal rest. “RESOLVED, That we deeply sympathize with our beloved pastor and his family in their bereavement and we pray God to give them Christian fortitude to be submissive and to bear up under this heavy dispensation of His providence. “RESOLVED, That a copy of these resolutions be spread on the church book and a copy sent to the Tennessee, Baptist--a paper much approved among us--for publication, accompanied by a suitable obituary notice. “By order of the church. THOMAS A DODSON, Ch. Clerk.” Elder Hanks remained a lonely widower for about one year, when he married Mrs. Esther L. Miller, the widow of John Miller, Esq., of Maury County, Tennessee. Their marriage took place on the 19th of July, 1855. His second wife was a woman of deep piety and made him an agreeable companion. She was a member of the Cumberland Presbyterian church. They lived happily together for fourteen years; but death came again and Brother Hanks was left again to mourn in grief his lonely fate. She died December 31st, 1868, aged sixty-two years. The author of this sketch has often heard Elder Hanks remark that the good Lord had blessed him with two as good wives as ever lived and in their kindness to him he knew no difference between them.

A TRIBUTE TO THE MEMORY of ELDER ELIJAH HANKS Adopted by the Judson Association of Baptists, at the annual Session’ held with the Mars Hill Church in September, 1871,

WHEREAS, It has pleased our Father in Heaven, in whose hands are the issues of life, to remove, by death, our aged’ and much- beloved brother, Elder Elijah Hanks, who died on the 12th instant, at 9 o’clock p.m., in perfect peace, at the residence of his son-in-law, Brother J. M. Witherspoon, after a long and painful illness; and WHEREAS, Our venerable brother was the pioneer preacher among the churches now composing the Judson Association, and through whose earnest preaching many hundreds of precious souls have been brought into the fold of Christ; therefore, RESOLVED, That whilst we bow in humble submission to the will of God, in removing our father in Israel, (whose praise is in all the churches,) from our midst, thus depriving us of his counsel and advice, for which, as ministers and as a body, we have long looked, and who had long presided as the efficient and faithful moderator of the Judson Association; we will ever cherish a lively remembrance of his many virtues, and try to imitate his pious example. RESOLVED, That a copy of this preamble and resolutions be spread on the minutes of this session for preservation.

For some months previous to the death of Father Hanks, he had been in a low and suffering condition, and talked much. of his approaching death. He was deliberate and careful in arranging all his business, so that no trouble should be found in settling it up after his decease. He often visited, in his last days the grave of the wife of his youth, and, on one occasion, selected the precise spot where he desired to be buried, setting up a stone at the head of the place of his grave. Finally, the last meeting that he should ever attend, of his old church, that he loved so devotedly, was held, commencing on the Saturday before the first Sunday in August, 1871. This proved to be the last meeting as he had believed it would be. On Sunday he was there, and enjoyed the services very much, and on Monday he was found in his accustomed place. After the sermon by the pastor (Elder R. Hull) he was assisted by two brethern to stand up, while he delivered’, in somewhat broken sentences, ‘his last charge to his loved and loving brethern. This was a precious privilege to the aged and care-worn veteran--one that he had long desired to enjoy, for he had been unable to speak publicly for more than a year previous to this time.

HIS LAST CHARGE TO HIS LOVED AND LOVING BRETHERN. The following is the substance of his last effort to address the church:

“Dear Brethern and Sisters--I feel that I am with you for the last time at this place. I have come to bid you farewell, and to give you my last advice. I have been with you, in much meekness, for more than forty years, during which time we have enjoyed many precious seasons; but my time is well nigh done on-earth. I do not feel today that I can say as did Paul, ‘I have fought the good fight,’ &c; but I can say, ‘I have fought the good fight’ as best I could, and “have kept the faith’, and henceforth, I hope, there is a crown of righteousness laid up for me, ‘which the righteous Judge will give me at his appearing,’ &e. And now, beloved brethern,” continued the feeble and almost worn-out disciple, “live in peace--love one another, and forgive one another, as Christ forgave you. Be faithful to your principles--labor to spread them over the land. I love the Baptist faith and doctrines, for I believe they are taught in God’s word. I have believed and taught them for almost fifty years, and I believe them still. I want them spread over all this land of ours. As an evidence of my anxiety for the spread of our principles, I have subscribed for one share in the Southern Publication Society, located in Memphis, Tennessee, for the benefit of my daughters, and I urge you, as a church, to take stock in the same, for I believe it will be the mean, in the hands of God, of accomplishing great good.” Continuing his address, he remarked, “I thought, while Brother Hull was preaching today, that if the same doctrines had been preached by the Baptists in this country forty years ago, they would have taken the whole land.” After he had closed his speech, and as he was borne up by the brethern, in making his way out of the church, he cast once more a lingering look upon those that he had loved so long and ardently, saying, “Farewell, brethern and sisters! once more, farewell!” And he was carried to Brother Witherspoon’s, where he had lived so pleasantly during the last years of his life. He lingered on from day to day through the week, up to Friday, when his daughter, Mrs. Eliza Moore, arrived from West Tennessee. On her coming into his room, he smiled, and said: “Eliza, I am glad to see you once more; you are here in time to bid me good-bye, and see me put away. I am now ready to die, I have finished my work. Children, don’t weep for your old worn- out father, for I hope soon to be at home.” And with many other words did he try to cheer and comfort his weeping children and friends, exhorting them to meet him in Heaven. He then asked some one to sing for him that good old song commencing “On Jordan’s stormy banks I stand,” and joined in the song himself with his usual cheerfulness.

On the next day he was found to be sinking rapidly and as his last moment approached nearer and still more near, his faith grew stronger and his prospects brighter, and so he passed the day, with his feet planted on the margin of the river and his soul resting on the Rock of ages. At 9 o’clock p.m., surrounded by his children, grand-children, and many friends, the spirit of this great man of God, as calmly as the evening breezes, sweetly passed away, escorted as we believe, by a convoy of angels to his home in heaven, On the next day, it being the Sabbath, his remains were carried to the church, where funeral services were performed by Elders Rollin Hull, and W. T. Ussery, in the presence of, perhaps the largest assemblage of people ever gathered together at that place. After the conclusion of the services in the church, his body was borne to the grave-yard, near by, and there commit- ted to its last resting-place, to await the final summons when he shall hear the welcome plaudit, “Thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things. Enter thou into the joys of thy Lord.” The writer of the preceding pages has endeavored as best he could, to give to the world, as well as to the churches, a plain, unvarnished and truthful statement of facts, relating to the life, labors, and death of one who served his “Master” faithfully for nearly half a century, till, it may be truthfully said, the world was not worthy of him and he was taken to that “rest that remaineth for the people of God.” I therefore send forth this little book not claiming that it is faultless, but deprecating sensorious criticisms, and committing it to the reading public, feeling fully satisfied that the appreciative reader will do me justice to believe that I have done all I could, under the circumstances, to place in their proper light the life and character of the now sainted Hanks, as an example worthy of imitation of all men, sincerely trusting that much good may result from the perusal and contemplation of what I have deemed suitable to embody in the foregoing pages.

Monday, August 12, 2024

Sing the Lord’s Song

“How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?”—Psalm 137:4.

Methinks, my soul, this strange land is the very place to sing the Lord’s song in, though the carnal around understand it not. Shall I hang my harp upon the willow, when Jesus is my song, and when he himself hath given me so much cause to sing?

I will sing now, I will sing for evermore. In this strange land, in this barren land, in this distant land from my Father’s house, I will sing, and Jesus shall be my song. He shall be the Alpha and the Omega of my hymn; and until I come to sing in the louder and sweeter notes of heaven, among the hallelujahs of the blessed, upon the new harp and new stringed chords of my renewed soul, will I sing of Jesus and his blood, Jesus and his righteousness, Jesus and his complete salvation. And when the last song upon my trembling lips, with Jesus’s name in full, shall be uttered; as the sound dies away, when death seals up the power of utterance; my departing soul shall catch the parting breath, and, as it enters the presence of the court above, the first notes of my everlasting song will go on with the same blessed note, “to him that hath loved me, and washed me from my sins in his own blood!”

Robert Hawker, The Poor Man’s Morning and Evening Portions, March 4, Morning

Sunday, August 11, 2024

Lord, save us: we perish.

“Lord, save us: we perish.”

Save, Lord, Or We Perish (No. 224) is an unique Sacred Harp tune, and among my favorites. You can listen to a rendition of it HERE.

Written by Reginald Heber, the words appear as “FOURTH SUNDAY AFTER EPIPHANY. No. IV. R. H.” in Hymns, Written and Adapted to the Weekly Church Service of the Year (Reginald Heber. London: John Murray, 1827, p. 39).[i] It has 3 stanzas of 4 lines, with 12 syllables per line.

The author of this hymn, Reginald Heber, was born in 1783 at Cheshire, England. After several years of service in England, he was made the Church of England’s Bishop of Calcutta in June 1823, and arrived in India in October of that year. Heber died in India in 1826, and was buried at St. John’s Church, Trichinopoly, Tamil Nadu, India. The hymn book was published posthumously the year after his death. “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty” and “From Greenland’s icy mountains” are among his best-known hymns. Many of the 57 hymns he wrote are still in use.

Psalm 89:9; Psalm 107:23-30
1. When through the torn sail the wild tempest is streaming,
When o’er the dark wave the red lightning is gleaming,
Nor hope lends a ray the poor seaman to cherish,
We fly to our Maker—“Save, Lord! or we perish.”

Matthew 8:24-27
2. Oh Jesus! once toss’d on the breast of the billow,
Aroused by the shriek of despair from thy pillow,
Now, seated in glory, the mariner cherish,
Who cries in his danger—“Save, Lord! or we perish!”

Hosea 8:7; 1 Peter 5:8; Revelation 12:10
3. And oh, when the whirlwind of passion is raging,
When hell in our heart his wild warfare is waging,
Arise in thy strength thy redeemèd to cherish,
Rebuke the destroyer—“Save, Lord! or we perish.”

The hymn is sometimes titled “Stilling the Sea.” The first stanza ascribes to the Maker the power to still the sea, to save the perishing mariners. The second stanza becomes more specific, referencing the incident of the disciples on the sea of Galilee. The third stanza applies the idea to the Lord stilling the tempests and temptations that rage in our sinful hearts.

I have added above the stanzas some Bible verses that I think appropriately go with the hymn. The original has “Help, Lord” rather than “Save, Lord.” I kept “Save, Lord” since that is the way I know it, as well as it seeming to better match the disciples’ statement in Matthew 8:25.

The Sacred Harp tune was written by Matthew Mark Wynne.[ii] Wynne was born in 1835 in Franklin County, Georgia, the son of Sloman Wynne and Mahala Camp. He married Sarah Carolyn Garrison in 1859 in Haralson County, Georgia. Wynne was a farmer, school teacher and music teacher, and later a newspaper editor. He was active in the Sacred Harp Conventions of Georgia before moving to Texas.[iii] Several of his compositions appeared in The Sacred Harp by B. F. White and E. J. King. After the death of his first wife, Wynne married Mrs. Frances J. (Lewis) Tolbert August 18, 1891 in Goldthwaite of Mills County, Texas.

M. M. Wynne was a Confederate Veteran and a Mason. Wynne served for a time as editor of the People’s Advocate newspaper of Goldthwaite before assuming control of the Brownwood Living Issues paper early in 1894. At least in his later years, he was very active in the People’s (Populist) Party of Texas and his newspapers represented that viewpoint. Matthew Mark Wynne died November 18, 1895 in Brownwood, Brown County, Texas and is buried at the Greenleaf Cemetery there. His grave was either never marked or has been lost. “Editor M. M. Wynne, of the Living Issues, died at his home in this city Monday after a protracted illness, and was laid to rest Tuesday evening in Greenleaf cemetery. Mr. Wynne had long been in feeble health, only doing with an effort the duties of his office. He had gained many friends during his residence in Brownwood and these join The Bulletin in sympathy for the bereaved family and relatives.”

Some songbooks pair the hymn with Sullivans (also known as Cardiff and Heber) by Arthur Seymour Sullivan (1842-1900).


[i] This book also contains poetry by H. H. Milman, Sir Walter Scott, Jeremy Taylor, and others. “R.H.” is given to signify those written by Heber.
[ii] Sometimes his last name appears as “Wynn” and his first name as “Mathew”.
[iii] M. M. Wynne served as secretary of the two oldest continuing Sacred Harp Conventions – the Chattahoochee Musical Convention (org. 1852) and the East Texas Musical Convention (org. 1855).

Saturday, August 10, 2024

Jesus Christ is important, and other quotes

The posting of quotes by human authors does not constitute agreement with either the quotes or their sources. (I try to confirm the sources that I give, but may miss on occasion; please verify if possible.)

“Saying that Jesus Christ is an important part of your life is like saying that breathing is an important part of your life. Christ is your life.” -- Mark Osgatharp

“It is important, not only to read, but understand, the Scriptures. The meaning of the Bible is the Bible.” -- J. M. Pendleton, reflecting on Acts 8:30

“In church history where do I find the preserved word of God; where do I look? We should not look into monasteries or libraries or among scholars, but we should look among God’s people.” -- Christian Khanda

“Atheism is a temporary condition. Every knee will bow, every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.” -- Unknown

“The best advice I can give you: ‘Look unto Jesus, beholding his beauty in the written word.’” -- John Newton

“If Scripture is not God’s word, then Christianity is not theologically grounded but anthropologically sourced.” -- Peter Van Kleeck, Sr.

“Changing the revealed nature of God based on free will as the overarching and controlling principle is a heresy.” -- Kent Brandenburg

“There are two types of tired: one that requires rest, and one that requires peace.” -- Unknown

“I believe the whole Bible, not a Bible full of holes.” -- Mark Buch

“Politicians should wear sponsor jackets, like NASCAR drivers do -- so we know who owns them.” Paraphrase of a joke told by or sentiments of various speakers, including Paul Harvey, Don Noel, and Robin Williams

“It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them they’ve been fooled.” -- Often attributed to Mark Twain, but without documentation. However, Twain did write, “How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!” (Autobiography of Mark Twain)

“I would rather have Scriptural presuppositions even if I cannot answer all the questions.” -- Tenrin Grey

Friday, August 09, 2024

Francis Pieper: The Bible in Your Hand

F. Pieper: 1. Wir wiffen a priori aus der gӧttlichen Berheikung, daß wir in der Bibel, die in unsern hӓnden ist, Christi Wort haben, das bis an den Jüngsten Tag in der Kirche und von der Kirche zu lehren ist.

English translation: 1. We know a priori from the divine decree (or promise), that the Bible we have in our hands is the word of Christ that is to be taught by and in the church until the last day.

Christliche Dogmatik, Franz Pieper (1852-1931), St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1924, page 290

The context can be seen in this English translation of Christian Dogmatics by Theodore Engelder and others (St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1950, p. 240):

We are not saying, however, that textual criticism should be eliminated entirely from our theological curriculum. We, too, in our theological seminary at St. Louis introduce our students to modern textual criticism. That is a part of the complete external equipment of a theologian of our day. But we point out two things to our students: 1) We know a priori from the divine promise that in our present Bible we have the Word of Christ which is to be taught in the Church and by the Church to the Last Day. 2) We recognize, too, a posteriori, that the divine providence has so wonderfully held its protecting hand over the Bible text that in spite of the variae lectiones not a single Christian doctrine has become a matter of doubt.

Pieper did not hold a King James position. Nevertheless, his bibliology is quite strong compared to modern evangelical theologians. He is clear that he thinks most of the variae lectiones are orthographical matters. Interestingly, on page 241 he advises (as a practical matter) to not use a challenged reading in a dispute.

...in a dispute with Unitarians on the doctrine of the Trinity relinquish I John 5:7-8 as a prooftext...One may be convinced, on the basis of scientific investigation, that these words are nevertheless genuine, that is, that they were in the original autographs. We personally hold this position...But in a dispute with a Unitarian, who denies the authenticity of I John 5:7, we at once disregard this passage as a prooftext. That does not make the doctrine of the Holy Trinity doubtful in any way...

[Note that Pieper holds I John 5:7-8 is genuine.]

Thursday, August 08, 2024

Moving toward a purpose

Acts 20:1-6, fulfilling a former purpose

Verse 1: Paul had previously purposed to pass through Macedonia and Achaia, and then go to Jerusalem. Staying in Ephesus a little longer, he sent Timotheus and Erastus ahead of him into Macedonia. Now Paul is moving on that purpose. He bids the disciples a loving farewell.

Verses 2-3a: Paul traveled through Macedonia to exhort and encourage the disciples, then went into Greece. Greece is identified as Achaia in Paul’s purpose, described in Acts 19:21. He stayed there for three months. It possibly was during this time Paul wrote his letter to the Romans (cf. Romans 15:25-26, 31).

Verse 3b: The Jews here “laid wait” for Paul (cf. v. 19), indicating an intent to ambush him, for evil intent – either to arrest and accuse Paul before the authorities, as they had done at other times; or possibly to accost and kill him. Perhaps they intended to attack Paul on board ship, since knowing of the plot, Paul changed his course to reroute back through Macedonia rather than sail to Syria from Greece. Some have suggested a contrived robbery at sea, since Paul was carrying a contribution from the churches in Macedonia and Achaia to the saints in Jerusalem.

Verse 4: Accompanying Paul to Asia were eight men:

  • Sopater of Berea
  • Aristarchus (of the Thessalonians)
  • Secundus (of the Thessalonians)
  • Gaius of Derbe
  • Timotheus [of Lystra, 16:1]
  • Tychicus (of Asia)
  • Trophimus (of Asia)
  • Luke [a “we” section begins verse 5. Acts 20:5-21:18, from Philippi to Jerusalem]

Verse 5: Sopater, Aristarchus, Secundus, Gaius, Timotheus, Tychicus, and Trophimus go on ahead of Paul, Luke, and (presumably) Silas to wait for them at Troas.[i] “tarried for us” indicates that Luke has rejoined the group.

Verse 6: the author, Luke, evidently stayed at Philippi during the events of Acts 17:1 to Acts 20:5-6 – possibly 6 years.[ii] Note that this time the trip from Philippi to Troas took five days, in contrast to two days on the initial trip from Troas to Philippi recorded in Acts 16:11-12. After this five-day journey, they stayed in Troas seven days.


[i] Silas has not been mentioned by name since he and Timothy joined Paul in Corinth (18:5). Outside of Acts he is mentioned (by the Latinized form “Silvanus”) in II Corinthians 1:19; I Thessalonians 1:1; II Thessalonians 1:1; and I Peter 5:12.
[ii] The calculation and approximation of this time includes possibly a month in Thessalonica (17:1ff.), stays in Berea and Athens (chapter 17), over 18 months in Corinth (18:11), a trip back to Jerusalem and Antioch (chapter 18), 3 years in Ephesus (cf. 20:31), travel through Macedonia, and 3 months in Greece (20:3) before going back through Macedonia.

 

Wednesday, August 07, 2024

From the BaptistBoard BrainTrust

The BaptistBoard discussion board is infected with a high dose of anti-KJVO/anti-KJV members.[i] They have one forum called “Bible Versions & Translations.” In theory it is for any and all discussion of Bible versions and translations. In practice it is mostly for or against the King James Bible. It can be hard to praise the KJV there without some anti comeback. The diseased are quick to say that they do not hate the King James Bible, it is just King James Onlyism that they hate. By their works ye shall know them. If a man says he hates me, but treats my parents with despite, etc., it will be hard to think he does not hate them too, even if it is only on my account. Below are a few comments I picked from threads at the BaptistBoard. It not only shows their hatred for KJVO, but also their despite of the KJV itself. It further indicates that these smart folks are not are smart as they think they are. For example, if they cannot read a 1611 King James Bible, they are not even as smart as I am! Yet they set themselves up as smart enough to tell others what they ought to do.

“I have listened to several KJVO preachers (preachers who grew up on the KJV) mistranslate verses because of the antiquated language (the ‘so’ in John 3:16; the ‘morning star’ in Isaiah; the ‘sea of reeds’ in Exodus....etc.).” (You don’t understand the difference between “mistranslate” and “misinterpret” yet we should take your advice?)

“Have you ever actually seen a 1611 KJV Bible? You can’t hardly read it today.” … “Here’s [a scan] from the book of Judges in the 1611. It’s almost unreadable.” (And yet “you people” are usually the ones recommending that others learn to read Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek – while you can’t even read English in the blackletter font?)

“If you want to struggle through the font and spellings of the 1611, then have at it.” (Hardly any regular KJV reader is reading the 1611 fonts and spellings!)

“The translators did not have as many resources as we have today.” (More is not automatically better, and sometimes the more clocks you have, the less you actually know about what time it is! Additionally, they may have had access to some resources no longer available today.)

“What I can’t understand is why the KJV usually translated αγιου πνευματος as ‘Holy Ghost’!” (In Biblical or Christian Old English gast meant spirit or life. It was used to render the Latin spiritus. Gast comes into modern English spelling as ghost. This sense can be seen in Holy Ghost and gave up the ghost. Nothing that hard to understand there.)

In one thread when a member wrote “I recommend the KJV only for the pure words of God in the English language,” the ubiquitous anti-KJVO critic Rick Norris popped in to say “Your recommendation is not Scripture. Are you recommending an opinion or tradition of men?” Yet when another member wrote “I recommend the NASB only for the pure words of God in the English language,” ever-present Rick was not present. He remained as quiet as church mouse, silent as the grave, and as dead as a door-nail. He claims to fight onlyism, but his responses are always only in the vein of the King James Bible.

These are just a few samples, easily gathered. What a bunch of maroons.


[i] I used to post a lot on the BaptistBoard – I even served as moderator there many years ago – but I found the consistent ignorance and belligerence of a few made it highly intolerable to be there, especially when one of them was an unmoderated Moderator pushing the Covid agenda.

Tuesday, August 06, 2024

The Unorthodox C. S. Lewis

“C.S. Lewis (1898-1963) is loved with an equal fervor by conservative evangelicals, emergents, Roman Catholics, Mormons, even atheists, a fact that speaks volumes to those who have ears to hear” (David Cloud, “C. S. Lewis’s Denial of the Blood Atonement”).

I have no desire to trash C. S. Lewis. He said a lot of good things, and is eminently quotable. He excelled as a writer. On the other hand, there are so many starry-eyed love-struck devotees among American evangelicals when it comes to Lewis, I also believe it is imminent that we orthodox “Biblicists” fire a warning shot across the bow. The fundamental theology of Lewis lacked orthodoxy, and folks should be told that.

“…the whole point of that book [The Pilgrim’s Regress by C. S. Lewis, rlv] is to say that by clear thinking, you can think yourself from a rationalist or atheistical position into the Christian position. And he actually, at one time, founded in Oxford what he called the Socratic Club, which used to meet on Monday nights, in which he used to try to show people how to reason themselves into Christianity. ‘With the heart man believeth unto righteousness.’ You cannot do it merely by a process of intellectual reasoning” (D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, “A Change of Heart,” a sermon on Romans 10:9-10). Martyn Lloyd-Jones also said:

“C. S. Lewis had a defective view of salvation and was an opponent of the substitutionary and penal view of the atonement.” (Christianity Today, Dec. 20, 1963; as requoted in “Mere Atonement,” Ariel James Vanderhorst, Touchstone Magazine, March 2009)

David Cloud further points out that C. S. Lewis not only “denied Christ’s substitutionary atonement,” but also “held a sacramental view of salvation…did not hold to the infallible inspiration of Scripture,” and called the six-day creation “a Hebrew folk tale.” In The Problem of Pain, Lewis wrote, “If by saying that man rose from brutality you mean simply that man is physically descended from animals, I have no objection.” I cannot see how such a statement can be recycled into orthodox biblicism.

If you read Lewis, read with both eyes open.

Monday, August 05, 2024

The Peacemakers

“Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.” Matthew 5:9

They shall not only be sons of God, but shall be called such, recognized as such in his kingdom—not merely subjects of the kingdom, but sons of the king. We need not wonder at this exalted promise to peacemakers, for theirs is a very difficult and very noble achievement. They must often be content to bear bitter complaint from both sides, must exercise great self-control, unwearied patience, and loving tact, and must be manifestly impartial and unselfish. There is no more Godlike work to be done in this world than peacemaking.

John Albert Broadus (1827-1895), Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew, pp. 91-92

Sunday, August 04, 2024

There is a fountain

“There is a fountain fill’d with blood” is a long-standing staple in Baptist churches. It is usually acceptable and accepted in most churches that do not object to the imagery of “blood.” However, a recent evangelical commenter on my Facebook page took the song to task, writing, “Scripture does not envisage sinners being ‘plunged into a flood’ of blood. It’s not a faithful representation for how the blood of Christ applies.” I respectfully disagree, seeing this as an overly scrupulous and rigid application of literalness to something meant to use imagery figuratively. Such scrupulosity would likely mine every sermon for some meticulous break with finely-shined exactness. And it would find plenty!

One might pause and ask, “does the rest of my church see a problem with these words?” “Does the wider Christian community, across time and geography, find the song objectionable?” If not, could it just be me? Perhaps one might not like the particular poetic picture drawn by William Cowper in this hymn, but the point that the blood of Christ cleanses us from all sin comes through clearly. Not only my church, but many churches over several hundred years have approved of the text. That doesn’t make it right, but should give pause, if only you (and the few you have influenced) think something is wrong with it.

Based on Zechariah 13:1, “In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness.” This hymn is a meditation on and praise of the saving power of the blood of Christ. In a time when Bibles and hymnals are removing the blood, we need more hymns on the subject, not less.

Hebrews 9:22 ...without shedding of blood is no remission.

1 John 1:7 ...the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

This is Hymn CLXIX on pages 187-186 of A Collection of Psalms and Hymns, from Various Authors: for the Use of Serious and Devout Christians of All Denominations (Compiled by Richard Conyers, London: Clement Watts, 1772).

1. There is a fountain fill’d with blood,
Drawn from Emmanuel’s veins;
And sinners plung’d beneath that flood,
Lose all their guilty stains.

2. The dying thief rejoic’d to see
That fountain in his day’
And there have I, as vile as he,
Wash’d all my sins away.

3. Dear dying Lamb, thy precious blood,
Shall never lose its pow’r,
’Till all the ransom’d church of God
Be sav’d to sin no more.

4, E’er since by faith I saw the stream, (* originally, ’Ere, possibly a typo)
Thy flowing wounds supply,
Redeeming love has been my theme,
And shall be ’till I die.

5. Then in a nobler sweeter song,
I’ll sing thy pow’r to save,
When this poor lisping stammering tongue
Lies silent in the grave.

6. Lord I believe thou hast prepar’d
(Unworthy tho’ I be)
For me a blood bought free reward,
A golden harp for me.

7. ’Tis strung and tun’d for endless years,
And form’d by pow’r divine,
To sound in God the Father’s ears.
No other name but thine.

The original hymn has seven stanzas in Common Meter. Most hymnals included only the first five (or less). The most common tune I know is called Cleansing Fountain in The Sacred Harp (No. 505). Redeeming Love by Aldine S. Kieffer is another good tune with which it has been paired.

The hymn was then later published as Hymn LXXIX in Book I of Olney Hymns (by Cowper and John Newton), included in the hymns on the book of Zechariah. The heading is “Praise for the Fountain opened. Chap. xiii. 1.”

The hymn as above is as originally published by Cowper. Some alterations have been made – some rejected and some which remain. A major change that did not take was made by James Montgomery in 1819. It altered the entire first stanza, as well as places in other stanzas. The first is:

From Calvary’s cross, a fountain flows
Of water and of blood,
More healing than Bethesda’ pool,
Or famed Siloam’s flood.
While there is nothing unscriptural in the lines of Montgomery, it loses something in the “translation.” He thought the stanza of Cowper was “objectionable as representing a fountain being filled, instead of springing up.” However, the wider community has favored Cowper’s version over Montgomery’s. Hymnologist E. E. Ryder says this change “forgets…the poetry of intense and impassioned feeling, which naturally embodies itself in the boldest metaphors.” John Julian adds that in the alteration “the sustained confidence and rapture of Cowper are entirely lost.”

The end of stanza two has been changed and kept to the present,  to what is commonly used in hymnals today:

And there may I, though vile as he,
Wash all my sins away.
This may have been thought to bring the singer into the text more personally. As written by Cowper, it is his personal testimony.

If you have a conscientious objection to the hymn, then do not sing it. (However, please consider whether the objection is really valid. See questions above.) “As for me and my house,” we will try to serve and glorify God, and honor the blood of Jesus Christ, while singing “There is a fountain filled with blood.”

Saturday, August 03, 2024

5 Things Science Cannot, and other links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Friday, August 02, 2024

Baptists, Baptism, pro and con

Some anti-Baptist writings online
Some pro-Baptist writings online
Some baptism, Baptist-related disputations online

Thursday, August 01, 2024

Assembly, Church, Ekklesia

Assembly, Church, Ekklesia 

Acts 19:32, 39, 41 show the common Greek usage of εκκλησια (ekklesia), the word adopted in the New Testament to identify the Lord’s congregations. It is here an assembly of the local townspeople of Ephesus. In the Greek language εκκλησια referred to citizens gathered together for the discussion, deliberation, and decision in community business. However, note the calling here is irregular (not lawful, vs. 39-40).

εκκλησια (ekklesia) occurs 115 times in 112 verses in the Greek New Testament printed by the Trinitarian Bible Society. The English word church/churches is found 117 times in 114 verses in the King James translation. There is not a one-to-one correspondence of “ekklesia” and “church.” In Acts 19:37 the translation “robbers of churches” is related to ιεροσυλους (hierosulos). In I Peter 5:13, “ekklesia” is not in the Greek text, but supplied by the translators and presented in italics, indicating it as understood of whom at Babylon is sending greetings (the church). I Peter 5:13 ασπαζεται υμας η εν βαβυλωνι (The church that is at Babylon) “Ekklesia” is translated three times as “assembly” in Acts 19.

The English word “assembly” is found 5 times in the King James New Testament. In Acts 19:32, 39, and 41 the Greek word is εκκλησια; in Hebrews 12:23 it is πανηγυρει (πανηγυρει/general assembly και εκκλησια/church πρωτοτοκων εν ουρανοις); in James 2:2 it is συναγωγην.

In Acts 7:38 the church (εκκλησια) is an assembly or congregation of Israelites following Moses in the wilderness (εκκλησια εν τη ερημω) This assembly was not a church in the New Testament sense. However, it was a visible body of people assembled or congregated in the same place.

The use of the Greek word “ekklesia” – an assembly of the citizens in a free city-state – is consistent in usage with the New Testament idea of and reference to a gathered congregation, a local assembly of baptized Christian believers.

See also “The Church Before Pentecost.”