Translate

Showing posts with label Music. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Music. Show all posts

Saturday, April 11, 2026

What AI exposes, and other music links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Anapestic Meter

What? What is that?

Awhile back, I ran across on Archive.Org the hymn book Sacred Poetry and Music Reconciled, Or, A Collection of Hymns Original and Compiled, by Samuel Willard. (Boston, MA: Leonard C. Bowles, 1830). In it I noticed several hymns labeled with the meters “C.M.A.,” “L.M.A.,” “S.M.A.” I had never noticed that kind of labeling before...

And I am always up for learning more about the meter designations. The hymn meter is the pattern of syllables and stresses in the hymn text. I have posted a number of times on the subject. Here are most, if not all:

  1. Common Meter Extended hymns
  2. Explanation of Meter, from The Baptist Standard Hymnal
  3. Hymn meter
  4. Hymn Meter Again
  5. Hymn Meter Explanations and Information
  6. Metrical Index of Tunes
  7. Online metrical indices
  8. 50th hymn meter

Willard’s explanation of his designations are as follows:
  • L. M. A. - Long Meter Anapestic. 10.10.11.11. (usually, but not always; this also includes hymn with 4 lines of 11s. and one 8-line hymn that is 10.11.11.11.12.11.11.11.)
  • C. M. A. - Common Meter Anapestic. 11.8.11.8.
  • S. M. A. - Short Meter Anapestic. 8.8.11.8.

Some relevant excerpts from Willard’s book Sacred Poems:

A considerable number of hymns in this collection are in the anapestic measure, like the first, fourth, and eighteenth, containing in general three syllables for a measure or bar; while most of the tunes, which are named for them, have usually been sung in iambic verse, dividing each measure into two parts, the first a semibreve, or other notes equivalent to it, and the second a minim. If these hymns should be adopted in any society, where these tunes are not actually divided in the collections of music in use, the following rule will remove every difficulty in performing these or any other tunes of the kind, in the manner required; viz.

Let every measure, intended for three syllables, be divided into three equal parts, by splitting semibreves, or removing slurs, and let every part be sounded on the same tone, it would otherwise be. Thus, for instance, in the tune of Froome, named for the first hymn, let the slur be removed from the crotchets in the first full measure of the first line, and let the minim in the first measure of the second line be performed like two crotchets. The only exceptions to this rule are those, which are signified by numbers or points in several hymns, and which may be observed, or not, as may be found convenient. When the first syllable in a measure has the number 1 over it, it is to fill two thirds of the bar, and for the two following syllables, marked with the number 4, the last third of the bar. is to be divided, as in hymn 4. (pages 11-12)

Some of the metres are distinguished in this book into seven varieties, and are marked by the figures 1, 2, 3, &c. prefixed to the tunes, which are named. The first variety is pure iambic from the beginning to the end of every line. The second is precisely the same with the first, excepting a trochee in the beginning of the first line. With a little attention, the chorister will understand the other diversities, which, in the adaptation of tunes, are almost as important to be observed, as the difference of metre. (page 18)

Willard says that most of the named tunes in his book can be found in the Bridgewater, Handel and Haydn, and American Psalmody collections.

A little about Samuel Willard:

Samuel Willard, the son of William Willard and Catherine Wilder, was born April 18, 1775 (his daughter wrote 1776). His grandfather was a Congregational minister and his father a deacon. He graduated from Harvard College and became a Congregational minister. The initial council declined to ordain him due to his Unitarian tendencies, but a more liberal-thinking group was convened and ordained him. Willard became a long-time influential Unitarian in Massachusetts. He compiled two hymn books – Sacred Poems (1830), Regular Hymns: on a Great Variety of Evangelical Subjects and Important Occasions: with Musical Directions, for all the Varieties of Appropriate Expression (1824), and The Family Psalter (circa 1857). The latter may have never been published, and his other books probably found only limited use outside his region (and probably not much outside the Unitarian fold). His daughter writes:

…he gave much thought and time to the subject of sacred music. He composed many hymns; on his favorite plan of adapting the poetical to the musical emphasis. He left a manuscript collection of four hundred or more of these hymns;, about one hundred of which were composed in his eighty-second year. After his birthday of eighty-two he prepared an elaborate preface to this collection, in which he emphasized the idea, that sacred music and poetry, fitly adapted to each other, are to be among the great factors in harmonizing the discordant elements of the world. This collection he named ‘The Family Psalter’.” (Life of Samuel Willard, D.D. A.A.S. of Deerfield, Mass, Mary Willard, editor. Boston, MA: George H. Ellis, 1892, pp. 22-23)

As far as I have discovered, the C.M.A., L.M.A., and S.M.A. metrical designations seem to be limited in use to Willard’s work. They may have been created by him for his work, and not used elsewhere. In Regular Hymns, Willard does not use metrical designations, but simply gave tunes for the hymn. He wrote, “In general, I have named two tunes for each hymn, taken either from the third edition of Deerfield Collection, or the tenth of the Bridgewater Collection. Those from the former are marked with a star, and those from the latter with a cross; to prevent any mistake” (pp. x-xi).

Samuel Willard died October 8, 1859, and is buried at the Laurel Hill Cemetery in Deerfield, Franklin County, Massachusetts.

Saturday, December 27, 2025

Why We Sing, and other music links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Saturday, August 09, 2025

Almost Forgotten, and other music links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Saturday, January 18, 2025

Art that accords, and other music links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Tuesday, January 07, 2025

Hymn Meter Explanations and Information

Hymn Meter Explanations and Information

“Hymn meter” is the pattern of syllables and stress in the text of a hymn. The meter designations in hymn books relate to the syllables, meter, or “feet” of the poetry. A hymn of a certain meter (Common Meter = C. M., for example) can be sung with any tune of that same meter. Knowing the metrical symbols and matching hymns to tunes are knowledge and skills needed for hymn-book singing.

Alphabetical Metrical Designations

C. M. – Common Meter; a quatrain (four-line stanza) with alternating lines of iambic tetrameter and iambic trimeter, which usually rhymes in the second and fourth lines and sometimes in the first and third (8/6/8/6); also called Ballad Meter in other contexts. Iambic is one short or unaccented syllable followed by one long or accented syllable.

C. M. E. – Common Meter Extended; a five-line stanza in which most commonly the first, third, and fourth lines rhyme, and the second and fifth lines rhyme. C. M. E. is like C. M. except that it is “extended” with an extra line of 8 syllables (8/6/8/8/6). 

C. P. M. – Common Particular Meter; a six-line stanza of which the first, second, fourth and fifth lines are iambic tetrameter, and the third and sixth lines are iambic trimeter (8/8/6/8/8/6). 

D. – Doubled; indicates an eight-line stanza instead of four, as in C. M. D. or D. C. M. – Common Meter Doubled or Doubled Common Meter (8/6/8/6/8/6/8/6). 

H. M. – Hallelujah Meter; a six-line stanza of which the first four lines are trimeter and the last two are tetrameter, which rhymes most often in the second and fourth lines and the fifth and sixth lines (6/6/6/6/8/8). At times this may be instead listed as (6/6/6/6/4/4/4/4).

L. M. – Long Meter; a quatrain (four-line stanza) in iambic tetrameter, which usually rhymes in the second and fourth lines and often in the first and third (8/8/8/8).

L. P. M. – Long Particular Meter; a six-line stanza of iambic tetrameter (8/8/8/8/8/8). 

M. T. (or 12s.) – Meter Twelves; a quatrain in anapestic hexameter (12/12/12/12). Anapestic is two short syllables followed by one long syllable.[i] 

P. M. – Particular Meter, Peculiar Meter; Psalm Meter; sometimes may stand for Psalm Meter (but this is more commonly known as 8s. 7s.); it usually means Particular Meter, or Peculiar Meter (these two indicating poetry with its own particular, peculiar, or non-standard, meter).[ii]  

S. M. – Short Meter; iambic lines in the first, second, and fourth are in trimeter, and the third in tetrameter, which rhymes in the second and fourth lines and sometimes in the first and third (6/6/8/6). 

S. P. M. – Short Particular Meter; a six-line stanza of which the first, second, fourth and fifth lines are iambic trimeter, and the third and sixth lines are iambic tetrameter (6/6/8/6/6/8).

T. – Tripled; indicates a twelve-line stanza instead of four, as in L. M. T. – Long Meter Tripled (8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8). See Westford/Vain World Be Gone in The Sacred Harp. (“Tripled” is not very common.)

With Refrain – The hymn meter designation may be followed by the words “with refrain” – indicating a repeating refrain or chorus that does not follow the metrical pattern of the hymn itself. Similar designations are “With allelulias” and “With amens” indicating “allelulias” or “amen(s)” added to the end of the hymn.

Numerical Metrical Designations

7s. 6s. – Sevens and sixes; a quatrain with alternating lines of three and one-half feet and three feet, which rhymes in the second and fourth lines and sometimes in the first and third (7/6/7/6).

8s. 7s. 4s. – Eights, sevens and fours; a six-line stanza with alternating syllables of 8, 7, 8, 7, 4, and 7 (8/7/8/7/4/7). In practice (in singing) the four-syllable line is often repeated to create a line of eight syllables, and also the last two lines repeated. This enables the 8s. 7s. 4s. meter hymn to be sung with a doubled 8s. 7s. meter tune.

8s. 7s. – Eights and sevens; a trochaic quatrain with alternating lines of four feet and three and one-half feet, which rhymes in the second and fourth lines and sometimes in the first and third (8/7/8/7); also called Psalm Meter. Trochaic is one long syllable followed by one short syllable.

8s. – Eights; used to distinguish an eight-syllable quatrain that does not contain the iambic stress pattern characteristic of Long Meter (8/8/8/8). 

11s. – Elevens; used to distinguish an eleven-syllable quatrain (usually anapestic, which may rhyme in either the first and second, third and fourth lines, or first and third, second and fourth (11/11/11/11).

12s. 11s. – Twelves and elevens. A four-line stanza with alternating lines of twelve syllables and eleven syllables (12/11/12/11).

12s. – Twelves; see “M. T.” above.

Summary

The more common designations (C. M., L. M., S. M.) are almost universally standard across hymn books. “Common Meter” is what it appears to be – the most common hymn meter used in English hymnody. In relation: (1) “Long Meter” is longer than “Common Meter” in its second and fourth lines; (2) “Short Meter is shorter than “Common Meter” in its first line. Some designations vary by editors, geography, and time periods. For example, William Gadsby’s A Selection of Hymns, for Public Worship includes the following designations: 104th for the 10.10.11.11 pattern; 112th for L. P. M.; 122nd for S. P. M.; and 148th for H. M. These metrical patterns were related to old psalm tunes. H. M. (6.6.6.6.8.8.) was the meter for the Old Version Psalm 148, and so, often 148th was used to identify this pattern. The same sort of history applies to the designations 104th, 112th, and 122nd. Some hymn-meter variations made by editors may intend to encompass rhyme patterns as well, but rhyme patterns (though often prevalent in a certain way) are not inherent in hymn meter designations.

Most of the numerical meter designations are fairly intuitive (the number equals the number of syllables per line). 10s has ten syllables per line; 9s has nine. Some are not as intuitive, however. For example, many books use the label 8.7.4. The actual pattern of the hymn is 8.7.8.7.4.7. An almost endless combination of numerical designations of meter could be assembled. 

Both syllables and stress must be accounted for; but at the most basic level meter involves counting the number of syllables in a line of poetry. Amazing Grace is Common Meter: “A-ma-zing grace how sweet the sound” is 8 syllables; “That sav’d a wretch like me” is 6 syllables; “I once was lost but now am found” is 8 syllables; and “Was blind but now I see” is 6 syllables. Every Common Meter hymn and tune will follow that same pattern. If C. M. is written as C. M. D., or L. M. as L. M. D., etc., then that means the tune has enough music to sing two stanzas of a hymn instead of just one.

For another example, if you find a hymn labeled “11s”, a tune paired with the words “How firm a foundation, ye saints of the Lord” will likely work for singing that hymn.

Although any hymn of a particular meter can be sung with any tune of that same meter, the music of a particular song does not always seem fitting in mood for every hymn – even though it might work metrically. Also, the same number of syllables with different stress patterns will not fit well with the same tune. For example, compare “When I survey the wondrous cross” (Hamburg) with “How tedious and tasteless the hours” (Greenfields). They have the same number of syllables but different stress patterns.

In metrical hymn singing, there are tunes that have been passed down and have not been written down (or at least not in the forms in which they are sung). Songs from The Sacred Harp are good sources for tunes to set with the metrical hymns. Additionally, many hymnals will have a “Metrical Index” by which tunes may be found according to the meter in which they are written.

May the Lord bless this to be useful to someone.

Compiled by Robert Vaughn, initially in September 2006, with recent revisions and additions. Gathered from many sources over many years, so that little of what you read is original with me.


[i] Dactylic feet/stress is the reverse of Anapestic, having one long accented syllable followed by two short syllables, and might be found in some hymns.
[ii] “Irregular” or “Irr.” seems to now be the more commonly preferred designation rather than “P. M.” for lines and/or meters that are not standard. On occasion “P. M.” seems to be used in place of multiplying the number of designations in a hymn book. For example, I have seen “P. M.” used in place of “H. M.” (6/6/6/6/8/8). The Psalter (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1912/1927) includes two alphabetical metrical designations I have not commonly found – Common Hallelujah Meter (C. H. M., 8/6/8/6/8/8) and Long Hallelujah Meter (L. H. M., 8/8/8/6/8/6).

Sunday, December 15, 2024

God music did at once supply

Johann Walter was the first Lutheran kantor, and was an advisor and colleague of Martin Luther. He desired that a holy and proper use of music in worship prevail in German churches. A poet as well as composer, Walter produced a lengthy, rhymed poem of 324 lines which describe his view of music’s importance in liturgy.” Cynthia Pock

“In 1538, while at Torgau, he published a rhymed homage to music, Lob und Preis der loeblichen Kunst Musica (In Praise of the Noble Art of Music), a didactic poem of 324 lines, in which he developed an entire theology of music, following the ideas of Luther’s scattered remarks on the subject. . . .

“Luther himself provided a rhymed introduction to this poem entitled ‘Vorrhede auff all gute Gesangbuecher’ (‘A Preface for All Good Hymnals’). Luther put his preface on the lips of Frau Musica (Lady Music) and had her extol her own gifts. Luther’s introduction, together with Walter’s more elaborately conceived poem, provide remarkable insights into the early Reformation’s view of music.” Carl Schalk

Johann Walter was born in 1496 at Thuringia, Germany. He died in 1570 at Torgau, Germany. He believed God created music; and his work influenced congregational participation in worship services. The stanza’s below are from an English translation of Walter’s hymn praising God and his music. As far as I know, it has not been used as a church hymn.

1. That such unmerited free grace
(Which God from love for all our race
Had promised in his word) might be
Kept fresh in human memory
And move the heart to high delight
In praising God both day and night—

2. This is the weightiest reason why
God music did at once supply.
Then too, since sin acquired at birth
Would bring to Adam’s seed on earth
Much woe and—earth itself now spoiled—
Small joy in all for which they toiled,
As antidote against that blight,
To keep man’s life from wilting quite,
And also to rejoice the heart,
God soon supplied sweet music’s art.

Saturday, September 28, 2024

An Explanation, and other music links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Saturday, August 24, 2024

No melody without music, and other music quotes

The posting of quotes by human authors does not constitute agreement with either the quotes or their sources. (I try to confirm the sources that I give, but may miss on occasion; please verify when possible.)

“The best, most beautiful, and most perfect way that we have of expressing a sweet concord of mind to each other is by music.” -- Jonathan Edwards

“We cannot have a melody without music, nor can we have divine record of God speaking without words.” -- John MacArthur

“Since the largest book in the Bible is a songbook, we see the importance of sacred music before God.” -- David Cloud

“The hymn was the prayer of the penitent, and the hallelujah of the redeemed.” -- George C. Loud, Evangelized America 

“Music is God’s gift to man, the only art of Heaven given to earth, the only art of earth we take to Heaven.” -- Walter Savage

“Next to the Word of God, the noble art of music is the greatest treasure in the world.” -- Martin Luther

Saturday, June 15, 2024

A mega-mechanism, and other music & worship links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Wednesday, May 29, 2024

The Socialist Singing Orator: Prof. E. F. Stanton

Introduction

“Rev. E. F. Stanton is styled the ‘singing orator’ and is an ordained minister of the Baptist church.”[i] 

In my rambles of research, I ran across an “odd duck” – a preacher and music teacher who was also a lecturer on the Socialist circuit in the early 1900s. This seemed sort of incongruous to me. Here is a bit of the story of Ernest F. Stanton.

Birth/Family/Marriage/Children

Ernest F. Stanton was born in Alabama in March of 1864, to parents William Henry Stanton and Elmyra Antoinette Phillips. Born in Georgia, they married in Alabama, before eventually coming to Arkansas and finally Comanche County, Texas.

E. F. married Florence Zeriah Sturkie of neighboring Erath County, on May 12, 1887 in Erath County, Texas. They had nine children, including Henry Eugene Stanton (1892–1956), Paul Otis Stanton (1894–1969), Cora Stanton Wattenberger (1898–1949), Lawrence Edwin Moore Stanton (1900–1996), Emmette Owen/Olen Stanton (1903–1965), and four whose names are lost to posterity. Based on the 1900 and 1910 censuses, the Stantons lost four children between the time of their marriage in 1887 and the 1900 census taken June 9, 1900.[ii]

Ernest and Florence Stanton made an unfortunate splash in Oklahoma newspapers in the second decade of the 20th century, when he filed for divorce in February 1916.[iii] This was reported all across the state. This action may have been dismissed, as his wife later sued for divorce in 1919 “on the grounds of Desertion and gross neglect of duty.”[iv]

Ernest F. Stanton in U. S. Federal Censuses:

  • 1870 Opelika, Lee County, Alabama; At home
  • 1880 6th district, Comanche County, Texas; At home, farmer
  • 1900 Duke, Greer County, Oklahoma; Music, vocal & instrumental
  • 1910 Wellington, Collingsworth County, Texas; Teacher of music
  • 1920 War Eagle, Benton County, Arkansas; Music Teacher
  • 1930 Precinct 5, Smith County, Texas; Teacher, music

Newspaper mentions suggest Stanton moved a lot and lived in a number of other places, including in Arkansas: Larue (ca 1923); Oklahoma: Duke (ca 1902);[v] Davidson (ca 1907),[vi] Oklahoma City (ca 1907), Altus (ca 1911),[vii] Hobart (ca 1916) Lone Wolf (1918); Texas: Gorman (ca 1905), Wellington (ca 1910),[viii] Hamlin (ca 1912), Rochester (ca 1912), Smith County (1914). It is possible, however, that the newspaper reports could have gotten some of the locations wrong. Additionally, this may indicate places he lived temporarily as he traveled to teach and lecture. His death certificate (1934) states, suggests, or at least implies that his residence was in Hood County, Texas before he entered the Austin State Hospital.[ix] He had been a resident at the State Hospital for four months and 10 days (from 6/27/1934) at the time of his death (11/7/1934).

His Work

Ernest F. Stanton was a music teacher, songwriter, Baptist minister, debater, and socialist lecturer (he was listed as a farmer in the 1880 census). He actively participated in gospel singing conventions. He compiled the song book Home and Church Songs, and perhaps others. He served as an assistant editor on some other songbooks, such as Our Thankful Songs: a New Collection of Choice Gospel Songs for Prayer, Praise, and Gospel Meetings, by the A. J. Showalter Company.

Singing schools.

In connection with his music work, Stanton itinerated to teaching singing schools. For example, he taught in Proctor, Texas in 1892; Prairie Home, Oklahoma in 1900; Quartz, Oklahoma in 1902; Martha, Oklahoma in 1904: Durant, Oklahoma in 1913; Cameron, Oklahoma in 1923; Fairview, Oklahoma in 1925. These probably only represent a small portion of the singing schools he taught. In connection with this work, he was often called “Professor E. F. Stanton.” His primary fields of labor were Texas and Oklahoma.

Orator.

E. F. Stanton is labeled as a Baptist minister on several occasions. There is no evidence that he was ever a pastor, and his primary religious work was probably itinerant evangelism. Additionally, most newspaper accounts of his oratory skills refer to lectures on the subject of Socialism – suggesting he was more of an evangelist for social reform than religious revival.

When Stanton lectured at the schoolhouse at Texola, Oklahoma in 1907, the reporter found the auditors listening attentively to the entire speech, except for a “few of the younger persons who like fiction more than facts, fun more than logic” who left the building when the lectures began.[x] Likewise a Socialist Justice periodical that same year described that in a courthouse speech “For two hours the ‘Singing Orator’ held the audience spell-bound with the glorious Gospel of Socialism.” Stanton himself wrote that he “Lectured at one place before a large audience. Every man was converted to Socialism except one old man who just returned from the asylum.”[xi]

A blurb in a Pentecostal Church of the Nazarene periodical in 1918 suggests that E. F. Stanton might have been connected with that denomination at the time. On the other hand, it may be that Stanton was only ever loosely connected to the Baptists, and that his moving ministry was inclusive of all denominations.

Herald of Holiness (Kansas City, Missouri), Vol. 6, No. 45, February 13, 1918, p. 16

Debate.

Stanton engaged in debates promoting Socialism. (Newspapers mention some that failed to make.) In 1910 a four-days debate with J. L. Davis rendered for Socialism “a powerful victory,” gaining 20 new members to the Wilmoth, Oklahoma local Socialist group.[xii] I found no records of religious debates.

Other.

E. F. Stanton authored several booklets, including The Fall of Babylon (possibly a poem) and What Socialism Is and Why It Should Prevail (Gerard, KS: Appeal to Reason, 1909).

In 1910, Stanton applied for and received a patent on a crude oil burner.

In 1918, the Herald of Holiness blurb calls Stanton the president of the Stanton Art Company.

Death

Ernest F. Stanton traveled extensively in Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas – and perhaps other places not now known. He seems to have been most active in Oklahoma. Perhaps the people of this young state overall were more friendly to his Socialist views. It is not hard to imagine how this belief could have hindered him in this period. Many Christians associated Socialism with atheism. In the context of challenging Stanton to debate, Luther Roberts also announced an address on the subject in which he would “charge, and prove, that socialism was hatched in atheism and that it is today atheistic and anti-religious.” [xiii]

Stanton’s life ended in the state where it began, Texas. He spent the last four months (and 10 days) of his life at the Austin State Hospital, Travis County, Texas, and died while there. His death certificate says he is buried there in the State Asylum Cemetery. Thus ended the career of the Socialist Singing Orator.

Three songs by E. F. Stanton


[i]Socialist Lectures,” Fort Worth Telegram, Friday, August 23, 1907, p. 9. Stanton is called the “singing orator” in a number of papers in Texas and Oklahoma (his primary base of operation). For example, Justice, June 7, 1907; The Comanche News, May 31, 1904; et al.
[ii] I searched Find-A-Grave and did not find any likely burials on that site for these children.
[iii] He complained that she was “nervous, quarrelsome and irritably disposed” to such a degree “to break up his health and injure his mental equilibrium and physical health.” “Enough After 29 Years,” The Weekly Democrat-Chief (Hobart, Oklahoma), Thursday, February 17, 1916, p. 1.
[iv] “Suit for Divorce,” The Mangum Star, Thursday, December 18, 1919, p. 3. The divorce may have been granted, as he is not in the censuses with his wife in 1920 and 1930, or they may have simply lived as separated. E. F. Stanton is listed as “widowed” in those censuses (his wife was not dead), and “separated” on his death certificate.
[v] “23 Years Ago,” Altus Times-Democrat, Friday, December 25, 1925, p. 10.
[vi] “Who Opposes Socialism,” Justice (Duncan Oklahoma), Friday, June 7, 1907, p. 6. It is possible that Davidson was not where he lived, but where he was on his lecture circuit when he wrote to the newspaper. (Justice appears to be a Socialist newspaper.)
[vii] Altus Weekly News, Thursday, June 8, 1911, p. 2.
[viii] Ibid.
[ix] “Hood County, Texas” is entered over the line “If non-residence give city, or town and state.” For profession, the death certificate lists “Laborer.” This must be information collected from his records at the hospital, since the informant is “Austin State Hospital Records.”
[x] “Noted Musician Lectures Here,” The Texola Herald, Friday, August 9, 1907, p. 1.
[xi] “Who Opposes Socialism,” Justice (Duncan Oklahoma), Friday, June 7, 1907, p. 6.
[xii] “Debate At Wilmoth,” The Oklahoma Pioneer (Oklahoma City), Saturday, December 17, 1910, p. 3; The debate was held at the Cottonwood Schoolhouse near Wilmoth, beginning November 21, 1910, “on the question: ‘Resolved, That Socialism Would be to the Best Interest of the People of the United States.” Stanton favored, and Rev. J. L. Davis of Bluffdale, Texas opposed. “Debate Near Wilmoth,” The Oklahoma Pioneer, Saturday, November 12, 1901, p. 4.
[xiii]Speaking at Teacross,” Hollis Post-Herald, Thursday, January 26, 1911, p. 1.

1904 Showalter Company Advertisement

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

A Church’s Music

It seems to a large degree I have lost or failed to keep up with a part of the original focus of this blog – “Music.” Below is an interesting exposition of the church music at Refuge Reformed Church of Ogden, Utah. Pastor Brian Sauvé explains the church’s Sunday music program. I do not know this church or its pastors. (Therefore, this is not intended as a personal recommendation. It is a topic of interest.)

[Q.] “How do you do music at your church on Sundays?”

[A.] Here’s the breakdown:

We sing almost exclusively from the Cantus Christi 2020 hymnal, accompanied by a piano. Most of the settings are in four-part harmony.

We don’t amplify anything. I conduct the congregation from the front, but don’t sing into a microphone. Sometimes I sing the melody, but often I sing the Tenor part.

We sing 10 songs per service. Three of them stay the same each week (David Erb’s setting of Psalm 134, The Lord’s Prayer, and the Doxology).

The other seven usually consist of about five Psalms and two hymns. These are scattered at different points of the service, including two that we sing seated during the distribution of the bread and wine for Communion.

Why we sing in four parts:

1. It allows men to sing like men, women to sing like women, children to sing like children.

2. It takes effort. We don’t want to offer to the Lord that which costs nothing.

3. It is objectively beautiful, far more so than the best contemporary worship band I’ve ever heard—and we’re not even particularly gifted or anything.

4. Much of the great musical inheritance of the Church is in parts. Lose this skill and you lose access to the richness of that blessing.

How we learn to sing songs in parts:

Every Tuesday evening, barring the last Tuesday of the month, we have a potluck followed by a Psalm-singing workshop. I use the “Sing Your Part” app to teach each group their parts, then we practice. The actual practice is only 45 minutes, so the whole thing only takes 90 minutes each week.

We typically have about 50% of our Sunday attendance at Psalm sing on Tuesdays. This lets us learn, on average, one new song per month.

I couldn’t even read music when we started learning this stuff. Any church [can] do this if they decide to.

[Originally written in an X post on July 24, 2023, by Brian Sauvé.]

Saturday, February 10, 2024

3rd Annual Sacred Harp Singing, and other music links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Saturday, September 09, 2023

Pilsbury’s The United States Sacred Harmony

A recent addition to the Archive.org book family:

Additionally, there is an article about this book in The Hymn, July 1981:

And this one is American Music, Winter 1995:

Thanks to Barry Johnston!

Amos Pilsbury was born in Massachusetts in 1772, and died in 1812 in Charleston, South Carolina. In addition to being a composer and book compiler, he was a schoolteacher, silversmith, and a clerk in the Presbyterian Church. In 1809 he published a collection of hymn texts titled The Sacred Songster: or, a Collection of Hymns and Spiritual Songs, For the Use of Religious Assemblies (Charleston, SC: G. M. Bounetheau). Apparently he was also a music teacher, and his Find-A-Grave memorial suggests he preached at the Methodist Church in the years prior to his death.

The Charleston Mercury, November 3, 1828, p 3