An Examination of the NKJV

In discussion with Mark Ward, an editor at Lexham Press, concerning his “Why Do Our TR-Only Brothers Reject the NKJV with Such Passion,” my attention was brought to two articles by Albert Hembd, a consultant with the Trinitarian Bible Society, as well as Mark’s article now on his blog. Here are links to all three:

• An Examination of the New King James Version, Part 1 -- “Thus we see that Thomas Nelson initially proposed a mere language update of the Authorised Version (though this certainly was not the result...”
• An Examination of the New King James Version, Part 2 -- “...the New King James includes readings from the Nestle-Aland/UBS text in its marginal notes.”
• Why Do Our TR-Only Brothers Reject the NKJV with Such Passion? The Trinitarian Bible Society’s “Examination of the New King James Version” -- “I come to the Trinitarian Bible Society’s two–part, 38,000-word “Examination of the New King James Version,” written by Albert Hembd, with a question.”