Translate

Thursday, July 31, 2025

Acts 24:10-16

Verse 10: “Forasmuch as I know that thou hast been of many years a judge unto this nation, I do the more cheerfully answer for myself.” Paul also uses captatio benevolentiae (cf. verses 2-3. Latin, ‘winning of goodwill’). He is glad to answer for himself, standing before a man with experience in judgment regarding the Jewish people.

Verses 11-13: Paul wants Felix to clearly understand the circumstances, which have been both vaguely and falsely represented by Tertullus.

  • It had been but twelve days since he went up to Jerusalem to worship
  • He was worshipping (cf. 21:26-27), rather than in the temple disputing 
  • He was not “raising up the people,” that is, promoting sedition (cf. v. 5)
  • He was not doing this in the synagogues or in the city 
  • His accusers cannot prove the charges they make

Verses 14-15: He “confesses” that his accusers are correct in one thing. He worships the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in a way that the Jewish religious leaders “call heresy.” Paul is convinced that his doctrine and way of worshipping God is the correct one that believes “all things which are written in the law and in the prophets” – in distinction from the faith and practice of both the Pharisees and Sadducees.  Even in this variation, the Pharisees “allow” the faith of hope toward God (and the Sadducees who reject resurrection nevertheless do not reject the Pharisees as true Jews); that is, that “there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.”

Verse 16: “And herein do I exercise myself” – compare Paul’s statement before the council, “I have lived in all good conscience before God until this day.” To practice toward God what one believes and to project before men what one believes is to “have always a conscience void of offence toward God, and toward men.” It does not mean that all men will like it, as the Jews who brought charges against Paul obviously did not!

Wednesday, July 30, 2025

Sin takes, costs, and keeps

A riff on or derived from combining an old saying and thoughts preached last night on Jonah chapter 1 by Brother Herman Johnson, at Mt. Zion Baptist Church, July 29, 2025.

  • Sin will take you farther than you want to go.
    • “Jonah rose up to flee unto Tarshish from the presence of the Lord”
  • Sin will cost you more than you want to pay.
    • “he found a ship going to Tarshish: so he paid the fare thereof”
  • Sin will keep you longer than you want to stay.
    • “Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.”


(I still generally am not going to post on Wednesdays, but I thought this was too good to pass up, and I already had it typed up.)

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

In Memory of Mike Hinton

I paused and waited for some more appropriate person to write this memorial, to not rush ahead of someone better suited for the task. But like Elihu of old, “the spirit within me constraineth me.” About 4:30 a.m. one morning I had to get up and set down some thoughts in writing.

Samuel Michael “Mike” Hinton was born May 8, 1943, in Washington, DC, to Grover L. Hinton and Violet Denson. He was a grandson of the legendary Sacred Harp singer, teacher, and composer Thomas Jackson Denson. The Denson family created the Sacred Harp Publishing Company, and revised the 1911 James Edition of The Sacred Harp. Outliving his cousins Amanda Brady and Richard Mauldin, Mike was the last Denson family member serving the publishing company. He passed from the walks of this life at age 82, on Friday, July 18, 2025.

Mike had a long-term military career (retired from the U. S. Army Medical Service Corps, with the rank of Colonel), and became very active in the Sacred Harp Community after his retirement. Mike traveled widely and became a great and much-loved ambassador of good will for the Sacred Harp tradition. I believe that the addition of the words “Amazing grace, how sweet the sound” to No. 146 in the 2012 Cooper Edition of The Sacred Harp rose as a good-will response to that kind of good will displayed by Mike. He liked add those words to the song when he led Hallelujah.

Among other things, Mike Hinton served as Chair of the Texas State Convention (1996, 2015), the Southwest Texas Convention (2008), Rusk County Convention (2016), and Coker Singing Convention (2008-2011). Around 2012 the Coker Singing held at Mike’s church was “consolidated” into the Texas State Convention, which singing’s location was moved to the Coker Church in San Antonio, Texas. Mike was treasurer of the Texas State Convention at least for 2020-2024 (according to minutes where I found it mentioned, but possibly longer). In 2002 Mike Hinton was elected President of the Board of the Sacred Harp Publishing Company, and served in that capacity until his passing in July of 2025. In 2018, during Mike’s tenure as president, the Sacred Harp Publishing Company Board of Directors unanimously approved a revision of their 1991 Edition of The Sacred Harp (which will become available in September 2025).

I admired (even envied) Mike’s ability to prepare and present a moving memorial lesson. We asked him a number of times to conduct the memorial lesson at the East Texas Convention. Now he becomes a subject in rather than a presenter of our lessons. Surely some lessons will include that song he so loved:

And let this feeble body fail,
And let it faint and die;
My soul shall quit this mournful vale,
And soar to worlds on high.

Give joy or grief, give ease or pain,
Take life or friends away,
But let me find them all again,
In that eternal day.

Amazing grace, how sweet the sound
That saved a wretch like me.
I once was lost, but now am found,
Was blind, but now I see.

And I’ll sing hallelujah,
And you’ll sing hallelujah,
And we’ll all sing hallelujah,
When we arrive at home.

Friend, you have arrived at home. We’ll keep singing “Hallelujah” down here, knowing you are singing “Hallelujah” up there – where you may now say with experience rather than hope, “My Father’s house on high, Is my eternal home.”

Please remember Mike’s family in your prayers, and remember him when you sing.

Hallelujah

My Eternal Home

Additional information: Mike will be buried with military honors at Ft. Sam Houston National Cemetery on Wednesday, August 6th at 11:00 a.m. A Celebration of Life Service will take place at Coker Global Methodist Church in San Antonio, Texas on Saturday, October 4th at 10:00 a.m. A reception at Coker will follow this service. See Obituary.


Note: In 2016 Mike served as Chair of the Rusk County Singing Convention, a combined Christian Harmony-Cooper Sacred Harp Convention. I also remember Mike serving as Chair of the Smith Memorial Convention, but did not find the records to show what year or years.

Monday, July 28, 2025

A sheaf of the first-fruits

“A sheaf of the first-fruits.” Leviticus 23:10

“Help me, Lord, I pray thee, in my heart, in my house, in the field, in the city, in the church, in the closet, in the world, in the family, to be for ever waving before my God, ‘the sheaf of the first-fruits’ in all his bounties. In Jesus I have all; in Jesus would I enjoy all; and then shall I most assuredly have that sweet promise for ever fulfilling in my heart: ‘Honour the Lord with thy substance, and with the first-fruits of all thine increase: so shall thy barns be filled with plenty, and thy presses shall burst out with new wine;’ Proverbs 3:9, 10.”

Robert Hawker (1753-1827)


Sunday, July 27, 2025

The McMaster Hymn

Daniel Arthur McGregor (1847-1890) wrote “Jesus, Wondrous Saviour.” It is popularly known known as “The McMaster Hymn” because it is the “official unofficial” hymn of McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Written in 1889, in 1921 McGregor’s family donated the original manuscript to the McMaster University. The hymn extols and expresses of the ectasy of devout worship.

1. Jesus, wondrous Saviour! Christ, of kings the king!
Angels fall before thee, prostrate worshipping;
Fairest they confess thee in the Heav’n above.
We would sing thee fairest here in hymns of love.

2. Fairer far than sunlight unto eyes that wait
Amid fear and darkness, ’til the morning break;
Fairer than the day-dawn, hills and dales among,
When its tide of glory wakes the tide of song.

3. Sweeter far than music quivering from keys
That unbind all feeling with strange harmonies.
Thou art more and dearer than all minstrelsy;
Only in thy presence can joy’s fullness be.

4. All earth’s flowing pleasures were a wintry sea,
Heav’n itself without thee dark as night would be.
Lamb of God! Thy glory is the light above.
Lamb of God! Thy glory is the life of love.

5. Life is death if severed from thy throbbing heart.
Death with life abundant at thy touch would start.
Worlds and men and angels all consist in thee:
Yet thou camest to us in humility.

6. Jesus! All perfections rise and end in thee;
Brightness of God’s glory thou, eternally,
Favored beyond measure they thy face who see;
May we gracious Saviour, share this ecstasy.

Daniel Arthur McGregor was born December 13, 1847 in Ontario, Canada, the son of Alexander and Clementine McGregor. He died at age 42 on April 25, 1890 in New York City, USA. He was in New York for surgery for a spinal disorder that had caused paralysis. McGregor was a Baptist pastor in Ontario, then later professor at Toronto Bible College and McMaster University.

The hymn is sung to the tune Franconia by Thomas Hastings and can also be sung to Hermas by Frances Havergal. There is also a tune called McMaster that fits. I am unsure which tune is used by the McMaster University. The hymn is not common in popular hymn books, but can be found in Psalms and Hymns and Spiritual Songs (# 157; Knoxville, TN: Melody Publications, 2020) and Living Hymns: Psalms, Hymns, and Spiritual Songs of Faith (# 88; Alfred B. Smith, 1972/2019, Lancaster, CA: Striving Together Publications). I could not find a sung version of it, but found it played on the piano HERE.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

In other words, including Catholic and Orthodox stuff

  • aristocratic, adjective. Of or relating to the nobility; of or relating to government by an aristocracy (cf. demotic).
  • bespoke, adjective. Custom-made.
  • catechumen, noun. A convert to Christianity receiving training in doctrine and discipline before baptism.
  • demotic, adjective. Of or relating to the common people; popular (cf. aristocratic).
  • diluvial, adjective. Pertaining to or caused by a flood or deluge.
  • diocese, noun. A geographical area or ecclesiastical district under the direction of a single bishop (used in this way by the Roman Catholic church, the Greek Orthodox churches, the Anglican Communion, and others).
  • diurnal, adjective. Of or belonging to the daytime (cf. nocturnal).
  • Filioque, noun. The Roman Catholic doctrine that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son (from Latin, “and the son”).
  • gainsay, verb. To declare to be false or invalid; to oppose, especially by contradiction.
  • glyph, noun. A pictograph or hieroglyph; a sculptured figure or relief carving.
  • heresy, noun. An opinion or doctrine at variance with the orthodox or accepted doctrine, especially of a church or religious system.
  • Icon, noun. (Theology) A representation or picture of a sacred or sanctified Christian personage, used and venerated - especially in Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • Iconoclast, noun. A person who breaks or destroys images, especially those set up for religious veneration.
  • Iconophile, noun. A person who religiously venerates icons or images.
  • mugwump, noun. A person who is unable to make up his or her mind on an issue (especially in politics); a person who is neutral on a controversial issue.
  • nocturnal, adjective. Of or relating to the night (cf. diurnal).
  • par excellence, adjective. Being an example of excellence; superior; preeminent.
  • parish, noun. An ecclesiastical district having its own church and member of the clergy; (in the state of Louisiana) The equivalent of a county.
  • primate, noun. A chief or leader; (Eastern Orthodox) The archbishop (aka patriarch) ranking first among the bishops in each of the separate autocephalous hierarchical churches professing Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • pontifex, noun. (Roman religion) A member of the Pontifical College, which was presided over by a chief priest Pontifex Maximus; (Roman Catholic religion) A bishop; the Roman Catholic pope, the Bishop of Rome.
  • Quartodecimanism, noun. The celebration of Easter on the fourteenth of Nisan according to the Jewish lunar calendar -- regardless of what day of the week on which it occurred.
  • replevy, verb. To take or get back by a writ for replevin (an action regarding personal property which is claimed to be wrongfully taken).
  • Theotokos, noun. A title for Mary, the mother of Jesus, used especially in Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • Tonsure, noun. The practice of cutting or shaving some or all of the hair on the scalp as a sign of religious devotion or humility.
  • voluntarism, noun. The concept that belief is a matter of the will.
  • Vulgate, noun. (Latin “common”) A translation of the Bible into Latin from the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek (by Jerome, who lived circa AD 342-420).
  • zeitgeist, noun. The spirit of the times; the general trend of thought, feeling, or tastes characteristic of a particular period of time.

Friday, July 25, 2025

God was manifest in the flesh

George Sayles Bishop on the Revision Version of 1885.

The Revision weakens and removes the Deity of Christ in many places—I will mention five: 

I Tim. 3:1—“Great is the mystery of godliness, God was manifest in the flesh.” The Revision leaves out θεὸς God, and renders it “Great is the mystery of godliness, He who was manifest in the flesh,”—i. e., the manifested One was only one phase—the highest—of godliness, the precise rendering for which all the Unitarians have been contending for the last 1,800 years…Dr. Scrivener says his senses report it Theos. “I have examined it twenty times within as many years,” he declares, “and seeing (as every man must do for himself with my own eyes, I have always felt convinced that Codex ‘A’ reads Theos.” That conviction of Dr. Scrivener is my conviction and on the very same grounds—a conviction so deep that I will never yield it, nor admit as a text of my faith a Book pretending to be a Revelation from God which leaves that word out. The Holy Ghost has written it—let no man dare touch it—Great is the mystery of godliness, God was manifest in the flesh.

“Oh, but it is only one word!” yes, but one word of Scripture of which it is said “Thou has magnified Thy Word above all Thy Name!” “Only one Word!” But that word “God.” Better the whole living church of God should perish than that that one word should perish. If any take away from the words of the book of this prophecy God shall take away his part.” Let criticism pause. The principle at stake is solemn.

George Sayles Bishop, “The Principles and the Tendency of the Revision Examined,” in The Doctrines of Grace: and Kindred Themes, New York, NY: Gospel Publishing House, 1910, pp. 78-80.

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Acts 24:6-9

Chapter 24 divides into three parts – 1-9 Ananias and Tertullus, against Paul; 10-21 Paul answers for himself; 22-27 the responses of Felix.

In this chapter Luke records both Tertullus and Paul speaking to the governor, Felix, then concludes with the varied responses of Felix.

A textual variant not in modern translations.

Verses 6-8: “who also hath gone about to profane the temple: whom we took, and would have judged according to our law. But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands, commanding his accusers to come unto thee: by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him.” 

Most modern English translations do not include the bolded portion. It is in the King James Bible, the Textus Receptus Greek New Testament, Codices Laudianus (E, 6th century), Athous Laurae (Ψ, 8th century) and the Latin Vulgate (4th century). It explains the situation, from the accusers’ standpoint, which is left somewhat vague otherwise. Internal evidence supports the reading. The fact that Felix wanted to hear more from Lysias (v. 22) supports the reading, because a reference to Lysias is made by Tertullus and Felix would need to look into that.

Verse 9: The other Jews present testified to their agreement with the charges Tertullus made against Paul.

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

Faith Promise Giving, once more

Awhile back I had an anonymous commenter challenge my blog post about faith promise giving as “a total misunderstanding of what Oswald J Smith taught.” The person writes:

“This is a total misunderstanding of what Oswald J Smith taught on the matter. Furthermore, if you listened to him carefully, you’d have known that he wasn’t the creator of the idea.
“A faith promise was a promise one made to God to trust him to provide for them to give more than they thought their budget would allow. They would then believe God to provide for them to give what they had promised. He never asked anyone to be foolish or unwise but only to trust God to help them give more than they themselves might be able to without His extra provision. Respectfully presented. Nothing unbiblical about that.”

I replied briefly then, but make these additional remarks. Let us look a little further. Below is the 2-page tract of Oswald J. Smith (in Times roman type) and some responses from me (in Arial italic type).

A FAITH PROMISE OFFERING

Oswald J. Smith, Litt. D.*

A Faith Promise Offering is a Scriptural offering; it is a Pauline offering, and, therefore, God blesses it (2 Corinthians 8-9).

The Apostle Paul took up Faith Promise offerings. He would get the Church to promise a certain amount and then he would give the Church a year to pay it. Then, you remember, as the year drew to a close, he would send Titus, or someone else, to remind the Church of the promise that had been made, so that he would not be ashamed when he arrived. He wanted to be sure it would be paid. Then, at the end of the year, he came and collected it.

In this tract, Oswald Smith grounds his system in the practice of Paul, the apostle. Does his explanation match the practice of Paul? Only in a caricatured way. Of course, the Bible mentions no such thing as a “Faith Promise Offering.” No doubt, Smith would likely admit that and say he put a name to a principle he found in the Bible. Does this principle and practice exist? While Smith says Paul “would get the Church to promise a certain amount,” the text of 2 Corinthians 8-9 says no such thing. In fact, it is much the opposite. The churches of Macedonia were willing of their own liberality, and asked Paul to receive and distribute their gift (8:3-4). Further, Paul said that he spoke “not by commandment” (8:8).

In this tract Oswald J. Smith presents Faith Promise as a scriptural manner of giving. However, in Smith’s personal testimony “How God Taught Me To Give,” we find he did not discover this method through Bible study. Rather than taught from the word of God, he says that God spoke to him and told him to give a faith offering (and how much to give). All told, this gives the smell of an adopted practice that went searching for scripture to back it up – and 2 Corinthians 8-9 was the best available.

Have you ever in your life given a Faith Offering, or have you only given a cash offering? It doesn’t require any faith to give a cash offering. If I have a dollar in my pocket, all I have to do is tell my hand to go into my pocket, find the dollar, take it out and put it on the [offering] plate. I don’t have to pray about it. I don’t have to ask God for it. I don’t have to trust Him for any definite amount. I just have to give it.”

In encouraging to offer by “faith” what they do not have, Smith disparages those who give out of what they have – even though Paul said, “it is accepted according to that a man hath, and not according to that he hath not” (8:12). Such a standard also disparages the “cash offering” of the poor widow who threw in her two mites, all that she had (Mark 12:41-44; Luke 21:1-4).

But with a Faith Promise Offering it is entirely different. I have to pray about it and ask God how much He would have me give, and then trust Him for it, and month by month go to Him in prayer and ask Him for the amount promised, and wait upon Him until it comes in. that is the offering that brings the blessing.”

Smith would have us believe that those who do not give faith promises are not spiritual in their giving – they are not moved by faith in God, and they do not pray about their giving. This disparages the faith and practice of all those who do not follow his method.

That is about the only kind of an offering I have taken up for Missions in all these years, well over a quarter of a century now—a Faith Promise Offering. I would never go back to a cash offering. With a cash offering I could only get a very little, but with a Faith Promise Offering I can get much. In our Annual Missionary Convention we never get more than $7,000 in cash, but we get a quarter of a million or more in Faith Promises.

The testimony in this paragraph has nothing to do with scriptural or spiritual giving, but descends into pure pragmatics – we get a lot more money this way.

There is many a church that will not give a Faith Promise Offering. They are not interested in Scriptural giving. They will not obligate themselves for the definite support of their missionaries. They will not promise a certain amount to any one worker. They simply divide whatever comes in, in the way of cash, between various missionary societies. They don’t have to trust God for anything. If it comes in, they give it. But since there is no need to exercise faith, therefore there is no burden, no responsibility. I have no use for that kind of giving. I believe that every individual church should obligate itself in faith before God for a certain definite amount, and pray until that amount has been received.

The disparaging continues. Those who will not give a “Faith Promise Offering…are not interested in Scriptural giving.” Those who do not give this way are not trusting God. How arrogant, how high-handed! 

I do not believe in pledges. I have never taken up a pledge offering in my life. What is the difference, you ask, between a pledge offering and a Faith Promise Offering? All the difference in the world. A pledge offering is between you and a church, between you and a missionary society, and some day the deacons may come along and try to collect it, or you may receive a letter asking for it. In other words, you can be held responsible for a pledge offering.

A Faith Promise Offering, on the other hand, is between you and God. No one will ever ask you for it. No official will ever call on you to collect it. No one will ever send you a letter reminding you of it. It is a promise made by you to God, and to God alone. If you are unable to pay it, all you have to do is to tell God. Give Him your excuse and if He accepts it, you are free. You do not have to pay it. That, I say, is a Faith Promise Offering. That is the kind of an offering I preach and teach and take everywhere I go. I want to be Scriptural in all I do.

In these two paragraphs, Smith unconsciously contradicts his foundational text. Paul’s practice is like the pledge offering, between the church at Corinth and the missionary society (Paul and his co-laborers). Like the pledge, where someone will come along and try to collect it, so Paul “came and collected it.” In Smith’s “Faith Promise” system, “no one will ever ask you for it” – but in his description of Paul’s system, someone does ask for it! His text will not bear the weight of his teaching.

I have gone to many a church that has been opposed to a pledge offering, but as soon as I have explained the nature of a Faith Promise Offering, all opposition has disappeared, and those who have been most antagonistic to a pledge of any kind, have been perfectly willing to accept the plan of a Faith Promise Offering, and God has accomplished wonders.

I believe we could get all the missionary money we need if we would take up Faith Promise Offerings in all our churches.

These two paragraphs once again appeal to the pragmatism of the practice. I have no problem believing that doing things God’s way is practical. However, that is not the reason we do those things. And in this case, Smith fails to clearly establish that his practice comports with Scripture. 

Interestingly, Smith promotes this as a marvelous missions munificence, while never bothering to explain that this New Testament era collection was being taken for the saints at Jerusalem, not missions.

Have you ever given such an offering? If not, do it and you will be amazed the way God will bless you.

* Dr. Oswald J. Smith was the originator of the idea of a Faith Promise offering for missions. For many years, he was pastor of The Peoples Church in Toronto, Canada, where he challenged that congregation to raise $1 for missions for every $1 they spent on themselves. That story still continues today with his son as pastor.

The anonymous respondent claimed that “if you listened to him carefully, you’d have known that he wasn’t the creator of the idea.” Yet this tract plainly credits Oswald J. Smith as “the originator of the idea of a Faith Promise offering for missions.” I didn’t make that up.

Perhaps “anonymous” can equivocate because there were some antecedents before Smith created the “Faith Promise offering for missions.” 

In “Faith Promise Giving,” Eugene Gurganus says it originated with A. B. Simpson and was refined by Oswald J. Smith (Missions in the Local Church, Melbourne E. Cuthbert, Jeannie Lockerbie, 1998 p. 147). I think the clarity is found that Simpson was using a form of pledging which Smith refined and named “Faith Promise.”

How God Taught Me to Give” by Oswald J. Smith is his personal testimony that shows he does not credit the word of God for showing him this truth, but a sort of subjective experience in which God told him to give a faith promise offering.

In the video How God Taught Me to Give, Oswald Smith tells his experience, beginning with the Proverbs 11:24-25. Despite starting with a text, the testimony is based on an experience, not from studying the Bible.

Perhaps Smith’s own son helps clear up the timeline. He writes about it this way:
The first faith promise offering in our times was probably organized by a Presbyterian minister. Dr. A. B. Simpson founded the Christian and Missionary Alliance denomination — although a denomination was not a part of his original vision. Dr. Simpson was greatly concerned about world evangelization and the older Alliance churches existed primarily to promote and support foreign missions.

To do this they had a missionary convention every year at which their people were urged to designate a large percentage of their total giving to missions. They still do this. The offering is a commitment of what people will trust God to enable them to do win the next twelve months and it is generally called a pledge. The Christian and Missionary Alliance churches established the system and led the way for the rest of us in this kind of giving for missions.


The Alliance method of raising money for mission captured father’s imagination, but he was bothered by their use of the word ‘pledge.’ …My father searched for some word that would express the concept that had always been used in the Christian and Missionary Alliance churches – a word to take the place of ‘pledge.’

He concluded that the two words ‘faith promise’ would be ideal. This would retain the missionary offering concept of the Alliance people and eliminate the unfortunate connotations of the word ‘pledge.’ Whether or not this was actually originated by father I do not know. However, it is safe to say that it was his ministry that made the evangelical world familiar with the expression ‘faith promise.’ Very few of the tracts or booklets that have been written on the subject can complete their topic without reference at some point to Dr. Oswald J. Smith. (The Senders: World Missions Conferences and Faith Promise Offerings, Paul B. Smith, Burlington, Ontario: Welch Publishing Company, Inc., 1979, pp. 59-61)
So, according Paul Smith, Oswald J. Smith’s son, the “faith promise” system rose out of the missions pledge of the Christian and Missionary Alliance. Smith tweaked it, gave it a new name, and new emphasis. The contemporary “faith promise giving” most certainly finds its genesis in Smith, even if he drew on the previous practices of others. Nevertheless, whether it originated with Oswald J. Smith, A. B. Simpson, or someone else is a deflection from the scriptural discussion, and will not make the errors of it scriptural.

“You don’t need any faith to give a cash offering,” says Oswald J. Smith. Says I, “Tell that to the poor widow who gave her two mites.”

Note: For another writing on Faith Promise giving, see Is “Faith Promise Mission Giving” Bible-Based?

Monday, July 21, 2025

Impoverished and Insolvent

“I was born into an impoverished and insolvent family and then I squandered all that I ever had even selling my own self into slavery.  Were it not that my elder BROTHER, CHRIST my LORD in Sovereign Mercy did undertake the discharge of my debts I would surely perish, starving to death in abject bondage.”

Mike McInnis, Grace Chapel, O’Brien, Florida

Sunday, July 20, 2025

John 3:16, with an air from the county of Londonderry

I ran across the following lyrics in an online blog comment. I did not know the source or who wrote the words. When I first searched, I found the words in a book called Echoes of Grace (Addison, IL: Bible Truth Publishers, 1951), but it was uncredited.

For God so loved
The world; I find it written,
In verse sixteen
John’s Gospel chapter three.
He gave his son
Who was for sinners smitten
When nailed upon
The cross at Calvary.

Such wondrous love,
It passes human knowledge,
That Jesus died
That we might ever live;
Eternal Life
That none need ever perish,
This Life to all believing souls he now will give.

The words are arranged to be sung to the tune Londonderry Air (or as originally transcribed by Jane Ross simply called “An Air from the County of Londonderry,” where it was heard). This tune is known to most folks as the music to the popular song, Danny Boy. We have then an air composed by an unknown composer, fused with lyrics written by an unknown author – which combine to share the Gospel message of “God so loved the world.”

As I continued to search, I found two gems – that there is a recording of this song on YouTube, and that it was included in a hymn book called The Gospel Singout (No. 54, p. 12, words only, again without attribution). These songs were sung in the Bukit Bintang Senior Sunday School at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

See here for a printed score of the Londonderry Air.

Note: As I was working on this, it struck me that the tune for the Dottie Rambo song He Looked Beyond My Fault and Saw My Need is the tune Londonderry Air. If I knew that, I had forgotten.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

Statement on the Antichrist, and other links

The posting of links does not constitute an endorsement of the sites linked, and not necessarily even agreement with the specific posts linked.

Friday, July 18, 2025

The Homer

Ezekiel 45:10 Ye shall have just balances, and a just ephah, and a just bath.

Hebrew: חֹמֶר —transliteration: homer or chomer — is a Hebrew measurement, which equals about 8 bushels.

The homer was used as a standard comparison for the ephah (dry measurement) and the bath (liquid measurement). See Ezekiel 45:10-11.

  • Leviticus 27:16
  • Numbers 11:32
  • Isaiah 5:10
  • Ezekiel 45:11, 13, 14
  • Hosea 3:2

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Acts 24:1-6

Chapter 24:1-9 presents Ananias and Tertullus, against Paul.

Verse 1: Five days after Paul was sent to Felix, Ananias the high priest, some of the elders, and an orator whose name was Tertullus, arrived in Cæsarea to make their charges against Paul.

Verses 2-3: As an orator, Tertullus’s purpose is to make a good presentation of the case against Paul. He began the accusation by first shrewdly addressing the governor, Felix. As Paul in Acts 22:1 (q.v.), Tertullus uses captatio benevolentiae (Latin, ‘winning of goodwill’). He praises the peace achieved under Felix’s rulership (“we enjoy great quietness”), his provisions toward the Jewish nation, and he expressed the gratefulness of the people to Felix for these things.

Verses 4-6a: Tertullus appreciates Felix’s clemency (kind disposition toward them, επιεικεια), and alludes to the fact that he will not be tedious by imposing on his kindness or lengthy in his address, but would rather make the case in “a few words.”[i]

The charges of the Jews against Paul are fourfold, “we have found this man” to be:

  • “a pestilent fellow”
    •     He is one who carries disease and death; he is a plague
  • “a mover of sedition among all the Jews”
    •     He is moving Jews toward rebellion; all the Jews, throughout the Roman world 
  • “a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes”
    •     He is – ringleader, sect, Nazarenes – certain truth presented in a negative light
  • “who also hath gone about to profane the temple”
    •     He profaned the temple, the immediate complaint that set off the entire affair

The first two charges are worded in a way that could be concerning to a Roman governor. A general public nuisance is something of which the sitting governor should want to take note. However, the actual “sedition” to which Paul moved “all Jews” throughout the world was toward believing their Messiah had come in the person of Jesus, who died for their sins and rose for their justification. He did not incite violence or promote any rebellion against the Roman government.

The last two charges were concerning religious issues, as Lysias had written, “whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law.”


[i] “It was also customary to promise brevity, though such is human nature that the promise is rarely kept.” Acts. Longenecker, p. 335. He sees the praises of peace and provisions as an “appeal to Felix’s vanity.” The character of this governor was “frequent displays of ferocity, cruelty, and greed.”

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Born of God

John 1:11-13 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

The sinner must be born. But born how?

This text sets up a contrast between the human and the divine in salvation, the new birth. A threefold negative denies any recourse to any human source.

  1. Not of blood. (cf. Acts 17:26; Matthew 3:9)
  2. Nor of the will of the flesh. (cf. John 3:6; Matthew 6:27)
  3. Nor of the will of man. (cf. John 5:40; 6:44)

This threefold cord is too strong to be broken. It will not allow for salvation by any human means. The Jews prided themselves on being the descendants of Abraham. Even children of Christian parents may take false refuge in that type of relationship. Three times we are told that being born sons of God is not of man. Man cannot breed or birth his own salvation. Man cannot bring forth his own salvation. Man cannot buy or borrow his own salvation. It is not by human descent, human desire, or human development. Man cannot save himself. Salvation is of the Lord (Jonah 2:9; Ephesians 2:8-9).

In stark contrast to the threefold denial, John confirms, but [born] of God. Salvation is a divine work, not a human achievement.

John 6:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

  • as many as received him
  • to them gave he power (to become the sons of God)
  • them that believe on his name

Born of God!

“Ye must be born again.” (John 3:7)

Monday, July 14, 2025

Rambling abroad

“It is want of business at home in men’s own hearts, that makes them ramble so much abroad, and rake into the lives of others. Study yourselves more, and other men less. Did you search your own hearts and lives, you would find so much cause of self-judging and self-abhorring, that you would have little cause to despise others, and much cause of compassion toward others.” 

Matthew Poole, How May Detraction Be Best Prevented or Cured?

Sunday, July 13, 2025

Christ For Us

The hymn below, by Horatius Bonar, was apparently first published in his Communion Hymns (London: James Nisbet & Company, 1881, pp. 74-75). It is titled “Christ For Us,” emphasizing our salvation through the merit of God’s Son, and none of our own – staking our whole eternity on “another’s life, another’s death.” The hymn consists of eight stanzas of 4 lines, in Long Meter. I have not seen it printed with music, though I feel surely it has been. I suggest that the tune Hebron by Lowell Mason might be a tune that will match it well.

Christ For Us.

1. On merit not my own I stand;
On doings which I have not done,
Merit beyond what I can claim,
Doings more perfect than my own.

2. Upon a life I have not lived,
Upon a death I did not die,
Another’s life, another’s death,
I stake my whole eternity.

3. Not on the tears which I have shed:
Not on the sorrows I have known,
Another’s tears, another’s griefs,
On them I rest, on them alone.

4. Jesus, O Son of God, I build
On what Thy cross has done for me;
There both my death and life I read,
My guilt, my pardon there I see.

5. Lord, I believe; oh deal with me
As one who has Thy word believed;
I take the gift, Lord look on me
As one who has Thy gift received.

6. I taste the love the gift contains,
I clasp the pardon which it brings,
And pass up to the living source
Above, whence all this fullness springs.

7. Here at Thy feast, I grasp the pledge
Which life eternal to me seals,
Here in the bread and wine I read
The grace and peace Thy death reveals.

8. O fullness of the eternal grace,
O wonders past all wondering!
Here in the hall of love and song,
We sing the praises of our King.

Horatius Bonar was born at Old Broughton, Edinburgh, Scotland in 1808, the son of James Bonar and Marjory Pyott Maitland. He was educated at the high school and university at Edinburgh. Bonar was ordained in the Church of Scotland in 1837, and in 1843 he joined the Free Church of Scotland. Bonar pastored 21 years in Kelso and 19 in Edinburgh. He authored many prose works and numerous works of poetry. Though an eminent minister and theological writer, he is probably best remembered today as a hymnwriter. Doubtless his best-known (and possibly best) hymn is “I heard the voice of Jesus say…

Around 1845, Horatius Bonar married Jane Catherine Lundie, a daughter of the Scottish minister Robert Lundie. They had at least seven children. Bonar died at his home in Edinburgh on July 31, 1889. He and his wife are buried in the Canongate Churchyard in Edinburgh.

Saturday, July 12, 2025

If you get word, and other quotes

The posting of quotes by human authors does not constitute agreement with either the quotes or their sources. (I try to confirm the sources that I give, but may miss on occasion; please verify if possible.)

“It matters not who was the Kings Secretary, or with what Pen it was written, if it be once known that it was the King who made the Order or Decree” -- Matthew Poole

“If you get word that Bro. E. L. Jones is dead, don’t believe a word of it. I will be more alive than ever.” -- Eugene Lorenzo Jones

“You’re seeking validation from a world that crucified God!” -- Copied

“God is not looking for more stars; He’s looking for more servants.” -- Howard G. Hendricks

“You can’t expect God to be the source of your peace if the world is the source of your satisfaction.” -- Unknown

“It is the task of the pastor and of the church to feed the sheep. If someone who is not a sheep comes in, that’s fine, but we’re not going to change the menu and give the sheep goat food.” -- R. C. Sproul

“To erase the wrong is as important as writing the right.” -- Unknown

“Doctors care for the body’s condition; pastors care for the soul’s destination.” -- Clife Prayer

“A woman’s heart should be so close to God that a man should have to chase Him to find her.” -- C. S. Lewis

“I would give the children music, physics and philosophy, but the most important is music, for in the patterns of the arts are the keys to all learning.” -- Plato

“Ministers…are called labourers, and should not be loiterers.” -- Matthew Henry Commentary

“Many on earth hate to hear the word ‘repent’. Many in Hell wish they could hear it once more!” -- Unknown

“Adam was the first sinner, but Cain the first murderer.” -- Thomas Manton

Friday, July 11, 2025

Pagan names and pagan food?

Sometimes cultural decisions either can be or seem to be tricky. Pastor Calvin Summers of Glenfawn Baptist Church pointed out how that the four Hebrew children captured by the Babylonians accepted the king’s names (Daniel 1:7), but rejected the king’s meat (Daniel 1:8ff). That is interesting to ponder.

There is no indication in the context that they refused (to be called by) the names, as they did refuse the meat. That doesn’t mean they preferred or liked the names, but suggests they acquiesced to that which was external and outside their control. We are not responsible for what someone else does (including what they call us), but we are responsible for our own choices (including what we eat).

I think there is a lesson here to ponder.


Thursday, July 10, 2025

Acts 23:31-35

Acts 23:

31-35 Paul sent to Felix in Cæsarea

Verse 31: The nighttime leg of the trip brings Paul to Antipatris, a city built by Herod the Great during the first century BC.[1] It was named in honor of Herod’s father, Antipater. It was located on the Roman road from Jerusalem to Cæsarea, roughly halfway – about 30 miles northeast from Jerusalem and about 30 miles southwest from Cæsarea.

Verse 32-33: On the next day, the soldiers turned back to their place in Jerusalem, while the horsemen went on with Paul to Cæsarea. This might serve as a diversionary tactic, but most likely is that many soldiers were unnecessary for the rest of the trip once they had created separation between themselves and the plotters at Jerusalem. Upon arrival at Cæsarea, they delivered the letter and the prisoner to Felix.

Verse 34-35: Felix read the letter, then inquired of Paul his citizenship. Paul was of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, and so Felix was satisfied that he was in the right jurisdiction. Apparently this was so, since, even though the disturbance occurred in Jerusalem, Paul was a citizen of a Roman province. Felix ordered that Paul be kept over in Herod’s judgment hall until his accusers could also come for the hearing.


[1] This is now the site of the Tel Afek National Park in Israel.

Tuesday, July 08, 2025

Cain and Abel

Cain.

Old Testament. (Cain is mentioned in Genesis 4)

  • He is the first-mentioned child of Adam & Eve. Genesis 4:1
  • He was a tiller of the ground. Genesis 4:2
  • He brought of the fruit of the ground as an offering. Genesis 4:3
  • His offering was not respected by God. Genesis 4:5a
  • He became angry with God and his brother. Genesis 4:5b ff.
  • He killed Abel, his brother. Genesis 4:8ff.
  • He was punished by God. Genesis 4:9ff.
  • He took a wife and had children. Genesis 4:16ff.

New Testament. (Cain is mentioned 3 times in the NT)

  • Hebrews 11:4 By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.
  • 1 John 3:12 Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.
  • Jude 1:11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
  • Cain’s offering was not by faith. Hebrews 11:4
  • He followed the wicked one, his spiritual father. 1 John 3:12
  • His works were evil. 1 John 3:12 (He did not become evil because he slew his brother, but he slew his brother because he was evil.)
  • He had his own way. Jude 1:11 (Proverbs 14:12; 16:25)

Abel.

Old Testament. (Abel is mentioned in Genesis 4)

  • He is the second-mentioned child of Adam & Eve. Genesis 4:2
  • He was a keeper of sheep. Genesis 4:2
  • He brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof, as an offering. Genesis 4:4a
  • His offering was respected by God. Genesis 4:4b
  • His brother talked to him. Genesis 4:8a
  • He was killed by his brother, Cain. Genesis 4:8b
  • His blood cried for retribution. Genesis 4:10-11
  • He was “replaced” by his brother Seth. Genesis 4:25

New Testament. (Abel is mentioned 4 times in the NT)

  • He is called righteous (his blood requires retribution). Matthew 23:35; Luke 11:51
  • His offering was by faith. Hebrews 11:4
  • His blood does not speak as well as Christ’s. Hebrews 12:24.
  • Matthew 23:35 that upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
  • Luke 11:51 from the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
  • Hebrews 11:4 By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.
  • Hebrews 12:24 and to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.

Why did God accept Abel’s sacrifice and not Cain’s sacrifice? 

  • (Note: both Cain and his offering were not accepted.) 
  • Abel was righteous and Cain was unrighteous. Matthew 23:35; Hebrews 11:4; John 3:12
  • Abel and his sacrifice were accepted by faith. Hebrews 11:4
  • Cain and his sacrifice were unacceptable because of no faith. Hebrews 11:4; compare Hebrews 11.
  • 1 John 3:12 states that Cain was “of that wicked one.” Jude compares Cain to false prophets that had went Cain’s way and were like, “spots in your feasts of charity…” (Jude 11-12). 
  • Hebrews 11:6 - “without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.”
  • “An high look, and a proud heart, and the plowing of the wicked, is sin” (Proverbs 21:4).

Cain gave his sacrifice:

  1. from a wicked heart 
  2. without faith

Monday, July 07, 2025

The zeal of God’s house

“The zeal of God’s house ate up our Master, and it is but a small matter that it should also consume His servants. If, by excessive labor we die before reaching the average age of man, worn out in the Master’s service, then glory be to God. We shall have so much less of earth and so much more of Heaven! And suppose we should be abused, misrepresented, and slandered for Christ’s sake, then glory be to God that we had a reputation to lose for His sake, and blessed be our Lord who counted us worthy to lose it!”

Charles H. Spurgeon, “How to Meet the Evils of the Age,” An All-Around Ministry: Addresses to Ministers and Students

Sunday, July 06, 2025

Leave It There

Leave It There is a 20th-century gospel song by Charles A. Tindley. Thematically it urges Christians to cast all their care upon God – “for he careth for you.” Leaving whatever burden you have with and on the Lord remembers that the “little bird” (five sparrows sold for two farthings) is not forgotten before God. “Fear not therefore: ye are of more value than many sparrows” (Luke 12:7). Your burden might be pain, assault of enemies, or even old age. Whatever it is, be assured that God is in control and God cares.

The chorus line “If you trust and never doubt, He will surely bring you out” sounds a bit man-centered, as if God’s deliverance might hinge on our never doubting. However, considering that the rest of the hymn extols a God who will never leave you, the intent may rather be an exhortation to the believer to never doubt, since the Lord is completely trustworthy.

The song was copyrighted in 1916 in the book New Songs of Paradise.

1. If the world from you withhold of its silver and its gold,
And you have to get along with meager fare,
Just remember, in His Word, how he feeds the little bird,
Take your burden to the Lord and leave it there.

Refrain:
Leave it there, leave it there,
Take your burden to the Lord and leave it there.
If you trust and never doubt, He will surely bring you out,
Take your burden to the Lord and leave it there.

2. If your body suffers pain and your health you can’t regain,
And your soul is almost sinking in despair,
Jesus knows the pain you feel, he can save and he can heal,
Take your burden to the Lord and leave it there.
[Refrain]

3. When your enemies assail and your heart begins to fail,
Don’t forget that God in heaven answers prayer;
He will make a way for you and will lead you safely through,
Take your burden to the Lord and leave it there.
[Refrain]

4. When your youthful days are gone and old age is stealing on,
And your body bends beneath the weight of care,
He will never leave you then, he’ll go with you to the end,
Take your burden to the Lord and leave it there.
[Refrain]

The author of this song was a Methodist Episcopal minister, composer, and hymnwriter. Charles Albert Tindley was born July 7, 1851 in Berlin, Maryland. His parents were Charles and Hester (or Esther) Miller Tindley. According to some sources, his father was a slave, and his mother was free. Tindley’s mother died when he was about 4 years old. His mother’s sister, Caroline Miller Robbins, took him in and raised him.[i] Circa 1880, he married Anna Daisy Henry and they had twelve children (according to the 1900 census; some probably died in infancy). The children were very musically active, and son Charles arranged some his father’s songs. Elbert was a preacher and musical evangelist. The music of Tindley influenced Thomas A. Dorsey.

Daisy Tindley died December 7, 1924, on the eve of the opening of the new Tindley Temple building of East Calvary Methodist Episcopal Church. She was buried at the Eden Cemetery in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. Tindley remarried in 1927 to Jenny Caulk Cotton, the widow of Wesley H. Cotton, also a Methodist minister. Charles A. Tindley died July 26, 1933, and was buried at the Eden Cemetery.

Tindley, sometimes called the “Father of Gospel Music,” never received formal training. He taught himself to read and write, and took a correspondence course to train for the ministry. Besides Leave It There, some of his best-known songs are Stand By Me (which Ben E. King developed into a secular song in the 1960s), Nothing Between, The Storm Is Passing Over, and We’ll Understand It Better By and By (aka When the Morning Comes). Tindley’s song I’ll Overcome Someday became the basis of and was arranged & adapted for the civil rights anthem We Shall Overcome.

Tindley became a full-time pastor at the Bainbridge Street Methodist Episcopal Church in 1902. In 1904 they relocated to become the East Calvary Methodist Episcopal Church. A new building (later renamed Tindley Temple circa 1927) was built in 1924. Though perhaps now best remembered because of his music, in his lifetime he was an extremely popular preacher who drew large crowds of multiple races of people. Some sources say the building seated over 3000, there were three held each Sunday to accommodate all the attendees. His songs were often connected with his sermons.

The songs of Charles Tindley were published in Soul Echoes No. 1 (1905), Soul Echoes: a Collection of Songs for Religious Meetings, No. 2 (Philadelphia, PA: Soul Echoes Publishing Company, 1909), and New Songs of Paradise: a Collection of Popular and Religious Songs for Sunday Schools, Prayer Meetings, Epworth League Meetings and Social Gatherings (Philadelphia, PA: Paradise Publishing Company, 1916). In 2006 the General Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Church republished all of Tindley’s previously published hymns in Beams of Heaven: Hymns of Charles Albert Tindley (S. T. Kimbrough, Jr., Carlton R. Young, editors). In this book, Emory University hymnologist James Abbington described Charles Albert Tindley “pastor, orator, poet, writer, theologian, social activist, ‘father of African American Hymnody,’ ‘progenitor of African American gospel music’ and ‘prince of preachers.’”


[i] However, he appears in the 1860 and 1870 censuses with his father. Additionally, in 1860 his father’s occupation is given as laborer (not slave). Normally slaves were not enumerated in the census.

Saturday, July 05, 2025

What we can “afford,” and other quotes

The posting of quotes by human authors does not constitute agreement with either the quotes or their sources. (I try to confirm the sources that I give, but may miss on occasion; please verify if possible.)

“We can afford many sacrilegious hours to our lusts, and can scarce afford God a little time without grudging.” -- Thomas Manton

“...When Scripture speaks, God speaks.” -- B. F. Warfield

“God rescues his sheep even from dens of wolves.” -- John MacArthur

“The happiest people don’t always have the best of everything; but they know how to make the best of everything they have.” -- Author unknown

“What we build, how we build, and for whom we build all matter.” -- Heath Knox

“In the midst of great emergencies the best policy sometimes requires that we ‘make haste slowly.’”--  Z. N. Morrell

“Joshua did not wait for the river to go down.” -- Tony Zinnah

“It’s better to ask a ‘stupid question’ than to make a stupid mistake.” Unknown

[To American Christians] “We can’t be looking to the White House; We need to look to our house.” -- Dustin Jenkins

“Saul represents a nation’s ungodly decisions and the failures that come from it.” -- Dustin Jenkins

“Many people are willing to eat at God’s table, but are unwilling to work in his field.” -- Unknown

“Yesterday is today’s memory, and tomorrow is today’s dream.”

“Yesterday, when I was young...”

Friday, July 04, 2025

Bath, a liquid measurement

Ezekiel 45:10 Ye shall have just balances, and a just ephah, and a just bath.

Hebrew: בַּת —transliteration: bath or bäth – is a Hebrew liquid measure. In the Bible it is described or defined as 1/10 of an homer (Ezekiel 45:10-14). It is found in the following verses, in addition to Ezekiel 45:10, 11, and 14: 1 Kings 7:26, 38; 2 Chronicles 2:10; 4:5; Ezra 7:22; Isaiah 5:10).

Based on measurements of unearthed jars, archaeologists believe a bath was approximately six gallons liquid measure.

The molten sea of the temple held nearly 12,000 gallons of water.

1 Kings 7:26 And it was an hand breadth thick, and the brim thereof was wrought like the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies: it contained two thousand baths.


Notes: 1. My printing of the King James contains the umlauts above the letter “a” (bäth). 2. Some older authors suggest a bath was about 7 or 8 gallons.

Thursday, July 03, 2025

Acts 23:26-30

Verses 26-30: This text demonstrates what can be considered a standard epistolary style of letter from a captain of troops writing to a provincial governor.

  • Sender:            Claudius Lysias
  • Epithet:           most excellent governor
  • Receiver:        Felix
  • Salutation:      greeting
  • Details:           This man was taken of the Jews…
  • Purpose:          [for] his accusers also to say before thee                                    what they had against him
  • Closing:          Farewell

Though the chief captain is mentioned a number of times previously (21:31-37; 22:24-29; 23:10-22), verse 26 is the first time Luke mentions his name (cf. 24:7, 22).[1] “most excellent” is the same designation Luke uses for Theophilus (Luke 1:3). “greeting” and “Farewell” is the same formula used in the letter from. the church at Jerusalem (Acts 15:23, 29).[2]

In the letter Lysias included his own judgment that Paul was not guilty of any crime based on Roman law, but that the dispute concerned Jewish religion and law. Cf. Acts 18:14-15.

F. F. Bruce suggests Lysias’s “letter to Felix about Paul subtly rearranges the facts so as to place his own behaviour in the most favourable light.”[3] Perhaps this is most readily seen in his explanation of “having understood that [Paul] was a Roman.” Though he came to understand he was a Roman citizen, initially Lysias thought Paul was “that Egyptian…” (21:28)


[1] John Gill says that “Claudius” was a Roman name and “Lysias” a Greek name; Lysias is probably his given name and that he was born Greek rather than Roman – since he had to purchase his freedom (22:28). Claudius could have been chosen to honor the Emperor Claudius. Additionally, he is simply referred to as “Lysias” in Acts 24, verses 7 and 22.
[2] Though with the difference between plural and singular regarding “farewell.” ρωννυμι. (Farewell) is missing from the Greek texts of Nestle-Aland and United Bible Society.
[3] “Claudius Lysias,” F. F. Bruce, The New Bible Dictionary, page 238.