Those who read this blog (and hear me teach) know
that I use the King James Bible in private study and public ministry. I do this
not for convenience, but because I believe its accuracy of translation and
underlying Greek texts are superior to other translations. I recommend only it
to others for personal study, public use and private devotions.
At “Seeking the Old Paths,” I have written Thoughts
on King James. I have highlighted the positives
of the King James Bible, and as well as explaining details of Why
the Ye's and Thou's are in the King James Bible (and worth retaining) – even considered the one use of Easter
in the King James Bible. I have gone negative in Answering
the Anti-KJV Agenda.
At times promoting the King James Bible requires
its proponent to speak out against false-supporters of the book. Two of these
are Jack Hyles and Peter Ruckman. Peter Ruckman’s
views are probably the most widespread. His doctrines of “double inspiration” and
“advanced revelation” are in direct conflict with what God has revealed in His
Word. Jack Hyles’s influence may be lesser than Ruckman’s, but his doctrine may be
more pernicious in that it touches the very heart of the gospel and salvation.
In the next two posts I intend to address these errors.
No comments:
Post a Comment