Paul relates his experience to the crowd at Jerusalem, Acts 22.
Verses 6-11: “as I made my journey…” Now here is what happened.
- I…was
come nigh unto Damascus about noon
- suddenly
there shone from heaven a great light round about me.
- I
fell unto the ground
- [I]
heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
- I
answered, Who art thou, Lord?
- he
said unto me, I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.
- they
that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid
- they
heard not the voice of him that spake to me.
- I
said, What shall I do, Lord?
- the
Lord said…Arise, and go into Damascus… it shall be told thee of all things
which are appointed for thee to do.
- I
could not see for the glory of that light
- [I
was] led by the hand of them that were with me…into Damascus.
The book of Acts contains three accounts of Paul’s conversion. The writer, Luke, records the first account as history (Acts 9:1-8). Paul himself gives the second and third accounts, when addressing a mob (22:4-11) and when testifying before Agrippa (26:12-18). Critics make time to mine the accounts for contradictions. They claim that Paul gives two different memories of his conversion, and that his memories contradict each other as well as Luke’s record.[1]
It is a simple fact that there are differences in the accounts. Differences, however, are not necessarily contradictions. All the complaints, save one, are merely that one thing not mentioned in one is mentioned in another. Rather than contradictory, the accounts are complementary and supplementary. A true account told need not include every detail every time. See Appendix T next week for more details.[1] For example, skeptic and text critic Bart Ehrman writes, “the three accounts differ in numerous contradictory details.” For some critics, this is just a matter of searching for random contradictions to generally discredit the authority of the Bible. For others, it fits into a larger pattern of claiming that Paul, not Jesus Christ, was the founder of Christianity – and then proceeding to try to debunk the reliability of Paul.