Translate

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Castor and Pollux

...another “NKJV why?

  • Acts 28:11 (AKJV): And after three months we departed in a ship of Alexandria, which had wintered in the isle, whose sign was Castor and Pollux.
  • Acts 28:11 (NKJV): After three months we sailed in an Alexandrian ship whose figurehead was the Twin Brothers, which had wintered at the island.

The New King James Version editors claimed they were creating a Bible which one could easily hear and read alongside the King James Bible (“there is remarkable ease in listening to the reading of either edition while following with the other.”). I don’t find remarkable ease of reading when I am jarred with “the Twin Brothers” in place of “Castor and Pollux” (both of which are the same thing, so why change it). [In fact, it reads in this place better side-by-side with some modern versions than with the KJV.]

Literally Διοσκουροις in Acts 28:11 is “sons of Zeus” or “Zeus’s boys” – not Twin Brothers. (Διοσ is the genitive singular of Ζεύς, Zeus; see Acts 14:13, for example.) However, in English Twin Brothers, Twin Gods, Castor and Pollux, Dioscuri (and maybe others) are all the same and accurately convey the meaning of Διοσκουροις. The somewhat transliterated Dioscuri is an available English word (Merriam-Webster or Dictionary.com give Castor and Pollux as the definition of Dioscuri). As to the Latin, Castorum is plural and for Latin speakers it stood for the Dioscuri (Castor and Pollux, the twins of Zeus). The Douay-Rheims translation, translating from the Latin, has “the Castors” (plural), showing those translators understood it that way.

John Calvin explains some of the history of  the Dioscuri, Castor and Pollux, the twin boys of Zeus: “The old poets did feign that Castor and Pollux came of Jupiter and Leda; for which cause they are called in Greek διοσκουροι; which word Luke useth in this place, as if you should say, Jupiter’s sons.”
John Gill writes: “whose sign was Castor and Pollux; or Dioscuri, that is, the sons of Jupiter; for Castor and Pollux were his sons, by Leda: these are placed among the constellations in the Zodiac, and go by the name of Gemini, or the twins; and these were supposed to have a power of saving men in danger at sea…”
So, the twins are Castor and Pollux in Latin, Dioskouroi in Greek. The Greek word for twins is δίδυμα. The Latin word for twins is gemini, which is also the name of the constellation in which the two brightest stars are known as Castor and Pollux.

Why, NKJV translators, did you find it necessary to change Castor and Pollux to the twin brothers? In doing so, you violated your claim to make it easy to follow the KJV and NKJV together. This is not a question of text, but of translation. Your reading matches the ASV, EHV, HCSB, ISV, LSB, NASB, NLV, NRSV, RSV, TLB, and others – but not the KJV, the Bible you claim to follow. “Twin Brothers” is no more readily understood than “Castor and Pollux.” If you don’t know Greek and Roman mythology you won’t know who they are either way. I can see no claim of improved understanding for changing the reading here. So, NKJV, why?

Monday, August 19, 2024

Tribulation worketh patience

“…knowing that tribulation worketh patience.” Romans 5:3

“… as all the perfections of God are engaged for God’s people, certain it is, that no trial to his people can arise which he knew not, nay, which he appointed not, and for which he hath not made a suitable provision. Well then, what trouble of thine can be so great, as to counteract and overcome divine strength? What burden so heavy that Jesus cannot bear? What afflictions so painful that Jesus cannot soften? What grief so scorching as to dry up the streams of God’s love? Hear then his words: ‘In your patience possess ye your souls.’

“My soul, rest in this. Let past experience bring thee present confidence. See that all the fresh springs of patience flow from Jesus. Wait patiently for the Lord, by believing in him; and, depend upon it, thy present tribulation, of what sort or kind soever it is, will terminate, like every former, in bringing glory to God and comfort to thy soul.”

Robert Hawker (1753-1827)

Sunday, August 18, 2024

The little flock, on Zion's hill

“The little flock, on Zion’s hill” is a hymn that, to me, is of unknown origin. It appears possibly as early as 1790, in Society Hymns, Original and Selected on Evangelical and Experimental Subjects.[i]This book was published by Manning & Loring of Boston. It is “Hymn II” with the caption “The Church’s Request.” The hymn is structured as a prayer from a newly-formed congregation (our infant state) to the Lord in heaven, to bless them with a faithful pastor. The hymn is seven stanzas of Common Meter, and might be sung with most any good Common Meter tune already used by a congregation.

The hymn book itself states neither an editor nor an affiliation (unless some front matter is missing in the copy I found online). It has multiple texts from John Rippon’s Selection (and many other sources, of course).

1. The little flock, on Zion’s hill,
In happy union blest,
Implore their great Redeemer, still
To grant them one request.

2. Distinguish’d mercy found a place,
And led the flock to rest:
Head of thy church, we seek thy face,
To grant us one request.

3. Thy sovereign favours, freely giv’n,
Our hearts have deep imprest;
Still hear our pray’r, indulgent Heav’n,
And grant us one request.

4. While some are gather’d to the fold,
By mercy’s high behest,
Do thou our infant state behold,
And grant us one request.

5. With thoughtless souls, and anxious mind
Thy courts are daily prest;
That each a portion here may find,
O grant us this request.

6. A faithful pastor, Lord, prepare;
’Twas Jesus’ great bequest;
For this we raise our ceaseless prayer:
O grant this one request.

7. Then shall our grateful hearts adore
Thine interposing love;
This gift bestow’d, we’ll grieve no more,
But wait the joys above.


[i] There is some concern as to the correct date of Society Hymns. Though some sites online give 1790, there is no date in the book itself. Hathi Trust has “between 1790 and 1799” – with a question mark.

Saturday, August 17, 2024

In other words, abaciscus to zigzag

  • abaciscus, noun. (Architecture) A small abacus (a slab forming the top of the capital of a column); a tessera (q.v.).
  • coeliac (also celiac), adjective. Relating to the abdomen, or to the cavity of the abdomen; used as an abbreviation of/shorthand for coeliac (celiac) disease.
  • collocation, noun. The arrangement of words; especially a series of words or terms that occur together more often than would be expected by chance.
  • concenter, verb. To come to one point, a common center; to draw or direct to a common center.
  • denomi-network, noun. An religious organization that functions like a traditional denomination in some ways and has the flexibility of a network in other ways. (Coined by Suzii Paynter.)
  • doddle, noun, (Chiefly British) Something easily done, easily fixed, etc.
  • hermitage, noun. The habitation of a hermit; any secluded place of residence; retreat; hideaway.
  • homage, noun. Special honour or respect shown publicly.
  • hypallage, noun. A figure of speech interchanging or reversing the syntactic relation of two words (e.g., her beauty’s face).
  • insouciance, noun. Carelessness, heedlessness, indifference, or casual unconcern.
  • mere, adjective. Being nothing more than; being nothing less than; having no admixture.
  • mere, noun. (chiefly British) An expanse of standing water; lake, pool.
  • peduncle, noun. A stalk bearing a flower or flower cluster or a fructification.
  • principal, adjective. First or highest in rank, importance, value, etc.; chief; foremost.
  • principle, noun. A basic truth, law, or assumption; a rule or standard.
  • puppetute, noun. (Informal, derogatory) A woman who is willing to compromise her values or morals for someone she loves or desires (a portmanteau of “puppet” and “prostitute”).
  • rara avis in terris, phrase. Latin, literally “a rare bird on the earth” and by extension, describes something or someone that is extraordinary, unique, or exceptional; something rare or hard to find. 
  • stotious (also stocious), adjective. (Primarily Irish and Scottish English) Drunk; inebriated, esp. when unable to speak or act in the usual way.
  • tessera, noun. One of the small pieces used in mosaic work.
  • ultracrepidarian, noun. One who gives opinions and advice on matters that he knows little or nothing about. adjective, pertaining to one who is talking about things beyond his scope of knowledge.
  • wassail, noun. A hot drink that is made with wine, beer, or cider, spices, sugar, and usually baked apples and is traditionally served in a large bowl (especially at Christmastime).
  • waster, noun. (Informal) A person who does little or nothing of value.
  • wastrel, noun. Vagabond, waif; one who expends resources foolishly and self-indulgently.
  • zag, verb (used without object). To move in one of the two directions followed in a zigzag course.
  • zig, verb (used without object). To move in one of the two directions followed in a zigzag course.
  • zigzag, noun. A line, course, or progression characterized by sharp turns first to one side and then to the other (similarly used as an adjective, adverb, and verb).

Friday, August 16, 2024

Unto the church at Smyrna

On the isle of Patmos, where he was exiled, John the apostle received a revelation from the Lord. He was directed to write down the revelation, in one writing sent to seven recipients (1:1-4). The second of the seven recipients was the church in the city of Smyrna, whose letter we will consider.

Introduction

First, notice some things about the letters to the seven churches of Asia.

There is a general pattern found in the writing of all the letters, divided into seven parts. 

  • A Greeting
  • A Description
  • A Commendation (except for the church at Laodicea)
  • A Condemnation (except for the churches at Smyrna and Philadelphia)
  • A Warning
  • A Charge
  • A Promise

The order of the charge and the promise begin with the charge first – in the first three letters – then in the last four the promise is placed first. The order of the letters themselves are in a sort of circular geographical order. Ephesus is the town nearest Patmos, then travel geographically north to Smyrna and Pergamos. Afterward move southeast to Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea. The symmetrical order of the letters is this:

Ephesus – a church standing on the verge of judgment, candlestick removed.

Smyrna – a poor suffering church not placed under condemnation.

Pergamos

Thyatira

Sardis

Philadelphia – a weak church with an open door.

Laodicea – a church standing on the verge of judgment, spewed out.

If you do not read the text of the letters to the seven churches in the King James Bible (and if you cannot read Greek) you will miss the subtle interplay between the second person singular (thy, thou, thee) and second person plural (you, ye).

Among other things, each letter is a lesson to all churches, then and now. They contain an admonition for churches to see themselves as God sees them.

I. Smyrna is candidly addressed by the Lord, v. 8.

Written to the church in Smyrna.

Sent from the Lord in heaven.

The first and last (1:5, 11, 17).

Was dead and is alive. (1:5, 18).

II. Smyrna is thoroughly known by the Lord, v. 9.

Thy works. Psalm 139:2; Matthew 7:22-23.

Thy tribulation. Romans 5:3.

Thy poverty. 1 Corinthians 1:27-29.

The opposition. Cf. Revelation 3:9; Romans 2:28-29.

III. Smyrna is securely sustained by the Lord, v. 10.

Fear not. Isaiah 35:4; 41:10.

Suffering. Phil 3:10; Romans 8:18.

Prison. (John Baptist, John, Peter, Paul, Silas)

Tribulation. John 16:33; Heb. 11:36-37.

Death. 2 Corinthians 2:10.

Be faithful. Heb 13:5-6; 1 Corinthians 4:2.

Receive a crown of life. (5 crowns)

IV. Smyrna is not the only church of the Lord, v 11. 

(Cf. also Revelation 1:4, 11-13, 20; 2:1-3:22)

He that hath an ear. (spiritual capacity) Matt. 13:16. My sheep hear my voice, John

Let him hear. (individual responsibility) Rom. 14:12.

What to the Spirit saith. (divine revelation) 1 Cor. 2:10.

Unto the churches. (corporate responsibility) 1 Pet. 4:17.

He that overcometh. John 16:33.

Conclusion:

  • The churches are local & visible, the gathered people of God in a certain place.
  • The churches are independent but interconnected.
  • Tribulation in the world is part of the lot of the Christian, 2 Timothy 4:12.
  • In Christ we are more than conquerors, Romans 8:37-29.

Now is the accepted time (2 Cor. 6:2), exhort one another daily, while it is called To day (Heb. 3:13).

Thursday, August 15, 2024

Three names, one office

Three names, one office, Acts 20:17,28

There are three names for one office. Paul, on his way to Jerusalem, calls the plural elders of the church at Ephesus to meet him in Miletus. In charging the elders, he calls them “overseers” (bishops; ἐπισκόπους) who are to “pastor” (ποιμαίνειν) the church/flock of God. In this case, the noun form of episkopos is used directly, and again the pastoring is embedded in the verb form of feeding (poimainein) the flock. Acts 20:17, 28.

And from Miletus he sent to Ephesus, and called the elders (πρεσβυτερους) of the church…Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers (επισκοπους), to feed (ποιμαινειν) the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

 Baptists, generally, as well as some other congregational churches, have contended for two continuing offices in the local congregation – pastors and deacons.[i] Many denominations use terminology that is not biblical (e.g., Pope, Archbishop, Cardinal, Doctor, Reverend, etc.), as well as use scriptural terminology in ways that are not biblical (e.g. Bishop as a supervisor over a number of churches and pastors). It is an error to separate and isolate the terms bishop, elder, pastor and create different ecclesiastical offices for each. Notice the New Testament use of this terminology.

Elder and elders (presbuteros; πρεσβυτερος) are used 68 times in the King James Version in the New Testament. In the Gospels and sometimes in Acts, it refers to the elders of the Jews. In the following verses, it refers to an ecclesiastical office:[ii] Acts 11:30; Acts 14:23; Acts 15:2, 4, 6, 22, 23; Acts 16:4; Acts 20:17; Acts 21:18; I Timothy 5:17; I Timothy 5:19; Titus 1:5; James 5:14; I Peter 5:1 (2 times); II John 1:1; III John 1:1.

Bishop and bishops (episkopos; επισκοπος) are used five times in the King James Version in the New Testament. Four of these refer to officers in the church, and once to Jesus Christ himself (Philippians 1:1; I Timothy 3:1; I Timothy 3:2; Titus 1:7; I Peter 2:25). Episkopos is translated “overseers” in Acts 20:28. επισκοπουντες is translated “taking the oversight” in I Peter 5:2.

Pastors, or shepherds (poimen; ποιμεν) is used once in noun form, in Ephesians 4:11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors (ποιμενας) and teachers (διδασκαλους).[iii] The Chief Shepherd in I Peter 5:3-4 is Jesus, and elders by implication are shepherds who feed the flock.

The biblical evidence indicates the synonymous usage of bishop, elder, and pastor.[iv]

In writing to Titus, Paul uses elders (πρεσβυτερους) and bishop (επισκοπον) interchangeably, noting they must hold fast the faithful word (v. 9 αντεχομενον του κατα την διδαχην πιστου) – the food the pastor feeds the flock.[v] He speaks of Titus’s purpose in Crete of ordain elders, then begins to speak of their qualifications prefaced with the word “bishop.” “for a bishop” beginning verse 7 indicates that it connects back to the elders in verse 5. They are connected. They are synonymous. Bishops are elders.

Peter, writing to “strangers” scattered in various places, exhorts the elders in these places. To the elders he exhorts, Peter says these elders are “to bishop” (επισκοπουντες) and “to pastor” (ποιμανατε) the flock/church of God. Incorporated in the duties of the elders are found, in verb form, the names of the other interchangeable terms – episkopountes and poimavate.

In addition to the synonymous usage of the terms bishop, elder, and pastor, the collective and harmonious nature of the three terms may be deduced from the scriptural qualifications for office. I Timothy 3:1-7 details the qualifications for the office of bishop – “A bishop then must be…” Comparing I Timothy 3:1-7 to Titus 1:5-9 demonstrates that the office of bishop and elder are the same office, with two descriptions. The Bible contains no separate and distinct qualifications for another office, except that of deacons, signifying that pastor needs no separate qualifications. It is the same office as that of elder and bishop. As early as the fourth century, Jerome made a similar observation in a letter to Evangelus: “Presbyter and bishop are the same; the one name describes the age of the man, the other his dignity. Hence instruction is given to Titus and Timothy about the ordination of a bishop and of a deacon; but there is absolute silence about presbyters, because the presbyter is contained in the bishop” (date of letter unknown).[vi] C. N. Glover writes, “The word ‘bishop’ involves the authority given to the office by the Lord Jesus Christ. The word ‘elder’ involves the character of the man who fills the office, and the manner in which he fills it. The word ‘pastor’ involves the duties of the office of bishop, and the manner in which he is to perform them.”[vii]

There are not three sets of qualifications for three offices, but one set of qualifications for the same office, for which either of three names suffice. The three terms relate the office to its character, work, and qualifications. The term elder signifies experience, maturity, wisdom (e.g., “Not a novice”). The term bishop signifies administration, oversight, leadership (e.g., “take care of the church of God”). The term pastor signifies care, feeding, teaching (e.g., “apt to teach”). After providing their unique emphases, all three names meld into one work and one office. This tri-unity of terms for one office corresponds with the plurality of the eldership and anticipates the unity that should appear among those plural elders who function together in this office work in a local congregation.


[i] That is, two offices that are permanent for the entire church age.
[ii] I Timothy 5:1 uses elder, but probably not for the office. The related terminology “presbytery” is used in I Timothy 4:14. A presbytery is a group of (ordained) presbyters (Gk.) or elders (Eng.). Other synonymous English terms are “the body of elders,” “the eldership,” and “the presbyterate.” “Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery (πρεσβυτεριου).” πρεσβυτεριον is translated “council” in Luke 22:66 in reference to Jewish elders. A Christian presbytery functions as a council to give counsel.
[iii] Pastors (ποιμενας) and teachers (διδασκαλους) here is the same gift, not two distinct gifts.
[iv] J. M. Pendleton explains it this way: “A bishop was a pastor of a church, and the New Testament, so far from encouraging a plurality of churches under one pastor, refers, in two instances at least, to a plurality of pastors in one church. See Acts xx. 28; Phil. i. 1. In the former passage [Acts 20:28] the elders of the church at Ephesus are called overseers, and the word thus translated is the same rendered bishop in Phil. i. 1; 1 Timothy iii. 2; Titus i. 7; 1 Peter ii. 25. Thus does it appear that pastor, bishop, and elder are three terms designating the same office. This view is further confirmed by a reference to Peter v. 1, 2, where elders are exhorted to feed the flock—that is, to perform the office of pastor or shepherd—taking the oversight thereof, etc.—that is, acting the part of bishops or overseers. For the word translated taking the oversight belongs to the same family of words as the term rendered bishop in the passages cited. It is plain, therefore, that a pastor's work is the spiritual oversight of the flock, the church he serves. Like a good literal shepherd, he must care for the feeble and the sick, as well as for the healthy and the vigorous.” pp. 24-25.
[v] Here the elder/bishop is also called a “steward” (οικονομον).
[vi] The Papal System: William Cathcart, Philadelphia, PA, 1872, p. 56; For Jerome, see also Letter 146, To Evangelus.
[vii] C. N. Glover, Glover’s Church Manual, 1983, p. 34.

Wednesday, August 14, 2024

So grows the Lotus

Back in May of 2014, I wrote about “Tulips, Roses, Poinsettias and Lilies: a veritable theological garden.” Now ten years later, I have discovered a new flower growing in the acrostical soteriological garden – the Lotus.

Apparently “LOTUS” is the brainchild of Daniel Weierbach, pastor of Open Door Baptist Church in Prattville, Alabama. According to his book LOTUS: A Free Grace Response to TULIP (Daniel Weirbach, 2024), Weierbach wanted to create a five-letter acronym, based on flower name, that would “counter” the Calvinistic acronym TULIP, point-by-point, in sequential order. Here grows the Lotus:

  • Liable Depravity - Each person is liable for their own sin, but not so depraved that they can’t choose to believe in the Gospel.
  • Occupational Election - Election is never unto salvation, but is to an office, position, service, or blessing.
  • Total Atonement - The death of Jesus Christ was sufficient to pay for the sins of the entire world, not only the “elect.”
  • Unlimited Grace – God’s grace is unlimited in the sense that it extends to all people who have to decide to receive or reject it.
  • Security of the Saints -A Christian has eternal security because of the power and promise of God.

The Lotus’s weak version of depravity encapsulates the spirit of the age, and sets the flower in array against the Bible itself. I quickly lost interest in any beauty it might have.

While looking into the LOTUS, I ran across another acrostic – PROVIDE. Not a flower this time, but evidently created by Southern Baptist theologian Leighton Flowers.

  • People sin: Which separated all from fellowship with God.
  • Responsible: Able-to-respond to God’s appeals for reconciliation.
  • Open door: For anyone to enter by faith. Whosoever will may come to His open arms.
  • Vicarious atonement: Provides a way for anyone to be saved by Christ’s blood.
  • Illuminating grace: Provides clearly revealed truth so that all can know and respond in faith.
  • Destroyed: For unbelief and resisting the Holy Spirit.
  • Eternal security: For all true believers.

Provisionist Southern Baptists and Independent Baptists seem to be going of the cliff in rejecting total depravity. Regardless of any abuses of the terminology, we are totally depraved sinners whose only hope is Jesus Christ and not ourselves. Separated from God. No way back on our own. All of us. Totally. Hereditarily.

Theologically, LOTUS and PROVIDE seem to be two peas in a pod.

Tuesday, August 13, 2024

Memoir of Elder Elijah Hanks

Baptist preacher of Tennessee.

MEMOIR OF ELDER ELIJAH HANKS [1793-1871]

By S. C. Evins, 1872

Chapter I.

ELDER ELIJAH HANKS, the subject of this memoir, was born on the 12th of December, 1793, in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. His parents were devoted Christians, and members of the Baptist Church. They removed to Kentucky when he was but five years old, where they remained for several years. In the year 1810 they came to Tennessee, when it was but little more than a wilderness, and one vast canebrake. The Red-men had scarcely left his hunting-grounds when the Baptists planted the standard of the Cross, and erected rude cabins in which to worship the God of our fathers. In those early days, the facilities of acquiring an education, in Tennessee, were very few; consequently Elder Hanks, like most of the boys raised in that day, obtained but a limited education; but, being possessed of an indomitable will, and a strong constitution, he went forth in his daily labor, aiding his older brothers in subduing the forests, and making way for the plowshare. Thus he grew up to manhood, inured to hard and incessant toil, and hardly possessing the rudiments of a common English education. He was taught, however, to respect the worship of God, and although he grew up irreligious, he was quite moral in his habits, and regular in his attendance at church on Sundays. At the early age of nineteen years he was united in marriage to Miss Mary Wolverton, who proved a helpmeet indeed in all his arduous labors, till God took her home. They commenced the journey of married life together, neither of them being professors of religion. Like thousands of others, with them the family alter was entirely neglected. But God had a work for them to do though as yet they knew it not. Elder Hanks was endowed with an untiring energy, and such A powerful constitution that, in after life, he was enabled to do an amount of labor, both physical and mental, that seems almost incredible. But few men possessed the power of endurance that he did. Thus much information of the early life of Elder Hanks we have gleaned from reliable sources.

Chapter II. In this chapter we give the manner of, and some of the circumstances attending, his conversion and call to the work of the Ministry, as related by himself to the author of this memoir.

“My impressions, at times, were very strong to call on sinners to come to the Savior; but, when I thought of my inability for this important work, I would shrink from the cross. Being almost entirely without an education, I thought if I attempted such a thing, I would only disgrace the cause and myself. Finally, I was brought low on the bed of affliction. I felt guilty before God, for not doing what I sometimes thought was my duty, and I promised God that if he would restore me to health again I would do the best I could. I had a very long spell of fever, but finally, through the mercy of God, I was restored to health. Then my promise to God was arrayed before me, and I prayed to God, time and again, to make known to me, plainly, my duty, and I promised to perform it the best I could. I recollect one day, while I was on my knees at prayer, the curse inflicted on Jonah, for disobedience, passed before my mind, and I believed if I failed to yield to impressions, which I often had, that the frowns of God would rest upon me. The Pastor of our church, Elder Dodson, lived some distance away, and he was only with us once a month; and my brother-in-law had similar feelings to my own, he and I held prayer meetings, which greatly assisted me, our church cooperating with us. We held meetings .at night, from house to house, two or three nights in the week, and would give exhortations. The Lord greatly revived his work. In a few weeks there were about sixty added to the church. Sometimes, while telling what the Lord had done for poor sinners, it seemed the greatest privilege that I ever enjoyed; at other times I thought that I had disgraced myself and the cause of Christ, and that I had better quit; and if it had not been for the kind treatment and encouragement given me by the church, I should have faltered by the way. In a short time the Church licensed me to preach, and in a few months I was set apart to the full work of the ministry, by a Presbytery consisting of Elders Hobbs and Dodson.

Chapter III., After his ordination he was called to the Pastorship of the Knob Creek church, of which he was a member, it having ceased to be an arm of the Rutherford’s Creek church, as it had been constituted into an independent church. He says: “I was called to take charge of this church, soon after my ordination, and as my views on the Atonement were nearly the same with those of Brethern Dodson and Hobbs, for a time all seemed to move on in harmony. These two ministers were the only ones, in the Cumberland Association, who agreed with me on the extent of the Atonement made for the world by the sufferings of’ our Savior.” But in a short time one of them died, and the other moved away, leaving him alone to plead the clause that he had espoused with all his heart. About this time he was called to the care of the Friendship Baptist church, twelve miles south of Columbia. He accepted the invitation, and entered at once upon his duties as the Pastor of this church.

At this time, Elder Hanks tells us, there existed very dissimilar views between himself and other Ministers on the Atonement: that they taught some things which he believed were contrary to the teachings of the Scriptures; and that he could not preach his views fully without crossing the views of his preaching brethern. At first, he tells us, they treated him kindly, telling him that by reading and meditation he would see differently. He says: “Some were teaching that a covenant was made, before the foundation of the world, between the Father and the Son, and that the Church was given to the Son by the Father; that the Son agreed, on his part, to come into this world, to suffer and die for those whom the Father had given him in that covenant, and that all for whom he died would be saved. Sometimes they would preach that the Church was eternally justified in the mind and wisdom of God--that there was a common and a special call to sinners; the special call could not be resisted; the Spirit quickening the elect alone. In referring to this subject, he says: I did my best to believe this doctrine, as taught by my brethern, for I fully believed them to be honest. I loved them, and it grieved me to the heart that I could not see and believe as they did; for I could be nothing but a Baptist. I read and investigated their proof-texts prayerfully, willing to follow the teachings of God’s word in all things. I felt that I was responsible to God for everything that I taught in His name, and if called to the ministry, it was my duty to preach the whole truth, as I understood it. I believed in the doctrine of election and predestination, as taught in God’s word, but not as understood and preached by my brethern. Indeed, it was a matter of rejoicing to my poor heart that God did predestinate us to the adoption of children by His Son Jesus Christ, who is mighty and able to save, to the uttermost, all that come unto him; seeing He ever liveth to make intercession for the transgressors. I believed that we are the children of God by faith in Jesus Christ, having been elected according to the foreknowledge of God through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth. In this way I believed and taught the doctrine of election. For I believed that All the happiness that accrues to the children of God, is by faith in Jesus Christ, and not for works. I also believed and taught that Jesus Christ, by the grace of God, had tasted death for every man. This doctrine I proclaimed wherever I went. My very soul burned within me, for I wanted to preach it all over the land, from the rivers to the ends of the earth. I could not find anything in all God’s word that did not harmonize with my cherished views. This made me feel strong in the faith and power of His might. My brethern, however, began to cry out, ‘he is an Arminian! – have nothing to do with him!’ Still I could not hold ‘my peace, but cried the more, in the language of the “Master,’ to all men, ‘Repent, and believe the Gospel. Except ye repent, ye shall all perish; for God commandeth all men, everywhere, to repent. He that believeth not shall be damned. Ye will not come unto me that might have life.’ And with many such Scripture quotations I appealed to the sinners. God blessed my own soul as I preached his precious truth, and also made it the power of God unto salvation to many precious souls.”

Chapter IV. Elder Hanks’s bold and effective manner was not to be tolerated longer, by his brethern holding views on th Atonement differing from his own; accordingly, at the meeting of the Cumberland Association of Baptists, in the year 1829, or near that time, a committee of several brethern was appointed to confer with him and the Knob Creek Church, for nearly all of its members had embraced his views. That committee consisted of Eiders McConnico, Gale and Hunter, their strongest men. They came, bringing others with them. In giving an account of the visit of the committee, Elder hanks says: “I hoped to be able to satisfy them that we were orthodox. It was all in vain; for, although shown from the history of the Baptists, that, years ago, our brethern in Virginia and Kentucky had agreed that the preaching, by a brother that Jesus Christ, by the grace of God had tasted death for every man; or by the preaching by another brother, that he only died for the elect, and that the elect alone have a right to the privileges of the Gospel; should be no bar to church fellowship and communion; and that each party did agree, and had dropped the names by which each had been heretofore distinguished, styling themselves the “United Baptists.” I also showed that I was not the aggressor; for the same doctrine preached by me, was preached by our brethern in other States. After all this, the committee decided that we had departed from the faith, and we were consequently cut off from union with our people. “This was a sore trial to me and the little band, who, like true and trusty friends, as they were, stood by and supported me in the darkest time of my ministerial life. “The church doors, as well as private dwellings were closed against me, and for many months I was denounced as a heretic by those whom I had taught in my early days to love Jesus. The churches were warned to have no fellowship with me. In this lonely condition, I shall never be able to describe my feelings. With not a Baptist Minister near enough to me with whom I could associate, I was shunned and avoided by them all, as if to touch me would contaminate or sully their purity; and except the Knob Creek and the Friendship churches, which had been likewise cut off from the Cumberland Association because they adhered to the views entertained by me, there was not a church in all this part of the State which had any sympathy for me, or those holding similar sentiments.” I have given the foregoing account of Elder Hank’s trials and separation from the Cumberland Association, in nearly his own words, choosing to adopt his own mode of expression rather than my own. How hard it must have been to be severed so unceremoniously from those dear friends and brethern with whom he had been identified ever since he had been in the ministry, none of us at this late date can realize. But our beloved father in the ministry was ready to forsake all for Christ and his truth; and yet he naturally sought and craved the association of his brethern.

Chapter V. I will now give, in his own words, an account of his connection and participation in the “open communion” movement in which the Knob Creek church was once entangled. He says, in his own hand-writing: “Yet I do not say that, in this long and lonely time through which we passed, we lived free from error. My home church and myself drove into open communion, and received one or two Pedo-Baptist immersions. The effect was so different to what we had anticipated, that I was astonished and mortified; for, instead of bringing our Pedo-Baptist friends nearer to us, it only had an opposite tendency, and produced only alienation of feeling, as their Ministers almost forsook us. In the meantime, I went so far as to immerse two Methodists and two Presbyterians in good standing, who desired to be immersed by one who believed it to be the only mode, with. the understanding that they should remain with their respective churches if they wished to do so. In this practice we continued but a short time, for, seeing we did not get the sympathy and encouragement that we expected from them we very soon began to consider the error of what we had done, and whither we had drifted. The result was, that we soon returned and took our former stand, and that too, without the loss of a single member.” He also tells us that for the act of baptizing those persons, he received no thanks from their preachers. “I then thought,” said he, “that I was justified by the case of Phillip, who baptized the eunuch; but long since I have looked upon the act of baptizing their members, and communing with them, as incompatible with the Word of God. And I would, therefore, advise my brethern never to do the same, for when we commune with them at the Lord’s table and receive their baptisms, we certainly endorse their sprinkling and infant baptism. It seems to me that there can be no other fair construction of such acts. Then our members were frequently called Hanksites because we were cut off from our people and could neither ‘pour’ nor ‘sprinkle’ for baptism.” Again Father Hanks says: “I believed that there was too much intelligence in the Baptist Ministry for them to stay long where they then were; so in a few years the division took place--said to be, on the mission question; the one party believing that the Gospel should be sent by the efforts of the churches to the destitute in our own and heathen lands; the other party believing that if God wanted the Gospel preached to the world, He would send it without our aid; and that it would be done through persecution.

Hence each party separated from the other and began to work in their own way.’ I, of course, was found on the mission side of this question, and how my feelings were changed from a state of loneliness to that of joy and pleasure, for many of those who heretofore had held me off at a distance had their eyes opened now, and mutual friendship and good feeling were restored. How thankful I was, no tongue can tell, to meet not only in friendship, but in fellowship, those that I had so dearly loved. I now felt that whilst I was proclaiming a full and free salvation to all men, I had the prayers and sympathy of many warm and loving hearts, who were once estranged from me in feeling. . When the final separation took place in the Knob Creek church we were stronger in numbers than it was at first believed, our number being near one hundred, including all the officers of the church. “About this time the Friendship church was also cut off by the same Association because it endorsed the doctrine that I believed and taught, by retaining me as a pastor.”

Chapter VI.

“With these churches we began our work,” says our brother, amidst the most bitter persecution from many of our former associates in the Ministry. But the good Lord blessed his own truth and soon we began to see the pleasure of the Lord prosper in our midst. In a short time I baptized about forty-five hopeful converts. While our anti-mission brethern were crying ‘Heretic!’ ‘Wildfire!’ ‘Delusion,’ etc., I was permitted to baptize many precious souls into the fellowship of our churches. O how in my soul I magnified the Lord, who had visited his people in mercy. “While we stood alone, I visited my relatives in Kentucky, and there I baptized about fifteen persons. At the same time I baptized a gentleman who lived in Virginia (his name forgotten) and gave him a certificate of his baptism. A few months after my return I received a very pressing request to go back to the same place and take care of my scattered sheep with which I readily complied; and when I reached the place I found the church in a divided condition, two parties having already formed, some endorsing the views that I have preached and others still clinging to the old Antinomian creed, each party claiming to be the church. Those holding views consonant with my own in the meantime had procured the services of a Brother Edwards who lived in the state of Illinois, as their pastor and I at once decided on staying there several days and preaching for them. The other party as soon as I had commenced a meeting sent off immediately after one of their most talented ministers to come and confute the doctrines that I was preaching. The brother responded to their call and next day found him at my meeting. In the meantime his friends requested that I should invite him to preach when he arrived which I readily agreed to do. My appointment was at a private house and as soon as their preacher came, I invited him to preach, to which he agreed, on condition that I should preach first. So I proceeded in the services and being familiar with all the proof-texts, I referred to them, giving my views on the same as I proceeded. However there was one text which I purposely omitted, viz., ‘Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bond- woman shall not be heir with the son of the free woman.’ After I had closed, Brother C. arose and quoted that text and said it referred to the elect and non-elect; the son of the free woman to the elect, and the son of the bond woman to the non-elect. This was all the point made in his whole talk. When he closed I arose and asked the audience whether they would believe Paul or the preacher. Paul said, ‘These are two covenants,’&c. To close the services of the occasion I called on the Presiding Elder of the Methodist church to pray. The brother prayed very fervently that the good Lord might bless the truths preached by the first brother and make them the power of God unto salvation! ‘But O lord,” prayed he, ‘forgive the errors of the second brother, and make him a useful preacher.’ This prayer seemed to enrage the good brother for as soon as I announced the benediction he approached me and in an angry manner asked me if I aimed to insult him? To which I replied, ‘Sir, call on him who made the prayer.’ This he declined to do, and so the matter ended. “That church is still in existence and I am happy to learn in a prosperous condition. May it long continue to exert a salutary influence in the country where it is located. “On returning home, I visited Friendship church at the regular meeting time, where I met with one of the Anti-mission preachers. As my custom was, I invited him to preach for me. He very readily agreed to do so and during his sermon he took occasion to warn the people to shun those who came to them wearing black coats and white cravats and who rubbed their backs against the college walls! ‘for’ he said, ‘he is going about imposing himself on the churches and rending them wherever he goes. All his allusions to black coats, etc., I did not notice in my reply, but stated frankly to them (as to getting rid of me as he called it,) that I had repeatedly told them that if they continued me as their pastor they would certainly be cut off from the Association. They preferred to obey God rather than man and hence they were cut off as I have before stated without ceremony.”

Chapter VII. Thus we see that the strongest efforts were made to prejudice the minds of the people against our brother and if possible to put him down. But he continued to hold up Christ and Him crucified to perishing men inviting sinners to ‘come for all things are now ready,’ amidst the most bitter persecution. God owned his truth, and glorious results followed, wherever he went. Here is another instance of opposition which I give in his own words: “As I was on my way,” says he, “to fill an appointment in Hickman county, at a place called Gray’s Bend, the road was strange to me and seeing a gentleman and lady just ahead I hurried up my horse until I came up with them. On inquiring about the road, they stated that they were going to hear Hanks preach--’the man that was rending the churches all over the land.’ My reply was: ‘He must be a very bad fellow if what you say of him is true. I believe I will stop and hear him myself.’ They knew not that I was the Hanks of Whom they spoke in such unmeasured terms of condemnation until I arose to open the services. “I refer to these things,” said our venerable brother, “to show that my brethern who differ from me on the Atonement and kindred subjects, held me up before the world as a disturber of the peace. They even went so far as to threaten me with a prosecution by the civil law, for solemnizing the rites of matrimony and preaching as they were pleased to say without authority.” But none of these things moved him, neither counted he his life dear unto him for he desired to finish his life with joy. About this time Elders Leftwich and Roberts visited Elder Hanks. These brethern belonged to the Duck River Association of Baptists situated in Bedford and adjoining counties. They were called “Separate Baptists,” at that time. They remained several days with him and preached at the Knob Creek church and its vicinity preaching the same blessed truths believed and taught by our brother. This visit by these servants of God gave him great strength and encouragement. And when they left they invited him to visit their Association that they might become more intimately acquainted with each other’s views. This he gladly consented to do and promised to meet with the brethern of that Association. Accordingly he visited that body which held its session that same year with the Garrison Fork church in Bedford County.

On Monday at eleven o’clock the Association suspended its regular order of business and invited Elder Hanks to preach, requesting him especially to give them fully his views on the Atonement, together with a kind of epitome of the doctrine as believed by his people and taught by himself. For about two long hours he stood before that body of strange brethern. No mortal man ever plead the cause of his Master with more fervency and zeal than did our beloved brother on that memorable occasion. - When he closed a proposition was made by some brother for all the brethern who could heartily endorse the doctrine preached by Brother Hanks to signify the same by giving him the hand of fellowship. Whereupon the whole assembly, en masse, pressed forward to give him a hearty endorsement. The speaker wept and laughed and praised God who had brought him through so many sore trials. And now that he had found so many preaching brethern holding to the very same doctrines for which he had been maligned and persecuted it is not strange that he should weep for joy and cry out in the fulness of his heart, “Bless the Lord, O my soul! and all that is within me, praise His Holy name!,” At the next meeting of the Duck River Association delegates from both the Friendship and Knob Creek churches were sent and united with that body which met with the Flat Creek church, Bedford County, Tennessee. In the course of two or three years the subject of corresponding with what was then called the “Missionary Baptists” began to be agitated. Elder Hanks entered warmly into the discussions that ensued, and his whole soul was enlisted in the one great work of having the Gospel preached all over the known world. The discussion which followed for a time by both the friends of missions and their opponents as a general thing were carried on in a truly Christian-like spirit. But, alas! the demon of discord entered and the Duck River Association was doomed to division; one party favoring and wishing to aid the Mission Baptists in their plans to educate the rising ministry and thus qualify them successfully to defend the truth and maintain the same against all its adversaries and also to send the Gospel to the destitute everywhere; the other party opposing. Finally, in the year 1834 this body was rent asunder while holding its session with the Salem church, Franklin county, Tennessee. This separation Elder Hanks deplored very much. He thought it would very likely keep good and efficient brethern from cooperating together for years in spreading the truth throughout the land. The writer of this memoir has often heard him lament that our brethern, now called Separate Baptists should have committed the sad mistake of assuming a position so antagonistic to the great Baptist Brotherhood throughout the world and thereby weakening and retarding so far as their means and influence reaches our efforts to spread Baptist Bible truths from the rivers to the ends of the earth; and that he hoped and prayed for the union of all the Baptists in Tennessee, as well as all over the whole world and they might be made one in faith and one in effort to evangelize the nations of earth. For, while they are in a divided condition their enemies are striving hard to supplant them, and thus banish what we hold to be Bible truth from the earth.

Chapter VIII. After this sad and mournful event the Ministers of other Associations as well as from the Duck River began to visit Elder Hanks and to aid him in the information of other churches, Rutherford’s Creek church up to this time had been attached to the Cumberland Association (the same to which Knob Creek and Friendship churches had formerly belonged); but it decided almost unanimously that it was its duty to sever that connection. Accordingly delegates were sent and received into the Duck River Association, Elder Hanks being their pastor. Carter’s Creek church was organized this year under the fostering care of our ever-faithful brother. Others namely Mount Zion, Mars Hill, Rock Spring, Mount Lebanon and New Ramia sprang up and by the blessing of God the Baptists in number and talents began to be a power in the land. Truly may it be said that Elder Hanks was the pioneer of the Baptists in this part of Middle Tennessee. in 1849 the Judson Association was organized at Mount Lebanon church now a member of the Duck River Association. Elder Hanks was unanimously chosen its first Moderator. This body adopted the Constitution, &c. of the Duck River Association. I will here insert what Elder Hanks calls his articles of faith--those that he offered as a basis of union and cooperation to the committee sent by the Cumberland Association to investigate his orthodoxy in the early part of his ministry.

ARTICLES OF FAITH 1. “By one man sin entered into the world and death by sin; so death has passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.” Rom. v. 12 2. “But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honor; that he, by the Grace of God, should taste death for every man.” -- Heb.11. 9 3. “Therefore, being justified by faith, we have peace with i of God through our Lord Jesus Christ. -- Rom. v. 1. 4. “We are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation.” -- 1 Peter 1.5 5,- “And they went down into the water, both Phillip and the eunuch and he baptized him.” -- Acts viii* 38 “Therefore we are buried with him by baptism that like as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father,” &c. ‘Rom.vi. “Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?” Acts X4, 47. “But when they believed Philip, preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.” -- Acts viii. 12. 6. “They that have done good unto the. resurrection of life, and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” John v. 29. 7. “For God hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world by that man whom he hath ordained,” &c. Elder Hanks was the devoted Pastor of the Knob Creek church for a period of more than thirty years and he was beloved by his flock very dearly. He presided as an efficient Moderator of the Judson Association nearly every year after its organization. In the early days of his ministry standing alone as he did it was indeed very hard for us to realize the difficulties and dis- advantages under which he labored; but armed as he was with the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God, and having been thoroughly drilled in its use--(or from a child he had been taught in the Holy Scriptures) -- and, being filled with the Holy Spirit, his heart burdened with love for perishing sinners, he was able to vindicate and maintain the truth, as it was taught in God’s holy word.

Chapter IX. The readers of these pages is again referred to some of the struggles through which the subject of this memoir passed in his efforts to build up the Baptist cause in this country. At the time when the Rutherford’s Creek church invited him to become their pastor the majority of the members favored his views; yet there were a very few who seemed to cling to the “Do-nothing” side. But when they listened to his unanswerable arguments in support of the Bible doctrine, that the atonement is free and full, made for all men--that the scheme of redeeming mercy embraced the whole human race--it caused them first to look with favor and then to embrace his most cherished views. He took great pleasure in exposing the sophistries sometimes called Calvinism, but more correctly termed Fatalism or Stoicism- for the stoics long before Calvin’s day taught some of the same unscriptural and dangerous errors that are to be found in Calvin’s writings. Elder Hanks would take hold of any or all of their proof texts and with a master workman’s hand show that they fully harmonized with the doctrine of a free and full atonement. Carter’s Creek church was built up amidst the strongest opposition. Here he was called upon to whet up his weapons and gird on his armor of truth to do battle in defence of our faith in the one baptism--the immersion of a believer in water by a scriptural administrator as the only Christian baptism. The contest was waged pretty warmly between him and an eminent Pedo-Baptist Minister. Although Elder Hanks was not versed in the classics, knowing nothing of Hebrew and Greek, still, with our old English Bible which he had made the man of his counsel from his youth he was more than a match for any of his opponents. The cause of truth suffered not in his hands in this discussion but it was ably and successfully vindicated. The churches grew and multiplied under his care, the Lord adding the saved almost weekly to their members. Up to this time there had been no effort made to build a church east of Columbia. Elder B. Kimbrough had lived in the Rock Spring country for a short time but had gone to another field. However in the providence of God, Sister Nancy Cannon, wife of Brother George Cannon, now one of the Deacons of Rock Spring church, moved into that vicinity, she being the only Baptist in that community and having faith in her principles as firm as the everlasting hills, God made use of her as the means in his hands of building up his cause in her immediate vicinity. This sister desired Baptist preaching in the neighborhood, still more she wished for a Baptist church, one with which she could worship the God of her fathers and keep the ordinances as they were delivered to us. Soon after her removal she visited Elder Hanks and made known her wishes.

He yielded to her solicitations to have preaching and he gave her an appointment to carry back to her people. She went back with a glad heart, and made known his promise to preach for them. The people met at a schoolhouse near Rock Spring when Brother Hanks always true to his engagements was there in good time. On this occasion he seemed to be possessed of supernatural strength in holding forth the word of life and a crucified Savior; for before he closed his sermon the whole congregation was in a flood of tears some weeping over their sinful hearts and others rejoicing in the Christian’s hope. He at once saw plainly that here a people should be raised up for the Lord and therefore he left another appointment to visit them again. At the appointed time of his next visit he carried with him a young brother, Dawson a licentiate of Knob Creek church. This time he was still more encouraged and he therefore determined to hold a series of meetings as soon as practicable. Accordingly he appointed a time when he would return to that place. The next visit he made, Brother Meachum who had lately settled as pastor at Carter’s Creek church, accompanied him. This young brother was an active and energetic worker in the Master’s cause. During this meeting the good Lord did a great and glorious work for that people. Many souls were happily converted and before the meeting closed a church of thirty members was organized. He was called unanimously to become its pastor and in that capacity he labored efficiently for nine years. The year after this little vine was planted Elder Kimbrough paid them a visit and assisted brother Hanks in holding another meeting of several days which was a glorious success. The church at this meeting nearly doubled itself in numbers. He continued to preach for this church until Elder E. W. Benson was settled there as pastor.

Chapter X. Elder Hanks was twice married--to his first wife, Mary Wolverton, on the 6th day of June, 1811. Eight children, four sons and four daughters were the result of this union. Thomas Hanks, his eldest son is now a resident of Missouri and is an able Baptist minister. Sister Hanks was truly a help-meet for her devoted husband; she would often when he was so much discouraged, cheer him up, telling him to go and preach Jesus to the people and not suffer any uneasiness about his home affairs for she would take care of them. She often attended meeting with him and labored zealously in her sphere to give interest and success to the meetings. Sometimes in her ever-pious zeal for salvation of sinners she would exhort and persuade them to flee the wrath to come. In the absence of her husband at night before retiring to rest she would call her family together and after repeating a few verses from the old family Bible she would bow with and pray for them and commit them to her Saviour and friend not forgetting to ask the Lord to bless the labors of her husband and make him useful in the work of the Lord. He has often said to the writer of these lines that he attributed much of his success as a preacher to the encouragement he always received from his wife in the early part of his ministry. This good sister passed away from this world to her home in heaven quietly and peacefully on the last day of July, 1854, in the fifty-eighth year of her age. Her funeral was preached by Elders E. W. Benson and Thomas Witherspoon, her remains being followed by a large number of relatives and friends to the lonely grave and there deposited to await the summons from on high, “Arise and come to judgment.” She was often heard to pray most fervently that God would save all her children and we may add that we humbly hope her prayers have been answered for all of them now living are members of the church and those that are dead, died, as we learn in the triumphs of the Christian’s hope. The following is the obituary published in the Tennessee Baptist:


“Mary Hanks, consort of Elder Elijah Hanks, departed this life July 31st, 1854, aged 58 years. Her illness was very painful and protracted yet she complained not, but patiently endured it all as a part of her lot and even glorified-God amid dissolving nature. She died as she had lived, a Christian; though an humble, unpretending child of God, yet abounding in every good word and work by which a husband, child, relative or even humanity might be benefitted. “Sister Hanks had few equals in the discharge of the various duties of life. She was a devoted wife of our beloved Brother Hanks (one of the most useful Ministers in Middle Tennessee), for over forty years. During this long relationship to him as a man and a minister, she was truly a helpmeet indeed. When at home, she was kind, obliging and ever ready to do all in her power to render him happy. When called to go and labor in the vineyard of the Lord, he was blessed with one at home whose energy and force of character kept his domestic affairs well regulated; and though her happiest hours was in his company she never opposed his leaving home, night or day but urged him to go and preach unsearchable riches of Christ to a sinful world. As a mother she was tender, affectionate and exemplary. In answer to her prayers she lived to see all her children members of the Baptist church. May they never forget her advice in training them up for God: As a mistress she was merciful and reasonable; as a member of the Baptist church at Knob Creek for more than forty years she was faithful, pious, energetic and abundantly useful. As a member of society, social, agreeable, needing only to be known to be loved. Benevolent to the poor and kind to all. In her death her absence is deeply felt in all these endearing relationships, But our loss is her gain. “A short time before she died she called her husband to her bedside and talked freely and sensibly about her departure and gave him her last sweet counsels; then the children were called up, one by one, and then the servants; and when even her hands were cold in death and the soul just ready to take its flight, her husband asked her if she was conscious that she was dying? She replied that she was. He then said to her, ‘I hope there remaineth a rest for you. ‘Yes,’ she said, “and I shall soon enjoy it” These were her last words. She died in the Lord, and she rests from her labors.” From an acquaintance of upwards of four years with this mother in Israel, I feel that the pen need not describe her many virtues, for they are treasured in a more durable form;-- they are lastingly impressed upon the memories of her associates and friends.”


This obituary was written by my most intimate friend and co-laborer, Elder E. W. Benson. The following preamble and resolutions were adopted by the Knob Creek church to express its condolement-. “WHEREAS God, in his mysterious providence has taken by death from our midst Sister Mary Hanks, consort of our beloved pastor, and so long an esteemed and devoted member of this body; therefor, “RESOLVED, That this church deeply deplores the loss of one so much beloved; but we humbly bow in submission to the will of the great Shepherd, who has taken her from her labors to her eternal rest. “RESOLVED, That we deeply sympathize with our beloved pastor and his family in their bereavement and we pray God to give them Christian fortitude to be submissive and to bear up under this heavy dispensation of His providence. “RESOLVED, That a copy of these resolutions be spread on the church book and a copy sent to the Tennessee, Baptist--a paper much approved among us--for publication, accompanied by a suitable obituary notice. “By order of the church. THOMAS A DODSON, Ch. Clerk.” Elder Hanks remained a lonely widower for about one year, when he married Mrs. Esther L. Miller, the widow of John Miller, Esq., of Maury County, Tennessee. Their marriage took place on the 19th of July, 1855. His second wife was a woman of deep piety and made him an agreeable companion. She was a member of the Cumberland Presbyterian church. They lived happily together for fourteen years; but death came again and Brother Hanks was left again to mourn in grief his lonely fate. She died December 31st, 1868, aged sixty-two years. The author of this sketch has often heard Elder Hanks remark that the good Lord had blessed him with two as good wives as ever lived and in their kindness to him he knew no difference between them.

A TRIBUTE TO THE MEMORY of ELDER ELIJAH HANKS Adopted by the Judson Association of Baptists, at the annual Session’ held with the Mars Hill Church in September, 1871,

WHEREAS, It has pleased our Father in Heaven, in whose hands are the issues of life, to remove, by death, our aged’ and much- beloved brother, Elder Elijah Hanks, who died on the 12th instant, at 9 o’clock p.m., in perfect peace, at the residence of his son-in-law, Brother J. M. Witherspoon, after a long and painful illness; and WHEREAS, Our venerable brother was the pioneer preacher among the churches now composing the Judson Association, and through whose earnest preaching many hundreds of precious souls have been brought into the fold of Christ; therefore, RESOLVED, That whilst we bow in humble submission to the will of God, in removing our father in Israel, (whose praise is in all the churches,) from our midst, thus depriving us of his counsel and advice, for which, as ministers and as a body, we have long looked, and who had long presided as the efficient and faithful moderator of the Judson Association; we will ever cherish a lively remembrance of his many virtues, and try to imitate his pious example. RESOLVED, That a copy of this preamble and resolutions be spread on the minutes of this session for preservation.

For some months previous to the death of Father Hanks, he had been in a low and suffering condition, and talked much. of his approaching death. He was deliberate and careful in arranging all his business, so that no trouble should be found in settling it up after his decease. He often visited, in his last days the grave of the wife of his youth, and, on one occasion, selected the precise spot where he desired to be buried, setting up a stone at the head of the place of his grave. Finally, the last meeting that he should ever attend, of his old church, that he loved so devotedly, was held, commencing on the Saturday before the first Sunday in August, 1871. This proved to be the last meeting as he had believed it would be. On Sunday he was there, and enjoyed the services very much, and on Monday he was found in his accustomed place. After the sermon by the pastor (Elder R. Hull) he was assisted by two brethern to stand up, while he delivered’, in somewhat broken sentences, ‘his last charge to his loved and loving brethern. This was a precious privilege to the aged and care-worn veteran--one that he had long desired to enjoy, for he had been unable to speak publicly for more than a year previous to this time.

HIS LAST CHARGE TO HIS LOVED AND LOVING BRETHERN. The following is the substance of his last effort to address the church:

“Dear Brethern and Sisters--I feel that I am with you for the last time at this place. I have come to bid you farewell, and to give you my last advice. I have been with you, in much meekness, for more than forty years, during which time we have enjoyed many precious seasons; but my time is well nigh done on-earth. I do not feel today that I can say as did Paul, ‘I have fought the good fight,’ &c; but I can say, ‘I have fought the good fight’ as best I could, and “have kept the faith’, and henceforth, I hope, there is a crown of righteousness laid up for me, ‘which the righteous Judge will give me at his appearing,’ &e. And now, beloved brethern,” continued the feeble and almost worn-out disciple, “live in peace--love one another, and forgive one another, as Christ forgave you. Be faithful to your principles--labor to spread them over the land. I love the Baptist faith and doctrines, for I believe they are taught in God’s word. I have believed and taught them for almost fifty years, and I believe them still. I want them spread over all this land of ours. As an evidence of my anxiety for the spread of our principles, I have subscribed for one share in the Southern Publication Society, located in Memphis, Tennessee, for the benefit of my daughters, and I urge you, as a church, to take stock in the same, for I believe it will be the mean, in the hands of God, of accomplishing great good.” Continuing his address, he remarked, “I thought, while Brother Hull was preaching today, that if the same doctrines had been preached by the Baptists in this country forty years ago, they would have taken the whole land.” After he had closed his speech, and as he was borne up by the brethern, in making his way out of the church, he cast once more a lingering look upon those that he had loved so long and ardently, saying, “Farewell, brethern and sisters! once more, farewell!” And he was carried to Brother Witherspoon’s, where he had lived so pleasantly during the last years of his life. He lingered on from day to day through the week, up to Friday, when his daughter, Mrs. Eliza Moore, arrived from West Tennessee. On her coming into his room, he smiled, and said: “Eliza, I am glad to see you once more; you are here in time to bid me good-bye, and see me put away. I am now ready to die, I have finished my work. Children, don’t weep for your old worn- out father, for I hope soon to be at home.” And with many other words did he try to cheer and comfort his weeping children and friends, exhorting them to meet him in Heaven. He then asked some one to sing for him that good old song commencing “On Jordan’s stormy banks I stand,” and joined in the song himself with his usual cheerfulness.

On the next day he was found to be sinking rapidly and as his last moment approached nearer and still more near, his faith grew stronger and his prospects brighter, and so he passed the day, with his feet planted on the margin of the river and his soul resting on the Rock of ages. At 9 o’clock p.m., surrounded by his children, grand-children, and many friends, the spirit of this great man of God, as calmly as the evening breezes, sweetly passed away, escorted as we believe, by a convoy of angels to his home in heaven, On the next day, it being the Sabbath, his remains were carried to the church, where funeral services were performed by Elders Rollin Hull, and W. T. Ussery, in the presence of, perhaps the largest assemblage of people ever gathered together at that place. After the conclusion of the services in the church, his body was borne to the grave-yard, near by, and there commit- ted to its last resting-place, to await the final summons when he shall hear the welcome plaudit, “Thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things. Enter thou into the joys of thy Lord.” The writer of the preceding pages has endeavored as best he could, to give to the world, as well as to the churches, a plain, unvarnished and truthful statement of facts, relating to the life, labors, and death of one who served his “Master” faithfully for nearly half a century, till, it may be truthfully said, the world was not worthy of him and he was taken to that “rest that remaineth for the people of God.” I therefore send forth this little book not claiming that it is faultless, but deprecating sensorious criticisms, and committing it to the reading public, feeling fully satisfied that the appreciative reader will do me justice to believe that I have done all I could, under the circumstances, to place in their proper light the life and character of the now sainted Hanks, as an example worthy of imitation of all men, sincerely trusting that much good may result from the perusal and contemplation of what I have deemed suitable to embody in the foregoing pages.

Monday, August 12, 2024

Sing the Lord’s Song

“How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?”—Psalm 137:4.

Methinks, my soul, this strange land is the very place to sing the Lord’s song in, though the carnal around understand it not. Shall I hang my harp upon the willow, when Jesus is my song, and when he himself hath given me so much cause to sing?

I will sing now, I will sing for evermore. In this strange land, in this barren land, in this distant land from my Father’s house, I will sing, and Jesus shall be my song. He shall be the Alpha and the Omega of my hymn; and until I come to sing in the louder and sweeter notes of heaven, among the hallelujahs of the blessed, upon the new harp and new stringed chords of my renewed soul, will I sing of Jesus and his blood, Jesus and his righteousness, Jesus and his complete salvation. And when the last song upon my trembling lips, with Jesus’s name in full, shall be uttered; as the sound dies away, when death seals up the power of utterance; my departing soul shall catch the parting breath, and, as it enters the presence of the court above, the first notes of my everlasting song will go on with the same blessed note, “to him that hath loved me, and washed me from my sins in his own blood!”

Robert Hawker, The Poor Man’s Morning and Evening Portions, March 4, Morning

Sunday, August 11, 2024

Lord, save us: we perish.

“Lord, save us: we perish.”

Save, Lord, Or We Perish (No. 224) is an unique Sacred Harp tune, and among my favorites. You can listen to a rendition of it HERE.

Written by Reginald Heber, the words appear as “FOURTH SUNDAY AFTER EPIPHANY. No. IV. R. H.” in Hymns, Written and Adapted to the Weekly Church Service of the Year (Reginald Heber. London: John Murray, 1827, p. 39).[i] It has 3 stanzas of 4 lines, with 12 syllables per line.

The author of this hymn, Reginald Heber, was born in 1783 at Cheshire, England. After several years of service in England, he was made the Church of England’s Bishop of Calcutta in June 1823, and arrived in India in October of that year. Heber died in India in 1826, and was buried at St. John’s Church, Trichinopoly, Tamil Nadu, India. The hymn book was published posthumously the year after his death. “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty” and “From Greenland’s icy mountains” are among his best-known hymns. Many of the 57 hymns he wrote are still in use.

Psalm 89:9; Psalm 107:23-30
1. When through the torn sail the wild tempest is streaming,
When o’er the dark wave the red lightning is gleaming,
Nor hope lends a ray the poor seaman to cherish,
We fly to our Maker—“Save, Lord! or we perish.”

Matthew 8:24-27
2. Oh Jesus! once toss’d on the breast of the billow,
Aroused by the shriek of despair from thy pillow,
Now, seated in glory, the mariner cherish,
Who cries in his danger—“Save, Lord! or we perish!”

Hosea 8:7; 1 Peter 5:8; Revelation 12:10
3. And oh, when the whirlwind of passion is raging,
When hell in our heart his wild warfare is waging,
Arise in thy strength thy redeemèd to cherish,
Rebuke the destroyer—“Save, Lord! or we perish.”

The hymn is sometimes titled “Stilling the Sea.” The first stanza ascribes to the Maker the power to still the sea, to save the perishing mariners. The second stanza becomes more specific, referencing the incident of the disciples on the sea of Galilee. The third stanza applies the idea to the Lord stilling the tempests and temptations that rage in our sinful hearts.

I have added above the stanzas some Bible verses that I think appropriately go with the hymn. The original has “Help, Lord” rather than “Save, Lord.” I kept “Save, Lord” since that is the way I know it, as well as it seeming to better match the disciples’ statement in Matthew 8:25.

The Sacred Harp tune was written by Matthew Mark Wynne.[ii] Wynne was born in 1835 in Franklin County, Georgia, the son of Sloman Wynne and Mahala Camp. He married Sarah Carolyn Garrison in 1859 in Haralson County, Georgia. Wynne was a farmer, school teacher and music teacher, and later a newspaper editor. He was active in the Sacred Harp Conventions of Georgia before moving to Texas.[iii] Several of his compositions appeared in The Sacred Harp by B. F. White and E. J. King. After the death of his first wife, Wynne married Mrs. Frances J. (Lewis) Tolbert August 18, 1891 in Goldthwaite of Mills County, Texas.

M. M. Wynne was a Confederate Veteran and a Mason. Wynne served for a time as editor of the People’s Advocate newspaper of Goldthwaite before assuming control of the Brownwood Living Issues paper early in 1894. At least in his later years, he was very active in the People’s (Populist) Party of Texas and his newspapers represented that viewpoint. Matthew Mark Wynne died November 18, 1895 in Brownwood, Brown County, Texas and is buried at the Greenleaf Cemetery there. His grave was either never marked or has been lost. “Editor M. M. Wynne, of the Living Issues, died at his home in this city Monday after a protracted illness, and was laid to rest Tuesday evening in Greenleaf cemetery. Mr. Wynne had long been in feeble health, only doing with an effort the duties of his office. He had gained many friends during his residence in Brownwood and these join The Bulletin in sympathy for the bereaved family and relatives.”

Some songbooks pair the hymn with Sullivans (also known as Cardiff and Heber) by Arthur Seymour Sullivan (1842-1900).


[i] This book also contains poetry by H. H. Milman, Sir Walter Scott, Jeremy Taylor, and others. “R.H.” is given to signify those written by Heber.
[ii] Sometimes his last name appears as “Wynn” and his first name as “Mathew”.
[iii] M. M. Wynne served as secretary of the two oldest continuing Sacred Harp Conventions – the Chattahoochee Musical Convention (org. 1852) and the East Texas Musical Convention (org. 1855).