Translate

Showing posts with label Tennessee Baptists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tennessee Baptists. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 13, 2024

Memoir of Elder Elijah Hanks

Baptist preacher of Tennessee.

MEMOIR OF ELDER ELIJAH HANKS [1793-1871]

By S. C. Evins, 1872

Chapter I.

ELDER ELIJAH HANKS, the subject of this memoir, was born on the 12th of December, 1793, in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. His parents were devoted Christians, and members of the Baptist Church. They removed to Kentucky when he was but five years old, where they remained for several years. In the year 1810 they came to Tennessee, when it was but little more than a wilderness, and one vast canebrake. The Red-men had scarcely left his hunting-grounds when the Baptists planted the standard of the Cross, and erected rude cabins in which to worship the God of our fathers. In those early days, the facilities of acquiring an education, in Tennessee, were very few; consequently Elder Hanks, like most of the boys raised in that day, obtained but a limited education; but, being possessed of an indomitable will, and a strong constitution, he went forth in his daily labor, aiding his older brothers in subduing the forests, and making way for the plowshare. Thus he grew up to manhood, inured to hard and incessant toil, and hardly possessing the rudiments of a common English education. He was taught, however, to respect the worship of God, and although he grew up irreligious, he was quite moral in his habits, and regular in his attendance at church on Sundays. At the early age of nineteen years he was united in marriage to Miss Mary Wolverton, who proved a helpmeet indeed in all his arduous labors, till God took her home. They commenced the journey of married life together, neither of them being professors of religion. Like thousands of others, with them the family alter was entirely neglected. But God had a work for them to do though as yet they knew it not. Elder Hanks was endowed with an untiring energy, and such A powerful constitution that, in after life, he was enabled to do an amount of labor, both physical and mental, that seems almost incredible. But few men possessed the power of endurance that he did. Thus much information of the early life of Elder Hanks we have gleaned from reliable sources.

Chapter II. In this chapter we give the manner of, and some of the circumstances attending, his conversion and call to the work of the Ministry, as related by himself to the author of this memoir.

“My impressions, at times, were very strong to call on sinners to come to the Savior; but, when I thought of my inability for this important work, I would shrink from the cross. Being almost entirely without an education, I thought if I attempted such a thing, I would only disgrace the cause and myself. Finally, I was brought low on the bed of affliction. I felt guilty before God, for not doing what I sometimes thought was my duty, and I promised God that if he would restore me to health again I would do the best I could. I had a very long spell of fever, but finally, through the mercy of God, I was restored to health. Then my promise to God was arrayed before me, and I prayed to God, time and again, to make known to me, plainly, my duty, and I promised to perform it the best I could. I recollect one day, while I was on my knees at prayer, the curse inflicted on Jonah, for disobedience, passed before my mind, and I believed if I failed to yield to impressions, which I often had, that the frowns of God would rest upon me. The Pastor of our church, Elder Dodson, lived some distance away, and he was only with us once a month; and my brother-in-law had similar feelings to my own, he and I held prayer meetings, which greatly assisted me, our church cooperating with us. We held meetings .at night, from house to house, two or three nights in the week, and would give exhortations. The Lord greatly revived his work. In a few weeks there were about sixty added to the church. Sometimes, while telling what the Lord had done for poor sinners, it seemed the greatest privilege that I ever enjoyed; at other times I thought that I had disgraced myself and the cause of Christ, and that I had better quit; and if it had not been for the kind treatment and encouragement given me by the church, I should have faltered by the way. In a short time the Church licensed me to preach, and in a few months I was set apart to the full work of the ministry, by a Presbytery consisting of Elders Hobbs and Dodson.

Chapter III., After his ordination he was called to the Pastorship of the Knob Creek church, of which he was a member, it having ceased to be an arm of the Rutherford’s Creek church, as it had been constituted into an independent church. He says: “I was called to take charge of this church, soon after my ordination, and as my views on the Atonement were nearly the same with those of Brethern Dodson and Hobbs, for a time all seemed to move on in harmony. These two ministers were the only ones, in the Cumberland Association, who agreed with me on the extent of the Atonement made for the world by the sufferings of’ our Savior.” But in a short time one of them died, and the other moved away, leaving him alone to plead the clause that he had espoused with all his heart. About this time he was called to the care of the Friendship Baptist church, twelve miles south of Columbia. He accepted the invitation, and entered at once upon his duties as the Pastor of this church.

At this time, Elder Hanks tells us, there existed very dissimilar views between himself and other Ministers on the Atonement: that they taught some things which he believed were contrary to the teachings of the Scriptures; and that he could not preach his views fully without crossing the views of his preaching brethern. At first, he tells us, they treated him kindly, telling him that by reading and meditation he would see differently. He says: “Some were teaching that a covenant was made, before the foundation of the world, between the Father and the Son, and that the Church was given to the Son by the Father; that the Son agreed, on his part, to come into this world, to suffer and die for those whom the Father had given him in that covenant, and that all for whom he died would be saved. Sometimes they would preach that the Church was eternally justified in the mind and wisdom of God--that there was a common and a special call to sinners; the special call could not be resisted; the Spirit quickening the elect alone. In referring to this subject, he says: I did my best to believe this doctrine, as taught by my brethern, for I fully believed them to be honest. I loved them, and it grieved me to the heart that I could not see and believe as they did; for I could be nothing but a Baptist. I read and investigated their proof-texts prayerfully, willing to follow the teachings of God’s word in all things. I felt that I was responsible to God for everything that I taught in His name, and if called to the ministry, it was my duty to preach the whole truth, as I understood it. I believed in the doctrine of election and predestination, as taught in God’s word, but not as understood and preached by my brethern. Indeed, it was a matter of rejoicing to my poor heart that God did predestinate us to the adoption of children by His Son Jesus Christ, who is mighty and able to save, to the uttermost, all that come unto him; seeing He ever liveth to make intercession for the transgressors. I believed that we are the children of God by faith in Jesus Christ, having been elected according to the foreknowledge of God through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth. In this way I believed and taught the doctrine of election. For I believed that All the happiness that accrues to the children of God, is by faith in Jesus Christ, and not for works. I also believed and taught that Jesus Christ, by the grace of God, had tasted death for every man. This doctrine I proclaimed wherever I went. My very soul burned within me, for I wanted to preach it all over the land, from the rivers to the ends of the earth. I could not find anything in all God’s word that did not harmonize with my cherished views. This made me feel strong in the faith and power of His might. My brethern, however, began to cry out, ‘he is an Arminian! – have nothing to do with him!’ Still I could not hold ‘my peace, but cried the more, in the language of the “Master,’ to all men, ‘Repent, and believe the Gospel. Except ye repent, ye shall all perish; for God commandeth all men, everywhere, to repent. He that believeth not shall be damned. Ye will not come unto me that might have life.’ And with many such Scripture quotations I appealed to the sinners. God blessed my own soul as I preached his precious truth, and also made it the power of God unto salvation to many precious souls.”

Chapter IV. Elder Hanks’s bold and effective manner was not to be tolerated longer, by his brethern holding views on th Atonement differing from his own; accordingly, at the meeting of the Cumberland Association of Baptists, in the year 1829, or near that time, a committee of several brethern was appointed to confer with him and the Knob Creek Church, for nearly all of its members had embraced his views. That committee consisted of Eiders McConnico, Gale and Hunter, their strongest men. They came, bringing others with them. In giving an account of the visit of the committee, Elder hanks says: “I hoped to be able to satisfy them that we were orthodox. It was all in vain; for, although shown from the history of the Baptists, that, years ago, our brethern in Virginia and Kentucky had agreed that the preaching, by a brother that Jesus Christ, by the grace of God had tasted death for every man; or by the preaching by another brother, that he only died for the elect, and that the elect alone have a right to the privileges of the Gospel; should be no bar to church fellowship and communion; and that each party did agree, and had dropped the names by which each had been heretofore distinguished, styling themselves the “United Baptists.” I also showed that I was not the aggressor; for the same doctrine preached by me, was preached by our brethern in other States. After all this, the committee decided that we had departed from the faith, and we were consequently cut off from union with our people. “This was a sore trial to me and the little band, who, like true and trusty friends, as they were, stood by and supported me in the darkest time of my ministerial life. “The church doors, as well as private dwellings were closed against me, and for many months I was denounced as a heretic by those whom I had taught in my early days to love Jesus. The churches were warned to have no fellowship with me. In this lonely condition, I shall never be able to describe my feelings. With not a Baptist Minister near enough to me with whom I could associate, I was shunned and avoided by them all, as if to touch me would contaminate or sully their purity; and except the Knob Creek and the Friendship churches, which had been likewise cut off from the Cumberland Association because they adhered to the views entertained by me, there was not a church in all this part of the State which had any sympathy for me, or those holding similar sentiments.” I have given the foregoing account of Elder Hank’s trials and separation from the Cumberland Association, in nearly his own words, choosing to adopt his own mode of expression rather than my own. How hard it must have been to be severed so unceremoniously from those dear friends and brethern with whom he had been identified ever since he had been in the ministry, none of us at this late date can realize. But our beloved father in the ministry was ready to forsake all for Christ and his truth; and yet he naturally sought and craved the association of his brethern.

Chapter V. I will now give, in his own words, an account of his connection and participation in the “open communion” movement in which the Knob Creek church was once entangled. He says, in his own hand-writing: “Yet I do not say that, in this long and lonely time through which we passed, we lived free from error. My home church and myself drove into open communion, and received one or two Pedo-Baptist immersions. The effect was so different to what we had anticipated, that I was astonished and mortified; for, instead of bringing our Pedo-Baptist friends nearer to us, it only had an opposite tendency, and produced only alienation of feeling, as their Ministers almost forsook us. In the meantime, I went so far as to immerse two Methodists and two Presbyterians in good standing, who desired to be immersed by one who believed it to be the only mode, with. the understanding that they should remain with their respective churches if they wished to do so. In this practice we continued but a short time, for, seeing we did not get the sympathy and encouragement that we expected from them we very soon began to consider the error of what we had done, and whither we had drifted. The result was, that we soon returned and took our former stand, and that too, without the loss of a single member.” He also tells us that for the act of baptizing those persons, he received no thanks from their preachers. “I then thought,” said he, “that I was justified by the case of Phillip, who baptized the eunuch; but long since I have looked upon the act of baptizing their members, and communing with them, as incompatible with the Word of God. And I would, therefore, advise my brethern never to do the same, for when we commune with them at the Lord’s table and receive their baptisms, we certainly endorse their sprinkling and infant baptism. It seems to me that there can be no other fair construction of such acts. Then our members were frequently called Hanksites because we were cut off from our people and could neither ‘pour’ nor ‘sprinkle’ for baptism.” Again Father Hanks says: “I believed that there was too much intelligence in the Baptist Ministry for them to stay long where they then were; so in a few years the division took place--said to be, on the mission question; the one party believing that the Gospel should be sent by the efforts of the churches to the destitute in our own and heathen lands; the other party believing that if God wanted the Gospel preached to the world, He would send it without our aid; and that it would be done through persecution.

Hence each party separated from the other and began to work in their own way.’ I, of course, was found on the mission side of this question, and how my feelings were changed from a state of loneliness to that of joy and pleasure, for many of those who heretofore had held me off at a distance had their eyes opened now, and mutual friendship and good feeling were restored. How thankful I was, no tongue can tell, to meet not only in friendship, but in fellowship, those that I had so dearly loved. I now felt that whilst I was proclaiming a full and free salvation to all men, I had the prayers and sympathy of many warm and loving hearts, who were once estranged from me in feeling. . When the final separation took place in the Knob Creek church we were stronger in numbers than it was at first believed, our number being near one hundred, including all the officers of the church. “About this time the Friendship church was also cut off by the same Association because it endorsed the doctrine that I believed and taught, by retaining me as a pastor.”

Chapter VI.

“With these churches we began our work,” says our brother, amidst the most bitter persecution from many of our former associates in the Ministry. But the good Lord blessed his own truth and soon we began to see the pleasure of the Lord prosper in our midst. In a short time I baptized about forty-five hopeful converts. While our anti-mission brethern were crying ‘Heretic!’ ‘Wildfire!’ ‘Delusion,’ etc., I was permitted to baptize many precious souls into the fellowship of our churches. O how in my soul I magnified the Lord, who had visited his people in mercy. “While we stood alone, I visited my relatives in Kentucky, and there I baptized about fifteen persons. At the same time I baptized a gentleman who lived in Virginia (his name forgotten) and gave him a certificate of his baptism. A few months after my return I received a very pressing request to go back to the same place and take care of my scattered sheep with which I readily complied; and when I reached the place I found the church in a divided condition, two parties having already formed, some endorsing the views that I have preached and others still clinging to the old Antinomian creed, each party claiming to be the church. Those holding views consonant with my own in the meantime had procured the services of a Brother Edwards who lived in the state of Illinois, as their pastor and I at once decided on staying there several days and preaching for them. The other party as soon as I had commenced a meeting sent off immediately after one of their most talented ministers to come and confute the doctrines that I was preaching. The brother responded to their call and next day found him at my meeting. In the meantime his friends requested that I should invite him to preach when he arrived which I readily agreed to do. My appointment was at a private house and as soon as their preacher came, I invited him to preach, to which he agreed, on condition that I should preach first. So I proceeded in the services and being familiar with all the proof-texts, I referred to them, giving my views on the same as I proceeded. However there was one text which I purposely omitted, viz., ‘Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bond- woman shall not be heir with the son of the free woman.’ After I had closed, Brother C. arose and quoted that text and said it referred to the elect and non-elect; the son of the free woman to the elect, and the son of the bond woman to the non-elect. This was all the point made in his whole talk. When he closed I arose and asked the audience whether they would believe Paul or the preacher. Paul said, ‘These are two covenants,’&c. To close the services of the occasion I called on the Presiding Elder of the Methodist church to pray. The brother prayed very fervently that the good Lord might bless the truths preached by the first brother and make them the power of God unto salvation! ‘But O lord,” prayed he, ‘forgive the errors of the second brother, and make him a useful preacher.’ This prayer seemed to enrage the good brother for as soon as I announced the benediction he approached me and in an angry manner asked me if I aimed to insult him? To which I replied, ‘Sir, call on him who made the prayer.’ This he declined to do, and so the matter ended. “That church is still in existence and I am happy to learn in a prosperous condition. May it long continue to exert a salutary influence in the country where it is located. “On returning home, I visited Friendship church at the regular meeting time, where I met with one of the Anti-mission preachers. As my custom was, I invited him to preach for me. He very readily agreed to do so and during his sermon he took occasion to warn the people to shun those who came to them wearing black coats and white cravats and who rubbed their backs against the college walls! ‘for’ he said, ‘he is going about imposing himself on the churches and rending them wherever he goes. All his allusions to black coats, etc., I did not notice in my reply, but stated frankly to them (as to getting rid of me as he called it,) that I had repeatedly told them that if they continued me as their pastor they would certainly be cut off from the Association. They preferred to obey God rather than man and hence they were cut off as I have before stated without ceremony.”

Chapter VII. Thus we see that the strongest efforts were made to prejudice the minds of the people against our brother and if possible to put him down. But he continued to hold up Christ and Him crucified to perishing men inviting sinners to ‘come for all things are now ready,’ amidst the most bitter persecution. God owned his truth, and glorious results followed, wherever he went. Here is another instance of opposition which I give in his own words: “As I was on my way,” says he, “to fill an appointment in Hickman county, at a place called Gray’s Bend, the road was strange to me and seeing a gentleman and lady just ahead I hurried up my horse until I came up with them. On inquiring about the road, they stated that they were going to hear Hanks preach--’the man that was rending the churches all over the land.’ My reply was: ‘He must be a very bad fellow if what you say of him is true. I believe I will stop and hear him myself.’ They knew not that I was the Hanks of Whom they spoke in such unmeasured terms of condemnation until I arose to open the services. “I refer to these things,” said our venerable brother, “to show that my brethern who differ from me on the Atonement and kindred subjects, held me up before the world as a disturber of the peace. They even went so far as to threaten me with a prosecution by the civil law, for solemnizing the rites of matrimony and preaching as they were pleased to say without authority.” But none of these things moved him, neither counted he his life dear unto him for he desired to finish his life with joy. About this time Elders Leftwich and Roberts visited Elder Hanks. These brethern belonged to the Duck River Association of Baptists situated in Bedford and adjoining counties. They were called “Separate Baptists,” at that time. They remained several days with him and preached at the Knob Creek church and its vicinity preaching the same blessed truths believed and taught by our brother. This visit by these servants of God gave him great strength and encouragement. And when they left they invited him to visit their Association that they might become more intimately acquainted with each other’s views. This he gladly consented to do and promised to meet with the brethern of that Association. Accordingly he visited that body which held its session that same year with the Garrison Fork church in Bedford County.

On Monday at eleven o’clock the Association suspended its regular order of business and invited Elder Hanks to preach, requesting him especially to give them fully his views on the Atonement, together with a kind of epitome of the doctrine as believed by his people and taught by himself. For about two long hours he stood before that body of strange brethern. No mortal man ever plead the cause of his Master with more fervency and zeal than did our beloved brother on that memorable occasion. - When he closed a proposition was made by some brother for all the brethern who could heartily endorse the doctrine preached by Brother Hanks to signify the same by giving him the hand of fellowship. Whereupon the whole assembly, en masse, pressed forward to give him a hearty endorsement. The speaker wept and laughed and praised God who had brought him through so many sore trials. And now that he had found so many preaching brethern holding to the very same doctrines for which he had been maligned and persecuted it is not strange that he should weep for joy and cry out in the fulness of his heart, “Bless the Lord, O my soul! and all that is within me, praise His Holy name!,” At the next meeting of the Duck River Association delegates from both the Friendship and Knob Creek churches were sent and united with that body which met with the Flat Creek church, Bedford County, Tennessee. In the course of two or three years the subject of corresponding with what was then called the “Missionary Baptists” began to be agitated. Elder Hanks entered warmly into the discussions that ensued, and his whole soul was enlisted in the one great work of having the Gospel preached all over the known world. The discussion which followed for a time by both the friends of missions and their opponents as a general thing were carried on in a truly Christian-like spirit. But, alas! the demon of discord entered and the Duck River Association was doomed to division; one party favoring and wishing to aid the Mission Baptists in their plans to educate the rising ministry and thus qualify them successfully to defend the truth and maintain the same against all its adversaries and also to send the Gospel to the destitute everywhere; the other party opposing. Finally, in the year 1834 this body was rent asunder while holding its session with the Salem church, Franklin county, Tennessee. This separation Elder Hanks deplored very much. He thought it would very likely keep good and efficient brethern from cooperating together for years in spreading the truth throughout the land. The writer of this memoir has often heard him lament that our brethern, now called Separate Baptists should have committed the sad mistake of assuming a position so antagonistic to the great Baptist Brotherhood throughout the world and thereby weakening and retarding so far as their means and influence reaches our efforts to spread Baptist Bible truths from the rivers to the ends of the earth; and that he hoped and prayed for the union of all the Baptists in Tennessee, as well as all over the whole world and they might be made one in faith and one in effort to evangelize the nations of earth. For, while they are in a divided condition their enemies are striving hard to supplant them, and thus banish what we hold to be Bible truth from the earth.

Chapter VIII. After this sad and mournful event the Ministers of other Associations as well as from the Duck River began to visit Elder Hanks and to aid him in the information of other churches, Rutherford’s Creek church up to this time had been attached to the Cumberland Association (the same to which Knob Creek and Friendship churches had formerly belonged); but it decided almost unanimously that it was its duty to sever that connection. Accordingly delegates were sent and received into the Duck River Association, Elder Hanks being their pastor. Carter’s Creek church was organized this year under the fostering care of our ever-faithful brother. Others namely Mount Zion, Mars Hill, Rock Spring, Mount Lebanon and New Ramia sprang up and by the blessing of God the Baptists in number and talents began to be a power in the land. Truly may it be said that Elder Hanks was the pioneer of the Baptists in this part of Middle Tennessee. in 1849 the Judson Association was organized at Mount Lebanon church now a member of the Duck River Association. Elder Hanks was unanimously chosen its first Moderator. This body adopted the Constitution, &c. of the Duck River Association. I will here insert what Elder Hanks calls his articles of faith--those that he offered as a basis of union and cooperation to the committee sent by the Cumberland Association to investigate his orthodoxy in the early part of his ministry.

ARTICLES OF FAITH 1. “By one man sin entered into the world and death by sin; so death has passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.” Rom. v. 12 2. “But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honor; that he, by the Grace of God, should taste death for every man.” -- Heb.11. 9 3. “Therefore, being justified by faith, we have peace with i of God through our Lord Jesus Christ. -- Rom. v. 1. 4. “We are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation.” -- 1 Peter 1.5 5,- “And they went down into the water, both Phillip and the eunuch and he baptized him.” -- Acts viii* 38 “Therefore we are buried with him by baptism that like as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father,” &c. ‘Rom.vi. “Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?” Acts X4, 47. “But when they believed Philip, preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.” -- Acts viii. 12. 6. “They that have done good unto the. resurrection of life, and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” John v. 29. 7. “For God hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world by that man whom he hath ordained,” &c. Elder Hanks was the devoted Pastor of the Knob Creek church for a period of more than thirty years and he was beloved by his flock very dearly. He presided as an efficient Moderator of the Judson Association nearly every year after its organization. In the early days of his ministry standing alone as he did it was indeed very hard for us to realize the difficulties and dis- advantages under which he labored; but armed as he was with the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God, and having been thoroughly drilled in its use--(or from a child he had been taught in the Holy Scriptures) -- and, being filled with the Holy Spirit, his heart burdened with love for perishing sinners, he was able to vindicate and maintain the truth, as it was taught in God’s holy word.

Chapter IX. The readers of these pages is again referred to some of the struggles through which the subject of this memoir passed in his efforts to build up the Baptist cause in this country. At the time when the Rutherford’s Creek church invited him to become their pastor the majority of the members favored his views; yet there were a very few who seemed to cling to the “Do-nothing” side. But when they listened to his unanswerable arguments in support of the Bible doctrine, that the atonement is free and full, made for all men--that the scheme of redeeming mercy embraced the whole human race--it caused them first to look with favor and then to embrace his most cherished views. He took great pleasure in exposing the sophistries sometimes called Calvinism, but more correctly termed Fatalism or Stoicism- for the stoics long before Calvin’s day taught some of the same unscriptural and dangerous errors that are to be found in Calvin’s writings. Elder Hanks would take hold of any or all of their proof texts and with a master workman’s hand show that they fully harmonized with the doctrine of a free and full atonement. Carter’s Creek church was built up amidst the strongest opposition. Here he was called upon to whet up his weapons and gird on his armor of truth to do battle in defence of our faith in the one baptism--the immersion of a believer in water by a scriptural administrator as the only Christian baptism. The contest was waged pretty warmly between him and an eminent Pedo-Baptist Minister. Although Elder Hanks was not versed in the classics, knowing nothing of Hebrew and Greek, still, with our old English Bible which he had made the man of his counsel from his youth he was more than a match for any of his opponents. The cause of truth suffered not in his hands in this discussion but it was ably and successfully vindicated. The churches grew and multiplied under his care, the Lord adding the saved almost weekly to their members. Up to this time there had been no effort made to build a church east of Columbia. Elder B. Kimbrough had lived in the Rock Spring country for a short time but had gone to another field. However in the providence of God, Sister Nancy Cannon, wife of Brother George Cannon, now one of the Deacons of Rock Spring church, moved into that vicinity, she being the only Baptist in that community and having faith in her principles as firm as the everlasting hills, God made use of her as the means in his hands of building up his cause in her immediate vicinity. This sister desired Baptist preaching in the neighborhood, still more she wished for a Baptist church, one with which she could worship the God of her fathers and keep the ordinances as they were delivered to us. Soon after her removal she visited Elder Hanks and made known her wishes.

He yielded to her solicitations to have preaching and he gave her an appointment to carry back to her people. She went back with a glad heart, and made known his promise to preach for them. The people met at a schoolhouse near Rock Spring when Brother Hanks always true to his engagements was there in good time. On this occasion he seemed to be possessed of supernatural strength in holding forth the word of life and a crucified Savior; for before he closed his sermon the whole congregation was in a flood of tears some weeping over their sinful hearts and others rejoicing in the Christian’s hope. He at once saw plainly that here a people should be raised up for the Lord and therefore he left another appointment to visit them again. At the appointed time of his next visit he carried with him a young brother, Dawson a licentiate of Knob Creek church. This time he was still more encouraged and he therefore determined to hold a series of meetings as soon as practicable. Accordingly he appointed a time when he would return to that place. The next visit he made, Brother Meachum who had lately settled as pastor at Carter’s Creek church, accompanied him. This young brother was an active and energetic worker in the Master’s cause. During this meeting the good Lord did a great and glorious work for that people. Many souls were happily converted and before the meeting closed a church of thirty members was organized. He was called unanimously to become its pastor and in that capacity he labored efficiently for nine years. The year after this little vine was planted Elder Kimbrough paid them a visit and assisted brother Hanks in holding another meeting of several days which was a glorious success. The church at this meeting nearly doubled itself in numbers. He continued to preach for this church until Elder E. W. Benson was settled there as pastor.

Chapter X. Elder Hanks was twice married--to his first wife, Mary Wolverton, on the 6th day of June, 1811. Eight children, four sons and four daughters were the result of this union. Thomas Hanks, his eldest son is now a resident of Missouri and is an able Baptist minister. Sister Hanks was truly a help-meet for her devoted husband; she would often when he was so much discouraged, cheer him up, telling him to go and preach Jesus to the people and not suffer any uneasiness about his home affairs for she would take care of them. She often attended meeting with him and labored zealously in her sphere to give interest and success to the meetings. Sometimes in her ever-pious zeal for salvation of sinners she would exhort and persuade them to flee the wrath to come. In the absence of her husband at night before retiring to rest she would call her family together and after repeating a few verses from the old family Bible she would bow with and pray for them and commit them to her Saviour and friend not forgetting to ask the Lord to bless the labors of her husband and make him useful in the work of the Lord. He has often said to the writer of these lines that he attributed much of his success as a preacher to the encouragement he always received from his wife in the early part of his ministry. This good sister passed away from this world to her home in heaven quietly and peacefully on the last day of July, 1854, in the fifty-eighth year of her age. Her funeral was preached by Elders E. W. Benson and Thomas Witherspoon, her remains being followed by a large number of relatives and friends to the lonely grave and there deposited to await the summons from on high, “Arise and come to judgment.” She was often heard to pray most fervently that God would save all her children and we may add that we humbly hope her prayers have been answered for all of them now living are members of the church and those that are dead, died, as we learn in the triumphs of the Christian’s hope. The following is the obituary published in the Tennessee Baptist:


“Mary Hanks, consort of Elder Elijah Hanks, departed this life July 31st, 1854, aged 58 years. Her illness was very painful and protracted yet she complained not, but patiently endured it all as a part of her lot and even glorified-God amid dissolving nature. She died as she had lived, a Christian; though an humble, unpretending child of God, yet abounding in every good word and work by which a husband, child, relative or even humanity might be benefitted. “Sister Hanks had few equals in the discharge of the various duties of life. She was a devoted wife of our beloved Brother Hanks (one of the most useful Ministers in Middle Tennessee), for over forty years. During this long relationship to him as a man and a minister, she was truly a helpmeet indeed. When at home, she was kind, obliging and ever ready to do all in her power to render him happy. When called to go and labor in the vineyard of the Lord, he was blessed with one at home whose energy and force of character kept his domestic affairs well regulated; and though her happiest hours was in his company she never opposed his leaving home, night or day but urged him to go and preach unsearchable riches of Christ to a sinful world. As a mother she was tender, affectionate and exemplary. In answer to her prayers she lived to see all her children members of the Baptist church. May they never forget her advice in training them up for God: As a mistress she was merciful and reasonable; as a member of the Baptist church at Knob Creek for more than forty years she was faithful, pious, energetic and abundantly useful. As a member of society, social, agreeable, needing only to be known to be loved. Benevolent to the poor and kind to all. In her death her absence is deeply felt in all these endearing relationships, But our loss is her gain. “A short time before she died she called her husband to her bedside and talked freely and sensibly about her departure and gave him her last sweet counsels; then the children were called up, one by one, and then the servants; and when even her hands were cold in death and the soul just ready to take its flight, her husband asked her if she was conscious that she was dying? She replied that she was. He then said to her, ‘I hope there remaineth a rest for you. ‘Yes,’ she said, “and I shall soon enjoy it” These were her last words. She died in the Lord, and she rests from her labors.” From an acquaintance of upwards of four years with this mother in Israel, I feel that the pen need not describe her many virtues, for they are treasured in a more durable form;-- they are lastingly impressed upon the memories of her associates and friends.”


This obituary was written by my most intimate friend and co-laborer, Elder E. W. Benson. The following preamble and resolutions were adopted by the Knob Creek church to express its condolement-. “WHEREAS God, in his mysterious providence has taken by death from our midst Sister Mary Hanks, consort of our beloved pastor, and so long an esteemed and devoted member of this body; therefor, “RESOLVED, That this church deeply deplores the loss of one so much beloved; but we humbly bow in submission to the will of the great Shepherd, who has taken her from her labors to her eternal rest. “RESOLVED, That we deeply sympathize with our beloved pastor and his family in their bereavement and we pray God to give them Christian fortitude to be submissive and to bear up under this heavy dispensation of His providence. “RESOLVED, That a copy of these resolutions be spread on the church book and a copy sent to the Tennessee, Baptist--a paper much approved among us--for publication, accompanied by a suitable obituary notice. “By order of the church. THOMAS A DODSON, Ch. Clerk.” Elder Hanks remained a lonely widower for about one year, when he married Mrs. Esther L. Miller, the widow of John Miller, Esq., of Maury County, Tennessee. Their marriage took place on the 19th of July, 1855. His second wife was a woman of deep piety and made him an agreeable companion. She was a member of the Cumberland Presbyterian church. They lived happily together for fourteen years; but death came again and Brother Hanks was left again to mourn in grief his lonely fate. She died December 31st, 1868, aged sixty-two years. The author of this sketch has often heard Elder Hanks remark that the good Lord had blessed him with two as good wives as ever lived and in their kindness to him he knew no difference between them.

A TRIBUTE TO THE MEMORY of ELDER ELIJAH HANKS Adopted by the Judson Association of Baptists, at the annual Session’ held with the Mars Hill Church in September, 1871,

WHEREAS, It has pleased our Father in Heaven, in whose hands are the issues of life, to remove, by death, our aged’ and much- beloved brother, Elder Elijah Hanks, who died on the 12th instant, at 9 o’clock p.m., in perfect peace, at the residence of his son-in-law, Brother J. M. Witherspoon, after a long and painful illness; and WHEREAS, Our venerable brother was the pioneer preacher among the churches now composing the Judson Association, and through whose earnest preaching many hundreds of precious souls have been brought into the fold of Christ; therefore, RESOLVED, That whilst we bow in humble submission to the will of God, in removing our father in Israel, (whose praise is in all the churches,) from our midst, thus depriving us of his counsel and advice, for which, as ministers and as a body, we have long looked, and who had long presided as the efficient and faithful moderator of the Judson Association; we will ever cherish a lively remembrance of his many virtues, and try to imitate his pious example. RESOLVED, That a copy of this preamble and resolutions be spread on the minutes of this session for preservation.

For some months previous to the death of Father Hanks, he had been in a low and suffering condition, and talked much. of his approaching death. He was deliberate and careful in arranging all his business, so that no trouble should be found in settling it up after his decease. He often visited, in his last days the grave of the wife of his youth, and, on one occasion, selected the precise spot where he desired to be buried, setting up a stone at the head of the place of his grave. Finally, the last meeting that he should ever attend, of his old church, that he loved so devotedly, was held, commencing on the Saturday before the first Sunday in August, 1871. This proved to be the last meeting as he had believed it would be. On Sunday he was there, and enjoyed the services very much, and on Monday he was found in his accustomed place. After the sermon by the pastor (Elder R. Hull) he was assisted by two brethern to stand up, while he delivered’, in somewhat broken sentences, ‘his last charge to his loved and loving brethern. This was a precious privilege to the aged and care-worn veteran--one that he had long desired to enjoy, for he had been unable to speak publicly for more than a year previous to this time.

HIS LAST CHARGE TO HIS LOVED AND LOVING BRETHERN. The following is the substance of his last effort to address the church:

“Dear Brethern and Sisters--I feel that I am with you for the last time at this place. I have come to bid you farewell, and to give you my last advice. I have been with you, in much meekness, for more than forty years, during which time we have enjoyed many precious seasons; but my time is well nigh done on-earth. I do not feel today that I can say as did Paul, ‘I have fought the good fight,’ &c; but I can say, ‘I have fought the good fight’ as best I could, and “have kept the faith’, and henceforth, I hope, there is a crown of righteousness laid up for me, ‘which the righteous Judge will give me at his appearing,’ &e. And now, beloved brethern,” continued the feeble and almost worn-out disciple, “live in peace--love one another, and forgive one another, as Christ forgave you. Be faithful to your principles--labor to spread them over the land. I love the Baptist faith and doctrines, for I believe they are taught in God’s word. I have believed and taught them for almost fifty years, and I believe them still. I want them spread over all this land of ours. As an evidence of my anxiety for the spread of our principles, I have subscribed for one share in the Southern Publication Society, located in Memphis, Tennessee, for the benefit of my daughters, and I urge you, as a church, to take stock in the same, for I believe it will be the mean, in the hands of God, of accomplishing great good.” Continuing his address, he remarked, “I thought, while Brother Hull was preaching today, that if the same doctrines had been preached by the Baptists in this country forty years ago, they would have taken the whole land.” After he had closed his speech, and as he was borne up by the brethern, in making his way out of the church, he cast once more a lingering look upon those that he had loved so long and ardently, saying, “Farewell, brethern and sisters! once more, farewell!” And he was carried to Brother Witherspoon’s, where he had lived so pleasantly during the last years of his life. He lingered on from day to day through the week, up to Friday, when his daughter, Mrs. Eliza Moore, arrived from West Tennessee. On her coming into his room, he smiled, and said: “Eliza, I am glad to see you once more; you are here in time to bid me good-bye, and see me put away. I am now ready to die, I have finished my work. Children, don’t weep for your old worn- out father, for I hope soon to be at home.” And with many other words did he try to cheer and comfort his weeping children and friends, exhorting them to meet him in Heaven. He then asked some one to sing for him that good old song commencing “On Jordan’s stormy banks I stand,” and joined in the song himself with his usual cheerfulness.

On the next day he was found to be sinking rapidly and as his last moment approached nearer and still more near, his faith grew stronger and his prospects brighter, and so he passed the day, with his feet planted on the margin of the river and his soul resting on the Rock of ages. At 9 o’clock p.m., surrounded by his children, grand-children, and many friends, the spirit of this great man of God, as calmly as the evening breezes, sweetly passed away, escorted as we believe, by a convoy of angels to his home in heaven, On the next day, it being the Sabbath, his remains were carried to the church, where funeral services were performed by Elders Rollin Hull, and W. T. Ussery, in the presence of, perhaps the largest assemblage of people ever gathered together at that place. After the conclusion of the services in the church, his body was borne to the grave-yard, near by, and there commit- ted to its last resting-place, to await the final summons when he shall hear the welcome plaudit, “Thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things. Enter thou into the joys of thy Lord.” The writer of the preceding pages has endeavored as best he could, to give to the world, as well as to the churches, a plain, unvarnished and truthful statement of facts, relating to the life, labors, and death of one who served his “Master” faithfully for nearly half a century, till, it may be truthfully said, the world was not worthy of him and he was taken to that “rest that remaineth for the people of God.” I therefore send forth this little book not claiming that it is faultless, but deprecating sensorious criticisms, and committing it to the reading public, feeling fully satisfied that the appreciative reader will do me justice to believe that I have done all I could, under the circumstances, to place in their proper light the life and character of the now sainted Hanks, as an example worthy of imitation of all men, sincerely trusting that much good may result from the perusal and contemplation of what I have deemed suitable to embody in the foregoing pages.

Wednesday, August 09, 2023

Grimes-Allen Discussion. When?

By June 14, 1928 John Harvey Grime had published a new 71-page booklet title A Discussion Between J. H. Grime and James A. Allen. Grime was Baptist and Allen church of Christ (Campbellite), editor of The Gospel Advocate. In it they debated the origin, faith and practice of their respective churches.

The original discussion was published as periodical installments. Thomas N. Thrasher’s Encyclopedia of Religious Debates (Volume 2 E-L, 2016, p. 63) notes that the discussion appeared in two periodicals – The Baptist and Commoner (Little Rock, Arkansas) and The Gospel Advocate (Nashville, Tennessee). Volume LXIX, No. 47 (November 24, 1927, p. 1) of The Gospel Advocate carries the first affirmative of the Grime-Allen Discussion with this note, “This debate is running simultaneously in the Gospel Advocate and in the Baptist and Commoner, Little Rock, Ark.” In The Gospel Advocate it ran in six consecutive issues in November and December, and was likely then printed in a similar series of dates in The Baptist and Commoner. The book itself was not printed until 1928, with late Spring being a likely possibility.

The background of the discussion is this.

An April 9, 1925 article by Allen in the Nashville Banner included the statement that “when a man becomes a Methodist, a Baptist, a Presbyterian, etc., he becomes something more or less than a Christian,” that these were “human denominations,” and that only the church of Allen was New Testament Christianity. This drew a response from Grime.

In 1925, Grime and Allen engaged in correspondence, Grime desiring a written discussion and Allen an oral debate.

 In 1926 (“Preface” dated November 11, 1926) in Blood Before Water and Christ Before the Church, J. H. Grime writes about wanting a written discussion on the following propositions

“The church with which, I, J. H. Grime, am identified, or of which I am a member, known by my brethren as a Baptist Church, is scriptural in origin, doctrine, and practice.”

“The Church with which I am Identified, or of which I am a member, known to my brethren as the Church of Christ, is scriptural in origin, doctrine, and practice.”

In 1927, James A. Allen published Alias “Campbellism”: Review of “Blood Before Water and Christ Before the Church” by J. H. Grime – a booklet reviewing Grime’s booklet (“Introduction” dated July 14, 1927).

Apparently, after these events, Grime and Allen were able to agree on a discussion through two religious periodicals. By June 14, 1928, the material had been published in book form by J. H. Grime.

“New Books Reviewed” in The Baptist and Reflector includes a review of “A Discussion, between J. H. Grime and James A. Allen. Published by J. H. Grime, Lebanon, Tenn. $0.25.” The Baptist editor reviews the booklet very positively.

“This is a compilation of a discussion held recently by the Rev. J. H. Grime of Lebanon and James A. Allen of the Gospel Advocate. It is well arranged and show the two sides of a controversy that has been wages since the days of Alexander Campbell. Dr. Grime holds to the position that Baptists are the successors of apostolic Christians. He back his thesis with history, scripture, and sound logic. Dr. Allen presents the usual arguments for the disappearance of New Testament Christianity and its restoration during the first part of the nineteenth century.” The Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, June 14, 1928, p. 13.

The first page of the booklet reminds the reader “This Discussion Was First Published in Papers, And is Now Put in This Form.”

Worldcat.org and Abilene Christian University list this booklet as “Publisher not identified” and “Place of publication not identified.” This can be cleared up with the booklet itself and the The Baptist and Reflector review, which shows it is published by J. H. Grime, Lebanon, Tennessee. The date can also be ascertained – 1928. A Discussion Between J. H. Grime and James A. Allen could only have been published after the paper discussion was closed in December 1927, and the booklet was “new” in June 1928.

The title and writing on the cover follows:

A DISCUSSION

BETWEEN

J. H. GRIME (Baptist)

LEBANON, TENNESSEE

AND

JAMES A. ALLEN

(Editor Gospel Advocate)

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

PRICE 25 CENTS


Tuesday, August 08, 2023

John Harvey Grime, obituary

 

Baptist and Reflector, September 25, 1941, page 5
(you should be able to click on and enlarge this image)

Thursday, October 21, 2021

“A. Nunnery”: his hand against every man

In 2016, Elder Alonzo Nunnery was nominated to the “Hall of Fame” of the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma. The Convention does not honor Nunnery, but rather believes his contributions in the main were undesirable, neverthless that those negative contributions helped the convention “cement its beliefs and firm stand in their convictions” against Nunnery and those who supported him.[i]

Alonzo Nunnery was born September 18, 1861 at Camden, Benton County, Tennessee. He was the second child of Nathaniel Nunnery and Francis Isabella Brewer.[ii] His younger brother, Astley Ulon Nunnery (1873- 1957), was also a Baptist preacher. Alonzo married Eliza Victoria Johnson on October 21, 1883, in Benton County, Tennessee. Nunnery was saved when he was sixteen years old (about 1877). The preaching of J. N. Hall influenced his union with the Baptists. “On October the first [1885], Brother Nunnery joined the Mount Lebanon Baptist Church, and there he was baptized into the fellowship of the Baptist Church.”[iii] He possibly began preaching about 1893, based on mentions of his name found in the Baptist and Reflector. Though he does not mention when he was ordained, Nunnery himself said that he was ordained at the Bible Hill Baptist Church near Parsons, Tennessee, in the Beech River Association.[iv]

“A. Nunnery” – as his name often appears – pastored churches in Tennessee and Missouri before going to Oklahoma. He was an active and popular preacher. The Central Association minutes for 1902 record him as pastor of six churches.[v] The Baptist and Reflector references him often. Reporting in 1894, Nunnery writes, “I have had quite an enjoyable time in my meetings. I have baptized 59 happy souls—39 into the fellowship of Mt. Gilead, 13 into New Hope and seven into Judson church. I have been preaching to Mt. Gilead church fourteen months and have had 60 additions.”[vi] In September 1895, he preached before the Beech River Association “from the text, ‘Son of man, can these dry bones live?’ He made the churches of the Beech River Association the dry bones. The sermon was an excellent one and full of the missionary spirit.” At this same meeting, Nunnery exhibited his interest in orphans. “The report of the Orphans’ Home was read by Rev. A. Nunnery, who made a feeling speech upon the subject and took up a collection for the Home.”[vii] Alonzo Nunnery’s parents both died when he was about 18, leaving the younger children as orphans in the older sibling’s care – likely the catalyst for Nunnery’s interest in work with orphans.

Nunnery attended Lexington Baptist Male and Female College in Lexington, Tennessee (and possibly Union University at Jackson, Tennessee).[viii] He was active in publications, establishing the Baptist Banner at Jackson, Tennessee in 1900. He was associated with this periodical until he moved to Oklahoma. After moving to Oklahoma, A. Nunnery established the Baptist Worker in 1909 and edited it until his death in 1939.[ix] He wrote The Kingdom or Churches of Jesus Christ, and A History of the Hawkins Matter, published by the Baptist Worker Publishing Company. The Baptist Worker Publishing Company printed Sunday School Literature, at least during some of its publishing lifetime. In 1912, Columbia Publishing and Printing published his debate on missions with H. M. Cagle.

After several years of successful ministry in Tennessee, Alonzo Nunnery moved to Granite, Oklahoma in 1907.[x] Tennessee Baptists received this as “sad news,” while commending him to Oklahoma Baptists.

“Brother Nunnery is one of the best preachers, and at the same time one of the strongest Baptists and truest men, not only in our State, but in the South. He stands four square against all evil, and for everything that is good and right.”[xi]

The Maple Springs Church, where he had been pastor for five years, described him thusly:

“…we can now, with a sincere desire of our hearts for good, recommend him, as a zealous and most ardent Christian, strong as a doctrinal preacher, never wavering from the truth from fear or favor of any man, or man-made creed of anyone, but always continuing steadfast in the apostles’ doctrine.”[xii]

Nunnery’s ministry certainly had not withered in western Tennessee. A “revival at Maple Springs Church, near Mercer, Tenn.,” shortly before the announcement of his departure to Oklahoma, “resulted in 30 conversions and 21 baptisms and four approved for baptism.” His ministry in Oklahoma seems popular there as well.

“Rev. Alonzo Nunnery, who went some months ago to the pastorate at Granite, Okla., is doing things there to build up the Kingdom just as he did while in Tennessee. There are additions to the church at almost every service. The church has recently contracted for new pews and pulpit. The house will be repainted on the outside and papered and carpeted inside.”[xiii]

One of his “four-square” stands was a staunch view of Nunnery had against football.[xiv] In its day, it may not have been unusual. It is certainly out of step with many enamored Baptists of our day.

Whereas, We believe that foot-ball is degrading to morals, and, whereas some of our institutions of learning tolerate and encourage the playing of football and other games; therefore,

            Be it resolved, That we, the Maple Springs Baptist Church, do condemn said game and the action of said institutions.

            Resolved second: That we will not lend our support in any way and wave all obligations to any institutions that tolerate and encourage said games.

            Resolved third: That we send a copy of these resolutions to the Baptist and Reflecter, Baptist Banner and The Baptist Flag, for publication, and also a copy be spread in our minutes.

                                                                                    A. Nunnery, Mod.

                                                                                    G. D. Siler, Clerk.

            We ask other churches who favor, to adopt same.

            Done by order of Church in Conference this 3rd Lord’s day in December, 1906. [xv]

Once in Oklahoma, Alonzo Nunnery soon was in conflict with the newly organized Baptist General Convention.[xvi] In the Encyclopedia of Southern Baptists, Roger Hebard calls the Nunnery Movement “the only distinct movement of its kind in Oklahoma Baptist history.”[xvii] According to Hebard, the friction was caused by “personal and policy disagreements between Nunnery and Franz Marshall McConnell, corresponding secretary-treasurer of the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma, 1916-22; convention purchase, 1919, of the Baptist Messenger, a rival publication of the Baptist Worker; Nunnery’s opposition to convention policies in promotion of the 75 Million Campaign; Falls Creek Assembly; operational policies in the Oklahoma Baptist Orphans’ Home; and the indisposition of convention leaders to deal with the John L. Hardin Hawkins case.”[xviii] In 1912 his Tennessee friends thought the Baptist Worker “deserves the patronage of Oklahoma Baptists” and “deserves to be the State paper.”[xix] Oklahoma Baptists thought differently, the Convention purchasing the Baptist Messenger in 1919.

Writing generally about “Oklahoma affairs” in which he had “no disposition to mingle,” Edgar E. Folk, editor of the Baptist and Reflector, wrote in 1915:

“...we are surprised that any charges should have been made against Brother A. Nunnery...We have known him for twenty years or more. We have been in his home, in churches of which he was pastor, in Association, and other meetings with him. We have seen him tried in the fire. We have never know a better, truer man. He is of an intense nature. He has strong convictions. He believes and therefore he speaks earnestly. But his heart is in the right place. He would not do anything wrong for the world if he knew it...Knowing Brother Nunnery as we do we felt that we should say the above words in behalf of a thoroughly good man, who seems to have been misunderstood by some. We have written what we have unsolicited by Brother Nunnery, and without his knowledge, but as a matter of simple justice.

“We should add, though, that Brother Nunnery is like a mule—you can lead him, but you cannot force him. In this respect he only shows his intense Baptist nature.”[xx]

The dissension led the Convention supporters to deny A. Nunnery a seat at the 1918 meeting, and then do so again in 1919. The 1919 report referred to the action of 1918, stating:

“It will be remembered that Rev. A. Nunnery was, by an overwhelming majority, refused a seat in the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma last year. The ground of such refusal was that said Rev. A. Nunnery, Editor of the Baptist Worker, of Granite, Okla., was not in sympathy and co-operation with the Convention. Many articles and editorials of his were cited, being an infraction or the principle set forth in Art. II of the Constitution of the Convention.”[xxi]

The 1919 action was supported by noting that Nunnery had made no retraction, neither had retreated from his position. Afterward, A. Nunnery and others washed their hands of this convention, and started another. The “Baptist Convention of Oklahoma” was organized at Chickasha on Oct 5, 1920. There were 101 messengers present from 48 churches, as well as well-wishers and other visitors.[xxii] They established a permanent orphan’s home in Chickasha (supervised by A. Nunnery and his wife), and organized a new church there – Ninth Street Baptist Church – to be affiliated with the Baptist Convention.[xxiii] Tennessee friends supported Nunnery in his struggle with Oklahoma Baptists, at least initially. In 1914 Fleetwood Ball wrote, “Tennessee Baptists know, love and believe in Alonzo Nunnery.”[xxiv]

“Bro. Nunnery knows Baptist doctrine from A to Z. His Baptist proclivities suit his brethren in Tennessee.”[xxv]

“Our good friend, Rev. Alonzo Nunnery, of Granite, Okla., editor of the Baptist Worker, was recently denied a seat in the Oklahoma Baptist Convention at Enid. This seems funny to his Tennessee friends who know his real worth.”[xxvi]

“His hosts of Tennessee Baptist friends are grieved to know that the Oklahoma Convention at its recent session in Shawnee, refused for the second time to admit to a seat in the body Rev. Alonzo Nunnery, of Granite, Okla., editor of the Baptist Worker on the ground of disloyalty to the state work…Evidently Alonzo Nunnery is a badly misunderstood man by his Oklahoma brethren, or else the wrong spirit is swaying them. He stood four square for the Lord’s work in Tennessee.”[xxvii]

In September of 1920, Fleetwood Ball, knowing Nunnery would start a new organization, changed his tune somewhat. He wrote, “Bro. Nunnery’s friends in Tennessee regret his deflection.”[xxviii]

During this period of upheaval, Mrs. Eliza V. Nunnery died May 21, 1921 of a heart attack. On January 1, 1922, A. Nunnery married Mrs. Minnie Corbitt, a widow of Camden, Tennessee.[xxix] In these times, Nunnery continued a successful evangelistic ministry, such as in 1920 when he assisted in a revival in Wewoka, Oklahoma that resulted in 40 additions, 31 by baptism.

Within a few years, there was a growing interest for unification of Baptist dissenters from the Southern Baptist Convention. Though all dissented from the work of the SBC, there was a wide range of beliefs among them on how to do mission work. Some were “gospel missioners” who decried mission boards, and some believed in boards if they thought they were carried on in a scriptural manner. This evidently was the position of A. Nunnery.

In his debate against S. K. Powers in August of 1907, Nunnery affirmed “The Use of Associations, Conventions and Boards in Carrying out the Commission as given in Matt. [28:]19-20 is Thoroughly Supported by the Scripture.”[xxx] Nunnery also debated H. M. Cagle on the subject in 1911, and carried on a written debate about missions circa 1917 with Ben M. Bogard in The Baptist Worker and Bogard’s Baptist and Commoner.[xxxi] In the summer of 1916, he debated (apparently about Conventionism) both C. A. Smith and G. W. Crawford, whom he identified as “Landmark Baptist”. In January 1917, The Baptist Worker announced a debate with Bogard at “the so-called Landmark Baptist church house at Alex, Oklahoma” commencing on January the 16th. The following propositions were to be discussed:

1st. “Resolved that those Baptists who oppose the organized Convention work, and call themselves Landmark Baptists are the regular Baptists.”

2nd. Resolved that the Baptists who do their mission work through what is called the organized work are the regular Baptists.”

Ben M. Bogard affirmed the first proposition, which Nunnery denied. A. Nunnery affirmed the second proposition, which Bogard denied.[xxxii]

Nevertheless, Nunnery seems to have come around to the idea of working with the “dissenters”. His “New” Baptist Convention grew. New churches joined. The Oklahoma Baptist describes January 3, 1924 as when A. Nunnery agreed for the first time “to really unify in a general way with us” and that on March 19, he wrote, “We are putting out what we feel that we can and will defend as being based on the Bible.”[xxxiii] In 1925, the Baptist Convention agreed to unite with the State Association of Oklahoma Baptist Churches (org. circa 1912) to form the Baptist General Assembly of Oklahoma. The first meeting of the Baptist General Assembly of Oklahoma was held at Chickasha, Oklahoma, October 26-27, 1926, at the city hall auditorium.[xxxiv] G. W. Crawford, whom A. Nunnery had debated in 1916, was elected state missionary. In his paper, Nunnery noted that the Oklahoma churches had “promised to assist [the BMA of] Texas in the support of Portugal missions, and we must be true to our word. Then, since the forming of the American Baptist Association other foreign mission fields have been placed before us.” Nunnery “distinctly understood that each church should be left free to do its foreign mission work as they wish…” He claimed, “…the churches cooperating with the Baptist General Assembly of Oklahoma have the best, the most thoroughly Baptistic and Scriptural principles of agreement of any cooperative body of Baptists in the land.” Further, he states, “It cannot be denied that the old conventions have become so mixed with unsoundness that a sound Baptist cannot afford to mix with them.”[xxxv]

A. Nunnery’s satisfaction with the new organization was short lived. He split from the Baptist General Assembly in 1927 and re-organized the Baptist Convention of Oklahoma. He had no home among the unsound Baptists of the old convention, but he would not work with the new assembly either. According to Hebard, controversies with Ben M. Bogard and others led Nunnery to reorganize the Baptist Convention in Chickasha December 27, 1927, with messengers from 12 churches. The Baptist General Assembly sued for the possession of the orphans’ home. They legally won possession of it in 1930, after a three-year court battle, but also had to pay a settlement to A. Nunnery and his wife.[xxxvi]

Chickasha Daily Express, Wednesday April 13, 1932

The ministry of A. Nunnery from 1930 until his death in 1939 were doubtless the waning years of his life. Yet, he remained active. Apparently, he was part of organizing a debating society in Chickasha.[xxxvii] He engaged in debates put on by the society. In 1932, Nunnery and J. W. Diggs debated whether the story of the rich man and Lazarus was literal or a parable.[xxxviii] He opposed the “Henshaw Bill,” which was to repeal state prohibition.[xxxix] Newspaper accounts show Nunnery pastoring Ninth Street Baptist Church in Chickasha, at least from 1936-1939.[xl] He was pastor of Bridge Creek Baptist Church, seven miles northwest of Blanchard, for 18 years, from 1921 until his death in 1939.[xli] He continued as editor of The Baptist Worker until his death. Sometime after that, the publication of the paper ceased.[xlii]

Chickasha Daily Express, Friday, February 12, 1937

Alonzo Nunnery’s hand was “against every man” in several ways. He opposed many in the form of debate. According to William T. Swanson, Nunnery took part in over 100 debates, with Baptists, Campbellites, and even a Socialist.[xliii] As a Baptist preacher and leader in Oklahoma, he wound up in the middle – against the Southern Baptists on one side, and the Landmark Baptists on the other side. He was involved in at least three lawsuits[xliv] – one that he brought against J. W. Bailey, J. E. Kirk, et al.;[xlv] one brought by W. S. Miller against him for libel;[xlvi] and the struggle for ownership between Nunnery (representing the Baptist Convention of Oklahoma) and the Baptist General Assembly of Oklahoma.[xlvii]

Despite all this, A. Nunnery’s staunch stands won him many friends among those who appreciated them. Swanson wrote in The Baptist Worker:

“I loved Brother Nunnery, and had the highest respect for him. His integrity and character was unquestionable. He was a very spiritual and able Minister of the Gospel.”[xlviii]

Even in death, one Southern Baptist paid high tribute to his life:

“Rev. [W. A.] Criswell[xlix] referred to Mr. Nunnery as a ‘defender of the faith,’ who had gone from ‘one end of the country to the other, proclaiming the message of Christ as he believed it and found it in the Bible.’ The minister spoke of Mr. Nunnery’s ‘staunch support of clean Baptist ministry,’ and the ‘ethical ideals he upheld.’”[l]

Swanson also quotes Criswell saying, “There is no man who ever attracted me quite like Brother Nunnery did. I have known ministers by the thousands, I have gone to school with them. I have heard them speak from the Atlantic to the Pacific, from Canada to Mexico. I have heard them from many foreign nations, but I never quite saw a man like Brother Nunnery to whom I could look to give me things of his faith and life...If there ever lived a defender of the faith, that man was Brother Nunnery. Through the years, through sermons, through writings, he constantly fought for the truth.”[li]

After being in poor health for several months, Alonzo Nunnery died on the Lord’s Day, September 24, 1939.[lii] He had been in the ministry about 52 years. His body was placed at the Rose Hill Cemetery at Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma, where it awaits the resurrection.

Beneath what seemed to be a hard hand-against-every-man exterior, at least in the theological realm, friends of “Rev. A. Nunnery” saw a kind, generous nature underneath it all. 

Chickasha Daily Express, Wednesday, September 27, 1939

Look for pastorates, debates, publications, and bibliography HERE.


[i] “Alonzo Nunnery (1861-1939),” a 2016 Hall of fame Monograph; article by Luke Holmes from The Oklahoma Baptist Chronicle (Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Eli H. Sheldon, Editor), Autumn 2016, Volume LIX, Number 2, pp. 19-22.
[ii] Nathaniel Nunnery had other children by previous marriages.
[iii] William T. Swanson in The Baptist Worker, September 1939, as cited in The Kingdom of God, Brawner, pp. 5-6
[iv] “Among the Brethren,” Baptist and Reflector, Nashville, Tennessee, Thursday, June 26, 1919, p. 5.
[v] Proceedings of the Sixty-Sixth Session of the Central Baptist Association, September 17-19, 1902. The church table lists A. Nunnery as pastor of six churches – Antioch, Chapel Hill, Jackson Royal Street, Maple Springs, Medina, and Mt. Pleasant.
[vi] “Good Work Done,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, November 15, 1894, p. 2.
[vii] “The Beech River Association,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, September 12, 1895, p. 9.
[viii] “Rev. Alonzo Nunnery was probably the second oldest [to enroll in the Lexington College] he being at least 50 years of age. His own sons were his classmates. It was my pleasure as a 17-year-old boy to recite with him and occupy a desk in front of his. Rev. Nunnery was a very noted minister, debater and moved to Oklahoma and edited a Baptist paper at Chickasha.” History of the Lexington Baptist Male and Female College, by J. A. Deere (written circa 1956). Deere must be incorrect about Nunnery’s age, though. When A. Nunnery was fifty (1911), he was already living in Oklahoma. Baptist and Reflector articles show Nunnery living in Lexington from at least 1894 to 1900. Probably during this time, he attended the college. In the fall of 1900, Nunnery “moved his family to Jackson, where he expects to attend school.” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, October 18, 1900, p. 12. In 1907, the Southwestern Baptist University at Jackson changed its name to Union University.
[ix] “Rev. Nunnery Funeral Set for Tuesday,” Chickasha Daily Express, Monday, September 25, 1939, p. 1.
[x] The newspaper accounts I have found say that Alonzo Nunnery went to Granite in 1907. On the other hand, in his “Hall of Fame” article, Luke Holmes claims he went to Mangum in 1907 and to Granite in 1911. (The Mangum Star on October 10, 1907, p. 5, describes Nunnery as “pastor of the Baptist Church at Granite.”) After leaving Granite, he moved to Chickasha, Oklahoma around 1920.
[xi] “Recent Events,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, August 22, 1907, p. 9.
[xii] “Resolution of Respect,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, August 29, 1907, p. 12.
[xiii] Wow, carpet in 1907! “Among the Brethren,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, October 31, 1907, p. 12.
[xiv] J. B. Cranfill of Texas also opposed it, writing, “We favor safe, helpful athletics in our schools, but to say the least, our Christian colleges are going far astray when they lend their influence to the training of boys to kick and trample their fellow students to death. We are against the murderous game [football, rlv], root and branch...If some of our over-enthusiastic youths that attend Baylor are bound to test their kicking abilities, let them cross legs with a burro. It will be fully as civilized and much less dangerous.” J. B. Cranfill, The Baptist Standard, 1899, as quoted in Prophets With Pens, pp. 28-29. It goes on to say that in 1904 Cranfill “urged the Baptist General Convention of Texas to adopt a resolution requesting that football at Baylor be disbanded…” The J. R. Graves Society of Religious Inquiry as Southwestern Baptist University opposed football and Sunday sports as well. Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, May 24, 1906, p. 7.
[xv] “Maple Springs Resolutions,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, January 3, 1907, p. 7.
[xvi] A Convention uniting disparate Baptist elements was formed in Oklahoma in 1906. It was initially dually aligned with the Home Mission Society in the North and the Home Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention. The Northern influence may have been the source of some differences and problems. See, for example, History of the American Baptist Association, p. 168. An article in The Tribune-Progress (Mountain View, Oklahoma, December 11, 1914, p. 1) indicates some difference arising between Nunnery and the Granite Baptist Church, in which the Granite Church initially granted a letter of dismission to Nunnery and others of his family, and then later tried to withdraw fellowship from him.
[xvii] This assessment seems questionable to me, depending on what Hebard means by “its kind”.
[xviii] Encyclopedia of Southern Baptists, Vol. II, p. 1025. The Hawkins case involved Nunnery witnessing “another minister with a woman not his wife, and felt he was unfit for Baptist service.” At least from Nunnery’s standpoint, the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma wanted to cover up the scandal. Nunnery wrote a booklet about the matter.
[xix] Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, February 8, 1912, p. 13.
[xx] Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, September 23, 1915, p. 8; In 1918, Fleetwood Ball mentions “a sharp controversy” between Nunnery and Oklahoma Secretary of State Missions F. M. McConnell, in which A. Nunnery objected to what he considered “un-Baptistic methods of appeal to the soldiers in the camps.” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, August 15, 1918, p. 13.
[xxi] Minutes of the 14th Annual Session of the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma, November 11-12, 1919, p. 89.
[xxii] The Baptist Convention of Oklahoma was often called the New Baptist Convention, probably to distinguish it from the “old” convention. L. W. Wright was the first moderator. History of the Baptist General Assembly of Oklahoma and Other Beginnings from 1903 to 1982, Baptist General Assembly Historical Committee, n.d., p. 4.
[xxiii] “Start Plans to Establish Third Baptist Church,” Chickasha Daily Express, Thursday, May 5, 1921, p. 3.
[xxiv] “Among the Brethren,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, November 12, 1914, p. 15.
[xxv] “Among the Brethren,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, August 7, 1913, p. 16.
[xxvi] “Among the Brethren,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, December 19, 1918, p. 13.
[xxvii] “Among the Brethren,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, December 4, 1919, p. 18.
[xxviii] “Among the Brethren,” Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, September 9, 1920, p. 20.
[xxix] Chickasha Daily Express, Monday, May 23, 1921, p. 1; Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, January 19, 1922, p. 15.
[xxx] “Religious Debate,” The Mangum Star, Mangum, Oklahoma, August 15, 1907, p. 6.
[xxxi] Nunnery-Cagle Debate, A. Nunnery; H. M. Cagle, [Magnolia, AR: Columbia Publishing and Printing, 1912]; The Baptist Worker, Granite, Oklahoma, Wednesday, June 13, 1917, p. 4; The Life and Works of Benjamin Marcus Bogard, Foreman and Payne, Little Rock, AR: Seminary Press, 1966, p. 341.
[xxxii] “Our Debate with Bogard,” The Baptist Worker, Wednesday, January 10, 1917, p. 2.
[xxxiii] “Notes from Lookeba,” The Oklahoma Baptist, Chickasha, Oklahoma, Thursday, May 15, 1924, p. 7.
[xxxiv] “Church Meet to Open Tomorrow,” Chickasha Daily Express, Chickasha, Oklahoma, October 25, 1926, p. 1. Nunnery estimated about 300 churches “Since the uniting of the two bodies, the Baptist Convention of Oklahoma and the Baptist Association of Oklahoma, into one cooperative body…” The Baptist Worker, January 6, 1926, p. 4.
[xxxv] The Baptist Worker, Wednesday, February 17, 1926, p. 4.
[xxxvi] “Orphans Home Title Changed in Church Suit,” Chickasha Daily Express, Thursday, June 12, 1930, p. 1.
[xxxvii] “A debating society has been organized in Chickasha, with sessions held each Saturday afternoon at the city hall.” – “Biblical Subjects Debated,” Chickasha Daily Express, Friday, April 8, 1932, p. 4.
[xxxviii] “Announce Debate Subject,” Chickasha Daily Express, Wednesday, April 13, 1932, p. 5.
[xxxix] “Pastors Plan Drive Against Henshaw Bill,” Chickasha Daily Express, Friday, October 9, 1936, p. 1.
[xl] Chickasha Daily Express, October 9, 1936; December 13, 1936; January 12, 1937; February 7, 1937; August 28, 1938; April 20, 1939.
[xli] William T. Swanson in The Baptist Worker, September 1939, as cited in The Kingdom of God, Brawner, p. 6.
[xlii] “Alonzo Nunnery (1861-1939),” Holmes, The Oklahoma Baptist Chronicle, p. 21.
[xliii] William T. Swanson, as cited in The Kingdom of God, Brawner, p. 6.
[xliv] Apparently some Oklahoma Baptists were ignorant of the apostles’ doctrine of not going to law one with another before the world (1 Corinthians 6:1-8)
[xlv] “Rev. Nunnery Sues Several Prominent Granite Baptists,” The Greer County Democrat, Mangum, Oklahoma, Thursday, December 3, 1914, p. 1.
[xlvi] “No Baptists Wanted on This Jury,” The Chickasha Star, Friday, January 25, 1924, p. 1. Miller lost his suit.
[xlvii] “Contract in Orphan Home Settlement,” The Oklahoma Baptist Voice, Rocky, Oklahoma, June 25, 1930, p. 1.
[xlviii] William T. Swanson, as cited in The Kingdom of God, Brawner, p. 7.
[xlix] Wallie Amos Criswell, Jr., well-known long-time pastor of First Baptist, Dallas, but then pastor of First Baptist in Chickasha, Oklahoma.
[l] “Tribute Paid to Rev. Nunnery,” Chickasha Daily Express, Tuesday, September 26, 1939, p. 1.
[li] William T. Swanson, as cited in The Kingdom of God, Brawner, p. 7.
[lii] “Rev. A. Nunnery Is Critically Ill,” Chickasha Daily Express, Monday, August 14, 1939, p. 1; “Rev. Nunnery Funeral Set for Tuesday,” Chickasha Daily Express, Monday, September 25, 1939, p. 1.