Translate

Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts

Friday, June 26, 2026

What we lose

As an old dinosaur, perhaps, I am particularly pained and puzzled by the move away from Bibles as books to Bibles on screens, phones, and computers. Now to be clear, I am not against using these resources when they can be a help – but, like Dustin Benge (a younger person and also an educator), overall, I see the switch is a loss rather than a gain.

What we lose when the Bible is only on a screen:

1. You remember where the verse lives on the page and aids memorization.

2. The page shows you much more at once. You see the context, not just a few verses at once.

3. The page keeps your notes. Years from now they will still be there, in your own hand.

4. The page cannot distract you with a notification. It only asks to be read.

5. The page is something your children watch you open and they know it’s the Bible.

The screen gives much. The page gives more.

- Dustin Benge


Saturday, June 20, 2026

All in me

“I have read the Bible and found many errors, all of which were in me.” Greg Mathis
I don’t know Greg Mathis. 

I began to read this – “the Bible…found many errors” – and I was shocked by the audacity! 

Then I read the punch line – “all of which were in me” – and I was shamed by the accuracy!

Thursday, May 28, 2026

A Next-World Bible

“Modern inerrantist evangelicals such as myself should adjust our expectations about the preservation of Scripture to what God actually did with the text of the Hebrew Bible rather than insisting on a level of jot-and-title perfection that God seems to have reserved for the next world.”

The comment above is by Mark Ward and is found in The Authority of the Septuagint (p. 181). What a strange view! It relegates the perfection of a trustworthy Bible to two times that it does no good for most Christians and churches; when it was hot off the press, so to speak, and when we all get to heaven. For now, we just have to make do with not knowing which words in the Bible are correct.

While we walk the pilgrim pathway,
Flaws oft overspread the Bible;
But when studying days are over,
Not an error, all perfect type!

When we all get to heaven,
What a day of rejoicing that will be!
When we have jot-and-tittle perfection
We’ll have the perfect Bible that we need!

Nah, I think I will keep my expectations for the high standard of God preserving his word, even if I do not have all the answers.

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Christopher Yetzer on Inspiration, Preservation, and Translation

By Christopher Yetzer, Baptist Missionary in Milan, Italy. (Used by permission.)

1. Inspiration

  • 1. I affirm that God sovereignly inspired His words exactly as He intended (2 Tim. 3:16; 2 Pet. 1:21). Inspiration rests in God’s act, not in my understanding of the process.
2. Preservation

  • 2. I affirm that God has preserved His inspired words, as Scripture promises (Ps. 12:6–7; Isa. 40:8; Matt. 24:35).
  • 3. Preservation means that God’s words remain accessible to His people and have not been lost to history.

3. Progressive Access in History

  • 4. I recognize that not every believer in every generation possessed the entirety of Scripture (e.g., Old Testament saints did not have the New Testament; early churches did not immediately possess the complete canon).
  • 5. Therefore, preservation does not require identical distribution in every era, but faithful transmission within God’s redemptive plan.

4. Recognition, Not Private Revelation

  • 6. I believe Christ’s sheep hear His voice (John 10), meaning believers are enabled by the Spirit to recognize and receive God’s Word—not to generate new revelation.
  • 7. I believe I possess God’s preserved Word today and can receive it with confidence.

5. The Textual Foundation

  • 8. I believe the Old Testament is most faithfully preserved in the traditional Hebrew Masoretic text, and the New Testament in the historic Greek manuscript tradition received by the church.
  • 9. Textual questions should be approached from this preservation framework rather than from a skepticism toward the text itself.

6. Translation

  • 10. I believe God’s words can be accurately translated into other languages.
  • 11. Accuracy does not always require word-for-word literalism but faithful representation of meaning and structure.
  • 12. Changes in language over time (e.g., “ass” to “donkey”) do not necessarily constitute doctrinal or textual corruption.

7. Principles for a Translation

  • I believe a faithful translation should aim for:
  • 13. Accuracy — conveying the meaning of the original text faithfully.
  • 14. Authority — broad ecclesiastical acceptance and proven use.
  • 15. Beauty and dignity — language fitting for public worship and reverence.
  • 16. Comprehensiveness — capable of expressing the full theological depth of the original languages.
  • 17. Unity — promoting doctrinal and congregational stability where possible.

8. Application to English

  • 18. For English-speaking believers, I believe these principles converge most fully in the King James Version.
  • 19. I desire similar faithfulness, clarity, dignity, and unity in translations for other languages.

My confidence in a translation rests not on private spiritual impression alone, but on its historical continuity, textual foundation, doctrinal faithfulness, and long-standing use among believers.

Notes.


I think this very well represents the truth, and with which I understand and agree. Generally there is the modern evangelical denial of preservation as a biblical doctrine. More a “oh, what we have is just what happened to survive to the present” kind of preservation.

I believe the best preservation of biblical faith and practice occurred to a large degree underground during the ascendancy of the “hierarchical church” (Roman Catholics and Greek Orthodox) from say the 500s to the Reformation. Both the people and the words of the Lord have been preserved. I see the Catholics and Orthodox as being heretical, and the truth generally preserved in persecuted bands of believers. (Not that no truths were preserved among the Catholics and Orthodox, but when they “hereticize” the doctrine of salvation outside of grace through faith, they have lost the plot.)

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Hold on a minute

“The human authors of Scripture were inspired to write by God’s Holy Spirit, but they wrote with careful attention to organization and structure; in other words, they did not write haphazardly, randomly, or chaotically.”

“Because real human authors wrote the Bible, even as they were inspired by God’s Holy Spirit, we should expect that they wrote in logical and organized ways.”

I recently read “The Key to Finding the Author’s Emphasis When You Read the Bible,” by Jon Nielson. The above quotes are from that essay. It had some helpful information, but those particular statements struck me as odd, even trending toward wrong. Maybe the author thought he was addressing a problem in people’s thinking about the Bible. On the other hand, I wondered if he also has a problem in his thinking. Nielson mentions the Holy Spirit twice in the article. Both times he correctly says the human writers of the Bible were inspired by the Holy Spirit. Yet, both times, there seems to an underlying implication that we should remember that Scripture is structured, logical, and organized because humans wrote it. Now, I don’t know about you, but I recognize that the divine authorship is a much better guarantee that Scripture is structured, logical, and organized (rather than the human element). I would never begin to imagine that the Holy Spirit would write “haphazardly, randomly, or chaotically.” Nielson may not have intended to imply that, but it came across that way to me.

I find it more reassuring that the Holy Spirit is the original and ultimate author of Scripture.

2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

2 Timothy 3:16-17 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

Updating an older verb table

Below I am updating a table that I published about 12 years ago. You should be able to select the picture and enlarge it to see it better.

For discussion of the verb endings, see Use of "-est" and "-eth" in the KJV and The verb ending "-edst".

Tuesday, May 13, 2025

The criterion of textual criticism versus textual translation

The criterion of textual criticism versus textual translation.

A curious cumbrous thought 
Came to my mind today:
Big Eva speaks one thing
And then shucks it away.
Translators must be Christians true,
For text critics – academic’ll do.

It is my impression that in the broad category of people who consider themselves evangelical, there exists the two contrasting and contradictory views about the places of faith and scholarship regarding text and translation.[i]

1. When it comes to textual criticism, many evangelicals are not concerned about who is doing the work of text criticism. They simply must be academically qualified.

2. When it comes to Bible translation, many evangelicals are concerned about who is doing the work of translation. They feel they should be professed Christians, and that they should hold the doctrines of inspiration & inerrancy.

Steelmanning the issue; not a strawman.

Statements about Textual criticism.[ii]

The quality of the work of textual criticism does not depend on the beliefs of the text critics, but on the credibility of their scholarship. Therefore, it does not matter what they believe, or even if they are Christians at all, as long as they are good well-trained scholars who consistently apply that scholarship.

“I would like to work as a text-critic as if God didn’t exist, so to speak.” Tommy Wasserman, comment on blog post “‘First-Century Mark’ SBL Panel

“In practice New Testament textual critics today tend to be Christians themselves, but not always. It does not matter, for the quality of their work does not depend on their faith but on their adherence to academic standards.” Jan Krans, “Why the Textus Receptus Cannot Be Accepted

“My job as a textual critic is not to ensure that readers have an inerrant edition of the Bible in their hands.” P. J. Williams, “Inerrancy and textual criticism

“If you understand the process of textual criticism today, if you understand how scholars examine manuscripts and examine readings today and there can be unbelievers that do it...” James White, White vs. Levesque Debate (starts at 1:04:20)

These quotes illustrate a common view that the quality of text critical work in establishing the true text of the Bible does not depend on the faith or religion of the textual critics but on their training and adherence to academic standards.

Statements about Bible translation.

I perceive there is among those called evangelicals a discrepancy and/or contradiction in their approach to textual criticism versus their approach to Bible translation. Bible translations by and for evangelicals emphasize the concern that the translators of the text of the Bible need to be orthodox Christians. So, suddenly the evangelicals decide the quality of the work indeed DOES depend on the orthodox beliefs of the translators.

“In faithfulness to God and to our readers, it was deemed appropriate that all participating scholars sign a statement affirming their belief in the verbal and plenary inspiration of Scripture, and in the inerrancy of the original autographs.” “Preface to the New King James Version,” The Holy Bible: New King James Version, Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1982 p. v

“In working toward these goals, the translators were united in their commitment to the authority and infallibility of the Bible as God’s Word in written form.” “A Word About the NIV,” The Holy Bible: New International Version, Colorado Springs, CO: Biblica, p. A14[iii]

“The ESV publishing team has included more than a hundred people…Translation Oversight Committee…Translation Review…the Advisory Council…Crossway Board of Directors. This hundred-plus-member team, shares a common commitment to the truth of God’s Word and to historic Christian orthodoxy and is international in scope, including leaders in many denominations.” “Preface,” ESV Study Bible, Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2011, p. 22

“The CSB is translated directly from the best available Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic source texts into English by biblical scholars who affirm the authority of Scripture as the inerrant Word of God and seek the highest level of accuracy in their translation.” Christian Standard Bible FAQs

Questioning the discrepancy; looking for answers.

Why does Average Joe Evangelical think that the scholarship of the translators and their adherence to academic standards are not sufficient to do the work of Bible translation? He thinks that way in the case of the scholarship of the text critics and their adherence to academic standards. Why, in their minds, cannot non-Christian scholars sufficiently make the same decisions about translation as orthodox Christian scholars? 

I personally believe that we need the trust of Christians who are skilled, orthodox, and honest, whether textual critics or translators of original language texts.[iv] (And more personally, I believe we already have text and translation we can trust.) However, I am trying to understand why the split thinking many evangelicals make in the two different tasks. Why is distinction of the necessity of orthodoxy made when it comes to translators? Why do they not call out for orthodox Christian text critics as well?

What’s going on?

If evangelical folks are willing to apply the mantra that the quality of the text critical work depends only on the quality of the training of the scholars, their academic credentials, and their working knowledge of the subject, why do these same evangelicals change horses when they get to the translation stream? Why wouldn’t the quality of the translators’ work also depend on the quality of the training of the scholars, their academic credentials, and their working knowledge of the subject?

I am unsure of this state of affairs. Perhaps one possibility is that most of them cannot read and do not directly use the products produced by the text critics – so that does not impact them directly (at least not in a way obvious to them). On the other hand, these evangelical Christians do read, use, and study the products produced by the translators, and can become quite disturbed when they find something that they believe is unorthodox.[v] 

Another matter involved in this may be how the different products are promoted. Evangelical-oriented Bible translations are deliberately marketed to their consumers framed in guarantees of the translation’s accuracy, reliability, and orthodoxy. Producers of original language texts (especially Greek texts) market their products in a different way, often much of the promotion addressing what great strides the scholars have made in the direction of recovering the “initial” text. A lot of that is probably foreign to the average evangelical Bible reader, even among the very educated.

That is two things that may come into play. What do you think? Why this discrepancy in how evangelicals look at scholarship regarding Bible translations versus original language texts?


[i] I understand that all evangelicals do not present a mass single view on the subject, but I perceive that there is a general common feeling and approach on this subject of which write.
[ii] Textual criticism in the biblical context is the branch of textual scholarship that attempts to establish what is the original or best possible reading of the Bible. See also HERE, HERE, and HERE.
[iii] NIV constitution statement: “Only those shall be eligible for membership on the Committee who endorse the purpose for which the Committee exists, and who are willing to subscribe to the following affirmation of faith: ‘The Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written, and is therefore inerrant in the autographs’; or to the statements on Scripture in the Westminster Confession, the Belgic Confession, the New Hampshire Confession, or the creedal basis of the National Association of Evangelicals; or to some other comparable statement.”
[iv] Here is what you get when translators are untethered from Christian orthodoxy: “The Scholars Version is free of ecclesiastical and religious control, unlike other major translations into English, including the King James Version and its descendants (Protestant), the Douay-Rheims Version and its progeny (Catholic), and the New International Version (Evangelical). Since SV is not bound by the dictates of church councils, its contents and organization vary from traditional bibles…The Scholars Version is authorized by scholars.” The Five Gospels: The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus. New Translation and Commentary by Robert W. Funk, Roy W. Hoover, and the Jesus Seminar, New York, NY: Polebridge Press/Scribner, 1993, p. xviii.
[v] One example of this was the great uproar that was created when the Revised Standard Version changed the word “virgin” in Isaiah 7:14 to “young woman.”

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

A “Standard” Bible

Oddly, there is one body, and one Spirit, one hope of our calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all … and hundreds of English Bible translations!

Though there are hundreds of translations, there are over a dozen vying to be the “standard sacred text.” How do we know? Because they tell us so by including “standard” as part of their names.

Notice all of these Bibles that use “Standard” in their names (with their most recent edition, if known):

Additionally, some Bibles aspire to be “International” or “World” Bibles. The ISV incorporates two ideas, “International” and “Standard.” This all seems to suggest that there is a heart longing to have one standard Bible. (Or maybe it is just clever marketing.)

A number of these “standard” Bibles – far from being standard – have fallen by the wayside. Some may have never made it as far as the wayside! When all is said and done, the King James Bible is still the standard – the one that every other Bible wants to be or to replace.

Friday, February 21, 2025

Donner, Psalm 12:6-7

“True thus is the word of the true, infallible One who cannot lie. The faith of the poet rests upon it, fully assured that none of the words of God shall fall to the earth unfulfilled. And the ages have established the truth of David’s praise upon the word of the Lord. The unbeliever has cast God’s Word into the ungodly crucible of his critique, and still does every day. It has been subjected to the most severe experiments that science could devise, and it still boldly continues. And with what outcome? That our precious Bible, after each trial, became more and more manifest, to be the pure, infallible Word of our God. Faith, then, fears not those experiments of infidel criticism; one does not make silver, purified seven times, into tin or lead. They will not be able to take God’s Word from us, they will have to let the Word stand.” J. H. Donner (Netherland Reformed), De Psalmen Voor de Gemeente Uitgelegd (The Psalms Explained For The Church), Volume 1, 1893, p. 77 (English translation from the original Dutch) 

“Waarachtig is alzoo he Woord van den Waarachtige, onbredriegelijk van Hem die niet liegen kan; het geloof des dichters verlaat zich er op, ten volle verzekerd, dat geen der woorden God onvervuld op aarde vallen zal.”

“En de eeuwen hebben de waarheid van Davids lof op het Woord des Heeren bevestigd. Het ongeloof heef Gods Woord in den ongoddelijken smeltkroes van zijn critiek geworpen, en doet dit nog elken dage. Men heeft het aan de zwaarste proeven, die de wetenschap kon uitdenken, onderworpen, en gaat er nog stout en driest mede voort. En met welke uitkomst? Dat onze dierbare Bijbel, na elke proef bij toeneming openbaar werd, het reine, zuivere, onfeilbare Woord onzes Gods te zijn. Het geloof vreest dan ook die proefnemingen der ongeloovige critiek niet, men maakt geen zevenmaal gelouterd zilver tot tin of lood; zij zullen ons Gods Woord niet kunnen ontnemen, het Woord zullen zij moeten laten staan.”

“True thus is the word of the True, infallible of Him who cannot lie; the faith of the poet rests upon it, fully assured that none of the words of God shall fall to the earth unfulfilled. And the ages have established the truth of David’s praise upon the Word of the Lord. Unbelief has cast God’s Word into the ungodly crucible of its critique, and still does every day. It has been subjected to the most severe experiments that science could devise, and it is still bold and bold. And with what outcome? That our precious Bible, after each trial, became more and more manifest, to be the pure, pure, infallible Word of our God. Faith, then, fears not those experiments of unbelieving criticism; they do not make silver, purified seven times, into tin or lead; they will not be able to take God’s Word from us, they will have to let the Word stand.”

“David geloof is wonderbaar gesterkt geworden, hij erkent en verwacht, dat de Heer de ellendigen en nooddruftigen bewaren en behoeden zal van het valsch en trotsch geslacht der leugenaars en lage vleiers.”

“David’s faith has been wonderfully strengthened, he acknowledges and expects that the Lord will keep and keep the poor and needy from the false and proud generation of liars and low flatterers.”

“De Heere alleen kan er hen voor behoeden en bewaren; want niet dan kwaad, niet dan verderf is te watchten, wanneer zij de overhand krijgen en de macht in kerk of staat in hunne handen komt.”

“The Lord alone can keep them from it and keep them; for nothing but evil, nothing but destruction is to be watched when they gain the upper hand and power in church or state comes into their hands.”

“De goddeloozen draven rondom, zij verheffen zich, wanneer de snoodsten der menschenkinderen verhoogd worden, wanneer dit boos geslacht van vleiers en leugenaars de eereplaatsen van macht en heerschappij innemen.”

“The wicked trot about, they lift themselves up, when the vilest of the children of men are exalted, when this evil race of flatterers and liars take the honors of power and dominion.”

Saturday, January 25, 2025

Let the Bible be the Bible

“Let the Bible be the Bible!”

Augustine of Hippo stated, “If you believe what you like in the Gospel, and reject what you don’t like, it is not the Gospel you believe, but yourself.” Truly we could further reflect “If you believe what you like in the Bible, and reject what you don’t like, it is not the Bible you believe, but yourself.”


Wednesday, November 06, 2024

God Bless the USA Bible

This post is not a recommendation of the Bible views of Tim Wildsmith. However, his review of the God Bless the USA Bible is timely and interesting because of the political circumstances. The reviews are not political, but rather talk about the binding and print quality of this particular Bible.


Saturday, October 26, 2024

The Text of the Bible

The TEXT of the Bible, not the papers, the covers, the title, the preface, the cross references, the study notes, or the concordance and maps in the back; yea, the text itself is the inspired and preserved word of God.

Friday, September 27, 2024

All manner of pleasant fruits, new and old

Martin Luther probably did not say, “The Bible is neither ancient nor modern. It is eternal.” Neither did he likely write, “The Bible is not antique or modern. It is eternal.” Both of these statements are frequently quoted unsourced, and almost as frequently quoted sourced to authors who quoted the words unsourced – but never with a distinct reference to some writing of Martin Luther, as far as I can find.

Regardless of who wrote or said it, it seems to contain a kernel of truth, doesn’t it? We might also just as well turn it around and say, “The Bible is both ancient and modern. It is eternal.” The Bible itself is forever settled in heaven. The message of the Bible is timeless and relevant for all people in all places – throughout all generations!

Some folks are obsessed with antiques. Others must have whatever is the newest and most up to date. The Bible is full of surprises; it is ever old and ever new, a faithful and trustworthy friend who reveals to us fresh insights as we travel along life’s highway. It contains “all manner of pleasant fruits, new and old” which God has set in it for us. It is the top-of-the-line Bread of Heaven. Like manna, it provides complete spiritual nutrition. everything you need for life and godliness.

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

John Canne and his Bible notes

Yesterday I posted a transcription “To the Reader” from John Canne’s publication of the King James Bible with marginal notes (The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments, Newly Translated out of the Original Tongues and with the former Translations diligently Compared and Revised, With Marginal Notes, Shewing The Scripture to be the best Interpreter of Scripture).

John Canne was an English separatist minister, theologian, and author. He was also a printer. He ministered both in England and in Holland. In the early 1620s, Canne succeeded Henry Ainsworth as pastor of a congregation of English independents in Amsterdam, staying there almost 20 years. In the 1650s he was at Hull. While there his wife Agnees and daughter Deliverance died and were buried at the Holy Trinity Church graveyard. Canne later went back to Holland, and it is believed he died in Amsterdam circa 1667. He was the author of several works, his Bible with marginal notes probably being the most important and enduring. Some others are:

  • (1634) A Necessitie of Separation from the Church of England, prooved by the Nonconformists Principles. Specially opposed vnto Dr Ames, his Fresh Suit against humane ceremonies in the point of separation only. Also Dr Laiton, Mr Dayrel, and Mr Bradshaw are here answered, etc.
  • (1639) A Stay against Straying; Or an Answer to a Treatise, intituled: The Lawfulnes of hearing the ministers of the Church of England. By John Robinson. Wherein is proved the contrarie, viz: The unlawfulnes of hearing the ministers of all false churches.
  • (1647) The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments, Newly Translated out of the Original Tongues and with the former Translations diligently Compared and Revised, With Marginal Notes, Shewing The Scripture to be the best Interpreter of Scripture.
  • 1656) Truth with Time: or, Certain Reasons proving that none of the seven last plagues, or vials, are yet poured out : neither will the time of their pouring out begin, till after the rising of the Two Witnesses and fourty two months of the Beasts reign be expired. Likewise, an answer to the said reasons; with a reply. Further, the author hath here set down (in a brief exposition) his opinion of the first vial.
  • (1657) The Time of the End: Shewing, First, Until the Three Years and an Half are Come (which are the last of the 1260 dayes) the Prophecies of Scripture Will Not be Understood, Concerning the Duration and Period of the Fourth Monarchy and Kingdom of the Beast. Then, Secondly, when that Time Shall Come ... the Knowledge of the End ... Will be Revealed by the Rise of a Little Horn, the Last Apostacy, and the Beast Slaying the Witnesses; Contemporizing the Characters of which the Little Horn, the Last Apostacy and the Beast ... are Here Faithfully Opened, Etc.

There has been some idea that Canne was possibly a Baptist. Champlin Burrage pushes back against that idea in “Was John Canne a Baptist? A Study of Contemporary Evidence.”

Matthew Verschuur has an abbreviated transcription of “To the Reader” HERE.

More biographical information on Canne can be found in Dictionary of National Biography:

“Canne, John,” W. E. A. Axon, Dictionary of National Biography, Volume VIII (Burton—Cantwell), Leslie Stephen, editor. New York, NY: Macmillan and Co., 1886, pp. 411-413. (This can also be found on Wikisource.)

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

John Canne, to the Bible reader

The following exhortation to the Bible reader was written by John Canne, as an introduction to his The Holy Bible ... with Marginal Notes, Shewing The Scripture to be the best Interpreter of Scripture. It is very instructive and illuminating. This is transcribed from the 1662 printing (no publisher or location given). It was published first in 1647, but this (1662) is the earliest edition I found online. I felt the earlier the better, with less likelihood of editorial changes and interpretations.

To that end, I have tried to reproduce as best I could the original formatting, spelling, italics, etc., so as to not add my own interpretations of what was written. However, I may have introduced my own errors. There is a later better typesetting (from 1747), which I consulted in places I found hard to read. All below was written by John Canne.

To the Reader.

IT is a Truth acknowledged by all, of all persuasions, viz. The Scripture to be the best interpreter of Scripture. To this I shall add a few things.

I. Such is the fulness and perfection of the holy Scripture, as it hath enough, and sufficiency in it self for the Explanation and opening of the Sence and meaning of it.

II. That this Explanation and Opening of Scripture by Scripture, is attainable; and (by Gods blessing) may be done, and with such fulness of matter, and clearness to the truth of the Sence, as there will be little need for other Interpreters, much less for men to impose their private Interpretations, and bold Glosses upon the Text.

III. I do not know any way whereby the Word of God (as to the Majesty, Authority, Truth, perfection, &c. of it) can be more honored and held forth: and the Adversaries of it (of all sorts) so thorowly convinced, and silenced, as to have the Scripture to be its own Interpreter. This I am sure, did men in their Expositions on the Scriptures speak less themselves, and the Scripture more, the Scripture would have more honour, and themselves less.

But here I must confess, to have a Scripture-interpreter, in the way I speak, Viz. of that Sufficiency and Fulness, as there should be no need to seek farther for the Sence and meaning of the Text: There are many things first to be done; among which some particulars I shall briefly set down.

I. That the Original Text of Scripture be rightly Translated, and, as much as possible, even word for word, without departing from the Letter of Scripture in the least. For it is necessary to preserve the Letter intire, how inconvenient, yea, how absurd soever and harsh it may seem to men’s carnal Reason: because the foolishness of God is wiser then men.

II. That Scripture Metaphors be not omitted, nor mistranslated one for another, but rightly opened.

III. Concerning the various Readings: here all care, study, and endeavour ought to be used, that nothing be taken but what is breathed by the Spirit of God in the Text.

IV. That the Genuine and proper signification of the Original words be truly opened, and explained; for this is of great use and furtherance to the work I mention.

V. The doubts and seeming differences be carefully heeded, and by Parallel Scriptures reconciled.

VI. That some words which are in the Original Tongues left untranslated be translated, and their signification opened. For howsoever such words to some may seem unfruitful, and afford not such matter in the Letter, yet according to the manifold wisdom of God, (and as the spiritual man judgeth) there is an excellent meaning of the Spirit in them.

Lastly. The Original particles are to be minded, and special notice taken of them, as a thing of great Concernment, to shew the Connexion of the Text and Context.

There are other particulars besides these, to have an exact and full Scripture-interpreter, but I shall refer them to another Time, and Place more proper. What I have done concerning this work, the thing it self will shew when it cometh forth: and therefore I will say nothing more  or less: but onely as Christ said of the woman, I have done what I could.

Something I will speak of the Reasons and Grounds whereby I have been encouraged in this kinde of labor.

1. The sweetness and great content that I have had all along in this Scripture work, hath caused me to account other studies and readings (which I formerly used) very low in comparison of it. It is said of Jacob, that he served seven years for Rachel, and they seemed but a few days, for the love he had to her. I can truly speak it, I have served the Lord in this work more than thrise seven years, and the time hath not seemed long, neither hath the work been any way a burden to me, for the love I have had to it.

But 2. That which hath more encouraged me, hath been a perswasion and good hope, that many will have much Soul good, and spiritual Comfort by it. For 1 Some people wilbe the more willing and forward to read and Search the Scriptures; having by them a Guide and Help: as when they meet with any place which is dark and they understand it not, then by direction to some other Text of Scripture immediately to be informed and satisfied, without looking into Commentaries which may be they have not. 2. A Scripture Interpreter will encourage men to exercise themselves, and in the meditation and Study of the Scriptures: as when a man hath a light carried before him, he goeth more cheerfully, then if he were in the dark, and groped for his way. 3. By this means not onely the knowledge of God and his Truth will grow and increase: But the Scriptures wilbe unto people more familiar and more their own (as I may say) then they were before: For those things which we hear from others, or have out of Books, usually soon come, and soon gone: whereas such Truths as are gotten by our own searching the Scriptures (the Lord giving a blessing to it) doe abide and continue with us.

4. Seeing it is the Spirit of God, that inlivens and breathes in the Scriptures, where can we expect the presence of this good Spirit, if not in the search and Meditation of the Scriptures. I speak not to the derogation of Commentators and other works of godly men: yet this I say, we making our prayer to the onely wise God, may expect the pouring out of the Spirit, as to be guided into the truth of the sence of the Scriptures in Reading and Studying them, more then in reading other Books.

5. That the Scriptures every where, are so much Neglected, so little honoured and regarded among men, one reason is, their Ignorance of them: to have therefore this Ignorance removed, and the word of God loved and delighted in, there cannot be (as I humbly conceive) a better way and meanes then a Scripture self-Interpreter.

6. It is not the Scripture that leadeth men into Errours and By-wayes, but the Misinterpretations, and false Glosses imposed upon it, as when men by perverting the Scripture to their own Principles and purposes will make them speak their sence, and private Interpretation. Laying therefore aside mens Interpretations, and onely following the Scripture Interpreting it self, it must needs be the best way, and freest from Errors.

But 3, That which hath most encouraged me is, the honour and glory of God: which I hope and desire will redound to his holy Name by it. And therefore whosoever shall reap any benefit either by this or what followeth, I beg of him for Christs sake that he give praise to God alone.

For conclusion, These Scripture-References, they are FEW, to those I could have produced.

But I have made it a great part of my work to comprise much in a little room, and therefore have viewed over all my Larger Notes, and with my own hand from beginning to the end, verse after verse, have chosen the most principall and proper Texts, so far as the Margin could contain. Besides I have used what care and diligence I could, to avoid all Mistakes in the Notes, and to have them placed in a right and due order.

Moreover (Reader) I intend God assisting with health and life, to set forth an Edition of the Bible in a large and fair Character, with large Annotations (a work I have been many years upon) and to make what speed I can. But the work will be heavy and require Care and Time.

For I purpose Therein to set forth all that I have done concerning the Scripture interpreter: whether I shall live to see it finished, God onely known: Howsoever it is ready and prepared for the press: so that if the Lord take me away before it be published, what remains of the Copy unprinted I shall leave in such hands as will (I doubt not) be both carefull and faithfull in accomplishing my Intentions; which that it may be to the glory of God, and good of his people every where, is my earnest prayer.

John Canne.


Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Correction

2 Timothy 3:16-17 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

General comments on verses 16 and 17:

The fact and purpose of inspiration is to profit the man of God in giving him all he needs to know, believe, and do. The Bible tells us what to believe and how to live. Doctrine (belief), Reproof (direct blame or censure), Correction (making accurate the inaccurate), Instruction (informing the understanding, conveying knowledge) – what is right and wrong to believe (doctrine, reproof), what is right and wrong to do (correction, instruction in righteousness), all four to know. Cf. Matthew 7:15-16 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits... Both their forecast and fruit is false.

The Bible is inspired, preserved, and sufficient. If the Bible were the only book you had, you are able to find every truth you need for salvation and for living the Christian life.

Correction indicates there is a standard, and that a standard is needed.

We see a standard in the shorter word “correct.” As a noun, it means free from error; accurate; an acknowledged or accepted standard.

Let God be true, but every man a liar, Romans 3:4.

Every word of God is pure, Proverbs 30:5.

We live in an age when men generally – and even professed Christians – are more concerned about correcting the Bible than about the Bible correcting them. A serious problem with the status of Bible reading in the United States – after the lack of Bible reading – is that we live in a time and with a state of mind such that if you don’t like what you read in the Bible today, you can buy a new version tomorrow. Additionally “everyday” Christians have been flooded with the kind of research that was once mostly limited to higher and lower critics in the dusty musty halls of academia. Notes and brackets cast doubt on the text. Those who don’t know the difference between majuscules and magistrates, minuscules and miniscules, or uncials and uncles, think they have become the arbiters of the text of the Bible. On the alleged authority of the scholarship somewhere behind the notes in their Bibles, these readers often choose what they like and reject what they don’t like.

Correction begins with wrong and brings it to right.

As a verb, “correct” means to point out or mark the errors in, to remove the errors or faults from. The noun “correction” refers to the act of pointing out and removing errors from, substituting the right for what is wrong. Webster says “the act of bringing back from error or deviation to a just standard.” It is used in Proverbs in connection with the training of children (Proverbs 22:15; 23:13; 29:17) and more broadly of wrongdoers.

Proverbs 15:10 Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die. Cf. Proverbs 7:22.

Often, we tend to think of correction as only the pointing out of what is wrong. We may think of a teacher “correcting” her students’ answers by marking them wrong. It must begin there, but should not end there.

Ephesians 4 excellently illustrates this principle – put off and put on. Don’t do this, but rather do that. 4:14-15 (not tossed about, but grow in truth and love); 22-24 (put off old man, put on new man); 25 (put away lying, speak the truth); 28 (steal no more, but labour); 29 (no corrupt communication, communication that is good); 31-32 (put away this, and do this instead).

Proverbs 3:12 for whom the Lord loveth he correcteth; even as a father the son in whom he delighteth.

If all have sinned, we need correction.

If the Bible is true, we need correction.

If there is a God, we need correction.

Tuesday, January 02, 2024

The Acts 21:37 Test: ἑλληνιστὶ γινώσκεις

“And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek?”

The Acts 21:37 Test. Do you know Greek?

We often, in Christian circles, banter around the words “know Greek” or “read Greek.” Most often that only means we have had some Greek courses and can “read” Greek in a minor sense – that we know the letters (alphabet), how they make words, know some of the words (vocabulary), some things about mood, tense, voice (conjugation), and so on. With the help of good tools, we can figure out what sentences in the Greek New Testament say. This is not really reading Greek. It is a good skill and a good tool, but honesty calls us to admit that we are doing a lot of studying with helps (in itself, not a bad thing) and not much reading. I have had a little study in five different languages, and I can only read and speak one – English (and not always well, at that).

Without looking at or using any helps, write the Greek words or phrases that correspond with the following common English words or phrases:

  1. Maybe                  ______________
  2. Table                     ______________
  3. Wolf                       ______________
  4. Eight                      ______________
  5. Chicken                ______________
  6. Yellow                   ______________
  7. Hot                         ______________
  8. Elbow                    ______________
  9. To shout               ______________
  10. To swim                ______________
  11. Bonus: “Goodbye, God bless you.” _______________________________

(With acknowledgement to Daniel Streett for the idea)

Without looking at or using any helps, read, understand, and translate the following sentence:

Πᾶς δὲ ὁ ἐρχόμενος ἐν ὀνόματι κυρίου δεχθήτω· ἔπειτα δὲ δοκιμάσαντες αὐτὸν γνώσεσθε, σύνεσιν γὰρ ἕξετε δεξιὰν καὶ ἀριστεράν.

Don’t post your results. There is no way we can know whether you worked from what was in your head, or used tools to cheat (from lexicons to online translators), or some combination of both. Just be honest with yourself and maybe benefit from the exercise. This is for personal growth; only in a live setting would we know for sure of the results.

The results for most of us should make us aware of at least two things.

  • We should not represent ourselves as seeming to know more than we really know.
  • If we have a limited knowledge of a language we cannot read or speak, we may lead ourselves or others astray with what we think we know.

Friday, December 08, 2023

1 Timothy 5:18 | Luke 10:7

1 Timothy 5:18 For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward.

Writing to Timothy, Paul refers to two things the scripture says – the first about not muzzling an ox treading out corn, and the second about a labourer being worthy of his reward. The first reference is easily identified as Deuteronomy 25:4 “Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn.” If we look in the Old Testament, we cannot readily identify any text close to “The labourer is worthy of his reward.” In Leviticus 19:13 and Deuteronomy 24:14-15 a similar concept exists, but the wording of these verses is not at all similar, and they are detailed, including a time element for making payment.

Why must we look in the Old Testament? Is not the New Testament scripture as well? Yes, of course it is. Perhaps we have too much “training” to think this way. (That is, to look in the Old Testament, but not the New.) Nevertheless, if we look in the New Testament, we find a verse of scripture that corresponds with 1 Timothy 5:18 – Luke 10:7.[i]

1 Timothy 5:18

  • KJV: For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward.
  • TR: λεγει γαρ η γραφη βουν αλοωντα ου φιμωσεις και αξιος ο εργατης του μισθου αυτου

Luke 10:7

  • KJV: And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house.
  • TR: εν αυτη δε τη οικια μενετε εσθιοντες και πινοντες τα παρ αυτων αξιος γαρ ο εργατης του μισθου αυτου εστιν μη μεταβαινετε εξ οικιας εις οικιαν

In the King James Bible, there is one word of difference – the synonyms “reward” versus “hire” (wages, hire, reward). In the Textus Receptus there is one word of difference – the conjunction και (and) versus the preposition γαρ (for). We have a scripture reference correspondence.

Without presuppositions to the contrary, it is easy to understand that the apostle is quoting the Gospel of Luke and referring to it as scripture. Paul uses this formula – For the scripture saith /λεγει γαρ η γραφη – elsewhere (e.g., Romans 9:17; 10:11). The New Testament elsewhere also refers to New Testament writings as scripture (e.g., 2 Peter 3:15-16).

As I mentioned earlier, perhaps we have been trained or conditioned to think that the writing of the inspired New Testament is late rather than earlier. Even scholars who are considered conservative are often careful to not allow these writings to occur too soon after the resurrection and ascension of Jesus. However, the simplest conclusion for simple Bible-believers is that Luke wrote his Gospel before Paul wrote First Timothy, and that Paul refers to the writing of Luke as scripture. (We believe and do not deny that Luke is scripture.) If these writings are inspired by God, and penned by the apostles and apostolic men (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul, etc.), then of necessity they were written in the lifetime of these men.


[i] Matthew 10:10 is worth noting as a passage similar to 1 Timothy 5:18 and Luke 10:7. nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves: for the workman is worthy of his meat. μη πηραν εις οδον μηδε δυο χιτωνας μηδε υποδηματα μηδε ραβδους αξιος γαρ ο εργατης της τροφης αυτου εστιν.

Wednesday, September 13, 2023

If the foundations be destroyed

Psalm 11:3 If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?

God speaks through his world.

He spoke the world into existence. Genesis 1:1ff.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth…And God said…

He speaks through the existing world. Psalm 19.

The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

Cf also. Hebrews 11:3. Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

God speaks through his word. 

He spoke the word into existence. 2 Timothy 3:16. 

All scripture is given by inspiration of God... 

He speaks through the existing word. Matthew 24:35.

Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.

Cf. also Isaiah 49:8 Thus saith the Lord, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee: and I will preserve thee...

Friday, August 25, 2023

Unclouded spiritual vision

In February of 1913 Benajah Harvey Carroll, Baptist preacher and president of Southwestern Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas, became seriously ill. Recovery seemed unlikely. During this time, his friends J. B. Cranfill and F. M. McConnell paid him a visit. During the visit, Carroll said the following words, which Cranfill published in The Baptist Standard. The words were later republished in other Baptist newspapers (below is quoted as published in Baptist and Reflector, Thursday, March 6, 1913, p. 9).

“Although I have suffered much and am still suffering greatly, my spiritual vision was never as unclouded as it is today. I know that Jesus is mine. Death has no terrors for me. I do not fear the river of death. When I shall press my feet up its shores the waters will divide, and I will go over dry shod. I know that God’s Book is true, that heaven is real, that Jesus Christ is my Redeemer and that He will welcome me into the Father’s house on high.”

Bad though it was, Carroll recovered from this illness. He did not die until over a year and a half later – November 1914. Nevertheless, his thoughts on the Bible, heaven, and Jesus were a blessing to many. Furthermore, these thoughts on the Bible, heaven, Jesus did not change between February 1913 and November 1914.