Translate

Showing posts with label Credentialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Credentialism. Show all posts

Thursday, August 24, 2023

Credential Creep, Credentialism, and False Credentials

Top Southern Baptist Convention news this past week probably is the resignation of Willie McLaurin from interim president and CEO of the SBC Executive Committee. I first read about it at Baptist News Global, a liberal news and opinion site that gleefully reports any foibles of the convention and skewers them for it.

McLaurin, interim president and considered most likely to be hired for the permanent post, resigned August 17th. He resigned because of the finding that he had falsified information on his resumé. His resumé included earned degrees from North Carolina Central University, Duke University Divinity School, and Hood Theological Seminary – all of which were false (as well as a claim of military service).

Previously, McLaurin had served 15 years on the staff of the Tennessee Baptist Mission Board, as well as a pastor at Greater Missionary Baptist Church in Clarksville, Tennessee, and pastor Greater Hope Baptist Church in Union City, Tennessee. He was elected to serve on the SBC Executive Committee staff in 2020. In 2022, after the departure of EC president Ronnie Floyd, he became the interim president of the Executive Committee.

All this lengthy introduction to make a few related points.

From what I have read about Willie McLaurin, he is a hard-working, personable man – a really nice guy that people like. Many Southern Baptists thought he was doing a great job as EC interim president, and were rooting for him to be elected to the permanent post. Nevertheless, he chose a false way to rise to the top. He lied. He falsified records. “Moreover, it is required in stewards that a man be found faithful.”

I think we all can agree that falsifying a resumé is wrong. (Even most who have done so inherently know it is wrong.) Most folks want their resumés to look their best, but to create information out of thin air cannot be justified. I have not noticed anyone mention or report what credentials/education Willie McLaurin actually has. Regardless, he apparently believed his actual education would either disqualify him or not be good enough qualifications. So, he lied. This raises a question to me, “Why would pastors, preachers, and Christian workers falsify a resumé?” What pressure do they feel that makes it seem necessary or beneficial? 

I believe the answer is “Credentialism” – or as one respondent at SBC Voices called it, “credential creep.” That writer, Nathan Petty, pointed out how that historically Baptists had grown in the United States mostly without the benefit of seminary trained preachers. Then they progressed in formal education. As this progress moved forward in the 20th and 21st centuries, the amount of degrees offered and education expected grew exponentially. According to Petty, the counsel of many would be for a man to get seven years of formal education (DMin) in order to be “really” be qualified to serve a local SBC congregation.[i]

This is not only an SBC issue. Many Baptists feel this pressure for credentials – or perhaps simply lust for the glory of the title. Our Baptist congregation is not affiliated with the SBC, neither any organized association, convention, or fellowship. Because of that, apparently, we received a lot of unsolicited “independent fundamental” correspondence. I have noticed in these circles a tendency for every Tom, Dick, and Harry – no matter how ignorant or uneducated – to be “Dr. So and So.” Whether they have legitimate degrees or bought one from the pawn shop, they tout their status. Every speaker at a conference is a “Dr.” What’s the deal? No doubt some of it is base human pride. I believe the other factor is “Credentialism.” We have unfortunately created communities of Christians who cannot “search the Scriptures” whether things are so, but need to be told it is so by “Dr. So and So.” If Paul’s Apostleship was not good enough for the Bereans, your “Doctorate” is not good enough for me!!

When we turn to the Bible discussions of qualifications (1 Corinthians 4:2; 1 Timothy 3:1-13; Titus 1:5-9), a clear case can be made for honesty and integrity. Level of formal education is nowhere to be found. Yes, apt to teach. No Doctor of Ministry. I have no fondness for ignorance. Nevertheless, the Bible is our rule of faith and practice. Throw away those practical qualifications your church or ministry has created. Go back to the Bible. The qualifications there are inspired by God.

My intent is not to beat up on Willie McLaurin. We all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. However, may this incident be a teaching moment.


[i] For example, the Duke Divinity School Doctor of Ministry (D.Min.) program is normally completed in three years. They require a prior Master of Divinity (M.Div.) or comparable master’s degree before enrolling in the program. Therefore, in this case, the DMin takes about six or seven years. (Duke also requires at least five years in full-time ministry before entering the program.)
[ii] While working on this, at the top of the Word Doc I had something else on which I was working — the hymn/poem “The Church’s Desolation.” The second verse (and others) seemed to have some correlation. “Her pastors love to live at ease, They covet wealth and honor; And while they seek such things as these, They bring reproach upon her. Such worthless objects they pursue, Warmly and undiverted; The church they lead and ruin, too— Her glory is departed.”
[iii] Mark Terry writes, “If we cannot depend on pastors and church workers to tell the truth, then we’re in bad shape.”

Saturday, July 30, 2022

Ye scholars, hearken (again)

1. Ye scholars, hearken unto me,
Ye, who against my Bible be;
Ye work and toil, the “King” to foil
Therefore, its beauties do not see.

2. Ye scholars, on your letters high,
Do cause us plebes to weep and sigh;
Why fight ye so, to such lengths go
To smite the Bible hip and thigh?

3. Ye scholars, with a single eye,
Would like to wave the “King” good-bye;
Both halt and lame, ye ply your aim
New Bible versions to supply.

Wednesday, June 08, 2022

Stephen M. Reynolds, the Comma, and Credentialism

Back in 2017, I posted a grammatical argument in favour of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7) made by Stephen Edward Mills Reynolds (1909-2007). Recently I prepared some biographical information on Reynolds for Find-A-Grave. At about the same time, I noticed a diatribe on the Baptist Board asserting that only long dead scholars (1700s-1800s) supported the Johannine Comma with a grammatical argument and that no “real” modern scholars do so. Enter Stephen M. Reynolds. I do not personally buy credentialism; neither am I selling it. However, those who scold others about “real scholars” usually do (buy and sell it). The credentials of Reynolds are first rate, as far as theological credentials go, and his expertise was in biblical languages. He taught in credible institutions, wrote for peer-reviewed journals, and was consulted for his expertise. Y’all don’t have to buy the argument made by Reynolds, but once in awhile y’all stick your heads up out of your holes and realize that all scholars are not cast in the same mold, even if all of your favorites are. (By the way, just ’cause someone is dead does not mean he is wrong, or because someone is contemporary does not mean he is right. And vice versa.)

The way to get around recognizing folks such as Edward F. Hills and Stephen M. Reynolds as “real scholars” is to have them “drummed out of the corps.” Such men having “real” credentials – often better than their detractors – teach in “real” institutions of learning, and write “real” articles for “real” peer-reviewed journals. However, their refusals to speak the standard scholarly shibboleths mean that they become anathema to the majority who feel threatened by their dissent!

Education:

  • Bachelor of Arts, Miami University, 1931
  • Bachelor in Theology, Princeton Theological Seminary, 1933
  • Master of Arts, Princeton University, 1938
  • PhD in Semitic Languages, Princeton University, 1939
  • Bachelor of Library Science, Columbia University, 1951

Employment includes:

  • Lincoln University, Chester County, Pennsylvania
  • Crozer Theological Seminary, Upland, Pennsylvania
  • Faith Theological Seminary, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania
  • Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Affiliations/Memberships include:

Works include:

  • The “Polyglot” Arabic text of Zachariah: a Comparative and Critical Study. PhD. Dissertation, Princeton University, 1939
  • “Al-'Alam’s Version of Zechariah,” The Muslim World, Volume 33, Issue 4. (October 1943): pages 273-275
  • “Calvin’s View of the Athanasian and Nicene Creeds,” Westminster Theological Journal, Volume 23, Issue 1. (1960): pages 33–37
  • “Supreme Importance of the Doctrine of Election and the Eternal Security of the Elect as taught in the Gospel of John,” Westminster Theological Journal, Volume 28, Issue 1. (1965): 38-41.
  • “Πυγμῇ (Mark 7:3) as ‘Cupped Hand’,” Journal of Biblical Literature, Volume 85, Issue 1. (1966): pages 87-88
  • “The Zero Tense in Greek, a Critical Note,” Westminster Theological Journal, Volume 32, Issue 1. (1969): pages 68-72
  • “A Note on Dr. Hengel’s Interpretation of πυγμῇ in Mark 7 3,” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Älteren Kirche, Berlin, Volume 62, Issue 3. (1971): page 295
  • “The Word ‘Again’ in Creeds and Bible,” Westminster Theological Journal, Volume 35, Issue 1. (1972): 28-35
  • Alcohol and the Bible, Little Rock, AR: Challenge Press, 1983
  • The Holy Bible, a Purified Translation, the Gospel According to John, Glenside, PA: L. L. Reynolds Foundation, 1999
  • The Holy Bible: A Purified Translation (The New Testament), Glenside, PA: L. L. Reynolds Foundation, 2000
  • The Biblical Approach to Alcohol, Glenside, PA: L. L. Reynolds Foundation, 2003 (original 1989, Princeton University Press)
  • Faithful Biblical Interpretations, Glenside, PA: L. L. Reynolds Foundation, 2003 (original 1994)
Additional:
The above list is compiled from my research, and does not claim to be exhaustive. As far as I know, all the information about Stephen M. Reynolds is correct, even if not complete.

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Be Called D.D.??

IT IS A SIN TO CALL OR BE CALLED D.D.
by Ira Copeland, Hillsboro, TX

Jude, verses 3 and 4, said, Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, It was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

Paul said, Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Abstain from all appearance of evil. I Thess. 5:21-22.

I now call attention to only one innovation that has taken deep root since the 16th century: the title of D.D. among our ministry.

It is a sin to call a man doctor in the sense of Divinity or for a man to suffer himself so called. Sin is transgression of God’s law and God’s law is any of His effective commandments. Jesus Christ is His Son clothed with equal authority. D.D., doctor, means teacher of authority, Rabbi, Master, Father, pope, etc. Jesus said, But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. And call no man your Father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called Masters: for one is your Master, even Christ Matt. 23:8-10. This is as much the law of God as any other command of God, and therefore a sin to call or be called D.D. The title is Romish and Judaistic. Do not they who seek authority over men and brethren love the title? Matt 23:1-7. No school has Bible right to confer it.

This is not intended as a personal slap or reflection on any one, but gentle reproof and an earnest contention for this part of the faith once delivered to the saints, and to avoid modern innovations, and to get in and stay in the old paths.

From The Baptist Progress, March 5, 1936 as reprinted in The Baptist Waymark

More D. D.

“Education has ruined preachers. Doctors of divinity abound in our day, but we have no prophets. I know that saying this gets me in trouble with the religious elite, but it must be said clearly and loudly. I am of the old school, not the new. And I have the fondest memory of an uneducated preacher here in north Georgia, Brother Rance Cain, whom I was blessed to hear in the 1960s. He could preach circles around any educated preacher of his day or ours. He spit out a little tobacco on you when he preached, but who cared! He was uncouth and country, but how he could declare God’s Word in power, truly confounding the educated!” -- From The Sheepherder of Tekoa by Brother W. F. Bell of Canton, GA

For you see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many noble, are called: But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; and base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yes, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: That no flesh should glory in his presence.” -- 1 Corinthians 1:26-29

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

About the title Reverend

ABOUT THE TITLE REVEREND
by J. F. Manning

"When Methodists want to justify infant baptism, they say the Bible does not forbid it. Such logic is common to Methodists, who would have thought Baptists would resort to it.

"We should not use the title “reverend” in addressing our ministers. Reverence for one another is a virtue to be cultivated. But we are nowhere, by precept or example, warranted in God’s word in calling anyone “reverend” as a title, or for any other purpose. (Some) say we are not forbidden to use it. The Methodists say we are not forbidden to sprinkle infants. Some use exactly the same logic as the Methodists.

"The New Testament clearly teaches that the preachers were called elders. If we want to follow the New Testament, we must discard the old Romish and Pedobaptist practice of calling our preachers “reverend” and call them elders.

"If others want to call them “reverend,” “the right reverend,” “the most reverend,” “holy papa,” “holy father,” or whatever man-made title they choose, they have a legal right to do so. But please excuse me. We do not have to use such titles to show reverence."

From The Baptist Progress, July 21, 1938 as reprinted in The Baptist Waymark, Vol. II No. 7 March-April 1992