Translate

Showing posts with label Christology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christology. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

We know...

We know God, we know the Spirit of God, we know the spirit of truth. 1 John 4:1-6. (Click the link to read the text at King James Bible Online™)

Beloved little children need to hear and heed the message of the beloved apostle. Error is widely dispersed in the world; we need to try all things that are being promoted in the name of God and truth.

Do not believe every spirit, 1 John 4:1.

Rather than believe any and everything we hear pawned off in the name of God and the Bible, we must try the spirits. Do not just foolishly trust; instead, faithfully try. To try the spirits means to test, examine, put on trial – to prove and know what is right and what is wrong.

The spirits may be earthly or ethereal, “though we, or an angel from heaven” (Galatians 1:8), but it matters not. All must be put to the test of truth, to accordingly find the principle that inspires or animates what is preached. “Whether they are of God” indicates that not all are from God (John 8:47). In John’s day and now, many false prophets are in the world. The Old Testament provided the people of Israel ways to test false prophets (Deuteronomy 13:1-3; 18:19-22) In that same spirit, John will provide us a way.

The fact that “many false prophets are gone out into the world” suggests those departing from the Christian faith to go back to the world (cf. 2 Timothy 4:10). “They went out from us, but they were not of us” (2:19) All false prophets are false, even those who may have previously presented themselves among the saints of God as true.

How shall we try the spirits? By the word of God (Acts 17:11). By measuring and aligning what is said by and with the truth. It is not just applying some feeling, but addressing the facts. As Isaiah said: (Isaiah 8:20) To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.

How to know the Spirit of God, 1 John 4:2-3.

John not only commands his readers to try the spirits, but gives a way to try them. When John speaks of knowing the Spirit of God, he particularly addresses the way whereby we know that what is said and taught actually proceeds from the Spirit of God. We know that the Spirit of God testifies of Christ (John 15:26).

Hereby, by the test of the prophet’s confession, one can know whether what is said proceeds from the Spirit of God. “Every spirit that confesseth…every spirit that confesseth not…” One begins by measuring how they “measure” Christ (Matthew 22:41-46). “These spirits set up for prophets, doctors, or dictators in religion, and so they were to be tried by their doctrine” (Matthew Henry). The test is confessional; that is, it concerns what a person confesses, or believes. The test is theological or Christological; that is, it concerns what a person confesses or believes about Jesus Christ. The test is applied both positively and negatively. A false confession arises from that spirit of antichrist, the contrary and supplanting spirit which is in the world and which manifests itself in these false teachers.

What does such a Christological confession imply, and of what does it consist? First, it recognizes and confesses Jesus, the historical child, born of the virgin Mary in Bethlehem. Second, it recognizes and confesses that this historical Jesus, and he alone, is the Christ, the Messiah of God. Third, it recognizes and confesses that he is “come in the flesh,” that is, he existed as God before and apart from the flesh, was made flesh and dwelt among us – “and the Word was God” (John 1:1, 14). Or, as John Gill wrote, “The proper deity and sonship of Christ, his true and real humanity, and his Messiahship.”

The ones written to are of God, 1 John 4:4.

John calls upon the ones to whom he is writing to remember they are “of God” – you have God living within you (Colossians 1:27). Because of this you are overcomers (5:4-5; Romans 8:37), you have overcome “them,” the false prophets and that spirit of antichrist. “All that is in the world” is temporal, “is not of the Father” but is animated by the wicked one (2:14-17). God is greater than our heart, the witness of God is greater than the witness of men (3:20; 5:9) – and God in you is greater than he that is in the world (cf. John 6:45).

Such transcendent knowledge as supplied by the apostle comforts, establishes, and encourages (Psalm 124:1-8; 2 Thessalonians 2:16-17). The Lord hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee (Hebrews 13:5).

“They” are of the world, 1 John 4:5.

They – false prophets, every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh – are of the world and speak of and to the world. Man by nature knows the things of the world (1 Corinthians 2:11). The world hears and recognizes their own. The world loves its own (John 15:19). Let a prophet speak falsely, and in doing so he speaks recognizably, smoothly, and soothingly to those who are of the world, who are animated by its spirit.

If someone is in a crowd of people speaking foreign languages, they know not what is being said. If suddenly someone speaks a word in their own tongue, they “recognize their own” (cf. 1 Corinthians 14:19). Those who have the Spirit of God recognize the voice of God (John 10:5, 17). Those who have not the Spirit of God recognize the spirit of the world and the spirit of error. It calls to them, as deep calleth unto deep.

The ones writing are of God, 1 John 4:6.

By “we” in context John seems to mean the apostolic witnesses (1 John 1:1-4). They were chosen, called, and sent by God (Luke 6:13; John 20:21). “We are of God.” Certainly, he considers those to whom he is writing to be “of God” (v. 4). However, he is giving a principle of “deep calling unto deep,” so to speak. “Ye of are God” and “We are of God.” Because of this, you recognize the words of truth being spoken. Those who know God listen to the apostolic witness (1 Corinthians 14:37). Those in their natural and unregenerate state do not know God, do not listen to the apostolic witness, and will be carried about with every wind of doctrine (1 Corinthians 2:14).

The spirit of truth consists of a true Christology proceeding from the Spirit of God (John 1:14; 1 Corinthians 12:3; 1 John 5:1). The spirit of error is that which is a false Christology proceeding from the spirit of antichrist, yea even Satan (2 John, v. 7). That which is book-ended between the “hereby” of 3:24 and the “hereby” of 4:6 gives the confessional Christological test to confirm the spirit of truth and the spirit of error. It begins with having the spiritual ability to hear the voice of the Jesus the Shepherd and concludes with the conjoining truth about Jesus the Christ. The Spirit and the word always agree.

We know (concluding thoughts), 1 John 3:24, 4:6.

“And hereby we know… Hereby know we…”

Do you listen to truth or to error? How do you know the difference? If someone is speaking and sharing for and from the Lord, then their words will align with the word of God and agree with the Spirit in us. Search the scriptures, whether the things are so or no (John 5:39; Acts 17:11). Let God be true, but every man a liar.

What do you confess? Do you know the Spirit of God? Do you know God? Do you hear the apostolic witness, spoken by the Spirit through the word? Does the witness of the Spirit witness to your spirit? (Psalm 42:7; Romans 8:16).

What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? (Matthew 22:42). Can you answer with Peter, “Thou art the Christ, the son of the living God?” Has flesh and blood given you a lie, or has the Father revealed to you the truth? (Matthew 16:15-17.) Do you confess that Jesus Christ come in the flesh is of God, or do you stand with the spirit of antichrist now in the world?

“Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved.” Acts 16:31.

Friday, November 08, 2024

The Blessed Man, Psalm 1

Psalm 1 contrasts one singular “the man” (vs. 1-3) versus plural ungodly men (vs. 4-5). Ultimately, the only one man who fulfills this perfectly and completely is our Lord Jesus Christ.

Verse 1

  • He does not walk in the counsel of the ungodly.
  • He does not stand in the way of sinners.
  • He does not sit in the seat of the scornful.

Verse 2 

  • He delights in the law of the Lord.
  • He meditates in the law of the Lord day and night.

Verse 3

  • He shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water.
  •     o He brings forth his fruit in his season.
  •     o His leaf also shall not wither.
  • Whatsoever he does shall prosper.

Verse 4 

  • The ungodly are not like the blessed man.
  • The ungodly are like the chaff which the wind drives away.

Verse 5 

  • The ungodly shall not stand in the judgment.
  • Sinners shall not stand in the congregation of the righteous.

Verse 6

  • The Lord knows the way of the righteous. (1 John 2:1 …Jesus Christ the righteous)
  • The way of the ungodly shall perish. (Luke 13:3,5 ...except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. John 10:28 ...I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish. Cf. John 11:25)

The descriptions of the blessed man in Psalm 1 can and should be seen as a reflection fulfilled in Jesus Christ’s life and character. Therefore, may we in this Psalm not lose sight of Jesus Christ. Only Jesus Christ never did what the man described in Psalm 1 does not do. Only Jesus Christ always did what the man described in Psalm 1 does do.

Jeremiah 10:23; Psalm 37:23. 1 Peter 2:21 “...leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps”

Seeing God’s blessing rests on this kind of man, we may rightly resolve that we want to be that kind of man. To the extent that we follow the Lord, we may not do what this blessed man does not do, and may do what this blessed man does do. However, in this way we will always fall short of being the blessed man, and find that our true blessings are found in The Blessed Man himself!

Psalm 2:12 Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

The fourth man in the fire

Daniel 3:25 He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.

Q. Who was the fourth man in the fire with Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego?

A. The dispute regarding this verse is, to some extent, based on variations in the translation of this verse. The Christian Standard Bible represents how many translators have translated this verse since the English Revised Version Bible of 1881-1885:
He exclaimed, “Look! I see four men, not tied, walking around in the fire unharmed; and the fourth looks like a son of the gods.”
As far as the details of the correct translation of this verse, I will leave that argument for Hebrew & Aramaic scholars. The interpretation and understanding of the verse and context includes considering what Nebuchadnezzar knew, but the correct translation of the verse is not dependent on what Nebuchadnezzar knew. It will be obvious that some translators come down on one side of the issue – “the son of God” – and some come down on the other side of the issue – “a son of the gods.” Rather than enter that argument, let’s look at the context surrounding the statement made by King Nebuchadnezzar and where that points our understanding. It is better to stick as closely as possible to the statements in the context, without doing too much guessing.

Here is some of what King Nebuchadnezzar knew, based on some statements in the book of Daniel.

  • Daniel 2:27-28, Daniel 2:47 – The king had experienced some of the truth of Jehovah, through Daniel’s gift of prophecy in describing and then interpreting Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. His understanding of the God of the Hebrews at this point would have been rudimentary, but not non-existent.
  • Daniel 3:15-17; Daniel 3:26 – The king knew that Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego served the most high God. They told him that God – the one they served – was able to deliver them, and that he will deliver them (one way or another).
  • Daniel 3:28 – Nebuchadnezzar says the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego sent his angel to deliver them. In this King’s mind “the Son of God” and “his angel” are the same. He is talking about the same person/appearance.[i]
In his Notes on the Bible Albert Barnes speaks of “two inquiries which arise in regard to this expression [the Son of God, rlv].” First, what did the king mean, that is, who did he think it was in the fire? Second, who was it in the fire with Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, actually? There is no reason to suppose that King Nebuchadnezzar understood anything distinctly about the “Godhead” of the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. Nebuchadnezzar knew that the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego was distinct from the gods of the Babylonians. These three asserted the power of their God to deliver them from the king. Nebuchadnezzar did not know “the Son of God.” Nevertheless, he did not mean “a son of the gods” of the Babylonians, based on the context of the conversation before and after the three Hebrew children were thrown in the fire. A son of the Babylonian gods was not whom they said would come, and would not have been whom Nebuchadnezzar expected.

Some commentators – such as Jamieson-Faussett-Brown Commentary or Matthew Poole’s Synopsis – posit this consideration: that Nebuchadnezzar spoke the truth of who was in the fire without really understanding the truth of what he said. This would compare to Caiaphas’s prophecy that “one must die for the people” (John 11:49-52), or Pilate’s superscription on the cross of Jesus (Luke 23:38).

Here is Jamieson-Faussett-Brown’s explanation:
Unconsciously, like Saul, Caiaphas (John 11:49-52), and Pilate, he is made to utter divine truths. “Son of God” in his mouth means only an “angel” from heaven, as Daniel 3:28 proves. Compare Job 1:6Job 38:7Psalm 34:7, Psalm 34:8; and the probably heathen centurion’s exclamation (Matthew 27:54).
The Son of God is an accurate translation that fits the context. It is not necessary for Nebuchadnezzar to have a clear theological understanding of New Testament revelation yet to come or even a distinct view of present Hebrew monotheism for his statement to be correct. The fourth man walking in the fire was the Son of God, appearing with his people before his incarnation.


[i] It is not unusual for expositors to consider “the angel,” “his angel,” to be Old Testament theophanies or Christophanies (of the pre-incarnate Son of God).

Sunday, March 22, 2015

Christ's human nature

"What is Christ's human nature? That is the rock on which many gallant ships have struck. It is not a person, having a distinct existence apart from the Deity of Christ; but it is a nature: what the Holy Ghost calls a "Holy Thing" (Luke 1:35); "a body that God had prepared for him" (Heb. 10:5), taken into intimate, mysterious, and inexplicable union with the Person of the Son of God. So that, whatever that human nature did and suffered, from its intimacy and union with the Son of God, the Son of God did and suffered." -- J. C. Philpot

"Mr. Philpot used the correct terminology in describing this union when he said it was an “inexplicable union”.  We often spend too much time trying to explain the unexplainable and simply wind up where Job did, with our mouths closed in wondrous amazement." -- Mike McInnis

Monday, October 27, 2014

Christophany

I haven't thought about this term -- Christophany -- in quite some time, until I heard a radio preacher use it one morning last week. Theophany may be a more common usage for the topic of appearances of God in the Old Testament. Dictionary definitions usually point to an older or traditional meaning of :Christophany

Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary: an appearance of Christ after resurrection especially as recorded in the Gospels
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary: An appearance of Christ, as to his disciples after the crucifixion.

A common usage in conservative and evangelical circles today refers to physical manifestations of God in the Old Testament. The rise of such usage is sometimes traced to James A. Borland and his book Christ in the Old Testament: Old Testament Appearances of Christ in Human Form (Chicago, IL: Moody, 1978). The originated with his doctoral thesis in 1976, “Christophanies: Old Testament Appearances of Christ in Human Form” (Grace Theological Seminary, 1976). One writer asserts, "A theophany is a manifestation of God in the Bible that is tangible to the human senses. In its most restrictive sense, it is a visible appearance of God in the Old Testament period, often, but not always, in human form."

In Jesus Christ Our Lord, John Walvoord states, “It is safe to assume that every visible manifestation of God in bodily form in the Old Testament is to be identified with the Lord Jesus Christ”  (p. 54). This is a broad position, much broader than that taken by some other conservatives but more restrictive than that taken by others. Part of the difference is probably in the definition and part in the interpretation (e.g., a pillar of fire is a manifestation, but is it a "bodily form"?). Another dispute is whether all theophanies are Christophanies, and whether some passages are appearence of God (theophany), and not appearances of angels (angelophany). "The angel of the Lord" is often interpreted to mean the pre-incarnate Son of God.

One set of criteria used to distinguish an Old Testament appearances of Christ from an appearance of an angel is:
* Does the New Testament refer to the event as an appearance of Jesus?
* Does the person receive worship?
* Is the person addressed as the Lord?

Christology 101 offers the following list of mentions of Christophanies:
* Genesis 16:7-13
* Genesis 22:15-18
* Genesis 31:11-13
* Exodus 3:1 ff
* Acts 7:30-35
* Exodus 13:21
* Exodus 14:19
* Judges 6:11-23
* Judges 13:9-20
* Genesis 24:7, 40
* Numbers 20:16
* Zechariah 1:12-13

I have created this Excel file of 30 passages that different writers list as Christophanies in the Old Testament. It attempts to be an inclusive list and does not represent what I believe. My list would be extremely shorter. For example, I don't believe Melchizedek was the pre-incarnate Christ. And while I think that the pillar of fire that Israel saw in the wilderness was a manifestation of God, I wouldn't call it a Christophany because it was not an appearance in a humanlike form.

CHRISTOPHANY IN THE OLD TESTAMENT
God walking in the Garden Genesis 3:8
The Lord appeared unto Abram in Moreh Genesis 12:7-9
Melchizidek king of Salem Genesis 14:18-20
The Angel of the Lord & Hagar Genesis 16:7-16
The Lord appeared to Abram at age 99 Genesis 17:1-2
The Lord appeared unto Abraham in Mamre Genesis 18:1ff
The Angel of the Lord & the sacrifice Genesis 22:11-19
The Angel & Abraham's servant Genesis 24:7,40
The Lord of Jacob's ladder Genesis 28:13-15
The Warner of Jacob Genesis 31:11-13
The Divine Wrestler Genesis 32:22-30
God in the midst of the bush Exodus 3:1-5
The Pillar of Fire Exodus 13:21
The Pillar between Egypt and Israel Exodus 14:19-20
The God of the paved sapphire stone Exodus 24:9-11
The Rock in the Wilderness Numbers 20:11-16
Balaam's adversary Numbers 22:22
Balaam's Lord Numbers 22:35
The Appointer of leaders Deuteronomy 31:14-15
The Captain of the host of the Lord Joshua 5:13-15
The Angel of the Lord at Bochim Judges 2:1-5
The Angel of the Lord at Ophrah Judges 6:11-23
The Angel appears to Manaoh & his wife Judges 13:3-20
The Angel who touched Elijah 1 Kings 19:4-8
The Angel of the Lord & Elijah 2 Kings 1:3-15
The Angel who smote the Assyrians 2 Kings 19:35
The Angel with the drawn sword in his hand 1 Chronicles 21:16-27
The Lord in the Whirlwind Job 38–42
God in the Fiery Furnace Daniel 3:23-25
The Angel who talked to Zechariah Zechariah 1:12-13

What do you think about Christophanies in the Old Testament?

Some links on the subject