tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20166943.post3749323738498452306..comments2024-03-28T14:43:35.296-05:00Comments on Ministry and Music - Seeking the Old Paths: Lockman and Logsdon, no urban legendR. L. Vaughnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10992710377193518029noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20166943.post-52683525429852232642024-02-21T11:30:32.938-06:002024-02-21T11:30:32.938-06:00Anonymous, do you mean the comments in the newspap...Anonymous, do you mean the comments in the newspaper clipping? Yes, both the AMP and NASB are revisions of the American Standard Version (1901). However, those comments were made in 1958, when Logsdon was very much on board with obtaining the rights to the ASV and revising it into a new Bible. In contrast, the audio of the negative comments about the NASB are made around about 20 years after he had changed his mind about the NASB.R. L. Vaughnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10992710377193518029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20166943.post-39449468219476443682024-02-21T06:17:34.123-06:002024-02-21T06:17:34.123-06:00Logsdon's comment on the Amplified seems to co...Logsdon's comment on the Amplified seems to contradict his concerns about the NASB. Didn't both translations use the same manuscript texts ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com